Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-11

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Anybody willing to take the hat of the commit fest manager? If nobody, > I am fine to take the hat as default choice this time. And now it is open. Let's the fest begin. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers

[HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-11

Hi all, At the moment of writing this email, it is 9PM AoE (Anywhere on Earth) 31st of October. This means that the next commit fest will begin in 3 hours, and that any hackers willing to register patches for this commit fest have roughly three hours to do so (plus/minus N hours). This current

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 2/1/17 10:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Amit Kapila >> wrote: >> >>> Many thanks to you for running the show. I think it might be okay if >>> one

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On 2/1/17 10:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Amit Kapila wrote: Many thanks to you for running the show. I think it might be okay if one consolidated mail is sent for all the patches that are marked "Returned with Feedback" or "Rejected"

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Amit Kapila wrote: > Many thanks to you for running the show. I think it might be okay if > one consolidated mail is sent for all the patches that are marked > "Returned with Feedback" or "Rejected" or "Moved to next CF". OTOH, > there is

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> The CF finishing soon, I have done a first pass on the patches >> remaining on it, moving patches to the next CF or updating

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > The CF finishing soon, I have done a first pass on the patches > remaining on it, moving patches to the next CF or updating them. There > are still 48 patches still on the tracker when writing this email: > Needs

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > As of the current score of the CF, for a total of 155 patches, 52 have > been committed, 3 rejected and 7 marked as returned with feedback. It > may look low, but actually it is not that bad by experience looking

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

Michael, all, * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: > There is one week left for this commit fest, and now is the time to > push for things that have a chance to get in. As of now, there is a > total of 25 patches waiting for some love from a committer. Many thanks for your work

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier > - Cascading standby cannot catch up and get stuck emitting the same message > repeatedly, a 9.3-only bug fix. Thank you for your hard work as a CFM. For a trivial note, this is

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Here are now the current stats of the patches: > - Needs review: 82. > - Waiting on Author: 18. > - Ready for Committer: 18. > Meaning that some effort is required from committers and reviewers to > get into a

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I changed the status to "In Progress". > > Thanks for covering my absence.

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > I changed the status to "In Progress". Thanks for covering my absence. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

Em sáb, 31 de dez de 2016 às 21:52, Michael Paquier < michael.paqu...@gmail.com> escreveu: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Michael Paquier > > wrote: > > > There are still a couple of days to register patches! So if you don't > > > want your fancy feature to be

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > There are still a couple of days to register patches! So if you don't > want your fancy feature to be forgotten, please add it in time to the > CF app. Speaking of which, I am going to have a low bandwidth soon

[HACKERS] Commit fest 2017-01 will begin soon!

Hi all, As mentioned a couple of weeks back, I am fine to work as commit fest manager for 2017-01. Here is the commit fest status at the moment I am writing this email: Needs review: 68. Waiting on Author: 17. Ready for Committer: 18. Committed: 27. Rejected: 2. Returned with Feedback: 6. Total:

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Thomas Munro > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:15

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Thomas Munro > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Peter Eisentraut >> wrote: >>> On 10/31/16 9:39 PM,

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Peter Eisentraut > wrote: >> On 10/31/16 9:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> We are on the 1st, at least in my timezone. So the CF should start

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 10/31/16 9:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> We are on the 1st, at least in my timezone. So the CF should start >> really soon, meaning that no new patches would get in. In a couple of >> hours that

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

On 10/31/16 9:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > We are on the 1st, at least in my timezone. So the CF should start > really soon, meaning that no new patches would get in. In a couple of > hours that would be fine? I recall that the last times we tried to > sync with the US East coast time.

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut >> wrote: >> > Commit fest CF 2016-11

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut > wrote: > > Commit fest CF 2016-11 is supposed to start in about a day. I don't > > think a commit fest manager was chosen

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Commit fest CF 2016-11 is supposed to start in about a day. I don't > think a commit fest manager was chosen yet. Volunteers? I'd like to pass my turn on this one as CFM, but I can bring in some time

[HACKERS] commit fest manager for CF 2016-11?

Commit fest CF 2016-11 is supposed to start in about a day. I don't think a commit fest manager was chosen yet. Volunteers? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2016-09 is now closed

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > There was something like 60~70 patches still listed as active in the > > CF app on Friday my time, so doing the vacuum

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2016-09 is now closed

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > There was something like 60~70 patches still listed as active in the > CF app on Friday my time, so doing the vacuum cleanup has taken some > time by marking patches as returned with feedback, rejected (few) and >

[HACKERS] Commit fest 2016-09 is now closed

Hi all, Per $subject, I would like to thank on behalf of Fabrizio everybody who has taken the time to send patches, review them and argue about them. This has been by experience the largest commit fest ever, with more than 200 entries in total. The delay in stabilizing 9.6 is likely the

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Gavin Flower wrote: > On 25/12/15 01:45, Michael Paquier wrote: > [...] >> >> And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: >> Committed: 30. >> Moved to next CF: 42. >> Rejected: 9. >> Returned with Feedback: 22. >> Total: 103.

