> On Wed, 02 Aug 2000 07:50:46 +0200, Richard Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hmmm.
> For my part I'd like to say that I don't want to continue to work on any of
> this unless a consensus is reached that this would be a good idea.
It absolutely is a good idea. Those who believe they can
Thanks! I've registered you as maintainer on PAUSE, so that the
indexer will pick your uploads of Test::Harness in the usual way.
--
andreas
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:08:49 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael G. Schwern) said:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 07:20:55PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >Why is t/TEST anything more than a thin wrapper around Test::Harness?
>>
>> Because t/TEST pre-
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 14:38:47 +0100, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It detects things like Autoloaders, eval STRING, goto LABEL, dynamic
> method calls, using non-exported variables and functions...
Why are you considering dynamic method calls an ill? I'm using them
frequ
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 16:03:51 +0100, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I anticipated this. From the docs...
>Perl has alot of wierd features. We love Perl for it, but
>it makes predictable refactorings really difficult. This
>module attempts to
> On 02 Mar 2002 18:41:15 -0800, Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If someone would like to send them to me, I'll get my act together a
> little better and get a new release out.
A pseudo-patch would be OK? I found that Tar.pm contains
chdir $_;
and
chdir $cwd
> On 16 Mar 2002 11:14:56 -0800, Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> "Michael" == Michael G Schwern writes:
Michael> and here's a patch.
> Applied, thanks!
Thanks to you both. Looking forward to test the new version.
--
andreas
> On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 13:01:52 +0200, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> If it only returns the value from sbrk(), damn well call it sbrk.
> Ahh, someone on /my/ side.
Mee too.
> So far, all I got was criticism. I asked for it. But no-one said it was useful.
> (Or I didn'
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:19:16 +0100, "Paul Marquess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> If I give the module a version number like 2.000_00, will the CPAN
> shell ignore it?
Yes. To be precice, the indexer on PAUSE will ignore it. But don't
forget to write it with quotes around.
--
andr
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:55:26 -0500, Gary Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The latest release of Devel::TypeCheck adds typing of functions (without
polymorphism) as well as numerous bug fixes:
> The uploaded file
>Devel-TypeCheck-1.2.tar.gz
> has entered CPAN as
> file:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:26:52 -0800, Luke Closs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This would allow non-perl people to install perl packages much easier,
> without having to mess with the CPAN shell and running tests. It
> would also make installing CPAN packages into hosted environments much
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:42:58 +0100, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am still considering building something[0] that shows the
> module-dependency as a graph to show how "bad" the problem has become.
> Even "simple" modules like YAML seem to include everything and the
> kitchen-
>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:13:40 -0800, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
> Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FWIW, we're using dh-make-perl to create debian packages from CPAN
>> modules.
> An
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:05:02 -0800, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Did anybody here have played with CPANPLUS::Dist::Deb?
>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-Dist-Deb/
>>
>> Believing its documentation, i
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:15:01 -0800, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi all,
> I've released a snapshot of the long-promised Test::Kwalitee. Internally,
it
> uses the CPANTS code to analyze a module along 13 of the Kwalitee
indicators.
> I recommend using this in developer
>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:41:25 -0800, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wednesday 15 February 2006 12:33, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> The prerequisite Module::CPANTS::Analyse can currently not be
>> installed because it relies on sme YAML import
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:22:20 +1100, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 1. Broken or corrupt packaging.
> A bad tarball, MANIFEST files missing.
Make sure you verify that all files in the distro are readable. Reject
if the permissions are bogus. Recently we had an increasig nu
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:51:02 -0800, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi all,
> In http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=17934, a Test::MockObject user
> dislikes the t/0-signature.t test that always runs.
I have filed a couple of bug reports against distributions with a
wrong
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:39:06 -0500, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:47 PM, David Golden wrote:
>> Some potential options:
>>
>> (a) Add "directory" as a synonym to the spec and add "dir" as
>> something that CPAN sites recognize.
