Hi Everyone,
It has been a long time since this was brought up. It's time.
Any important concerns should be discussed at (to keep everyone looking at the
same place):
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Forums_at_postgresql.com.au
But also keep general discussion on the mailing list.
-
The
Hi Everyone,
It has been a long time since this was brought up. It's time.
Any important concerns should be discussed at (to keep everyone looking at the
same place):
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Forums_at_postgresql.com.au
But also keep general discussion on the mailing list.
-
The
Sorry folks, this is an old message I forgot to copy pgsql-general on.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com
Date: 21 December 2010 11:48:07 AM AEDT
To: Thom Brown t...@linux.com
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres forums ... take 2
On 21/12/2010, at 11:26 AM
On 31/12/2010, at 12:43 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
I know this topic has gone quiet, I still think it's worth investing
time and resources in. I don't expect any progress to be made until
the new year now, but I hope we can
#undef typename
#ifdef PG_MODULE_MAGIC
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
#endif
};
Now there is no collision with the C++ keywords.
On 26/12/2010, at 5:14 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 12/26/2010 02:14 PM, Elliot Chance wrote:
In file included from /usr/include/pgsql/server/access/heapam.h
Hi everyone,
Is is possible to add handlers so that a C function is fired when a transaction
is committed or rolled back, for example (pseudo code):
BEGIN;
CALL my_function(1);
CALL my_function(2);
CALL my_function(3);
ROLLACK;
my_function()
Create my_file.txt.tmp
Write some information to
Hi everyone,
How do I get the active connection handle from inside a C function linked as a
PL/pgSQL function, like:
Datum pg_do_something(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PGconn *conn = ?
// now do some SELECTs / INSERTs
PG_RETURN_INT32(result);
}
Thanks,
Elliot
--
Sent via pgsql-general
Hi everyone,
From what i've read in the documentation you need funcapi.h to return SETOF
from a C function, the problem is when I include the header file the compile
throws heaps of errors; offending code
1. extern C {
2. #include postgres.h
3. #include fmgr.h
4. #include
I'm trying to link up a C++ project with postgres functions, the following code
compiles (as C++):
extern C {
#include postgres.h
#include fmgr.h
#ifdef PG_MODULE_MAGIC
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
#endif
};
extern C {
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(pg_xversion);
};
Cheers! It works.
On 24/12/2010, at 11:13 PM, Dmitriy Igrishin wrote:
Hey Elliot,
See http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/extend-cpp.html
Probably compiling with -fno-exceptions solve you problem.
2010/12/24 Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com
I'm trying to link up a C
Hi,
Is it possible to do the equivalent of RAISE EXCEPTION inside a C-function?
Like this:
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(check_something);
Datum check_something(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
// RAISE EXCEPTION 'bla bla'
}
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION do_check() RETURNS text AS $$
BEGIN
PERFORM
Hi,
I seem to be having trouble recreating C functions, the source:
=== test.c
#include postgres.h
#include fmgr.h
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
int32 plpgsql_test(text* s) {
return 100;
}
=== end ===
Then compile:
$ cc -fpic -c -I/usr/include/pgsql/server test.c
$ ld -shared -o funcs.so test.o
or reload while the server it
running? I couldn't find anything in the docs about it though.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2010/12/14 Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I seem to be having trouble recreating C functions, the source:
=== test.c
#include postgres.h
#include fmgr.h
2010/12/14 Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I seem to be having trouble recreating C functions, the source:
=== test.c
#include postgres.h
#include fmgr.h
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
int32 plpgsql_test(text* s) {
return 100;
}
=== end ===
Then compile:
$ cc -fpic -c -I/usr
:
On 22 November 2010 14:05, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 16:54, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Elliot Chance wrote:
Also, if someone registers on the forum, do they get a major domo
registration email? ?And if so, would
On 22/11/2010, at 10:22 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
As has been said previously, an unlinked forum (one which has no
interaction with the mailing list) is destined to fail, as others have
in the past. It's creates a fragmented
On 21/11/2010, at 2:59 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:46, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote:
for...@postgresql.com.au is pointed to a black hole so that email
disappears but the mailing list gets another copy. When the mailing list
gets
On 20/11/2010, at 9:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:57, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/11/2010, at 3:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 16:14, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Dave Page's
in the forum system) -- this would solve
Dave's concern.)
