-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:00:29 +0100 Magnus Hagander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I don't really buy the double patching argume
I wrote:
> The answer is "no, it doesn't work":
> $ psql -l
> psql: GSSAPI continuation error: Invalid token was supplied
> GSSAPI continuation error: No error
> $
> This surprises me; I would have thought the protocol was fairly
> orthogonal to the auth method. We should look into it and see
>
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:54:17PM -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Decibel! wrote:
> >
> > Yes, this problem goes way beyond OOM. Just try and configure
> > work_memory aggressively on a server that might see 50 database
> > connections, and do it in such a way that you won't swap. Good luck.
>
> That
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:34:19AM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
>> Is it possible to authenticate using GSSAPI over the V2 protocol? Is
>> there any documentation on the message formats for V2?
> Honestly - don't know :-) Never looked at that part.
I tr
Is it my imagination or the share\locale directory for nls support just does
not get installed on Windows.
(Even with NLS option chosen). It does for 8.2
Regards,
Gevik.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Can I ask when the Feature Freeze for next release will be?
> Also, from http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/faq
> "Q: When will 8.4 come out?
>A: Historically, PostgreSQL has released approximately
> every 12 months and
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:56:48 -0800
Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Can I ask when the Feature Freeze for next release will be?
>
> Also, from http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/faq
>
> "Q: When will 8.4 come out?
>A: Historically, PostgreSQL has released a
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Can I ask when the Feature Freeze for next release will be?
Also, from http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/faq
"Q: When will 8.4 come out?
A: Historically, PostgreSQL has released approximately
every 12 months and there is no desire in the community
to cha
Decibel! wrote:
>
> Yes, this problem goes way beyond OOM. Just try and configure
> work_memory aggressively on a server that might see 50 database
> connections, and do it in such a way that you won't swap. Good luck.
That sounds like an even broader and more difficult problem
than managing memo
On Feb 5, 2008 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 2008 3:24 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:27:05PM +, Pavel Golub wrote:
> >> I think a better solution is to add a parameter to clean.bat to make
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:46:26PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 15:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I cannot see any way of restricting global memory
> > consumption that won't hurt performance and flexibility.
>
> We've discussed particular ways of doing this previously and n
Wouldn't seeing which patches are trickling in during the first months
of 8.4 development give a better indication of when it should be
freezable? I'm all in favor of having lots of advance notice and
predictable schedules --- but it seems in the next month or so we'll
have a lot more insight of
On Feb 5, 2008 8:57 PM, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can I ask when the Feature Freeze for next release will be?
I shall be posting on this topic in the next day or so.
/D
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Can I ask when the Feature Freeze for next release will be?
Last time we discussed this the only date mentioned was end-March-2008,
which is less than 2 months away now.
We've long expressed the wish to move development onto a cycle that ends
in the Spring, so next alternative would appear to be
> The traces from buildfarm baiji seem to indicate that at
> least some NLS files are installed.
>
Those three dots are printed as default. (looking at Install.pm:456)
Regards,
Gevik.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extens
Gevik Babakhani wrote:
Hi,
Is it only on my system or the Install.pm:GenerateNLSFiles just does not
copy any NLS files.
It seems that in Install.pm:468:next.po$/); does not let anything
through.
Can someone please confirm?
The traces from buildfarm baiji seem to indicate that at l
On Feb 5, 2008 6:11 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please go ahead and remove the -i - it's not like users cannot cannot
> > specify which set of pg utilities to use if they need a specific
> > version.
>
> Ok, done!
Thanks.
/D
---(end of broadcast)--
Hi,
Is it only on my system or the Install.pm:GenerateNLSFiles just does not
copy any NLS files.
It seems that in Install.pm:468:next.po$/); does not let anything
through.
Can someone please confirm?
Regards,
Gevik.
---(end of broadcast)---
T
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Does this mean you have GSSAPI auth working for protocol v3? :-)
Yes, but since I'm not terribly familiar with GSSAPI or JAAS, I'm not
sure what configuration options need to get exposed to the user.
http://archives.postgresql
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Does this mean you have GSSAPI auth working for protocol v3? :-)
Yes, but since I'm not terribly familiar with GSSAPI or JAAS, I'm not sure
what configuration options need to get exposed to the user.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/200
Kris Jurka wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:34:19AM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
Is it possible to authenticate using GSSAPI over the V2 protocol? Is
there any documentation on the message formats for V2?
Honestly - don't know :-) Never looked at t
Dave Page wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:27 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:02:03AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
I would be satisfied with that if I thought people would actually read
the message. My complaint is really directed at certain adm
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:34:19AM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
Is it possible to authenticate using GSSAPI over the V2 protocol? Is
there any documentation on the message formats for V2?
Honestly - don't know :-) Never looked at that part. I mean, t
Dave Page wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:24 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:27:05PM +, Pavel Golub wrote:
I think a better solution is to add a parameter to clean.bat to make it
work like "make clean" does. So you'd to "clean" when you mean "make
clean", an
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 17:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Basically I'd rather try to attack the problem with dtrace ...
> OK. I'll switch to Solaris. Or do you something I don't about dtrace on
> linux?
Nope :-(. The SystemTap guys keep promising support fo
"Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I had a thought about how to soften the controversial hard cutoff of 100
> for the use of the histogram selectivity. Instead of switching 100% one way or
> the other between the two heuristics why not calculate both and combine them.
