The biggest unintended consequence of the sanctions, apart from the
Chinese moving in to fill the void left by the forced withdrawal of Western
oil firms, has been the strengthening of economic ties between Iran and the
Gulf States.
That's contributed to a warming of political relations and a
Louis Proyect writes:
Michael Perelman wrote:
Isn't this a common pattern, that the left falls (not really wins) into
office once
the right model becomes exhausted, leaving the purported left to harm the
masses in
ways that the right is reluctant to do.
I would look at it a different way.
I don't see much to choose between Clinton or Obama. I think we all know
that what's said on the stump or outlined in policy statements should be
taken with a grain of salt. The differences between the two aren't
substantive ones and in the end, it is the institutional constraints
(Carville's
Rising Cost
Of Iraq War
May Reignite
Public Debate
By YOCHI J. DREAZEN and JOHN D. MCKINNON
Wall Street Journal
February 4, 2008; Page A1
WASHINGTON -- The cost of U.S. military operations in Iraq is rising
rapidly, and could reignite the national debate about the war, which has
taken a back
Has the visit been arranged by the Democratic party? Photos of Ahmadinejad
in Baghdad won't play very well with the keynote Republican campaign
emphasis on how the surge is working...
- Original Message -
From: Leigh Meyers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
Sent: Thursday,
(From today's Barron's - Randall Forsyth, What Zimbabwe Can Teach America
About Asset Values)
WHERE WAS THE BEST PLACE to invest in 2007?
If you had picked emerging markets a year ago, you'd have been rewarded with
a 33.55% return, by Morgan Stanley Capital International Indices' reckoning.
And
Michael Perelman wrote:
Whatever happened to the rabid calls for eliminating Sarbanes Oxley? Does
anybody
even Enron, Tyco, Worldcom, etc? After calls for strong regulation to
prevent such
things from happening again, we Congress gave us the weak Sarbanes Oxley.
Not long
after, the business
Patrick wrote:
According to Harvey, the contradictions of capitalism were 'displaced'
instead of resolved: they were moved across time and space, especially via
hyperactive financial markets. Time is accounted for in the vast credit
bubble, which lets you pay now, on the basis of debt, and hope
Patrick wrote:
No comrade, the crisis is unfolding now, right now, and your fairy tale
of intrinsic US financial power (shared by Sam and Leo) is taking a
twist you comrades didn't expect.
Has the current crisis really caught those on the left - and beyond
Charles asks:
CB: What's your position , Marvin ? What do you say should be done ?
==
Fair question, Charles.
I don't think the banks need a bailout; I think their shareholders should
bear the burden. I'm for maximum debt relief and the maintenance of mass
purchasing
Charles:
CB: Detroit's been in deep recession for 30 years, so they already
shot this hostage.
Ok, let 'er rip. Maybe it will lead to a revolution. It's worked for
Detroit, hasn't it?
^^^
CB: Who said let her rip ? As Raghu hinted, give the money to the poor
instead of the rich. Don't
Raghu:
So now what? The Fed has no choice but to bail someone out. I just
think it'd be much better on many different levels, if the
beneficiaries are poor (sub-prime) people instead of Wall St.
===
I think the real debate which is taking place - as always, in
Jim D:
what about the coordinated part of this action? isn't that aimed at
preventing the US dollar from going into free-faill as the FOMC cuts
interest rates?
==
Mostly to do, I think, with easing the pressure on LIBOR by European banks
reluctant to part
Julio:
If people in the financial markets do this, how come they get the
fundamentals so wrong? Maybe their perspective is not that of the
working class. Maybe they don't care about human survival, let alone
building communism. Maybe they only care about profits in the short
run. Their
Raghu writes:
On Nov 9, 2007 8:17 PM, Marvin Gandall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or it may be due to the dollar's sharp fall since the August credit crisis.
Since 2002, the Fed - with the tacit agreement of the other central banks - has
been trying to engineer an orderly decline in the USD
of growth to rescue
the older ones from crisis.
- Original Message -
From: raghu
To: PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] central bank credibility v. transparency
On Nov 11, 2007 5:24 PM, Marvin Gandall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Raghu wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 2:32 PM, Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Fed's slowness to ease runs counter to the more apocalyptic
reading of the U.S. economy's prospects.
