I would disagree. It seems to me that maillists are primarily
conversational, and attempts to make them replace printed journals are
mostly wishful thinking. I my only rarely either read or write posts
much longer than 4 or 5 screens. Moreover, issues that really do depend
on large amounts of empi
>From: "Devine, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>the best any thread on pen-l (and lbo-talk?) seems to be able to do is to
>clarify differences.
Yes, clearly there's little difference between pen-l and lbo on that score
:)
Carl
_
MSN
Title: RE: [PEN-L:28996] Re: Re: Re: Re: : liberalism
Louis writes:
> I know this is an onerous burden to place on pen-l'ers, but
> you should search for ways to impart some kind of concrete information
> whenever you post.
That's good, but I like a weaker stan
Title: RE: [PEN-L:28995] Re: Re: Re: : liberalism
the best any thread on pen-l (and lbo-talk?) seems to be able to do is to clarify differences.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Henwood [mailto:[EMAIL
Michael writes:
> I would only add that in
>these debates nobody seems to learn anything from anybody else -- at
>least, you can pretty well predict what the few participants in such
>debates will write.
To be sure, most postings in most PEN-L debates appear as predictable
rehearsals of existi
Lou expressed my thought better than I did. I would only add that in
these debates nobody seems to learn anything from anybody else -- at
least, you can pretty well predict what the few participants in such
debates will write.
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:25:32AM -0400, Louis Proyect wrote:
> In
>Michael Perelman wrote:
>
>>Is this discussion or the elitism thread going anywhere?
>
>Not really, but does any thread ever go anywhere?
>
>Doug
I know this is an onerous burden to place on pen-l'ers, but you should
search for ways to impart some kind of concrete information whenever you
pos
Michael Perelman wrote:
>Is this discussion or the elitism thread going anywhere?
Not really, but does any thread ever go anywhere?
Doug
Title: RE: [PEN-L:28970] Re: RE: liberalism
I wrote: >>It's important to remember that the New Deal also had lots of support for businesses, too.<<
Justin: >Like I said, it saved c pitalism.<
there's a difference: individual businesses often care about nothing but their own profit. It's on
>
> >As I said, almost everyone. jks
>
>Almost everyone is right; as far as I can tell, yer man Posner is not in
>favour of representative government or of "extensive civil rights and
>liberties" in as much as these can't be derived from property rights.
That's unfair to Posner. His notion of
>As I said, almost everyone. jks
Almost everyone is right; as far as I can tell, yer man Posner is not in
favour of representative government or of "extensive civil rights and
liberties" in as much as these can't be derived from property rights.
What's your argument against his utopia of a smal
Title: RE: [PEN-L:28943] Re: Re: liberalism
>>Justin Schwartz wrote:
>>> As I said before, almost everyone here--you too--favors
> > > univ. suffrage --- Yes [Carrol's response]
> > > extensive civil rights and liberties Yes [ditto]
> > > representative govt - NO [ditt
12 matches
Mail list logo
