> . . .
> Your argument is that bombing (the military action of choice)
the Serb war
> machine (assuming that is the target) is preferable to inaction
in the face of genocide, even if those doing the bombing have
other than humanitarian motives, those who are targeted by the
Serbs include forces e
>
> Max, for someone who normally has a great deal of acuity about
the BS that is peddled by the US administration in support of
domestic economic policies, I wonder why you accept so
uncritically such crap when it applies in another part of the
world where you have no direct knowledge.>
> What
>
> Barkely Rosser on this provided an excellent background information which
> clearly indicates that the "ethnic claims" laid down by the KLA are rather
> bogus. . . .
I too appreciated Barkley's travelogue, as well as the query that prompted
it. But from what I could see, he reflected a rea
Hey Walker,
Finally read your piece. If it is true that, in some given
instances, a shorter work-week can increase output per week,
which is plausible enough, how do you address the issue of a new
regime where one dude has to work four days and another five for
the same pay?
Another question, w
Peter Kennedy. Most lucid thing on metrics I've ever seen.
mbs
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Dorman
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PEN-L:4403] econometrics text
>
>
> I will
>
> Several people have told me this is the AFL-CIO's line too -
you can't say there's no crisis or people won't believe you. Talk
about the citational nature of truth, eh? I wonder, though, if
this isn't just a bit of convenient cowardice that excuses the
AFL-CIO and Nader from criticizing Clint
>
> Max, could you explain why US Medicare isn't in
> crisis? what are the easy
> solutions you propose to the relatively minor problems you see?
The problem with Medicare is the current growth
trend in spending. This problem is common to
private health care costs as well, though in
the past fe
> Does "Red" mean left keynesian now?
Better terminology than 'red' might be precepts
which are not subject to dispute or which are ruled
'out of order' in political debate and media-
sponsored presentations, either because they are
classified as intellectually bankrupt or politically
untenable.
Try AFL and union web sites.
mbs
> Hi All,
>
> Can somebody point me in the direction of information on U.S.
corporations in El Salvador, including workers' wages, companies'
profits, etc.?>
>
> More, recently, during the Viet Nam war, eight
> disparate souls were charged with conspiracy . . .
But the late Abbie Hoffman, one of those charged,
later said "we were guilty as hell."
mbs
>
> Not saying I agree with Stevenson, just that I found it interesting. If
she's wrong, she's wrong in an interesting way.If true, how is the
conspiracy
outlined by Stevenson destructive of a left analysis? If true, I'm sure
these MIA's could tell a lot about what went on in Vietnam which is what
>
> Max, you should take any facts for granted from any source.
?? You mean 'not', I take it.
> I can sympathsize with you objection to La Rouche's
interpretation of facts, but you will have to disprove his facts
before you can convincing reject them.>
If I had to check all facts in what I rea
>
> I was thinking as I started reading this, "Ok, so
> Executive Intelligence
> Review is a LaRouche publication. That doesn't mean
> the info is bad."
Yes it does.
I wouldn't take any fact for granted if it came
from that source.
mbs
Regarding the petition I've been helping to
circulate, any self-respecting
Keynesian/liberal/progressive/whatever
economist who hasn't signed, the train is
gathering steam to leave the station. You
can e-mail your endorsement to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't forget your
title and affiliation (for ide
There's a bunch of used book stores that
deal over the web with searchable catalogs.
If you don't find any by searching with
Yahoo or something, I can give you some
URL's tomorrow.
Max
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Perelm
Excerpt from:
http://www.progressive.org/conniff9903.htm
The Republicans prodded Jackson about using the government
surplus to pay down the debt--wouldn't he rather spend the money?
Jackson stuck by the President's ultraconservative economic
program: "Reducing the debt obviously gives us more s
> Max Sawicky wrote:
>
> >Deficit/debt hawks like to discount the probability of
> >surpluses with assorted canards[...]
>
> Such canards as: over the last 130 years, there's only one historical
> instance of U.S. running substantial surpluses (defined as >1% of
Something's screwy with my e-mail so if my
responses are slow in coming I plead victimization
by unseen forces.
> >I rely on Max for such information. Could he be wrong? Impossible...
