Unless I hear any objections, I plan to add:
t/examples/golf.t
to automate running of tsanta.p6, so as to verify both my original and
rg0now's Santa golf solutions. I notice there is an existing (unfinished?)
t/examples/examples.t. I could add my new tests there, it's just that
I personally prefe
via RT François PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by François PERRAD
> # Please include the string: [perl #34483]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34483 >
>
> Following patch on mswin
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-03-07 through 2005-03-22
All~
Welcome to yet another fortnights summary. I believe this is the highest
volume I have ever seen the three lists at simultaneously. Hopefully
they will keep it up, because good work is being done. To aid in the
epic endeavou
ghc of 6.2 on OS X 10.3 with pugs svn-latest.
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/builtins/goto.t1 256?? ?? % ??
t/builtins/grep.t
> [mdiep - Di 22. MÃr 2005, 14:35:02]:
>
> pmc2c2.pl is the new pmc2c.pl. Both currently exist in Parrot CVS.
> Either pmc2c.pl should be deleted or pmc2c2.pl should be renamed to
> pmc2c.pl.
A better location might be 'build_tools/pmc2c.pl*, as the script is also
used in 'dynclasses/build.pl'.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:28:21PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
> PS "O'Reilly will have a small book soon" ?
Oh yeah, that's the developer's testing notebook Ian Langworth and chromatic
are working on.
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #34548]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34548 >
pmc2c2.pl is the new pmc2c.pl. Both currently exist in Parrot CVS.
Either pmc2c.pl s
Hello all,
I found another bug, this one to do with single quoted stings.
Basically, pugs does not seem to correctly parse the single quoted
string 'test\'
See t/pugsbugs/string_escaping.t for a test.
- Stevan
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 15:43, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> (Cc'ing this post to p6i and p6l, as this is likely to concern folks
> from all three mailing lists.)
I'm restricting the distribution back down so that I'm not creating a
followup wave.
> As of Pugs revision 1024, this works:
>
> % pugscc
(Cc'ing this post to p6i and p6l, as this is likely to concern folks
from all three mailing lists.)
As of Pugs revision 1024, this works:
% pugscc --runparrot -e "'Hello, Parrot'.say"
And yes, it does what you think it does. Pugs takes that Perl 6 source
code, produce an AST, triggers the Co
According to Chip Salzenberg:
> Therefore, in the spirit of the Hindmost: If you're out ahead of me,
> who are you and what are you doing?
It's been suggested to me on IRC that my previous message was a bit
opaque. Let me try again:
What design issues are crying for attention right now?
I know
It seems to me that the most productive things to worry about, from a
design point of view, are the things that interest the hubristic
and/or impatient people.
Therefore, in the spirit of the Hindmost: If you're out ahead of me,
who are you and what are you doing?
--
Chip Salzenberg-
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:28:21PM +, Adrian Howard wrote:
> I can't believe you didn't stick a reference to the perl-qa list there
> :-)
The audience was not Perl programmers. Primarily Haskell and Java. A few
people expressed interest in Perl afterwards but mostly in the form of
"so why d
On 4 Mar 2005, at 17:15, Michael G Schwern wrote:
[snip]
There's not nearly enough references, particularly when I expect the
audience
to go out and work things out on their own. I still can't think of a
decent
testing book nor tutorial to recommend. Test::Tutorial leaves the
reader
at a dead
At 12:27 PM -0500 3/22/05, MrJoltCola wrote:
At 06:55 PM 3/21/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Dan Sugalski:
As such, I'd like to say a big thanks to Chip Salzenburg who's agreed
to take the hat.
I thank you for your kind words, and for giving me the opportunity
again to work long hours
At 06:55 PM 3/21/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
According to Dan Sugalski:
> As such, I'd like to say a big thanks to Chip Salzenburg who's agreed
> to take the hat.
