Technically speaking, it's mojibake.
Larry
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 7:34 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users <
perl6-users@perl.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Windows 10 Pro - 21H2
> RakudoMoar-2022.06.01-win-x86_64-msvc.msi
>
> > raku -v
> Welcome to RakudoΓäó v2022.06.
> Implementing the Raku® Programm
ny(3,4))
: any(True, False)
:
: > ? (3.ACCEPTS(any(3,4)))
: True
:
: -y
:
:
: On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:38 PM Larry Wall wrote:
:
: > On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 10:18:13PM -0400, yary wrote:
: > : This came up in today's Raku study group (my own golfing-)
: >
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 10:18:13PM -0400, yary wrote:
: This came up in today's Raku study group (my own golfing-)
:
: > ? (any(4,3) ~~ 3)
: True
: > ? (3 ~~ any(4,3))
: True
: > given any(4,3) { when 3 {say '3'}; say 'nope'}
: nope
: > given 3 { when any(4,3) {say '3'}; say 'nope'}
: 3
: > given
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 01:14:09PM -0300, Aureliano Guedes wrote:
: > This seems pretty convenient and intuitive. At least, it is possible
: > to mimic that behavior in Raku:
: >
: > List.^find_method('split').wrap: { $^a.map: *.split($^b) }
: > List.^find_method('sin').wrap: *.map
the attendees at
: a conference are the people on stage, being attended-to by the
: attendants sitting down below them.
:
:
:
: On 9/1/20, Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 03:12:26PM -0700, yary wrote:
: > : I have a quibble there. 1st & 2nd sentences disagree slightly by
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:05:53PM -0700, yary wrote:
: I like this better for alpha counter
:
: raku -e "for (1..4) { say (BEGIN $ = 'AAA')++ }"
:
: with BEGIN, the assignment of AAA happens once. With the earlier ||= it
: checks each time through the loop.
: -y
Careful with that, though, since
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 03:12:26PM -0700, yary wrote:
: I have a quibble there. 1st & 2nd sentences disagree slightly by going from
: active to passive voice. "Caller, the one who calls" vs "object on which
: that method is being called"
:
: Suggestion for 2nd sentence "The invocant of a method wo
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:12:34AM +0200, Tobias Boege wrote:
: I have no idea if this attribute or the format
: for the 'prec' key in particular are standardized.
The whole point of providing equiv/tighter/looser was to avoid
standardizing absolute precedence levels. That being said, I
don't see
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 04:32:02PM -0500, Brad Gilbert wrote:
: In the above two cases ff and fff would behave identically.
:
: The difference shines when the beginning marker can look like the end
: marker.
The way I think of it is this: You come to the end of "ff" sooner, so you
do the end tes
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 09:38:31PM -0700, William Michels via perl6-users wrote:
: Hello,
:
: I ran across this 2010 Perl(5) article on the Oracle Linux Blog:
:
: "The top 10 tricks of Perl one-liners"
: https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/the-top-10-tricks-of-perl-one-liners-v2
:
: Q1. Now that it's
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:15:06AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: Maybe if I actually put a Chinese character in like 楽 it will leave it in
UTF-8?
Oops, actually, now that I think about it, 楽 (raku) is a Japanese-only
character.
The Chinese equivalents are traditional 樂 and simplified 乐.
I really
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:04:45PM -0400, yary wrote:
: Larry's answer came through my browser with munged Unicode, it looks like
: this
:
: [image: image.png]
: - with the Chinese character for "garlic" after the word "values"
I wrote the Unicode equivalent of:
%hash-with-arrays.values>>[].
