I'll reply to the rest of this (if someone doesn't beat me to it)
tomorrow, but just wanted to comment on your closing comment:
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 22:25 -0700, jerry gay wrote:
that's an install tree
policy, and as far as i'm concerned, it hasn't been addressed yet
(along with many other
Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
We could always do the 12th AND the 16th, just for fun and bonus
productivity (if everyone isn't exhausted from a day of hacking and
three days of conference)? ;-)
I'm also flexible. 12th and 16th sounds good to me.
I've booked to arrive in Copenhagen on the
I wrote up a summary and some notes and posted at
http://www.dlugosz.com/Perl6/web/code.html.
Can we come to a definitive statement of the Callable/Code/Block/Routine
types, relative to the hints that are in the synopses thus far?
What I would like to do is get a consensus to write this up
Since now STD.pm parses most Perl 6 code now, and spits out a parse tree
in YAML, a brave soul might want to write a syntax hilighter for Perl 6.
I volunteer to write a HTML backend for it ;-)
I think it basically involves walking the YAML generated tree, keep
track of a few variables and emit a
Allison Randal wrote:
Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
We could always do the 12th AND the 16th, just for fun and bonus
productivity (if everyone isn't exhausted from a day of hacking and
three days of conference)? ;-)
I'm also flexible. 12th and 16th sounds good to me.
I've booked to arrive
2008/7/28 jerry gay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:08:06AM -0700, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
In the source repository, the 'parrot' in runtime/parrot/foo is
pointless. It's a singleton directory, and
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Jul 28 13:00:02 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with
# New Ticket Created by Adrian Kreher
# Please include the string: [perl #57356]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57356
If I iterate a filehandle, it dies with this stacktrace. This would be very
Adrian Kreher (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Adrian Kreher
# Please include the string: [perl #57356]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57356
If I iterate a filehandle, it dies with this
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
In the course of working on unit tests in the 'parallel' branch, I came
across this inline comment in config/gen/makefiles.pm:
# Why is this here? I'd think this information belongs
# in the CFLAGS.in file. -- A.D. March 12, 2004
# New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
# Please include the string: [perl #57358]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57358
Hi,
The attached patch allows testing of parrot to be parallelized via
setting an
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:43 AM, via RT Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
# Please include the string: [perl #57358]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57358
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# from James Keenan via RT
# on Sunday 27 July 2008 18:45:
It appears that this test assumes (multiple times perhaps?) that it
may make named files in /tmp/.
Are you saying that making named files in /tmp (or any other
Eric Wilhelm (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
# Please include the string: [perl #57358]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57358
Hi,
The attached patch allows testing of
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Moritz Lenz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Wilhelm (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
# Please include the string: [perl #57358]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL:
Geoffrey Broadwell via RT schrieb:
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 13:13 +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
+stat $I0, conf_file, 0
+if $I0 goto conf
+
+# If installed into /usr/lib/parrot, not /usr/runtime/parrot
+# This logic has to be reversed when installed versions should
run faster
+
Will Coleda wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Moritz Lenz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Wilhelm (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm
# Please include the string: [perl #57358]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL:
On Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:36 Moritz Lenz wrote:
t/steps/auto_attributes-01.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 9
Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 12 tests but ran 9.
t/steps/auto_headers-03.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 8
Failed: 0)
# from Moritz Lenz
# on Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:
That's not -just- with the patch, though, is it? I presume you've
set TEST_JOBS to be something other than '1' ...
I've set it to 2, and obeserve the errors below. With serial testing I
get a PASS (r29828).
Yes. TEST_JOBS=1 doesn't change
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# from Moritz Lenz
# on Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:
That's not -just- with the patch, though, is it? I presume you've
set TEST_JOBS to be something other than '1' ...
I've set it to 2, and obeserve the errors below. With
- Original Message -
From: Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To properly support $tcl_precision in tcl, I need to change how I'm
currently implementing {$tcl_precision == 0}. Right now, I just fake
it by setting the precision to 16, but that isn't right.
where something like
{expr
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Moritz Lenz
# on Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:
That's not -just- with the patch, though, is it? I presume you've
set TEST_JOBS to be something other than '1' ...
I've set it to 2, and obeserve the errors below. With serial testing I
get a PASS (r29828).
Yes.
# from Moritz Lenz
# on Monday 28 July 2008 13:02:
With enough RAM everything is fair game ;-)
I ran it with $n == 20, and identified this list of files:
Yes. My reading of Parrot::Configure suggests that there's no tempdir
involved, which would need to be done per-process.
The alternative is
On Mon Jul 28 10:48:21 2008, particle wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tests need to be written defensively for arbitrary parallelization to be
possible.
The configuration step tests have been evolving for 13 months now, but
until today
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:13 PM, James Keenan via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon Jul 28 10:48:21 2008, particle wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tests need to be written defensively for arbitrary parallelization to be
possible.
The
25 matches
Mail list logo