>>
>> (b) Change the s
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:02:00 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> (What would be marginally worth it is having PAUSE sign distros. At
>> least we can assure that the CPAN mirror didn't tamper with the
>> files, which I think is the most likely "attack" on CPAN.)
> Frankly,
>>>>> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:22:16 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:02:00 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> said:
>> >>
>>>>> On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 03:52:52 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
> * Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-07 03:25]:
>> Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> >>>>>>On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:0
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:36:52 -0400, "Randy W. Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> David Wheeler wrote:
>> On Jul 13, 2006, at 05:56, Fergal Daly wrote:
>>
>>> That's funny, it looks like I did put some code in to disable the END
>>> block if it's "require"d rather than "use"d. Tu
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:24:37 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> * Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-17 02:00]:
>> perl -MDBI\ 999
>> DBI version 999 required--this is only version 1.50.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted.
> You can use an equals sign in
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:09:08 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Maybe we need a perlish kind of building it. It's not perlish
>> to show each other a passport and make sure that the image
>> there matches the face.
> hmm, I don’t know how else you’d do it; at lea
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:08:05 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> I’ll assume you didn’t actually mean it the way it came out; that
> you were actually complaining about the tools. I agree that
> Module::Signature falls far short of doing an adequate job; no
> arg
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:35:02 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On the other hand, give me an easy to use, works _everywhere_, never
> fails falsely positive or negative, never crashes, low-dependency
> security enhancement to CPAN clients that I never have to think about,
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:10:07 +0800, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I do agree, but if you are going to do that we should know NOT to tell
> people on failing platforms to do something we know is going to fail.
> So if we know it doesn't work on Windows (for example) we shoul
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:23:09 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> The mapping of flag to Module-Version pairs could actually reside on any
> server with ftp or http access. CPAN.pm would be configured to use such
> a URL.
> What do you think?
What you describe ca
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:51:42 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> What about adding a mechanism to PAUSE to map module/version pairs
> to the bundles they are mentioned in? One could parse the most recent
> bundles, extract the list of modules and the frozen version
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:42:52 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Sure, I did not mean that you implement it just because I had this
> idea about 10 years later than Bundles were implemented.
> I just meant to address one of the concerned raised in the discussion.
O
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 06:47:03 +0100, Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Hi!
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:35:41PM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
>> Question: how are the dists sorted on the /author/CPANID page?
> Currently random (whatever the DB spits out), but I'll cha
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:13:26 +, Florian Scharinger <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi perl-qa,
> I'm trying to download missing Perl test modules automatically during
> build time of my project, by using:
> use CPAN;
> CPAN::Shell->install("Test::Exception");
> Test::E
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:19:30 +, Florian Scharinger <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Andreas,
> I updated CPAN and version > v1.6 works, meaning that the path to the
> newly installed Perl modules is added to @INC.
> However, this doesn't really solve my problem, since my co
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:56:18 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 12/4/06, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> David Romano patched up Test-Simple to restore 5.4.5 compatibility. I'll
>> see about releasing that as 0.66. That might make a whole lot more of CP
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:17:11 +0100, Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Hi!
> CPANTS is now up and running again, with fresh data, which will be available
> daily. (There might be a problem with UTF8 and the database, but that
> should be solvable soon (especially as I
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2007 20:47:18 +0200, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 5/26/07, Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2007 20:06:18 +0200, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 20:06:18 +0200, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 5/26/07, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 26 May 2007, at 18:45, demerphq wrote:
>> > Maybe ill just upload my files in zip format from now on only, then
>> > its not my problem anymore right? Wou
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:45:38 +0200, Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> perl -MYAML=LoadFile -le 'LoadFile("Number-Phone-1.58.yml")'
Use YAML::Syck! It will cut your execution time too. Significantly!
% time perl -MYAML::Syck=LoadFile -le 'LoadFile("Number-Phone-1.58.yml")
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:04:14 -0700, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Well, the repository trunk is always kept at passing so if folks want to
smoke
> with that it's safe.
Smoking repositories is not comparable with smoking release
candidates. The number of possible
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:00:59 -0700, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Most CPAN smoke testers wouldn't have caught it because even though they
often
> run alphas they usually don't install them. So the interactions with
> dependencies would be lost.