e use this as a hack that works to 10
: levels deep:
:
: my %hash-with-arrays = a => [1,2], b => [3,4];
: sub postfix:<[**]> ($arg) { $arg[*;*;*;*;*;*;*;*;*;*]}
: say %hash-with-arrays.values[**].flat # (1 2 3 4)
:
: On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 7:46 PM Larry Wall wrote:
: >
: >
You can also do a hyper descalarize if you're into that sort of thing:
%hash-with-arrays.values»[].flat
Larry
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 02:03:23AM -0700, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
: On 10/13/18 3:02 AM, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
: >Hi All,
: >
: > if $StdOut { $ReturnStr = $$proc.out.slurp-rest; }
: >
: >gives me
: >
: > Malformed UTF-8
: >
: >How do I clean up $$proc.out.slur
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:47:40AM -0400, Curt Tilmes wrote:
: Adding it gives more information to the consumers of that routine,
: the people reading it, the compiler optimizing use of the routine,
: and the runtime execution which will validate the return and throw an
: exception for you if it is
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 09:35:08PM +0200, JJ Merelo wrote:
: El jue., 4 oct. 2018 21:21, Brandon Allbery escribió:
:
: > I don't think we've reached the point of such conventions yet. And there's
: > some history here, in --> not having done anything in the early days except
: > possibly slow thi
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Trey Harris wrote:
: Right; that's what I meant by "stylistically" — a `--> Mu` can highlight
: that something is being returned (and that side-effects are not the primary
: purpose), while nothing indicates that the return value, though it exists,
: is inc
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:28:01PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: On 10/2/18 11:23 AM, Ralph Mellor wrote:
: >So, to recap: a postfix `[]` acts on whatever is on its left,
: >pulling out elements from the thing on its left, treated as
: >a list like thing, with the elements selected according to
: >t
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 04:02:15AM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: Hi All,
:
: https://docs.perl6.org/routine/join#(List)_routine_join
:
: method join(List:D: $separator --> Str:D)
:
: $ p6 'say (1, ).join("|");'
: 1|a b c
:
:
: It states in the manual that this will happen.
:
: Questions:
:
:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 03:50:31PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: On 9/27/18 12:40 AM, Laurent Rosenfeld via perl6-users wrote:
: > > I am NOT asking it to limit my request to Infinity.
: >
: >Yes you are, implicitly. If you don't pass any parameter for
: >$limit, $limit will take the default value s
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:16:26PM -0400, Parrot Raiser wrote:
: Would it be correct to say:
: [ ] aka square brackets, always surround the subscript of an array or
: list, i.e. here "n: is an integer, [n] always means the nth item,
: while
: ( ), round brackets or parentheses, separate and group
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:40:13AM -0700, Joseph Brenner wrote:
: Sounds good, thanks.
Well, yes, *sounds* good. :-)
Monkey patching is allowed but discouraged in Perl 6, because Ruby.
Larry
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 06:45:33PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: Hi All,
:
: I have been doing a bunch with regex's lately.
: I just throw them out based on prior experience
: and they most all work now. I only sometimes have to
: ask for help. (The look forward () feature
: is sweet.)
:
: Anywa
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 06:37:34PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: Hi All,
:
: \L
: \N
I don't really know what you mean by those.
Regex switches are things like :i for case insensitivity. They're also
called regex modifiers or regex options. They always start with colon.
Something with a backsla
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 06:12:15PM -0400, Vadim Belman wrote:
: Though technically this aspect was clear to me, but to settle things down in
my mind completely: for now ordinary (not 'our') sub belongs not to the package
object but to the block which belongs to that package. Is it correct way to
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 09:30:51PM +0200, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
: The combination of “->” and “{ }” is sometimes referred to as a “pointy
block”, or even maybe just a “pointy”.
Note that "pointy" is specifically referring to the syntax here, not the
semantics. People use other terms when th
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:15:02AM -0700, Todd Chester wrote:
: Also, did you answer my question about "::" and did it
: just go over my head?
The implication was that "::" didn't change, but the default package
scoping of p5 that you're relying on is no longer the default in p6.
: The p5 guys us
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:28:27PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: Okay, foul!
:Str:D: Cool:D $needle
: why is there not a comma between "Str:D:" and "Cool:D"?
: And what is with the extra ":". By chance is the extra ":"
: a confusing way of using a comma for a separator?
Well, "confusing" is ki
Basically, ignore any advice to treat Nil as a normal value, because
it really is intended to represent the *absence* of a value as much as
possible. It's a bit like the way solid-state electronics treats "holes"
as if they were real particles, and gets away with it much of the time.
But not all t
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 03:47:46AM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: In Perl, what is the proper terminology?
We're not picky, since Perl has never made a hard and fast distinction
between routines that return values and routines that don't. You can call
them all functions or routines or procedures in
Oh, I guess Timo suggested .defined. I should relearn to read, now that
I can see again...