That would solve it, yes. I don't think mj2 will allow that though -
we've been looking for something similar for sysadmin use.
So let's patch Mj2.
If we use a pattern like the persons unique username:
Elliot Chance forums-chan
On 20/11/2010, at 11:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:26, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/11/2010, at 9:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:57, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/11/2010, at 3:58 AM, Magnus
Begin forwarded message:
From: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
Date: 20 November 2010 3:58:41 AM AEDT
To: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
Cc: Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com,
pgsql-www pgsql-...@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www
Apple Mail has not been copying the mailing list, so excuse the reposts if you
got one.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com
Date: 19 November 2010 9:18:18 AM AEDT
To: Daniel Verite dan...@manitou-mail.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] The first dedicated PostgreSQL
Apple Mail has not been copying the mailing list, so excuse the reposts if you
got one.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com
Date: 15 November 2010 9:02:43 PM AEDT
To: Thom Brown t...@linux.com
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres forums ... take 2
On 15/11/2010
Apple Mail has not been copying the mailing list, so excuse the reposts if you
got one.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com
Date: 16 November 2010 4:57:27 PM AEDT
To: Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres forums ... take 2
Using the reply to all, thanks.
On 21/11/2010, at 12:32 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:22, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/11/2010, at 11:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:26, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote
On 21/11/2010, at 2:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com writes:
Then I can create a catch-all so that when an email is sent to
forums-chan...@postgresql.com.au it finds the user chancey gets the real
address and sends it on. If there were a way we could register
Apple Mail has not been copying the mailing list, so excuse the reposts if you
got one.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com
Date: 14 November 2010 12:30:19 PM AEDT
To: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum
:15 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 00:00, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/11/2010, at 6:22 AM, Stephen Cook wrote:
On 11/16/2010 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
What I'm more interested in is still a word from the people who would
actually *use* a forum
Alrighty, here are the revised plans for beta3:
--- Changes / Fixes
* Without a doubt everyone one wants the forums to match the mailing lists. I
personally think that this defeats the whole purpose of a forum, but i'm here
to do what the community thinks is best. The extra forums that are not
On 17/11/2010, at 6:22 AM, Stephen Cook wrote:
On 11/16/2010 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
What I'm more interested in is still a word from the people who would
actually *use* a forum on how this would be better than sites like
Nabble and Gmane.
I'm one of those. I'm subscribed to
Hi again,
I've taken in all the feedback about http://forums.postgresql.com.au and the
general consensus is that nobody wants a separate entity - a few people
mentioned that if it was interoperable with the mailing list that it would be
better. So I did.
The concept goes like this;
1. Any
On 15/11/2010, at 8:37 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
On 15 November 2010 08:34, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
I've taken in all the feedback about http://forums.postgresql.com.au and the
general consensus is that nobody wants a separate entity - a few people
mentioned
forum mappings as needed, and I
could add post processing. So for example an email to pgsql-general with the
title perl won't connect will recognise perl and move it to the Languages
Perl.
On 15/11/2010, at 9:42 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:08, Elliot Chance elliotcha
On 16/11/2010, at 2:01 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 15/11/10 17:37, Thom Brown wrote:
That's actually some good work you've done there! I didn't know phpBB
supported bidirectional mailing list support.
Yikes. Neither did I. I've always seen phpBB as the barren wasteland of
web forums -
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the mailing list :)
As of today I have started the first dedicated postgres forum at:
http://forums.postgresql.com.au
I would much appreciate anyone that has the time to sign up and subscribe to
some of the forums ready to answer incoming posts.
Any
35 matches
Mail list logo