> The larger th
On Feb 5, 2008 3:24 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:27:05PM +, Pavel Golub wrote:
> >
> I think a better solution is to add a parameter to clean.bat to make it
> work like "make clean" does. So you'd to "clean" when you mean "make
> clean", and "clean
On Feb 5, 2008 3:27 PM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:02:03AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I would be satisfied with that if I thought people would actually read
> > > the message. My complaint is really directed at certain admin p
No. It's on the list, but other things around the release haev priority.
//Magnus
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:43:09PM -0800, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> Hi guys any updates on this? Pinging you just so that we do not forget
> it in the heap of mails in our inboxes.
>
> Best regards,
>
> On Feb 3,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:02:03AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> > >> Effect: we would stop receiving complaints that an old pg_dump can talk
> > >> to a server that most
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:34:19AM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> Is it possible to authenticate using GSSAPI over the V2 protocol? Is
> there any documentation on the message formats for V2?
Honestly - don't know :-) Never looked at that part. I mean, the V2
protocol is *really* old by now, isn'
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:27:05PM +, Pavel Golub wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 3909
> Logged by: Pavel Golub
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3RC2
> Operating system: WinXP
> Description:src\tool
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 14:14 +, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 17:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> Basically I'd rather try to attack the problem with dtrace ...
> >
> > OK. I'll switch to Solaris. Or do you something I don't about dtrace on
> > linu
So I had a thought about how to soften the controversial hard cutoff of 100
for the use of the histogram selectivity. Instead of switching 100% one way or
the other between the two heuristics why not calculate both and combine them.
The larger the sample size from the histogram the more we can wei
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:55:40PM +0100, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> > Or we should fix it, if we can figure out why. Is it the fact
> > that it only works with what happens to be the directory
> > layout I use, or is it the space in the filename that's
> > breaking something? Can you test a third
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 17:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Basically I'd rather try to attack the problem with dtrace ...
OK. I'll switch to Solaris. Or do you something I don't about dtrace on
linux?
One idea would be to add new arguments to LWLockAcquire as you suggest,
but in
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>> With the branch delayed they will have to say "Oh, there's a new
>>> release. I wonder when they will branch so I can start building the new
>>> branc
> Or we should fix it, if we can figure out why. Is it the fact
> that it only works with what happens to be the directory
> layout I use, or is it the space in the filename that's
> breaking something? Can you test a third case to figure that out?
>
I think it is the darn msbuild which accept
Gregory Stark wrote:
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
With the branch delayed they will have to say "Oh, there's a new
release. I wonder when they will branch so I can start building the new
branch."
No, I wrote that, not Tom. Your snipping went s
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> With the branch delayed they will have to say "Oh, there's a new
> release. I wonder when they will branch so I can start building the new
> branch."
Doesn't that just mean they should be sure to announce the branch loudly when
i
On Feb 5, 2008 11:50 AM, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This probably wasn't on the core team's horizon - IIRC Dave is the only
> member of core who runs a buildfarm member.
To be honest the zoo beside me didn't even cross my mind when that
thread happened. I didn't pay much attenti
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't really buy the double patching argument. Back patching becomes
more difficult when there has been significant code drit, but we surely
don't expect that much drift in the next week or two. Back patching when
there has been
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:11:42AM +0100, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like report an observations regarding compilation with msvc++
> I was trying to compile with nls=>'C:\Program Files\GnuWin32\' (of course
> with GetText installed and everything)
> The build process breaks on link w
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:57:16AM +, Dave Page wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 9:00 AM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I assume this vote was taken out on -core? I don't mind -core deciding on
> > this, not at all, but I would appreciate it if you would post the result of
> > the vo
On Feb 5, 2008 9:00 AM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume this vote was taken out on -core? I don't mind -core deciding on
> this, not at all, but I would appreciate it if you would post the result of
> the vote on -hackers.
It wasn't a 'vote' in the formal sense. It was just
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't really buy the double patching argument. Back patching becomes
> > more difficult when there has been significant code drit, but we surely
> > don't expect that much drift in the nex
Hi,
I would like report an observations regarding compilation with msvc++
I was trying to compile with nls=>'C:\Program Files\GnuWin32\' (of course
with GetText installed and everything)
The build process breaks on link with missing "Program.obj" error. When I
changed nls='C:\prog\pgsql\depend\get
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:08 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 20:03 +, Gregory Stark wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder how hard it would be to shove the clog into regular shared
> > > memory pages and let the clock sweep take care of adjusting the
> > > percen
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 17:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Basically I'd rather try to attack the problem with dtrace ...
OK. I'll switch to Solaris. Or do you something I don't about dtrace on
linux?
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
---(end of bro
(I really should stop reading the code after 12:00AM)
So if I understand correctly, the proper solution would be to handle the
localized (TM) format
within to_date (seq_search). This means that prior calling to_date a SET
LC_MESSAGES must be given.
but if we are following Oracle,
(http://www.techo
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Nevertheless, I think there's something interesting missing here, which
> is a sort of strftime's %c format string.
I think the Oracle way to do that would be to_char() with one argument and
setting NLS_DATE_FORMAT.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~pe
51 matches
Mail list logo