Larry
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:42:20AM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: How do I clean this up for use with Perl 6?
:
: $ perl -E 'say index("abc", "z") == -1 ? "False" : "True"'
: False
I'm a little bit surprised nobody suggested the most basic method:
say index("abc", "z").defined ?? "True" !! "Fa
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 11:45:58AM -0500, Stephen Wilcoxon wrote:
: Why the change in die handling between Perl 5 and 6? Suppressing line
: numbers with newline was very handy. Alternatively, adding some sort of
: directive would be more straight-forward (at least for Perl 5 users moving
: to Per
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:58:01PM -0700, Brent Laabs wrote:
: -c does compile time warnings, not runtime warnings. You can't make
: runtime warnings appear at compile time without using a BEGIN block.
That's perhaps a bit oversimplified, since in this case the warning is
coming out of the optimi
I'd probably just write something like:
s:g { « <( 0+ )> \d+ » } = '';
The first <( and the last » are not strictly necessary, but add clarity, or
at least balance. But in golf mode you could get away with something like:
sg/«0+)>\d//;
Larry
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 07:23:45PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: Follow up: based on Yary's wonderful advice, this is my keeper
: on the subject:
:
:
:
: perl6: what is the name of the subroutine you are currently in:
:
: It is:
: &?ROUTINE.name
: callframe(0).code.name
:
: $ p6 'sub
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 03:31:07PM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: Hi All,
:
: This seems like a trivial question, but I really adore
: the "for" loops. Is there a way to do the backwards?
: In other words, start at the end of the array and loop
: to the beginning? Does the "next" and "last" work i
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:44:12AM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: "abcrd-12.3.4" would be five letters, six numbers, and one
: I don't care.
Here's another approach:
$ p6 '"abcrd-12.3.4".comb.classify(*.uniprop).say'
{Ll => [a b c r d], Nd => [1 2 3 4], Pd => [-], Po => [. .]}
$ p6 '"
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 01:43:44AM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: The worst thing I had problems with in Perl was folks telling it
: was "Lexiconical". What? I wish they would have also said "which
: means Perl figures out your variables type on the fly, so you don't
: have to type cast everything"
The most detailed description of ... is still to be found starting down a few
paragraphs in the https://design.perl6.org/S03.html#List_infix_precedence
section.
In general the operators have not suffered as much "spec rot" as some other
parts
of the "speculations" known as Synopses, so most of S0
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:25:42AM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
: So as to make this not entirely content-free: I would suggest that the
: string language note the line on which it sees a bare newline, and if it
: subsequently hits a syntax error while still parsing that string it could
: output s
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 05:02:40PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
: Using the caller() in Perl 5 one can figure out if the file was loaded
: as a module or executed as a script.
:
: In Python one could check if __name__ is equal to "__main__".
:
: Is there some way in Perl 6 to tell if a file was exec
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 06:27:07AM -0500, Brandon Allbery wrote:
: If this were Haskell it'd be ByteString. But it's Perl 6 and byte arrays
: are too much of a PITA at present, since you can't do string-y things with
: them sensibly.
The currently suggested workaround is to temporarily pretend the
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 08:39:52PM -0800, ToddAndMargo wrote:
: Are there any special rules, like in Perl 5? Do I need to
: pre-declare the sub?
:
: sub BummerDude ($);
: sub BummerDude ($) { do something; }
For normal subs, you never have to predeclare, because the calling syntax can
assume an u
06:31 < [Coke]> iBakeCake: latest message on perl6-users about log(23,0) seems
to be something in your current wheelhouse
06:32 < iBakeCake> [Coke]: what is it?
06:32 < iBakeCake> Isn't log base 0 undefined
06:32 < moritz> log to base 0?
06:32 < [Coke]>
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.u
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 07:57:34PM +0200, mimosinnet wrote:
: @opposite = @opposite.sort({@$^a[3]});
I'd probably write that as:
@opposite .= sort: { $^a[3] }
or maybe just
@opposite .= sort( *[3] );
Larry
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:39:30AM -0400, yary wrote:
: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Brandon Allbery
: wrote:
: > I was explaining why some "symbols" are acceptable to the parser. Which
: one
: > is more appropriate is not my call,
:
: I was thinking about what exactly are valid identifiers i
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:54:42PM +0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
: Hi,
: In S05, I found:
: "Although the default |<.ws>| subrule recognizes no comment
: construct, any grammar is free to override the rule. The |<.ws>|
: rule is not intended to mean the same thing everywhere."
