A good place to start is by adding POD to the tutorial files already in
the directory. I added POD to many, but not to all. In r22071, I added a
one sentence descriptions this illustrates X to the files that had no
POD, which could be expanded into full descriptions.
On 11/08/07, Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:00:33PM +0200, Paul Cochrane wrote:
Within the past few months we've standardized on always quoting
type names in PIR, so the above needs to read
$P1 = new 'String'
Throughout Parrot you'll
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44553]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44553
This patch adds a new tutorial file, 56_defined.pir, which talks about the
concept
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0700, Colin Kuskie wrote:
This patch adds a new tutorial file, 56_defined.pir, which talks
about the concept of definedness.
...
+=head1 defined
+
+The defined function tells you if the contents of a PMC register is defined
or not.
Within the past few months we've standardized on always quoting
type names in PIR, so the above needs to read
$P1 = new 'String'
Throughout Parrot you'll find lots of examples and code that
use older deprecated syntaxes -- they should probably be
changed to the new syntax as well
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:00:33PM +0200, Paul Cochrane wrote:
Within the past few months we've standardized on always quoting
type names in PIR, so the above needs to read
$P1 = new 'String'
Throughout Parrot you'll find lots of examples and code that
use older deprecated
James E Keenan wrote:
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
hi,
I've started a bit on a PIR tutorial on the wiki.
If anybody can spare a few moments, some feedback would be very welcome!
I am very glad to see this. One suggestion and one request for
clarification:
1. First bullet point in FAQ should
hi,
I've started a bit on a PIR tutorial on the wiki.
If anybody can spare a few moments, some feedback would be very welcome!
regards,
kjs
On 3/8/07, Klaas-Jan Stol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I've started a bit on a PIR tutorial on the wiki.
If anybody can spare a few moments, some feedback would be very welcome!
I don't really have any feedback on what you have, but for what
you don't have:
1. docs/compiler_faq.pod teaches
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
hi,
I've started a bit on a PIR tutorial on the wiki.
If anybody can spare a few moments, some feedback would be very welcome!
I am very glad to see this. One suggestion and one request for
clarification:
1. First bullet point in FAQ should be: What does PIR stand
10 matches
Mail list logo