All the reports that I get indicate that the sweatshop workers do not get a
living wage. Their money wage may be greater than their parents, but their
parents had access to the food production and the light that was not priced
on the market. So the money wage is misleading.
Brad De Long wrote:
Michael Perelman wrote:
>All the reports that I get indicate that the sweatshop workers do not get a
>living wage. Their money wage may be greater than their parents, but their
>parents had access to the food production and the light that was not priced
>on the market. So the money wage is misl
Doug, what you say bears some resemblance to the reports that people gave about
the girls who worked in the Lowell textile mills. They were younger, single and
had no responsibilities. The horror stories that I hear relate to the young
girls that have responsibilities, especially children.
This
I agree with Micheal. Workers earning their livings in sweatshops do not
even get a living wage. Let's not make the situation look better.
Particulary, women workers are more vulnerable to exploitation in this
process.It is true that most of the women in this part of the world come
to cities to f
>I agree with Micheal. Workers earning their livings in sweatshops do not
>even get a living wage. Let's not make the situation look better.
>Particulary, women workers are more vulnerable to exploitation in this
>process.It is true that most of the women in this part of the world come
>to cities
>>I agree with Micheal. Workers earning their livings in sweatshops do not
>>even get a living wage. Let's not make the situation look better.
>>Particulary, women workers are more vulnerable to exploitation in this
>>process.It is true that most of the women in this part of the world come
>>
