Good day,
I operate a web-hosting/colocation/game server hosting company with a
generous amount of available banwidth. I have a OpenBSD bridge firewalling
my network but after reading about the 'Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs with
pf and ALTQ' I began to realize that there may be more I can do to sp
Dennis wrote:
"FREE" isnt really cheaper when you spend $1000's worth of your time
to make it work, and then end up with an inferior solution when you're
done.
-1, Troll
This is a pf list. pf does not require investing $1000s worth of your
time to "make it work." pf is not an inferior solution.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dennis wrote:
> "FREE" isnt really cheaper when you spend $1000's worth of your time to
> make it work, and then end up with an inferior solution when you're
> done.
I think, if you need $1000s worth of time figuring this out, perhaps you
shouldn't be doing this kind of stuff
bandwidth management tool it's
quite inferior. Priority queuing is an archaic, inferior technology,
if you can call it a technology.
The subject here is "pf/altq" on a fast link. How does it perform on a
gigabit wire with stats gathering and limits configured for 5000
hosts? How does
o "make it work." pf is not an inferior solution.
> >
> > Go peddle your "p2p sniffer" and your lies elsewhere.
>
> openbsd-pf is a good firewall. But as a bandwidth management tool it's
> quite inferior. Priority queuing is an archaic, inferior tech
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dennis
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Houx) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Good Day Anthony and pf list
>
On 05 Jun 2003 09:25:20 -0700, Dennis wrote:
> openbsd-pf is a good firewall. But as a bandwidth management tool it's
> quite inferior. Priority queuing is an archaic, inferior technology,
> if you can call it a technology.
>
> The subject here is "pf/altq" on a fas
n 2003 17:09:42 -0400
> From: Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Wouter Clarie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
>
> At 03:48 AM 06/05/2003, you wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dennis wrote:
> >
> > > "FREE" isn
> > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:09:42 -0400
> > From: Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Wouter Clarie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
> >
> > At 03:48 AM 06/05/2003, you wrote:
> >
> > >On Wed, 4 Jun
t.
//Wouter
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:09:42 -0400
From: Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wouter Clarie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
At 03:48 AM 06/05/2003, you wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dennis wrote:
"FREE" isnt real
Go here:
http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html
Daniel wrote a great article about just how to do this.
Can't help with "real world" examples, but that should point you in the
right direction.
Note, you will need openbsd 3.3 to accomplish this
scott
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Tony Faoro wrote:
>
> Goo
Tony Faoro wrote:
If anyone out there would be so kind as to share a pf.conf they are using
in a similar circumstance that would be great. I'm somewhat new to the
packet prioritizing world and would love some real world examples you all
have had success with.
Hi.
You can find further information
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:01:34AM -0700, Tony Faoro wrote:
>
> Good day,
>
> I operate a web-hosting/colocation/game server hosting company with a
> generous amount of available banwidth. I have a OpenBSD bridge firewalling
> my network but after reading about the 'Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs wi
Good Day Anthony and pf list
As everyone already covered some very good points and some good links. I
thought I would pass along something that would get you started.
Basically I work for a ISP/LEC and we have started using OpenBSD for
traffic shaping on customers that we will run some fiber to
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 8:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:01:34AM -0700, Tony Faoro wrote:
>
> Good day,
>
> I operate a web-hosting/colocation/game server hosting company with a
> generous amount of available ban
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 10:06:25PM +0100, Dom De Vitto wrote:
> As usual, Henning is right, but I'd add that (assuming that the ALTQ+
> PF code is negligible) some protocols may be better, even with plenty
> of available bandwidth.
>
> For example, you could say that TCP SYN,SYN+ACK and ACK packet
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Henning Brauer
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Houx) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Good Day Anthony and pf list
>
> As everyone already covered some very good points and some good links. I
> thought I would pass along something that would get you started.
> Basically I work for a ISP/LEC and we have
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 06:20:23AM -0700, Dennis wrote:
> If you get serious about bandwidth management, take a look at
> something a bit more advanced at a very affordable price. Our software
blah blah blah. what a bullshit. take your commercial advertising crap
elsewhere.
--
Henning Brauer, B
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 10:55, Henning Brauer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 06:20:23AM -0700, Dennis wrote:
> > If you get serious about bandwidth management, take a look at
> > something a bit more advanced at a very affordable price. Our software
>
> blah blah blah. what a bullshit. take your c
On 1 Jun 2003, Dennis wrote:
> If you get serious about bandwidth management, take a look at
> something a bit more advanced at a very affordable price. Our software
grrr. I think you miss the total point - we don't want to regulate p2p
traffic for a sub-AS network we just want to cap their tota
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dennis
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
[EMAIL PR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henning Brauer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 06:20:23AM -0700, Dennis wrote:
> > If you get serious about bandwidth management, take a look at
> > something a bit more advanced at a very affordable price. Our software
>
> blah blah blah.
On Mon, 1 Jun 2003, Dennis wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henning Brauer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> > blah blah blah. what a bullshit. take your commercial advertising crap
> > elsewhere.
>
> Sorry. I hate to see people struggle to do simple things. Do you still
> use a hand
, June 01, 2003 6:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henning Brauer) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 06:20:23AM -0700, Dennis wrote:
> > If you get serious about bandwidth management,
Dennis,
I do cut my grass with a hand mower, and wash my clothes in a
stream. But I only trust the best for my company and its employees and
have seen what other "bandwidth management" equipment is out there.
Personally if I use those pricey products (such as yours) and spend
endless a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wouter Clarie) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2003, Dennis wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henning Brauer) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >
> > > blah blah blah. what a bullshit. take your commercial advertising crap
> > > elsewher
:42 -0400
From: Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wouter Clarie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fast link
At 03:48 AM 06/05/2003, you wrote:
>On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dennis wrote:
>
> > "FREE" isnt really cheaper when you spend $1000's worth of your ti
www.devitto.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dennis
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pf/altq on a fas
29 matches
Mail list logo