I thank you for your kind words, and for giving me the opportunity
again to work long hours and explain difficult and arbitrary design
Hi,
a quick question: Will ceil and floor be in the core of Perl 6? I
vaguely remember that being in the case, but it's not in the Synopses.
(For comparision, in Perl 5 they're in POSIX.pm.)
--Ingo
Rod Adams wrote:
multi sub postcircumflex::<[ ]>(MyArray $obj : [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is rw {...}
but I'll wait for S14 before speculating further.
Will that ever be written? And if yes, will it be like S13 which
is basically saying that overloading is subsumed by A12/S12?
I see the 'does' operator a
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My hero. Thanks!
Welcome.
> Has anyone had a chance to try it on 64 bit, or swapped
> endian?
This is a PPC:
$ ./parrot examples/assembly/md5sum.imc MANIFEST
This appears to be a big endian processor: Please verify the MD5 checksum
b3ff04e9aa28c79baa
Investigating some recent dynclass/py*.t I found another problem in the
PMC compiler (classes/pmc2c2.pl, lib/Parrot/Pmc2c.pm).
On one computer I have in dynclasses/pylong.c temp_base_vtable
Parrot_default_destroy,
on the second I got:
Parrot_BigInt_destroy,
The latter is cor
Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been checking that my md5sum library still works after a few
months,
I've now checked in the whole MD5 stuff, slightly modifed (whitespace,
cosmetics, converted to a library, fix error with files > 2MB) and a bit
f
Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests.
>> These should be factored out into t/pmc/perl*.t.
[ patches ]
#34527 ignored
#34528 - #34531 applied, thanks.
Some more todo ;)
Thanks,
leo
$ perl -Ilib t/pmc/pmc.t
1..51
ok 1 - newpmc
ok 2 - il
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ...] , it's time to pass on the responsibility to someone
> who actually has the time. (Though I'll be wading through some of the
> recent backlog anyway, since I can't help but meddle :)
Many thanks for all your time and patience. It'll be great if you
> : I believe Perl 6 hasn't changed its policy on
> : labels, so you should be
> : able to write that in Perl 6. But your behavior
> : might be undefined.
> : It's weird to jump into the middle of a loop.
> : We may only allow you to
> : jump outwards from your dynamic scope.
>
> Perl 5's policy
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:12:58PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> > You use globbing instead of spelling each test out on the command line.
> > That's a Module::Install/autrijusism.
> >
> > If you want to see how MakeMaker specifically deals with it see
> > test_harness() in
> >
> http://search.cpa
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger
# Please include the string: [perl #34531]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34531 >
> The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests.
> These should be factored out
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger
# Please include the string: [perl #34530]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34530 >
> The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests.
> These should be factored out
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger
# Please include the string: [perl #34529]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34529 >
> The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests.
> These should be factored out
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger
# Please include the string: [perl #34528]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34528 >
> The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests.
> These should be factored out
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger
# Please include the string: [perl #34527]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34527 >
> The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests.
> These should be factored ou
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been checking that my md5sum library still works after a few
> months,
I've now checked in the whole MD5 stuff, slightly modifed (whitespace,
cosmetics, converted to a library, fix error with files > 2MB) and a bit
faster (25 times for bigger files
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 5:19 PM +0100 3/19/05, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>1) builtin methods are living in a class namespace e.g.
>>
>> Float."cos"
>> ParrotIO."open" # unimplemented
> I'm way out of the loop and may have been dealt with in prior mail,
> but are we doing re
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since PIR behaviour is ours to define, it can do whatever we want.
> I'm inclined to rule that a plain
> bar()
> is equivalent to:
> current_namespace::bar()
> and as such the PIR compiler should look up the function by name in
> the current na
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:12:58PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> --- Autrijus Tang wrote:
> > Later MakeMakers may have fixed that (not sure), but we're targetting
> > EU::MM 6.17 currently.
>
> I asked on perl-qa and Schwern gave a helpful reply, shown below.
> I've pushed this thread back to the
34 matches
Mail list logo