Actually I've been meaning to post an update to
my response, based on the CBO stuff Doug has
described below.
> Sam, your prior list and this one is very good.
> I would add many books on the social movements of the
> 60's, some below deal
> with Vietnam more than others; e.g.,
Ah, memory lane. I'd suggest The New Left Reader,
ed Carl Oglesby. A good anthology/sampling of
diverse currents of thought
> I absolutely agree with Jim D. in what he says below.
> I would also add
> that I suspect that King's father and lawyer might be
> telling the truth in
> saying that he was not particularly racist before
> going to prison.
>
> > is there anyone else out there who's feeling queasy
> because (1) i
>
> o.k., so the subject BEGS for one bad joke --
Someone call me?
The upshot is that farmers will not be permitted
to cultivate zucchini or cucumbers.
mbs
> >>> Yes, if you live in Alabama, buying a vibrator is now illegal.
> Along with the disclosure requirements, could we not
> have an energetic
> discussion about just what kind of organizations the
> foundations are. I
> think a wider exposure of the Heritage Foundation
> would do some good.
I can't imagine a bigger yawn than revelations
about where Heritage
> Burbach and Kargalitsky's book "Globalization and Its
> Discontents: The Rise of Postmodern Socialisms" is very much in
line with
> books by William Greider and Richard Barnet that view the
spread of
> multinational corporations as an unmitigated evil, particularly
in
> the maquiladora zone. Do
> Jim wrote:
> >
> > It seems to me that any author who does not disclose
> the funding of the research that went into an article
should not have that article published in any respectable
journal.
> >
> We were not talking about respectable journals, but
> those of the economics profession. What
his or her university.
Affirmative Action
People of color are strongly encouraged to apply.
Contact
Please direct all e-mail correspondence to Max Sawicky at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or fax inquiries and applications to (202) 775-0819.
> What bothers me about the pomo/postruc crowd (as with the
> crit theory crowd before them) is that they don't seem to care
whether
> their speculations are true. (Many deny the notion of empirical
> truth-tests on principle.)
> Simply expressing oneself cleverly appears to be the
> basis for aca
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Louis Proyect
> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 1999 12:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PEN-L:3627] Race as a "construct"
>
>
> >If race isn't a (social) construct, what is it? Biological?
> >
>
Of interest to economists and others,
see below.
mbs
--
Does the New York Times Get It Right?
How About the Washington Post?
When it comes to economic reporting, you can find out, with the Economic
Reporting Review (www.fair.org). The Economic Reporting Review (ERR)
provi
"Valis":
>> I thought it was wonderful when a Gulf War vet blew up that
G-building
(though he could have proven the same point on a Sunday, when his
victims were in church praying for extended American hegemony and
other heavenly signs). McVeigh taught the big boys some manners,
and when those m
Colleagues:
I am pleased to report that we have 65 signatures
to the petition, with some additional celebrities
to follow next week.
If you agree with the statement, don't fail to
forward your endorsement to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Questions may be addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A single sentence
>
> I think this is Microsoft humor at work. It comes up with the
> same response
> if you type "I'd like to see all the gerbils die" and "I'd like
> to see Bill Gates die" or "I'd like to be Gina Gershon."
>
> Doug
The choice of alternatives in this post should
should be enough to occupy L
> Quoth Louis: > You won't believe your eyes:
> >
> > 1. Go into MSWord
> > 2. Type: I'd like all niggers to die
> > 3. Highlight the sentence
> > 4. Go into the Tools - Language - Thesaurus
> >
> > I know you may not have MS Word but what happens is you get a message
> > saying, "I'll dr
Endorsements so far:
Randy Albelda, Professor of Economics, University of
Massachusetts, Boston
Ron Baiman, Assistant Professor of Economics, Roosevelt
University
Dean Baker, Senior Research Fellow, Preamble Center
Jared Bernstein, Economist, Economic Policy Institute
Peter Bohmer, Professor of
>
> I went to school, ya know. . . .
Great stuff. He was on TV some time ago and was
not very good.
Where can we get more Emo?
Max
>
> Here's an idea - social democracy is more compatible with "monopolized"
> ownership structures than most social democrats would like to
> admit, and is
> undermined by U.S.-style financial and corporate governance arrangements.
