On 6 Sep 2006, at 14:33, Ovid wrote:
- Original Message
From: Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hmm, that's curious. However, if it's undocumented I would argue
against
supporting it right now. What benefit does it gain us?
This comes from the Good Old Test.pm modul
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 04:28:56PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Thanks for the updates, Thomas. And now on with the complaining!
:-)
> >- has_example
> > An optional metric that checks if the author included a dir called
> > 'eg|ex|example(s?)' which in turn includes at least on *.pl
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:23:39AM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> >- has_example
>
> I thought we were generally negative on this one, because it would
> encourage people to spuriously add trivial example directories to their
> distributions...
Yes, but I've recently introduced the concept
On 9/7/06, Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Examples go in the installed docs or they are lost.
The docs could state that there are some ready-to-run examples in that
dir in the distribution.
In one module where we had planty of examples I addeded a script that
would creata a Modul
- Original Message
From: Torsten Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >From running it against a few test suites and getting some strange
> results, it seems like TAPx::Parser doesn't like lines like
>
> ok 3 # comment
>
> It flags the corresponding result as being of type "unknown".
Unesca
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
I could be wrong here, but I think the check is to make sure that tar
doesn't set +x on Makefile.PL or Build.PL, thus forcing the user to run
the proper version of perl instead of automagically running the perl
that shebang points to. (Example: Makefile.PL says #!/usr/bi
On Thursday 07 September 2006 00:51, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> In one module where we had planty of examples I addeded a script that
> would creata a Module::Name::Examples.pm that is a collection of the
> example files in pod format. This modules gets installed so the examples
> are right at hand.
>
On 9/7/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 07 September 2006 00:51, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> In one module where we had planty of examples I addeded a script that
> would creata a Module::Name::Examples.pm that is a collection of the
> example files in pod format. This modules gets
On Thursday 07 September 2006 03:28, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> On 9/7/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pod::ToDemo, for example?
>
> Sort of but not exactly.
>
> As I can see in the SDL::Tutorial where Pod::ToDemo is in use,
> there can be only one example perl .pm file and the real exampl
On 9/7/06, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/7/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 00:51, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
> > In one module where we had planty of examples I addeded a script that
> > would creata a Module::Name::Examples.pm that is a collection
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Oh, and if you want to join the fun and help a bit, here's a (probably
incomplete) list of tasks:
- Metrics:
[snip]
Would the metrics for community support channels that were suggested a while
ago be welcome? (The discussion about them sort of died out :-\)
- Salve
Adam Kennedy wrote:
> It might be an interesting idea to also add a "dependencies_exist"
> metric, that makes sure that all the dependencies that are declared
> actually exist in the CPAN. Dunno, could be of dubiously little value,
> but I just managed to somehow upload something with bad deps t
* Salve J Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-07 14:15]:
> Would the metrics for community support channels that were
> suggested a while ago be welcome? (The discussion about them
> sort of died out :-\)
Only if it’s possible for an author to state that this metric is
meaningless. F.ex., I can’t
Adrian Howard wrote:
Maybe this is the right time to think about mechanisms supporting
different versions of the TAP protocol?
http://perl-qa.yi.org/index.php/TAP_version
14 matches
Mail list logo