:
: I was looking
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:50:21PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
: On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Brandon Allbery
: wrote:
: > Oh, they are resumable exceptions? Useful but rather high cost I'd think.
: > (Granting that perl6 isn't one of those languages that think exceptions
: > should be norma
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:32:29PM +0200, Theo van den Heuvel wrote:
: Thanks Larry for the answer and the great language.
:
: It is quite ok for me to start alphabetically. I use the funny char
: to indicate a particular aspect shared by a bunch of subs operators
: and methods.
: So I tried:
:
:
You have to write it like this:
class Foo {
method ::('❤') { "mem heart".say }
}
my Foo $foo .= new;
$foo.'❤'();
Other than that, only names beginning alphabetically are allowed.
You could work around this on the caller end with a postfix:<❤>, but
that would be an operator,
I got tired of this FAQ, so I just made it work by using $_ as the
loop variable in the implementation of grep, so that an accidentally
returned regex still sees a $_ to make it happy. Running slower is
already sufficient punishment. :)
Larry
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 03:09:07PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: If you want to extract it from the scalar, use the @ again, this
: time as a prefix:
:
: for @$s { } # two iterations again.
Note that this distinction will go away after the Great List Refactor,
so Gabor gets his wish. Part of the G
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 06:31:30PM +0200, mt1957 wrote:
: L.s.,
:
: I found a small problem when writing a piece of grammar. A
: simplified part of it is shown here;
: ...
: token tag-body { ~ }
: token body-start { '[' }
: token body-end { ']' }
: token body-text { .*? }
: ...
:
A coupl
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:25:25AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote:
: Sorry for the noise.
No need to apologize--I thought it was interesting.
Larry
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 10:40:16AM +0100, Philip Hazelden wrote:
: Hi,
:
: I'm trying to create a one-element array containing a hash. I eventually
: managed to do this from the REPL, but when I create a script containing the
: same commands, it doesn't work.
:
: $ cat test.p6
: my %h = (
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:28:02AM -0500, Parrot Raiser wrote:
: It's not really a constant he wants, but a value that's read-only to
: everything but the setting routine. Some sort of object, perhaps?
Any parameter to sub MAIN is readonly by default, since parameters
in general are readonly by de
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:05:35PM +1100, Jacinta Richardson wrote:
:sub MAIN($terms = 35, $maximum = 4_000_000) {
: my @sequence = gather for fibonacci($maximum) -> $number {
: state $count = 0;
: take $number if $number < $maximum && $count++ < $terms;
:
In addition what Will said, you don't have to write \c[0xFFFD], since \xFFFD
should do the same.
Larry
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:21:52AM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:15, Smylers wrote:
:
: >
: > For the benefit of Perl 5 programmers used to string reverse it would be
: > nice to have a warning if reverse is invoked with exactly one string
: > argument (but not with a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:28:47PM -0400, Minimiscience wrote:
> I have a Perl 6 function currently written in the form:
>
> sub func($x) {
> for @data -> $datum {
> if condition($datum, $x) ff * {
># Do various things
> }
> }
> # Do various other things
>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:39:02PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
: Daniel (>), Leon (>>), Daniel (>>>):
: >>> Then why is it that .get works fine for $*IN?
: >>>
: >>> while $*IN.get -> $line {
: >>> say $line
: >>> }
: >>>
: >>
: >> Because you're using a while loop instead of a for loop ;-)
: >
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:43:47PM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
: On Wed, 2009-25-03 at 09:39 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:54:34AM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
: > : On Wed, 2009-25-03 at 22:45 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
: > : > Additionally, while you
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:54:34AM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
: On Wed, 2009-25-03 at 22:45 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
: > Additionally, while you recommended Camelia for Rakudo, my
: > understanding was that Larry was recommending it for Perl 6 rather than
: > Rakudo.