> It's probably very difficult for U.S. social dems to admit to
be listed as endorsing institutions,
unless we are otherwise advised.
Endorsements at this point include:
Dean Baker
Paul Davidson
James K. Galbraith
Max Sawicky
Randy Wray
AN OPEN LETTER ON THE CLINTON BUDGET
We, the undersigned professional economists, offer our views
-Original Message-
From: Robin Hahnel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 1999 11:33 AM
To: Louis Proyect
Subject: Re: [PEN-L:3052] Aztecs
> We have to be careful not to confuse Aztec or Inca domination over the
> tribes in their empire with what the Europeans did. I
.. . .
> production. The fact (as I understand it) is that when the head Inca
> wasn't mobilizing tributary labor (with whips, Max, because I know that
> excites you) . . .
Actually this pales next to the comprehensive discussion
of Lesbian phalluses on Henwood's 'Libidinous-Business
Observer' l
> Since Ricardo brings up "long waves" in connection
> with the discussion of Frank, let me simply note that these
> are Braudel "la duree" 300-400 year waves and not the lower
> level 40-50 year Kondratievs. . . .
Actually we're in the middle of a 4000-year
geological wave whose within-
>
> I wrote: >> . . .
You wrote plenty of substantive, well, substance,
but one thing you said could be misinterpreted
by the superficial, reckless, or malevolent
reader (circle all which apply).
>
> Max "mbs" Sawicky asks: >Is the whip used to force laborers to produce
> exchange value differ
> Louis P. wrote: >>In general, the Aztecs and Incas ruled with a relatively
> light hand<<
>
> Brad deL emoted: >!<
>
> I think Marx makes the point somewhere in vol. I of CAPITAL that overtly
> forced labor (which the Incas organized) combined with commodity
> production
> (which t
> . . .
> Saying that debt paydown is not the first-best option is fine. But in so
Isn't that exactly what the statement contradicts?
(reproduced below for your convenience)
> saying, please don't do anything to make people think that the
> Rubin-Sperling budget proposals are worse than tax cuts
Business WeekEditorial February 15, 1999
A Better Use of Surpluses
President Clinton will be remembered for many things, but in the economic
arena, fiscal responsibility will top the list. When he took office in
1993, the federal budget deficit came in at $225 billion, just off its high
>
> It is sad to see so many from the mainstream of liberal
> Keynesianism abandonding
> all hope of accomplishing anything. Paying down the debt was a
> traditional
> Republican plank [honored in the breach by radical tax reforms.]
> . . .
Call me naive but I am struck by the blatant pol
> It would be interesting to know what the composition of this NAS panel
> is. Any friends of EPI?
>
> Peter Dorman
>
> > Next month, a newly appointed committee convened by the
> National Academy of
> > Sciences will begin a 2-year study of a wide range of issues
> related to cost of living
> >Even proponents have to concede that the sample size is pretty small. How
> >many wave cycles have there been?
>
> Doug,
>
> Haven't you ever heard the expression "It ain't the meat, it's
> the motion."
I thought it was:
It ain't the flag on the ship;
it's the motion in the ocean.
How m
I am pleased to report that at least one liberal organization
in Washington, D.C., one in which I happen to participate,
has not lost its mind. (see below)
The item below is not a bad point of departure for a counter-statement
either. It's not crazy to run at least some surplus if employment is
> Saying that the best way to assure long-term growth is to give a large tax
> cut to the rich?
I'll assume that's a rhetorical question
addressed to some imaginary Republican
with a fluffy tail named Harvey.
> I would rather see the (potential future) surplus used to finance an
> expansion of
Read it and weep.
Anyone for a counter-statement?
Max Sawicky
--
Opinions reflected above do not necessarily
represent those of anyone else associated
with the E.P.I.
--
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF
o see a counter-petition.
Max Sawicky
-
Opinions reflected above do not necessarily
represent the views of anyone else associated
with the E.P.I.
Courtesy of the PUBLABOR list:
Middle Age is having a choice of two temptations
and choosing the one that will get you home earlier.