Not true. My s
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:55:45 +0200, "Jos I. Boumans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> This is a known issue and something that afaik Adam Kennedy is
> looking to
> resolve with having 'configure requires' support in META.yml.
This sounds as if you understood configure_requires to
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:31:41 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Doesn’t seem like you can do that from within MakeMaker so far.
See also http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=30098
(Documentation for EXTRA_META is missing)
--
andreas
Since 3.00 I have the following test output in my Image::Magick test
t/wmf/read..
1..2
ok 1
ok 2
ok
You already have a parser for (t/wmf/read.t) at
/home/src/perl/repoperls/installed-perls/perl/pe1S7WD/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/lib/5.10.0/TAP/Harness.pm line 412
On IRC AndyA and I
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:08:41 +0100, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
> There was already a module that does this, I can't remember it's name,
Maybe B::Prereq and its companion Test::Dependencies.
--
andreas
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:27:55 +0100, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>> (Why do I care? Because I get every other week a report of Time::HiRes
>> failing, that's why.)
> Yes, and other core tests are sensitive to load (stress tests for
> threads, Benchmark.pm,
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:47:57 -0800, Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:04 PM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>> So in order to make everything work robustly, distros should
>> explicitly list every single module they explicitly use no
>> shortcuts, no implica
Bug in CPAN::Reporter and/or Test::Harness and/or CPAN.pm?
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/796974
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/825449
All tests fail but Test::Harness reports NOTESTS and CPAN::Reporter
concludes UNKNOWN and CPAN.pm then installs it.
Your
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:12:51 -0800, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Adam Kennedy posed me a stumper on #toolchain tonight. In short, having a
> test which checks your signature doesn't appear to be an actual deterrent to
> tampering. The man-in-the-middle can jus
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:49:32 -0800, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Asking the wrong question. None of our testsuites is there to protect
>> against spoof or attacks. That's simply not the goal. Same thing for
>> 00-signature.t
> We would seem to be agreeing. If
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:34:37 -0800, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> See above. Once the bug is reported there is no justification to keep
>> the test around. In this case I prefer a skip over a removal because
>> the test apparently once was useful.
> Bt skipp
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:34:49 -0600 (CST), Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> However, usually I end up needing to investigate aspects of the
> testers platform, often by having them run snippets of Perl code from
> the shell, or asking them to try a patch. There's not much
>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:22:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig)
>>>>> said:
> 1. You get a fail report with an error message that doesn't tell you
>exactly what went wrong.
> 2. You rewrite your test in a way that it does te
>>>>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:12:43 -0800, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Saturday 22 December 2007 05:22:05 Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> 1. You get a fail report with an error message that doesn't tell you
>> exactly what went wrong.
>&
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:24:30 -0600 (CST), Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Sorry I didn't notice before I posted that this can be refactored into
>> a while loop:
>>
>> while (You don't understand the output of your own test script){
>> Rewrite your test script;
>>
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:26:47 +, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
dc> Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> [1] It can be argued that bleadperl testers should probably not email
>> authors
I tend to agree.
dc> I'd argue that they should, as problems found testing against blead
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:34:15 -0500, Michael Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> The common theme is this:
>
> Output from '/usr/bin/make':
> !!
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:21:34 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> a comment (a GIT commit id in this case). You need GNU tar 1.14 to
>> handle the extended header correctly. Earlier versions will display
>> a warning and extract the comment as a file.
ew> Ah, interesting.
>>>>> On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:55:19 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig)
>>>>> said:
> (I'll have a look what CPAN.pm can do about this ASAP.)
CPAN 1.92_64 is uploaded with a workaround for broken tar
implementations. Please upgrade:
cpan> in
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:57:20 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> And IMO this hints at a real problem that was mentioned
>> in this thread, but was not really indicted: namely CPAN.pm’s
>> logic that if there is no Makefile.PL, it is a sane idea to make
>> one up out of whole
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:24:34 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> That is different than a tarball though. Does the script installation
> have to be given up in order to eliminate the ambiguous behavior in the
> case of a dist tarball?