This is correc
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 01:33:41PM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
: I was unaware of mysogyny in the perl community. I'm sorry to hear
: about it.
In general it's not overt as it is in other communities, or even
intended--I think we do pretty well, in fact--but it's easy to
discourage people unintenti
Oh, I forgot to mention that Camelia's larval form was a dromedary,
and she's actually got a wingspan of about 3 meters. You really
don't want to get her mad. (It is rumored that she has a very
small hump, but if so, she shows it only to her close friends.)
She was genetically engineered while me
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:49:42AM -0700, Jon Lang wrote:
: 2009/3/24 Larry Wall :
: > http://www.wall.org/~larry/camelia.pdf
:
: Cute. I do like the hyper-operated smiley-face.
:
: What I'd really like to see, though, is a logo that speaks to Perl's
: linguistic roots. Th
http://www.wall.org/~larry/camelia.pdf
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:27:56AM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
: * Aristotle Pagaltzis [2009-01-02 23:00]:
: > That way, you get this combination:
: >
: > sub pid_file_handler ( $filename ) {
: > # ... top half ...
: > yield;
: > # ... bottom half ...
: > }
:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:46:09PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
>>
>>> However, I came across one thing in solution #3 that I posted
>>> yesterday. $pair.fmt(&quo
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:55:38AM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> However, I came across one thing in solution #3 that I posted yesterday.
> $pair.fmt("%s %s") is nice, but it doesnt allow for any action on either
> value or key before printing (I wanted to print the value as a
> percenta
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:26:23PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> S12 defines enums and rakudo impliments them, so
> perl6
> > enum wkend <>; my $x = Sun; say $x
> 1
>
> But suppose I want to get the "face value" of $x, viz., 'Sun'?
>
> How do I get it?
>
> say $x.key doesnt work.
Why not just
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 04:24:08PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> my ($name,@list) = .split /\,/;
That shouldn't parse, because .split should not be looking for an
argument list. (And, in fact, STD rejects it.) You need one of:
my ($name,@list) = .split: /\,/;
my ($name,@list) = .
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 04:41:30PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Supposed I define
>
> regex digit { [0..9] }
>
> what is the negative?
You need to be careful about what you mean here by "negative". If you mean
"match
a single character that is not in the list", then it is as Patrick said.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:26:50PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> More precisely, I dont understand the meaning of the ':' after '.sort'
It is turning the method call into a list operator, essentially.
It's not the so-called indirect object syntax, or it would be written:
my @ranking = so
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:06:31PM -0800, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
: Meaning, the gather/take syntax doesn't make much sense, because we're
: not "gathering" anything; the PID file handler has nothing to return.
: We'd only be using it for the "side effect" of being able to pause the
: callee's ex
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:03:55PM +0100, Carl Mäsak wrote:
: Илья (>):
: > I have array ref
: > my $ar = [1,2,3];
: > how can I go over it?
:
: All I know is that `for $ar.elems { ... }` used to work for this case.
: It doesn't seem to work anymore.
:
: Time to file a ticket, methinks.
Er, .ele
By the by, I don't know what you're using to send mail, but it's a
bit difficult to extract URIs from your message when most of them are
broken by autowrapping. This will be a more frequent problem as long
as the average length of URIs in the world is growing, so it's probably
worth dealing with.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:45:24AM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote:
: Hi,
:
: If system() is now called run()
:
: What replaces backtick or qx{} ?
qqx[] or qq:x[] would be the exact equivalent. qx[] or q:x[] would
be the same with single-quote semantics. (There are probably no
backticks for that purp
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:26:35PM +0100, James Fuller wrote:
: oh ya and the ability to mate right we can
: leave the last one off ;)
No we can't. That is *precisely* what this whole business of derivable
grammars is about, and it came about because you couldn't mate two
source filters in P
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:03:03AM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> No one likes bureacracy. But I feel much happier about handing over money,
> or persuading someone else to hand over money, to a group of people with
> established procedures and collective responsibility, than to some
> enthu
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:07:14PM +0100, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
: I would very strongly prefer to see a focussed effort towards a single
: full implementation.
:
: There are many important benefits to having several implementations,
: including fun and education. But commercially and marketing-wis
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:29:05PM +0100, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
: Then backtracking would happen, or more likely: Perl 6 would die. If
: this community cannot come up with a virtual machine that can handle
: Perl 6, then many people will lose all hope.
