Should be on the mirrors now, will announce it this evening ... things
looked to build clean, just would like a second opinion on it ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresq
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:51, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > really the most important thing here is that we get some movement on the
> > > site in order to ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new
> > > web VM.
> >
> > On techdocs? What part
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Justin,
>
> > From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
> > virtual machine too. That may or may not be the case these days, I just
> > don't remember.
>
> Really? I thought that they were running from one of Sun's machines.
In fact: http://oosurvey.gratismania.ro/stats
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Justin,
> >
> > > From memory, the OpenOffice.org surveys still run from the techdocs
> > > virtual machine t
'k, this doesn't look right, but it could be that I'm overlooking
something ...
The function I created:
CREATE FUNCTION month_trunc (timestamp without time zone) RETURNS timestamp without
time zone
AS 'SELECT date_trunc(''month'', $1 )'
LANGUAGE sql IMMUTABLE;
The query that fails:
a
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > 'k, this doesn't look right, but it could be that I'm overlooking
> > something ...
> >
> > The function I created:
> >
> > CREATE FUNCTION month_trunc (timesta
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> ---
> Hello,
>
> My name is <> and I work with postgresql group. Recently we/postgresql
> advocay/general group have decided to form a group of people who would help
> other projects w.r.t postgresql.
>
> So feel free to ask me questions.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Do we have any data on how many people download the partial tarballs
> (-base, -opt, etc.)? I have a feeling that more people are confused by
> them than use them.
on ftp.postgresql.org itself, since June 4th:
2812 /var/spool/ftp/pub/source/v7.3.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > > Do we have any data on how many people download the partial tarballs
> > > (-base, -opt, etc.)? I have a feeling that more people are confused by
> > > them than use them.
>
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Marko Karppinen wrote:
> I agree that the partial tarballs can confuse an ftp user, though. I
> think a good solution to this would be to put them one level deeper,
> into a subfolder. The full tarball would then be the only thing a casual
> user would encounter, but the sou
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/README.dist-split
> >
> > to reduce the confusion, that would be great. I've just symlink'd it into
> > the source directori
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Even if they weren't useful for anything else, I think there's value in the
> > developers having to consider what is optional and what is not. This need
> > for constant review probably reduces the chance of bloat, over time even
> > in th
We have just packaged up our second Release Candidate for v7.4, with the
hopes of producing a full release next week.
A full ChangeLog is available at:
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/sources/v7.4/ChangeLog.RC1.to.RC2
But, one of the highlights is that support for tcl8.0.x has been
re-int
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases.
> The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1)
Tom applied a patch so that the build will continue to work on 8.0.x ...
or is this some other issue?
---(end of
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:51 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases.
> > > The tcl version deal (with
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> > Too bad we didn't figure this out yesterday. We are now in code freeze
> > for 7.4 release, and I'm hesitant to apply a fix for what is arguably a
> > broken platform. Core guys, time for a vote ... do we fix, or hold this
> > for 7.4.1?
>
>
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> I said:
> > This worked in 7.3:
> > regression=# select '1999-jan-08'::date;
> > ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "1999-jan-08"
> > HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
>
> > Setting DateStyle to YMD doesn't help, and in any c
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I said:
> > > This worked in 7.3:
> > > regression=# select '1999-jan-08'::date;
> > > ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "1999-jan-08"
> > > HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
> >
> > > Setting DateSt
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I'm confused. My understanding from what Tom said is that it affects all
> configurations.
the stats collector problem, from what I've seen through this list,
affects Solaris, and only some Solaris configuration ..
---(end o
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Shouldn't you also add a regression test to catch this in the future?
>
> Yes, I absolutely plan to stick some regression test additions into HEAD.
> There's not a need for such changes in the 7.4 bran
My bad, confused two different issues in one thread :(
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Joe Conway wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>I'm confused. My understanding from what Tom said is that it affects all
> >>confi
'k, I just tag'd REL7_4 and built the bundles ... the files are available
under ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.4beta, and I've open'd up the
ftp server there to 100 connections so that ppl can get in and test it ...
It is 6:15pm AST here right now ... at ~9pm, I will move those files to
t
'k, I just moved the release into the /pub/source/v7.4 directory from the
v7.4beta one ... RC2 is still in place, so that I don't break a bunch of
links ... tomorrow night, I'll remove the RC2 ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will i
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The time from release 7.3 to release 7.4 was 355 days, an all-time high.
> We really need to shorten that. We already have a number of significant
> improvements in 7.5 now, and several good ones coming up in the next few
> weeks. We cannot let peop
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0? Seems like
> even 7.4 is hardly recognizable as the same database as 7.0.
Discussion like this tends to be more for just before beta, once we have
an idea what actually made it in :) You be pu
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > That is the usual goal *nod* Same goal we try for each release, and never
> > quite seem to get there ... we'll try 'yet again' with 7.5 though, as we
> > always do :)
>
>
Just did a quick search on archives, and the original plan was for a
release in mid-2003, which means the beta would have been *at least* a
month before that, so beta starting around May:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-11/msg00975.php
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Everyone on -hackers should have been aware of it, as its always
> > discussed at the end of the previous release cycle ... and I don't think
> > we've hit a release cycle yet that has actually stayed in the 4 month
> > period :( Someone is
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > Right now, I believe we are looking at an April 1st beta, and a May 1st
> > related ... those are, as always, *tentative* dates that will become more
> > fine-tuned as those dates become neare
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> That said, I'm not really sure how we can make better use of the beta
> period. One obvious improvement would be making the beta announcements
> more visible: the obscurity of the beta process on www.postgresql.org
> for 7.4 was pretty ridiculous. Does an
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 0. As you say, make it known to the public. Have people test their
>in-development applications using a beta.
and how do you propose we do that? I think this is the hard part ...
other then the first beta, I post a note out to -announce and -ge
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> I try to test stuff fairly frequently, and this time I didn't know when,
> exactly, SCO would make the release of the updated compiler.