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 09:45:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On 25/12/15 01:45, Michael Paquier wrote: [...] And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: Committed: 30. Moved to next CF: 42. Rejected: 9. Returned with Feedback: 22. Total: 103. Regards, You didn't say how may regards... [More seriously] Many thanks to you, and the other Postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On 12/24/2015 04:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Paquier writes: And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: Committed: 30. Moved to next CF: 42. Rejected: 9. Returned with Feedback: 22. Total: 103. Many thanks to Michael for doing the CF management work

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: > > And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: > > Committed: 30. > > Moved to next CF: 42. > > Rejected: 9. > > Returned with Feedback: 22. > > Total: 103. > > Many

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier >> wrote: >>> OK, if those don't get

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

Michael Paquier writes: > And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: > Committed: 30. > Moved to next CF: 42. > Rejected: 9. > Returned with Feedback: 22. > Total: 103. Many thanks to Michael for doing the CF management work this time!

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next >> CF with the same status. > > After a first pass,

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next > CF with the same status. After a first pass, Numbers are getting down, I am just too tired to continue: Needs review: 13. Waiting on

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

Michael Paquier writes: > To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input. Those are: : SQL function to report log message AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough to commit it. It's questionable whether we need such a feature at all, and it's

[HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

Hi all, As of today, at the moment I am writing this message, here is the commit fest app status: Needs review: 20. Waiting on Author: 24. Ready for Committer: 4. Committed: 29. Moved to next CF: 11. Rejected: 8. Returned with Feedback: 7. Total: 103. This means in short that 48 out of 103

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: >> To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input. > > Those are: > > : SQL function to report log message > > AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Corey Huinker corey.huin...@gmail.com wrote: What is required to get the New Patch superpower? I'm also in need of it. CCing Magnus... I am not sure myself, but I would

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote: 2015-02-16 12:25 GMT+09:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Michael Paquier

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Corey Huinker corey.huin...@gmail.com wrote: What is required to get the New Patch superpower? I'm also in need of it. CCing Magnus... I am not sure myself, but I would imagine that the commit fest needs to be Open and not In Process to be able to add patches. --

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

Michael Paquier wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Michael Paquier wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Corey Huinker corey.huin...@gmail.com wrote: What is required to get the New Patch superpower? I'm also in need of it.

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Michael Paquier wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Corey Huinker corey.huin...@gmail.com wrote: What is required to get the New Patch superpower? I'm also in need of it. CCing Magnus... I am not sure

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

Michael Paquier wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Corey Huinker corey.huin...@gmail.com wrote: What is required to get the New Patch superpower? I'm also in need of it. CCing Magnus... I am not sure myself, but I would imagine that the commit fest needs to be Open and not In Process

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

What is required to get the New Patch superpower? I'm also in need of it. On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Kouhei Kaigai kai...@ak.jp.nec.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Kouhei Kaigai kai...@ak.jp.nec.com wrote: I couldn't find operation to add new entry on the current CF.

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

lists Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote: 2015-02-16 12:25 GMT+09:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Kouhei Kaigai kai...@ak.jp.nec.com wrote: I couldn't find operation to add new entry on the current CF. Go to the bottom of this CF: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/4/ Then click on New patch. I couldn't find the New patch link on both of IE and Chrome,

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp wrote: 2015-02-16 12:25 GMT+09:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote: In order to move on to the next CF, I am going to go through all

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Kouhei Kaigai kai...@ak.jp.nec.com wrote: I couldn't find operation to add new entry on the current CF. Go to the bottom of this CF: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/4/ Then click on New patch. I couldn't find the New patch link on both of IE and

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

2015-02-16 12:25 GMT+09:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote: In order to move on to the next CF, I am going to go through all the remaining patches and update their status accordingly. And sorry for

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote: In order to move on to the next CF, I am going to go through all the remaining patches and update their status accordingly. And sorry for slacking a bit regarding that. If you wish to complain, of course feel

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote: We are soon entering in the money time for this CF. The last month has been mainly a vacation period, the progress being fantomatic on many fronts, still there are a couple of patches that are marked as ready for