According to the atimes.com article I linked to, the Fed's slowness to ease
may be related to Bernanke's
Jim wrote:
are billionaires measured in terms of yuan or dollars? If it is the
latter, if the yuan goes up (and the US$ falls), the number of PRC
billionaires would fall. That is, the number of billionaires may be a
temporary fluke.
In dollars. From the Hurun Report, to which the Times
Little-Known Entrepreneurs Putting China Near Top of Billionaires’ List
By DAVID BARBOZA
New York Times
November 7, 2007
SHANGHAI, Nov. 6 — The United States has more billionaires than any other
country: 415 by the last count of Forbes magazine.
No. 2, and closing fast? China.
A year ago,
Louis posted:
The Washington Post
SECTION: EDITORIAL
October 14, 2007 Sunday
Better Numbers;
The evidence of a drop in violence in Iraq is becoming hard to dispute.
[...]
=
If the numbers, which are always suspect, do show a marked drop, it is not
because the
October 20, 2007
The Prize That Even Some Laureates Question
By PATRICIA COHEN
New York Times
Carping from time to time over the unworthiness or politics of a particular
Nobel peace or literature laureate is expected. But when it comes to
economics, it’s the award itself that sometimes comes
Raghu wrote:
What these guys are trying to do is a logical impossibility. They
desperately need other investors to buy toxic securities (or
equivalently lend on toxic securities) that they themselves would
never put on their own balance sheets. Now why would any investor in
their right mind do
Raghu writes:
$100B is a lot of money even in the huge mortgage market. The
important thing is where is the money going to come from? The banks
are not planning to lend that much cash to the new vehicle (though of
course they will have to pitch in *some* amount of cash).
The plan is to *raise*
Three leading Wall Street banks are pooling their resources to create a $100
billion fund which will buy distressed short term asset-back paper from
bank-sponsored entities called special investment vehicles (SIV's) at a
higher price than the banks would get in the market. It mainly appears to be
Honda and UAW Clash
Over New Factory Jobs
Residency Rules Exclude
Most Union Members;
Indignant in Indiana
By NEAL E. BOUDETTE
Wall Street Journal
October 10, 2007; Page A1
ANDERSON, Ind. -- When Honda Motor Co. announced last year that it was
building a new plant amid the farms of southeastern
Interesting piece in today's Financial Times examining why securitization
did not prevent a banking crisis. The banks make up a large part of the
asset-backed market - either through their trading desks or the off balance
sheet conduits they sponsor - so much of the risk is recirculated among
(Two items posted on Louis Proyect's Marxmail list earlier today)
Iran's Unlikely TV Hit Show Sympathetic to Plight Of Jews During the
Holocaust Draws Millions Each Week
By FARNAZ FASSIHI
WSJ
September 7, 2007; Page B1
Every Monday night at 10 o'clock, Iranians by the
Jim D. wrote:
On 9/4/07, Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The halting moves themselves aren't directed at the working class,
but the haltingness takes the w.c. in to consideration. That is,
without the financial crisis, the Fed would be hanging tough, and not
even the melodramas of recent
Raghu wrote:
[MG]If the central banks aren't centrally concerned with protecting
capitalist
class interests, than who is? You might as well jettison class entirely as
a
framework for understanding social and economic conflict. But in this
This is not such a convincing argument. First of all,
Doug H. wrote:
On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:19 PM, raghu wrote:
Is there any evidence that the Fed does think in class struggle terms?
Their slowness to ease in this cycle, for example. Much of Wall
Street was expecting an easing even before the subprime crisis, but
it never came - and they've been
Central banks should not rescue fools
By Martin Wolf
Financial Times
August 28 2007
Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words. The one last Wednesday
showing Christopher Dodd, chairman of the US senate’s banking committee,
flanked by Hank Paulson, Treasury secretary, and Ben Bernanke,
This is where Fannie and Freddie step in
By Lawrence Summers
Financial Times
August 26 2007
Over the past 20 years major financial disruptions have taken place roughly
every three years, starting with the 1987 stock market crash; the Savings
Loans collapse and credit crunch of the early 1990s;
Doug Orr wrote:
Raghu raises another interesting question about the details of
mortgage backed securities. In the old days of a decade or so ago,
if a borrower defaulted on a mortgage, the bank that issued the
mortgage took the house, sold it at auction and received the
proceeds. The cost of
While the volatile stock and bond markets are urging the Federal Reserve to
cut the fed funds rate sharply and fast, other voices within the ruling
class don't want it to unblock consumer and corporate bottlenecks to credit.