Except that the people working on alternative
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:55:28AM +0100, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
: Personally I'm hoping for some extra abstraction in module filenames, to
: allow UTF-8 module names with ASCII filenames.
Already specced. From S02:
In the abstract, Perl is written in Unicode, and has consistent Unicode
s
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 03:00:36PM +0100, Wim Vanderbauwhede wrote:
: On 07/09/2007, Chas Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >
: > On 9/7/07, Wim Vanderbauwhede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > > The following program works fine in pugs r17041 (which is the rev of
: > > /usr/bin/pugs on feather):
: >
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:37:13PM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
: One approach would simply be to edit Perl-6.0.0-STD.pm and add some
: markup. To pick a token at random:
:
: =p6explain *
: An asterix in a version expression matches any version
: =end
: token whatever { '*' {*} }
Indeed, the example
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:22:49PM +0100, Carl Mäsak wrote:
: gabriele (>):
: >I wonder: why does take inside a gather structure returns undef?
: >I think it would be nicer if it could return the taken value, so that,
: >for example one can write something like:
: >
: > say take 2
: >
: >or like:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:40:44PM +0200, Gaal Yahas wrote:
: > I think it should be possible and nice to use a macro (possibly a
: > standard subroutine, I'm not sure) like
: >
: > testing {
: > ok foo;
: > }
: >
: > would it make sense or I'm just crazy?
:
: I like the approach.
I think you
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:26:41AM -0600, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
: Ovid wrote:
: (reversed the message a bit)
: > is 'b', any('a' .. 'h'), 'junctions should work';
:
: This looks like a Test "bug"; it's doing something like:
:
:is 'b', 'a' # not ok
:is 'b', 'b' # ok
:is 'b', 'c' #
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 11:31:33AM -0800, Ovid wrote:
: In trying to compress a list, I wrote the following code:
:
: my $compress = do {
: my $previous;
: $compress = -> $x {
: if !defined $previous or $x ne $previous {
: $previous = $x;
: $x;
:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Gaal Yahas wrote:
: L stipulates the
: results of a gather are flattened to a lazy list. I'm not sure how far
: that flattenning goes, but one of these should do the trick, I think
It would only flatten a recursive structure with the help of something
that
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:34:47AM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-21 15:24 (-0700):
: > : > That is, empty .[] has the same arrayifying semantics as @. (This is
: > : > currently b0rken in pugs though.) Likewise .{} is equivalen to %.
: > : Nice, but what'
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:10:04AM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-20 16:34 (-0700):
: > That should work but my preference is just
: > my @bar = $q.param[];
: > That is, empty .[] has the same arrayifying semantics as @. (This is
: > currently b0rken in
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:43:41AM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: > my @bar = @{ $q->param->{ 'bar' } };
:
: my @bar = $q.param.'@';
: my @bar = @ $q.param;
That should work but my preference is just
my @bar = $q.param[];
That is, empty .[] has the same arrayifying semantics as @. (This is
curr
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:16:32PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
: And in fact, I expect that PBP was written to be forward compatible
: to Perl 6, as it could describe styles that should be natural in Perl
: 6, even if less so in Perl 5.
Indeed, I know for a fact that it was. (Though the treatme
Okay, combining all these approaches minimalistically but without
golfing we get something like:
my @numbers = sort { rand }, constant @goal = 1..9;
my $steps = 0;
until @numbers ~~ @goal {
say [EMAIL PROTECTED];
@numbers[ 0 ..^ prompt "Reverse how many? " ] .= reverse;
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:27:57PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
: * Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-18 19:05]:
: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:18:52PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
: > : Maybe TheLarry can enlighten us… :-)
: >
: > We already have the operator you wa
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:18:52PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
: Maybe TheLarry can enlighten us… :-)
We already have the operator you want. It's spelled C. :-)
Larry
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:51:09AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
: On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:12:12PM -0400, Matt Todd wrote:
: > I really like these. I think you're on to something. I'm definitely in
: > favor of Momi Wiki, or just Momi.
:
: Just 'Momi' sounds good, I really like it.
Hmm, 'Momi' will
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