[HACKERS] Commit fest 2015-12 enters money time

Hi all, We are soon entering in the money time for this CF. The last month has been mainly a vacation period, the progress being fantomatic on many fronts, still there are a couple of patches that are marked as ready for committer: - Foreign table inheritance , whose first patch has been

[HACKERS] Commit Fest 2014-12, Status after week 1

Hi all, I have been though the patches of the current CF, looking at their related threads and updating each patch status if needed. After one week in this CF, we have done progress on many patches, more than 2/3 of them getting some comments, reviews and/or refreshed versions. Looking at the CF

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:58:39PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: WITH closest_candidates AS ( SELECT streets.gid, streets.name, streets.geom FROM nyc_streets streets ORDER BY streets.geom - 'SRID=26918;POINT(583571.905921312

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

On 12/15/2014 08:37 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes: - Point to polygon distance operator I looked at that briefly during the last fest, but was unsure whether it was too entangled

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote: On 12/15/2014 08:37 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes: - Point to polygon distance operator I

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

On 12/15/2014 03:45 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote: On 12/15/2014 08:37 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote: Right. I also looked at it briefly, but I wasn't sure if we really want it. AFAICT, no-one has actually asked for that operator, it was written only to be an

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote: Right. I also looked at it briefly, but I wasn't sure if we really want it. AFAICT,

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

On 12/15/2014 05:22 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote: Right. I also looked at it briefly, but I

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote: On 12/15/2014 05:22 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Heikki

[HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

Hi all, Let's begin the commit fest of December: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=25 Looking at the stats at the top of the above page, there are currently 56 patches to be dealt with: - Needs Review: 48 - Waiting on Author: 5 - Ready for Committer: 3 In short we are

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes: Let's begin the commit fest of December: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=25 ... To committers: there are 2 patches marked as ready for committer from previous commit fest: - Foreign table inheritance I should

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest 2014-12, let's begin!

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes: - Point to polygon distance operator I looked at that briefly during the last fest, but was unsure whether it was too entangled with the GiST patches that Heikki was looking

[HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 closed

I have closed the current commit fest. This doesn't have to mean much yet, except that it's probably time to stop reviewing and discussing, and instead focus on committing and polishing what is already committed. In this commit fest, we have committed 53 out of 112 patches, so that wasn't so

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

On 1.3.2014 18:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would be similar to the previous

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz wrote: On 1.3.2014 18:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to

[HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would be similar to the previous few commit fests. So decent job so far. Which

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed patches, which would be similar to the

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8, Rejected: 4. Total: 114. We're still on track to achieve about 50% committed

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com wrote: On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 16, Committed: 43, Returned with Feedback: 8,

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest status and release timeline

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com wrote: On 03/01/2014 07:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 03/01/2014 09:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 36, Waiting

[HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 5 report

Last week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 45, Waiting on Author: 13, Ready for Committer: 14, Committed: 38, Returned with Feedback: 4, Rejected: 2. Total: 116. This week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 43, Waiting on Author: 11, Ready for Committer: 12, Committed: 39, Returned with Feedback: 7,

[HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 4 report

Last week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 47, Waiting on Author: 15, Ready for Committer: 12, Committed: 37, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 2. Total: 116. This week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 45, Waiting on Author: 13, Ready for Committer: 14, Committed: 38, Returned with Feedback: 4,

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 4 report

Hi, On 2014-02-15 08:34:19 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Status Summary. Needs Review: 47, Waiting on Author: 15, Ready for Committer: 12, Committed: 37, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 2. Total: 116. This week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 45, Waiting on Author: 13, Ready for

[HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 3 report

Last week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 49, Waiting on Author: 18, Ready for Committer: 9, Committed: 33, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 1. Total: 113. This week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 47, Waiting on Author: 15, Ready for Committer: 12, Committed: 37, Returned with Feedback: 3,

[HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 2 report

Last week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 66, Waiting on Author: 16, Ready for Committer: 9, Committed: 20, Returned with Feedback: 2. Total: 113. This week: Status Summary. Needs Review: 49, Waiting on Author: 18, Ready for Committer: 9, Committed: 33, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 1.

[HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 1 report

We started this commit fest with 103 patches and got off to a flyer, with 20 patches committed during the first week. Somehow we ended up with 113 patches at the end of the first week, but let's please leave it at that. I'm tracking down patch authors who have not signed up for a review. I'll

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 week 1 report

On 01/23/2014 08:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: We started this commit fest with 103 patches and got off to a flyer, with 20 patches committed during the first week. Somehow we ended up with 113 patches at the end of the first week, but let's please leave it at that. I'm tracking down patch

[HACKERS] commit fest 2014-01 starts this Wednesday

Reminder: Commit fest 2014-01, the fourth and final commit fest in the PostgreSQL 9.4 development cycle, will start this Wednesday, January 15. If you have a patch that you would like to see considered for inclusion into PostgreSQL 9.4, please register it in the commit fest application:

[HACKERS] commit fest manager?