They want tighter money to engineer a long hoped-for recession in the US
Doug H. wrote:
On Aug 18, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Marvin Gandall wrote:
Or is this all preparation for the
Fed going the next step and buying the MBS's outright? Is it
limited by law
as to what securities it can buy through open market operations or
accept as
collateral for loans through
Doug Henwood recently posted on LBO a link to an interesting survey from the
Pew Research Centre on the political attitudes of different segments of the
US population, which I've since had a closer look at. The poll was conducted
in December, 2004, following Bush's re-election. Since that time,
Doug wrote:
Hey Marvin, within minutes of the Fed's action I posted this to lbo-
talk:
[I'm guessing that lowering the discount rate while reaffirming the
fed funds rate level is a way to target banks having real funding
problems, while not easing up too much for the real economy, where
the
Jim wrote:
I heard -- and I'd like to have it confirmed -- that the Fed was
willing to accept mortgage-backed securities as collateral on discount
loans. That's a lot like buying the mortgages themselves (but not the
same thing).
==
Yes, I recall reading early last week -
The mortgage meltdown has not only brought the rating agencies under the
gun, but will also increase the pressure on hedge funds to be subject to
more state scrutiny and regulation. This is something which nervous big
investors and central bankers have been seeking and the fund companies have
Jim Devine wrote:
To be fair to the ratings agencies, they don't get money directly out
of setting ratings (I think they're not-for-profit). They aren't
conpeople as much as they don't want to rock the boat.
On 8/16/07, Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first quote is ridiculous.
Julio wrote:
And let me add quickly that sterilization is, of course, more than
building up reserves. You have to offset the building up of reserves
(for which you pay in high-power local currency thus expanding
nominal M) by floating debt domestically or otherwise tightening
credit.
Julio wrote:
Scholar-googling recent works on the structure of the credit system in
the U.S., I bumped into this 2006 paper by NYU Stern's Edward I Altman
on the recent boom of credit junk:
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~ealtman/Are-Historical-Models-Still-Relevant1.pdf
Uncle Sam, Your Banker Will See You Now
By Paul Craig Roberts
08/08/07 ICH
[...]
This is a grim outlook. We got in this position because our leaders are
ignorant fools. So are our economists, many of whom are paid shills for some
interest group. So are our corporate leaders whose greed gave
Jim wrote:
but not all financial crises lead to depressions. For example, look at
1987. Engels and Marx were clear, I believe, that the financial sector
had enough autonomy from the real economy that it could have its own
crises.
==
Sure, but isn't this the orthodox
Jim wrote:
...The Fed is the main policy
organization in the US. If it cuts rates to fight the housing-related
financial problems and the looming possibility of a steep recession
(as in '87, etc.), it encourages inflation (already a problem) and an
even steeper fall in the US dollar, which
The road to peace runs through Jerusalem
By Gideon Rachman
Financial Times
Published: August 6 2007
Before the Iraq war, optimistic neo-conservatives came up with a new slogan
about the Israel-Palestine conflict: “The road to Jerusalem runs through
Baghdad.” American victory in Iraq would create
Leigh wrote:
On 8/2/07, Marvin Gandall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and it is not the case, in any event, that the least
skilled tend to be more advanced in these areas than the most skilled. I
wonder whether Leigh would agree.
Disagree... More often than not, the least skilled are aware
Carrol wrote:
Borderline cases tend to corrupt analysis. Management (as I would
describe it) is simply part of the capitalist class, their share of
surplus value coming to them in the form of salaries. But Management is
also a rubber-bag category that can be stretched weirdly. According to a
How is Ward Churchill's scholarly work generally viewed by historians and
other academics in his field without an ideological ax to grind?
Louis wrote:
Marvin Gandall wrote:
How is Ward Churchill's scholarly work generally viewed by historians and
other academics in his field without an ideological ax to grind?