> Then: Killer Weed
> Now: Weed Killer
>
> Then: The Grateful Dead
> Now: Dr. Kevorkian
>
> Then: Gettin
> Don't forget the lyrics for the songs in the movie by Yip Harburg.
> The story is told in the book:
>
> Who Put the Rainbow in the Wizard of Oz? : Yip Harburg, Lyricist
> by Harold Meyerson, Ernie Harburg, Yip Harburg ISBN: 0472083120
There's a CD of Harburg's songs. Not to be missed is
"Ly
>
> Louis P. mentioned L. Frank Baum as an unalloyed defender of
> capitalism. I've always been under the impression that the Wizard of
> Oz (no, this is not about you, Rob S.) is a critical allegory about
> the populist movement[farmers - the scarecrow, industrial workers -
> the tin man, t
Who?
>
> Early returns from exit polls show Tom Walker nosing ahead in the
> NEXT-CITY election.
>
> Gene Coyle
>
>
> Yeah, I thought it was very disappointing article; Lewis has never written
> anything even half as good as Liar's Poker. It was also very
Trail Fever was pretty good, I thought,
though you have to be struck by Lewis'
predilection for agreeing w/either Morrie
Taylor or Alan Keyes, depending on
> You may have a point there. A month ago I posted a notice that I had
> finished a long handout on game theory and collective action ("The
> Collective Action Problem: A Social Movement Perspective") and was
> willing to send it as an e-mail attachment to any and all. I got just
> one taker. G
> Brad De Long wrote:
>
> > >How about the attacks on Brad's colleague, David Card, financed by the
> > >fast food industry, "showing" that minimum wage laws hurt workers?
> > >--
> >
> > Card's doing fine. I had thought that he and Alan Krueger had
> won that one, no?
Card & Krueger have moved
> Salon notes that Reed has started his own online magazine, which is at
> http://www.ishmaelreedpub.com/. I urge folks to take a look at
> it. It seems
> first-rate.
This is indeed great news. I've been reading Reed
for years. I would highly recommended his essays.
Haven't kept up with his f
> I hate to interrupt these fascinating disquisitions on
> post-structural subjectivities and what not, but I am REALLY CONFUSED and
hope someone out there (you listenin', Max?) can help.
> Clinton's budget projects a $4.4t surplus over the next 15
> years (yeah,
> right!). Clinton pro
>
> good point, I hadn't thought of that, he is supposed to be in charge of
> monetary policy. I read the Times article about Greenspan today,
> and it seems
> he doesn't really oppose investing social security money in the market, he
> opposes the Government investing the money. I wonder if he
> > Old news in beltway-land, V. It was in the paper here.
>
> And it was interpreted how, by whom?
>valis
She was made out to be a lone bureaucratic
hero in the presidential satyricon.
mbs
>
> Anyone trying to distill truth from the interestingly inappropriate?
> In the Starr Report an unknown functionary named Evelyn Lieberman
> banished the emperor's latest fellatio interest from the palace,
> and he could do nothing about it. What unwritten law assured
> that this nugget fell
> Well that's the point here, it can be: if power is in our heads, if power
> forms our subjectivities, then it is dispersed in billions of us, in
> trillions of daily contacts. This obviously comes out of Foucault, who can
> be criticized for his excessively atomized view of power, but
> it's a u
> . . .
> very carefully. Nothing about domestic debt, current account deficits,
> fiscal inflexibility . . .
The apparent budget surpluses certainly reflect
some fiscal flexibility. It's only the political
rules and shibboleths that instill inflexibility.
> . . .
> Rather ambiguous on the deg
> >(Don't worry, Max, I'll give you two days'
> > lead time if I have any exotic plans)
> >
we know your plans
A different reference is "The Gift Relationship"
by Richard Titmuss which uses blood as a case in
point. I may have mentioned this in the past.
I don't know if the book deals with any
international aspects. The setting I gather is
the UK.
mbs
> Some years back, some of you old-timers mig
>
> And here's a virtual real-ity check mangled headline from CBC
> Marketwatch:
>
> YAHOO FALLS LOWER DUE RESIGNATION OF BRAZIL'S CENTRAL BANK CHIEF.
We took our honeymoon in Yahoo Falls.