Anyone else? Or you'll have to deal with me again? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager?

On 01/08/2014 02:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Anyone else? Or you'll have to deal with me again? I vote for Peter. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager?

On 01/08/2014 02:38 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 01/08/2014 02:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Anyone else? Or you'll have to deal with me again? I vote for Peter. +1 JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579 PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest manager?

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote: On 01/08/2014 02:38 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 01/08/2014 02:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Anyone else? Or you'll have to deal with me again? I vote for Peter. +1 +1 -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 final report

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On 12/17/13, 10:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Perhaps we should just move all the Needs Review and RFC patches forward to the next fest, so we don't forget about them? This was done the last few times, but it has caused some

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 final report

Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes: Committers should now try to get the Ready for Committer queue cleared. I'm still hacking on the WITHIN GROUP patch, and will look at the planner indexes thing after that's done. That leaves 8 patches that haven't been reviewed. If you take a look,

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 final report

On 12/17/13, 10:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Perhaps we should just move all the Needs Review and RFC patches forward to the next fest, so we don't forget about them? This was done the last few times, but it has caused some controversy. One problem was that a number of patches arrived in this commit

[HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 final report

The commit fest is closed. Final score: Needs Review: 8, Ready for Committer: 13, Committed: 36, Returned with Feedback: 42, Rejected: 9. Total: 108. All patches that were in Waiting on Author or Needs Review state and have received a decent review have been moved to Returned with Feedback

[HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 week 3 report

Last week's status: Fri Nov 29 Status Summary. Needs Review: 29, Waiting on Author: 33, Ready for Committer: 13, Committed: 24, Returned with Feedback: 5, Rejected: 5. Total: 109. Current status: Fri Dec 6 10:55 Status Summary. Needs Review: 24, Waiting on Author: 21, Ready for Committer: 14,

[HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 week 2 report

Last week's status: Fri Nov 22 Status Summary. Needs Review: 47, Waiting on Author: 28, Ready for Committer: 10, Committed: 18, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 3. Total: 109. Current status: Fri Nov 29 Status Summary. Needs Review: 29, Waiting on Author: 33, Ready for Committer: 13,

[HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 week 1 report

We started with Fri Nov 15 Status Summary. Needs Review: 79, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for Committer: 5, Committed: 7, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 1. Total: 102. We are now at Fri Nov 22 Status Summary. Needs Review: 47, Waiting on Author: 28, Ready for Committer: 10, Committed:

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 week 1 report

Hello, Peter. Is is possible to add small patch to the current commit fest? You wrote: PE We started with PE Fri Nov 15 PE Status Summary. Needs Review: 79, Waiting on Author: 7, Ready for PE Committer: 5, Committed: 7, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 1. Total: 102. PE We are now at

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 week 1 report

On 22-11-2013 11:07, Pavel Golub wrote: Is is possible to add small patch to the current commit fest? No. Deadline was 11/15. Add it to next CF [1]. [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=21 -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/

[HACKERS] commit fest 2013-11 starts this Friday

Reminder: Commit fest 2013-11, the third commit fest (out of four) in the PostgreSQL development cycle, will start this Friday, November 15. If you have a patch that you would like to see considered for inclusion into PostgreSQL 9.4, please register it in the commit fest application before Friday:

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest schedule for 9.4

On 28.05.2013 01:12, Craig Ringer wrote: On 05/16/2013 01:44 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: I'll also say: * we need to assign CF managers at least 2 weeks in advance of each CF * we need to replace them if they get too busy to follow-through, * and the last CF needs two managers. Strong +1 on both of

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest schedule for 9.4

Shared responsibility is no-one's responsibility. If we are to have multiple CF managers, I think it would be good to have one who's mainly responsible, and the second one's job is to nag the first manager if ernothing happens, and quickly take over if necessary. Ie. a hot standby

Re: [HACKERS] commit fest schedule for 9.4

On 05/16/2013 01:44 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: I'll also say: * we need to assign CF managers at least 2 weeks in advance of each CF * we need to replace them if they get too busy to follow-through, * and the last CF needs two managers. Strong +1 on both of those. I tried to pick up a CF that was

  1   2   3   4   >