His major work is A Little Matter of Genocide. I found it
well-researched and authoritative. It is basically
Eugene Coyle wrote:
There is an alternative that is dismissed by the mainstream Democrats (Barbara
Boxer for example) as a good idea that can't be enacted. So let's line up
behind Cap Trade. That is the Carbon Tax.
=
The Economist had a piece last
Raghu writes:
On 7/26/07, David B. Shemano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly is his insight? There is a great cost to taxpayers if the
industry is regulated but not if the industry is unregulated? There is
no one person to call? Diversification is good except when it is not?
His
Governments Get
Bolder in Buying
Equity Stakes
By JASON SINGER in London, HENNY SENDER in New York, JASON DEAN in Beijing
and MARCUS WALKER in Berlin
Wall Street Journal
July 24, 2007; Page A1
Foreign governments, flush with cash and no longer content with the meager
returns to be had on safe
Julio wrote:
To eliminate uncertainty altogether, we'd have to abolish the second
law of thermodynamics. That's not going to happen soon. But from
this doesn't follow that people will stop trying to reduce uncertainty
with, for example, the refinement of time-series analysis.
Human activity
Jim Devine wrote:
On 7/15/07, raghu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/15/07, Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/ben-stein-and-karl-marx/
This still leaves the crucial question unanswered - what is the reason
for the erosion of the trade union
Michael Perelman wrote:
Isn't the bureaucratization of the union hierarchy a part of the story?
=
I tend to see bureaucratization more as an expression than cause of the
decline in trade union militancy - much facilitated of course by the
institutionalization of labour
A new study has examined the manuufacture of the iPod in an effort to
illustrate how the new global economy - based on a vast expansion of
cross-border labour arbitrage and revolutionary advances in the means of
communication and transportation and of supply chain management - functions,
who
Interesting, if impressionistic, view of the power relationship between
China's rising capitalist class and state officials which conflicts with the
usual inferences drawn outside.
But they still seem to demand more of their regulators of Big Pharma than is
the case here. :)
Any sophisticated investors out there holding assets in Bear Stearns'
tottering High Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund?
Anyone been burnt by the recent scandal in Greece involving Constant
Maturity Swap Steepeners?
Sharon's dream, of course, is the inverse of Eldar's nightmare below and
that of all liberal Zionists (and of Fatah): that the isolation of Gaza and
the web of Israeli settlements and roads on the West Bank has put paid to
the two-state solution which fell short of being realized by the Clinton
June 3, 2007
Op-Ed Contributor
An Enemy We Can Work With
By BARTLE BREESE BULL
New York Times
London
WHEN the populist Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr emerged from 14 weeks of
invisibility on May 25, it was hard not to focus on his typically passionate
anti-Coalition rhetoric: “No, no to America;
The article below makes an interesting companion piece to the one from the
NYT I posted earlier this morning about the complex relationship between the
Sadrists and the US. It's by the Washington Post's David Ignatius, one of
the better connected and more astute commentators on US Mideast policy.
Julio wrote:
From the inside, things don't look the way you describe *at all*.
If there has been any ideological shift to register in the last
decade, it's been precisely one in the opposite direction. And this
is not surprising given the persistence of poverty and inequality in
the globe, the
Carrol wrote:
Too many leftists are flocking to a
once-in-a-lifetime sale of 10 pairs
(of rose-tinted glasses) for the price
of one.
Julio replied:
Right, leftists who don't fall for that, are holier than us.
Marv can speak for himself. But I don't think that by forwarding that
note he
- Original Message -
From: Carrol Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PEN-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] critique of Gintis
Doug Henwood wrote:
On Jun 1, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Marvin Gandall wrote:
I don't believe Carrol understands that ruling
Charles B. writes:
is there an accountant in the house?
what do you think of this, as summarized by SLATE, May 29, 2007?
USA Today leads with an analysis showing that if the federal
government were to use the same accounting standards as corporations
it would have recorded a $1.3
China's recent purchase of a $3 billion stake in the US hedge fund
Blackstone and its plans to recycle hundreds of billions of its USD and
other foreign exchange reserves into global equity and real estate markets
has drawn excited attention by the financial press to the proliferation and
rapid
The Financial Times China correspondent says the latest tightening moves by
the Chinese leadership will do little to cool the country’s blistering
growth because of the political and economic constraints which are
inhibiting it from doing so. These include the central government’s
inability to
Doug H. writes:
On May 21, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Michael Perelman wrote:
Charles Brown will enjoy this -- even though I don't think that the
AMI
is adding much to our understanding of the economy.
