On 9/25/07, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, one option might be something like:
>http://www.cpanforum.com/tags/name/helpwanted
> Gabor, would it be easy to add an Atom/RSS feed for a particular tag?
Please no! Let's not spread module metadata around any more than we have to.
E
On Sep 22, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Salve J Nilsen wrote:
- Set up some kind of syndication feed [RSS, Atom] [somewhere
sensible] where one can read which distributions currently have a
"pre-release" status. The feed might be called "NEED TESTING" or
something like that. Make this feed visible on
[crosspost from the mod_perl mailing list, at recommendation of others on the
MP list]
Wanted to ping the list about something that's irked me the last few days...
After recently releasing Apache2::Filter::Minifier::JavaScript/CSS, I saw
several failed CPAN testers reports, generally due to the
David Golden wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, one option might be something like:
>>http://www.cpanforum.com/tags/name/helpwanted
>> Gabor, would it be easy to add an Atom/RSS feed for a particular tag?
>>
>
> Please no! Let's not spread module met
On 9/26/07, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
> > Please no! Let's not spread module metadata around any more than we have
> > to.
> >
> > Extend META.yml to include the same kind of information that used to
> > be managed via the modules list. If someone wants to
I just released Bucardo, a multi-master replication system for Postgres.
It has a fairly intense test suite, and I was developing it, I ended up
writing Yet Another Test Counter. At some point, I decided to turn it
into a proper module. Here's the POD page:
http://bucardo.org/test_dynamic/Dynamic.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2007, at 18:51, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
http://bucardo.org/test_dynamic/Dynamic.pm.html
Comments and feedback welcome. I was not trying to solve everyone's
counting problems, just my own, but offer it in the hopes someone else
will find
On Sep 24, 2007, at 4:15 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
Andy Lester wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:23:21AM +0100, David Cantrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It appears that I can't make any changes without registering for
yet another bloody account. I already have too many.
You have a limit?
Hello list,
My team at Data Domain (NASDAQ: DDUP), the leader in de-duplicating
storage systems, is looking for an engineer with solid Perl skills as
well as a system performance measurement and tuning background. We are
part of the development team which builds the DDOS filesystem, so
someone wit
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
>> On 9/25/07, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, one option might be something like:
>>>http://www.cpanforum.com/tags/name/helpwanted
>>> Gabor, would it be easy to add an Atom/RSS feed for a particular tag?
>>>
>> Please n
Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> [crosspost from the mod_perl mailing list, at recommendation of others on the
> MP list]
>
> Wanted to ping the list about something that's irked me the last few days...
>
> After recently releasing Apache2::Filter::Minifier::JavaScript/CSS, I saw
> several failed CPAN
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> I just released Bucardo, a multi-master replication system for Postgres.
> It has a fairly intense test suite, and I was developing it, I ended up
> writing Yet Another Test Counter. At some point, I decided to turn it
> into a proper module. Here's the POD page:
>
> h
Zaven Boni wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> My team at Data Domain (NASDAQ: DDUP), the leader in de-duplicating
> storage systems, is looking for an engineer with solid Perl skills as
> well as a system performance measurement and tuning background. We are
> part of the development team which builds the D
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 2:36 pm, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> > So... to accommodate those who didn't have Module::Build installed, I set
> > up a basic Makefile.PL, following the general guidelines from
> > Apache::Test. Unfortunately, most testers borked this one to
On 9/26/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think (I hope) David was balking at the idea of encoding release information
> as CPAN forum tags and not so much at the idea of CPAN forum tags themselves
> as independent search keywords.
The former.
David
On 9/26/07, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think (I hope) David was balking at the idea of encoding release
> > information
> > as CPAN forum tags and not so much at the idea of CPAN forum tags themselves
> > as independent
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 20:16 +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> I'm guessing it wouldn't work well for heavily data driven tests? It
> seems to work by counting the calls to test functions - is that right?
That's a big part of it, yes, as well as accounting for subroutines and
other loops and codepa
Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> As a dumb alternative... what about explicitly listing M::B as a build
> dependency? Would that trigger CPANPLUS into installing it and then
> restarting the build?
I don't know what CPANPLUS does with build_requires. It'll probably balk
about missing CPANPLUS::Dist::
I don't think Module::Build can be a build_requires. I think it has to
be a configure_requires. (Not that support is widespread yet.)
David
On 9/26/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> > As a dumb alternative... what about explicitly listing M::B as a buil
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 3:41 pm, David Golden wrote:
> I don't think Module::Build can be a build_requires. I think it has to
> be a configure_requires. (Not that support is widespread yet.)
>
> On 9/26/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> > > As a d
Graham TerMarsch wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 September 2007 3:41 pm, David Golden wrote:
>> I don't think Module::Build can be a build_requires. I think it has to
>> be a configure_requires. (Not that support is widespread yet.)
>>
>> On 9/26/07, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Graham
# from Michael G Schwern
# on Wednesday 26 September 2007 16:40:
>Write a Build.PL with a compatibility Makefile.PL and make sure that
>Apache::Test is in the MakeMaker PREREQ_PM. You appear to be doing
> that so it should work. Is it not?
Note that the build class is trying to be 'Apache::Test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Sep 2007, at 22:51, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 20:16 +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote:
I'm guessing it wouldn't work well for heavily data driven tests? It
seems to work by counting the calls to test functions - is that
r
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 4:59 pm, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Michael G Schwern
> # on Wednesday 26 September 2007 16:40:
> > Write a Build.PL with a compatibility Makefile.PL and make sure that
> > Apache::Test is in the MakeMaker PREREQ_PM. You appear to be doing
> > that so it should wor
On 9/26/07, Graham TerMarsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> configure_requires would be nice, but what supports it at this point?
configure_requires is in the META.yml blead spec. CPAN has support
for it as of 1.92.
Unfortunately, the most common smoke testing setup is YACSmoke, which
uses CPANPLU
David Golden wrote:
> (Which reminds me to go update my module metadata on CPAN::Reporter
> since I've changed license and abstract since I first registered. The
> changes are in my META.yml, of course, but I forgot about PAUSE.)
>
This is a pretty good point and has caused me to change my min
26 matches
Mail list logo