Good point. I can probably limit it
> On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:54:40 -0700, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Or, Andreas could change PAUSE, which is a bit more involved :)
Do you not know the abandoned flag? Or not considering it appropriate?
On the Edit Module Metadata page the DSLIP status has under Support Level:
d
>>>>> On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:15:04 -0700, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, (Andreas J. Koenig)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:54:40 -0700, brian d foy <[EMAIL
> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:47:58 -0700, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> http://test-more.googlecode.com/files/Test-Simple-0.81_01.tar.gz
This version breaks the test for DAGOLDEN/Sub-Uplevel-0.1901.tar.gz
t/05_honor_prior_override
# Failed test 'use Sub::Uplevel;'
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:48:37 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> http://scratchcomputing.com/tmp/generated_by.module_build.list
Since yesterday I have downloaded and analysed ~56000 testreports from
cpantesters and found ~135 distros that have been tested by both MB
0.2808 an
>>>>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:36:00 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> # from Andreas J. Koenig
> # on Monday 08 September 2008 15:16:
>> Since yesterday I have downloaded and analysed ~56000 testreports from
>> cpantesters and found ~135 d
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:00:54 +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
> * Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-09 08:15]:
>> I was surprised to get a few hundred results
> Note that CodeSearch indexes tarballs, so there are likely to be
> a lot of dupes. B
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:03:25 -0700, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> I've uploaded a new alpha to deal with this.
It still breaks Sub::Uplevel. Sub::Uplevel has lots of dependencies. I
won't smoke a Test-Simple that breaks Sub-Uplevel. Or if the fault is
on Sub-Uplevel
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:51:02 +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL
>>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
> * Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-09 11:25]:
>> It's definitely the 'I broke CPAN' level. My smoker has 260
>>
>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:37:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig)
>>>>> said:
>> (d) Something else
> I lean toward PAUSE not indexing them thus pulling the plug as early
> as possible.
And so I have implemented it now. If it b
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:00:41 -0400, "David Golden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Problem 1: race condition between unarchiving and execution if
> Makefile.PL or Build.PL is world writable (ditto test files as well)
> (a) Have CPAN and CPANPLUS refuse to run 'perl *.PL' if the PL
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:40:09 +0200, "Jos I. Boumans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> And so I have implemented it now. If it breaks too much in too short
>> time, we could probably revert it, but first I'd like to see how bad
>> we really do.
> I agree to this (first) solution; thi
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:11:00 -0500, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Anyway, I think the average CPAN author doesn't
>> really know or care about that, sadly.
>> See also
> FWIW, this is true. I have never thought about it.
> Personally, I am confused as to why
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:51:26 -0600, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> I agree with demerphq here, why can't PAUSE just fix this?
It didn't come up in the hasty discussion about this problem, it
didn't occur to me for a moment. And to nobody else. And the number of
victim
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:13:40 -0800, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Now that the CPAN shells and archiving modules are handling it at their
end, I
> think the PAUSE filter should be removed. It's not PAUSE's job to be the
code
> police.
It is 'tar xzf CPANFILE.
>>>>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:44:45 -0800, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
> Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:13:40 -0800, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL
>>>>>>> PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:34:09 +0100, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Can anyone help me out with this? Is this EUI's fault or something
> else? Is anything to do with this permission issue that we have been
> discussing?
For the record: Unix has three types of permissions, "user",
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:50:05 +, Tim Bunce said:
> I'm strugling to find a common denominator in these test results:
>
http://bbbike.radzeit.de/~slaven/cpantestersmatrix.cgi?dist=Devel-NYTProf+2.07_94
> It would be wonderful if there was some tool that would analyse the
> perl
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:42:28 +0200, "H.Merijn Brand"
> said:
>For some reasons I need Date-Manip-5.xx instead of the parallel
>developed version -6.xx. By time-stamp, -5.xx may even be newer
>cpan SBECK/Date-Manip-5.56.tar.gz
>works fine, but if you do that ag
79 matches
Mail list logo