That's putting it mildly. It's standard-issue monetary crankery,
isn't it?
Yoshie writes:
The article's real beef about nationalized oil is that there is inherent
political pressure on state oil companies to direct their revenues to
social
programs and other state spending rather than to exploration and the
development of new supply which would hold oil prices in
I don't believe Nazi propaganda was, strictly speaking, anti-financier -
even in theory. It was designed to draw the connection between moneylending
and Jewry. It was not the charging of interest which was condemned as such,
but only usurious loansharking which was portrayed as the exclusive
Louis P. writes:
Marvin wrote:
...We can continue to disagree about
whether the accomodations by the mass parties have been due to failures of
leadership, as you contend, or to the unexpected historical resiliency of
capitalism and extension of the universal franchise which have combined to
Louis Proyect wrote:
The real problem is disincentives to invest. What do you do when
there is no incentive to invest, such as was the case during the
1930s?
In these circumstances, the state moves to reflate the economy by
recapitalizing the banks and boosting mass purchasing power. The
All is not going according to plan for the US and Israel in their efforts to
isolate Iran and its allies in the Mideast by forging a bloc of conservative
Arab regimes against the Persians. As the report below notes, the US is
now facing a dilemma about whether to recognize and prop up the fragile
Yoshie posted:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/08/world/middleeast/08israel.html
February 8, 2007
Noted Arab Citizens Call on Israel to Shed Jewish Identity
By ISABEL KERSHNER
JERUSALEM, Feb. 7 — A group of prominent Israeli Arabs has called on
Israel to stop defining itself as a Jewish state
Productivity Growth Rebounds,
Easing Pressure on Labor Costs
By BRIAN BLACKSTONE
Wall Street Journal
February 7, 2007 4:21 p.m.
WASHINGTON -- U.S. productivity growth rebounded during the fourth quarter
of 2006, easing pressure on labor costs and suggesting that the economy
still has the
Yoshie posted:
January 30, 2007
Europe Resists U.S. Push to Curb Iran Ties
By STEVEN R. WEISMAN
[...]
Several European officials said in interviews that they believe that
the United States and Saudi Arabia have an unwritten deal to keep oil
production up, and prices down, to further squeeze
Yoshie posted:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/28/business/28oil.html
January 28, 2007
Saudi Officials Seek to Temper the Price of Oil
BY JAD MOUAWAD
[]
Sometimes, the uncertainty gives rise to more conspiratorial theories.
Oil traders have been buzzing in recent weeks about whether
Leigh Meyers wrote:
.
The Saudis openly admitted to opening the taps in the days after 911
at the behest of the US adminstration. It was the meeting between
al-Bandar and Bush shown in Farenheit 911 where that deal was cut.
However, one of their oil ministry officials stated that if ALL
Yoshie wrote:
There are lots of factors, from unseasonably warm weather (due in part
to climate change) to rates of economic growth, many of which are
beyond the control of oil producers. The issue is what the Saudi
ruling class are doing with the part they do control, their own oil
reserves.
Jim Devine wrote:
it also hurts Russia, Venezuela, and all other high-cost producers.
(This would include Iraq if it could actually get a significant amount
of oil on the international market.) Is hurting those countries part
of SA's plan? It seems that SA may be facing conflicting goals.
On
US productivity growth lowest for a decade
By Chris Giles in London
Financial Times
Published: January 22 2007 22:08 | Last updated: January 22 2007 22:08
The US economy last year recorded its lowest rate of labour productivity growth
in more than a decade, with growth in output per hour
Yoshie wrote:
In the case of the ANC, it accomplished the most immediate and
important goal of national liberation: the end of Apartheid. (The
FSLN didn't face an apartheid problem comparable to what the South
Africans did and what the Palestinians still do.) Fatah has not.
Ceasing to be a
Yoshie wrote:
Fatah is no longer fighting Tel Aviv but is siding with and getting
material support -- money and weapons -- from it and Washington in its
war against Hamas. By doing so, Fatah essentially ceased to be an
organ of a national liberation movement. The ANC and the Sandinistas
never
Yoshie wrote:
On 1/15/07, Marvin Gandall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, if the left and the Islamists were equally vying for the
allegiance of the masses in their own countries, they'd be at each
other's
throats - as in Palestine, for example.