Wonderful place.
mbs
Courtesy of a colleague of mine.
[Warning: this post contains no ad hominem remarks,
slurs, viciousness, slander, ruthless criticism,
race-baiting, complaints, or other negative vibes.]
1. Understand that Xerox and Wurlitzer were going to merge. They're
going to make reproductive organs.
2. A
>
> I'll let everyone else go out on a limb on this one. There are so many
> factors off-the-books that comparing profits from decade to
> decade can't be
> a question of comparing REPORTED profits. One item that would reduce
> reported corporate earnings if it was on the books is the issuing of s
> I was planning to send the above greeting to Greenspan and Rubin,
> but I decided to toss the list a test message first.
> If my computer explodes someone will know who to tell about it.
>
> While America is busy contaminating the Iraqi gene pool
> Germany has conquered Europe without firing
My hero Dean Baker breaks into the Washington
Post op-ed page:
Print Edition
Today's Editorials
Sunday Outlook
Front Page Articles
On Our Site
Talk Central
Editorials & Opinion
A Deal Privatization Can't Beat
By Dean Baker
Wednesday, December 23, 1998; Page A23
> . . .
> There is the problem that successful worker-managed firms tend to want to
> not hire new workers . . .
This is well-taken, but you have to admit that on the
scale of grand systemic problems, it does not rank too
high. The state can essay macro and micro remedies
for this. We're a lo
>
> Don't ordinarily listen to Saturday Night Live, but I switch to
> it when the Howard Stern show is running a commercial. . . .
SNL was pretty good this past weekend. Quite often
these days it is awful. But they had some great
impressions of Tom Brokaw, Barney Frank, and
other impeachment
> >> >Anybody interested should talk to Dean Baker, currently
> >> >at EPI but unfortunately due to leave at the end of this
> >> >year.
> >> >
> >> >MBS
> >> >
> >>
> >> It sounds like a substantial loss to EPI. Where's he going?
> >
> >It is. In my view he is our best economist,
> >the model of
>
>
> >Anybody interested should talk to Dean Baker, currently
> >at EPI but unfortunately due to leave at the end of this
> >year.
> >
> >MBS
> >
>
> It sounds like a substantial loss to EPI. Where's he going?
It is. In my view he is our best economist,
the model of what an EPI person should
Anybody interested should talk to Dean Baker, currently
at EPI but unfortunately due to leave at the end of this
year.
MBS
>
>
> Maybe it is time to revive the project on the economics of intellectual
> property.
>
> --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
>
>
> What I would be on the look out for in initiatives to "preserve" and
> "affirm" the program would be calls -- in the name of "fairness" and "true
> insurance principles" -- for more closely tying benefit entitlements to
> lifetime contributions. What this means in practice is a ratcheting up o
> >If Clinton was so vital to the Republican
> >cause, they wouldn't be about to impeach him.
>
> I thought they wanted to "put that behind them" as quickly as possible.
That was last week.
mbs
> . . .
>Today's Washington Post has an article satatng that the clinton
> administration has drawn up five Social Security reform plans all of which
> call for some
> form of sotck market investment. The man who led the Repubican charge to
> abolish welfare is now leadiing their charge to d
> Max writes: >The earmarking gives rise to the Trust Fund balance,
> including its dates of cash deficits, overall deficit, and exhaustion of
the fund balance, all of which are key to the current debate. As I said,
> accounting may be dull, but it is political. It is the Right which is
demeanin
Max replied:
> >Unlike welfare, and like insurance, beneficiaries make
> >earmarked payments into the program. ...
>
> since funds are shifted about between various government budgets, the
> "earmarked" part is pretty unimportant. . . .
The earmarking gives rise to the Trust Fund balance,
inclu
> >... 3) I'm not quite sure why social security is not "insurance". How
> >does "insurance" differ from "government redistribution" in the case
> >of SS?
>
> I would say that SS _is_ a form of insurance. Insurance companies
> redistribute money from those whose houses don't burn down to those wh
Sorry I don't have time to elaborate too
much on all the questions, but a few answers:
> . . .
> 1) If I read this correctly, it sounds as if SS has never been
> a "savings" account where money is paid into the account, invested for
> the lifetime of the payees and then paid back to them when th
.. . . FDR supported the separation of social security form
> the rest of the budget to preserve the illusion that social security
> (OASI, now OASDHI) was a form of insurance. In fact, it is a government
> redistribution program largely indistinguishable from welfare. . . .
This implies either
> My brother tells me that under the Reagan administration the
> accounting of Social Security was changed. He says that they used to
> be separate budgets, but now they are combined accounts. He also says
> that the government has borrowed money from the Social Security
> accounts and not paid
> Zealand economist Tim Hazeldine's new book, Taking New Zealand Seriously:
> The Economics of Decency (Harper / Collins). He really has a knack for
Couldn't find this at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Harper/Collins.
Max
> >What about telling the story that American economics is properly
> a high wage economics and that adherence to a low-wage economics is
> UNAMERICAN? That is to say, for example, that not only is NAIRU
questionable as a theory and misleading as a guide for policy, it is first
and foremost FOREIG
> Which brings me to my question. Does anyone know of a good source that
> details the corporate ownership of the media? I know GE owns NBC, and
> Disney owns ABC, but do they also own radio stations and newspapers?
> Just how much of the media does Murdock own? Has anyone kept track of the
>
> Just checked EPI web site at Max's suggestion, (see below) no NAFTA paper.
>
> I am gearing up for a conference in Mexico early next year, where
> my task is
> to present on NAFTA, would like to see the EPI report, and anything else
> recent, with a critical edge.
>
>
> Where did Perelman g
> Max has already confessed to be Louis, so you have nothing to worry about
> personnally. Just keep Papandreou inside when the Ebola hits the fan.
I'm having fun, but I worry that we're
the ruin of PEN-L.
mbs
> . . .
> My recollection is that one of Ralph Nader's outfits was going after the
> banking industry about hidden fees and service charges. . . .
They've got it backwards. The real problem is that
depositors receive income which is untaxed, notwithstanding
the fact that the source of that inc
> Friends,
>
> Brother Max makes good points, but I do not think that all that many of
> today's union officials were yesterday's firebrands. Rather, as Kim
> Moody argues, most came to power during the period of labor-management
> cooperation and greater prosperity. This may be why so many hav
>
> Mike, Dennis, Max: all of you are reacting to hearsay. No one has
> actually read the Fraser article in Dissent (if I haven't misperceived);
> I don't even know who SF is, but this is tantamount to a lynching.
Easy big fella. The first words out of my virtual
mouth were "I didn't read th
> In the "Dissent" article Fraser makes light of union
> democracy, arguing
> that it can cause harm as well as good and, using the analogy of a
> nation at war, arguing that since labor is in a war with capital, union
> democracy is an unaffordable luxury.
I haven't read the article, but
>
> I understand that EPI has done a devastating critique of NAFTA. Could Max
> or someone provide details?
I'm not sure which devastating critique you're
referring to. Check our web site, and/or remind
me during the week. I'm kind of absorbed in my
arcana at the moment (state-local finance).
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Doug Henwood (correctly) insists that the same firms are often both
> >financial and industrial, but this dualism really amounts to a
> >schizophrenia.
>
> Yeah, but the dualism is sort of hardwired into the M-C-M' formula, no?
More than that, in a debate on taxa
> > Funny thing is, class seemed to play more in some
> > of the Southern Dem victories . . .
>
> According to my correspondent in Auburn, Ala, proposing using a
> lottery for higher ed bucks really helped the Demo (forget his name)
> to win there over the egregious theocrat Fob James. It se
> Would it be right to say that the Democrats have actually done better out
> of these elections than they might have expected before the Lewinsky story
> broke?
Could be. Though they had some things to look
forward to sans Lewinsky. The R's had overreached
in policy areas and had been internal
> Max >What I had in mind was natalism, a la
> >France, hardly eugenics.
>
> Still, natalism is obnoxious, since it is supposed to build up
> the "native" population. France did it to build up their army, I believe.
This would help them fight the "Huns" and Algerians. . . .
Not necessarily. It c
What in tarnation is "the myth of the state"?
MBS
1001 - 1100 of 1152 matches
Mail list logo