Fatah is not the left, however
Yoshie wrote:
On 1/16/07, Marvin Gandall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fatah - or rather, the PLO, which it dominates - still represents the
Palestinian left, such as it is, against Hamas and the rest of the
Islamist
movement, which was set up in opposition to it.
So, that means Tel Aviv
Yoshie wrote:
But have you found any actually-existing Palestinian, pro-Western or
anti-Western, secular or religious, who speaks of Fatah as the left
and Hamas as the right (or whatever)? The idea of Fatah = the left
seems to me to be your own creation...Terms such as left and right matter
Jim D wrote:
also, even if the left did exist as a social force, would any
Islamists want to all with us?
On 1/15/07, Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To consider the question of alliances seriously, you have to first
build your own social force. Adding 0 to 1 equals 1.
Yoshie wrote:
In many cases today, which force is left and which force is right
are hard to decide. You look at, for instance, the Egyptian
government and various Islamist organizations that oppose it, and it's
difficult to say which is more to the left.
That's true. I think the only place
Money Is Everywhere,
But for How Long?
Alan Murray
Wall Street Journal
January 3, 2007
It may be time to put away the bubbly.
The New Year's forecasts are so unrelentingly sanguine that you have to
wonder whether a tanker of strong, black coffee is in order. The U.S.
economy will keep growing.
Yoshie wrote:
The guarantee of minority rights is rooted philosophically in
liberalism and pluralism, not democracy per se. People can
democratically choose to establish and maintain liberal democracy with
commitment to pluralism, but what if they democratically reject
liberalism and
Yoshie wrote:
There can be cases where your party is a junior supporter of the more
or less secular government in power, which gets challenged by
Islamists' electoral victory, mass revolts, or terrorist attacks, all
of which have in fact happened in the Middle East, e.g., in Algeria,
Egypt,
CJ wrote:
I'm not really sure what you are waiting on to happen in Iraq Marvin,
so I'm not really sure what predictions you will see come true. I
think you have some hidden views about Iraq and Islamists that seems
to cloud your thinking...
===
I want a full and
Michael Perelman wrote:
Why in the world would the WSJ let Ali Abunimah review Carter's book?
Is the paper becoming more open to critical views? Hard to believe.
Jimmy Carter's Book:
A Palestinian View
By ALI ABUNIMAH
December 26, 2006; Page A12
=
Not to
Sistani 'opposes coalition plan'
Aljazeera.net
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2006
Iraq's most revered Shia cleric has withheld support for a US-backed plan
to
build a sectarian coalition, threatening hopes for political unity.
I observed on A-List (also archived at utah edu) that Sistani was like
a
Charles Januzzi is quite a kidder. He posts two items purporting to show
that the Sadrists are cobbling together a non-sectarian Iraqi front to fight
the Americans. The first (today, 11.01 am) is from tompaine.com. which
states:
Among those supporting the new National Salvation Front, along
Charles Januzzi wrote:
The Sunni Resistance of the sort
that fought it out with the US over Anbar and continue to do so has
shown itself quite resilient and coherent--for a Resistance. And it
has no superpower sponsorship, unlike the NLF in Vietnam...
Reslient, yes - but I'm not sure what
Jim Devine wrote:
On 12/21/06, Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many times did the US apply the surge technique in Vietnam -- there
was always
light at the end of the tunnel. The joke at the time was that it was
an oncoming
locomotive.
the escalations in VN weren't the same.
The US ruling class is not only debating whether to send more US troops into
Iraq in a final effort to secure Baghdad, but whether to aim at the Shia
Sadrists or the Sunni insurgents. On the one hand, US planners are concerned
that a blow against the Sadr forces would provoke an open revolt by
CJ wrote:
The biggest weakness--which occurs a lot--in the AEI analysis is to
see the Shia in Iraq monolithically. The very existence of the
Sadrists cuts to the very heart of the conflicts amongst the Shia. In
the event of a real Iraqi civil war, it is most likely to be Shia on
Shia, with
1 - 100 of 317 matches
Mail list logo