And there was no way you could predict that your contact there would take
off on holidays either :(
l.org/pub/src/[167].*
vs
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v[167].*
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)-
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> >> 0. As you say, make it known to the public. Have people test their
> >>in-development applicat
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Christoper Smiga wrote:
> All:
>
> Does anyone know if there is going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
> near future. What is the decission to develop on this platform since Sun
> is pushing Solaris x86 harder than ever.
Doesn't it work? I've run on Solaris 8 x86 extensi
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> >Guys,
> >
> >I agree with Neil ... it's not the length of the development part of the
> >cycle, it's the length of the beta testing.
> >
> >I do think an online bug tracker (bugzilla or whatever) would help. I also
> >think tha
ey just use
> the CVS version?
We do do nightly builds ... have for years now ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)---
on't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ...
Marc G. Fournier PostgreSQL, Inc (http://www.pgsql.com)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nobody else large enough to bother
with ... its going to be interesting to see :)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of bro
of the stack) ...
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Of course, now that SCO is claiming ownership of BSD code .
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Interesting thread t
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/data -S (postgres)
pgsql 60121 0.0 0.1 4908 3316 ?? SJ3:32AM 0:00.00 postmaster: stats buffer
process(postgres)
pgsql 60123 0.0 0.1 3964 3364 ?? SJ3:32AM 0:00.00 postmaster: stats
collector process(postgres)
----
Marc G
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 11:32:18PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> I suspect it might be because I'm running in a jail'd environment, but
> >> what should I be lookin
ke perl scripts.
>
> Sure, but couldn't we automatically turn off the write bits?
Just curious, but what do the write bits harm? Everyone that has access
to that VM has acccess to CVSROOT, either through CVS or directly ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://
ng
part of the manual?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
a checkout and this
change is made, will he have problems committing?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)---
Based on discussions on -hackers, and baring any objections betwen now and
then, I'm going to go through all files in CVS and change:
$Id$ -> $PostgreSQL$
I will do this the evening of Friday, November 29th ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Servic
never noticed such a
> large discrepancy myself.
Actually, I'm noticing similar "problems" with v7.4 ... "EXPLAIN ANALYZE"
seems to be showing some *very* high ms for execution time, but if you run
the actual query, it doesn't seem to take even 1/10th the ti
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually, I'm noticing similar "problems" with v7.4 ... "EXPLAIN ANALYZE"
> > seems to be showing some *very* high ms for execution time, but if you
'K, where do you find docs on the options file? there is nothing on it,
that I can find, in 'info cvs'?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
--
None that I've heard of ... Sean?
Tom, any way of writing a quite test C program for this? Something to
'simulate' the same thing, but without having to build the whole
postmaster?
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 00:50, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Based on discussions on -hackers, and baring any objections betwen now and
> > then, I'm going to go through all files in CVS and change:
> >
> > $Id$ -> $Pos
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > did you happen to take a look at the other set of queries I sent you, that
> > were showing 39k and 41k explain results?
>
> You mean this one?
Yup ...
> > tim
ld be proud that we've gotten the price of
> a seqscan down to the point where a couple of gettimeofday() calls per
> row are dominating the runtime.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Em
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> I've been running this code on a pair of FreeBSD (i386) boxen, for some time
> now, one of which is a 4.8-STABLE, the other is a 5.2-BETA.
>
> In 10 minutes of execution the 4.8 box has only shown the following:
>
> out of order tv_sec: 1070063393 11
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Could it be a hardware problem on Marc's box? Or specific to some other
> aspect of that installation (Marc, is pgsql74.hub.org multi-CPU, for
> example?)
All the servers are SMP ... pgsql74 is on a Dual-Xeon ...
Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm suspecting that the issue is amplified by load on the server itself
>
> That would fit right in with my idea that the failure occurs when the
> process loses its
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I'm suspecting that the issue is amplified by load on the server itself
> >
> > That would fit
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just got my first response on this, and, in fact, this is 'acceptable
> > behaviour' to a certain extent ... there is a kernel tuneable called
> > kern.ti
30 minutes.
what is kern.timecounter.method set to?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)---
TI
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> >> $ uname -a
> >> FreeBSD home.samurai.com 4.9-RELEASE [...]
> >
> > what is kern.timecoun
Bruce is going to do whatever magic he needs to on Tuesday, after while
I'll bundle it up for testing (at which point in time Peter should point
out any oops I happen to have made, no after, eh? *evil grin*) ... then
we'll do an announce of its availability on Wednesday ...
----
Marc G
Assuming I didn't miss any files, this is now complete ... I grep'd for
both $Header: and $Id:, and appear to have gotten them all ...
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 00:50, Marc G. Fournier
k, I see why ... fixing right now ...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Assuming I didn't miss any files, this is now complete ... I grep'd for
> > both $Header: and $Id:, and appear to have gotten
L
'K, changes are made, including the above ...
Let me know if I missed anything ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)--
curtime.tv_sec, curtime.tv_usec,
prevtime.tv_sec, prevtime.tv_usec);
}
last = now;
prevtime = curtime;
}
return 0;
}
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.h
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Joe Conway wrote:
> We (mostly Bruce, Tom, Peter, and I) have been having a discussion on
> the PATCHES list regarding some new functionality related to read-only
> GUC variables. The net result is pasted at the bottom of this post. Here
> is a link to the discussion:
> http://
Please take a quick peak at it ...
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.3.5
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast
ks!
> --
> Steve Wampler -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The gods that smiled on your birth are now laughing out loud.
>
> ---(end of broadcast)-------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
Marc G. Fournier
As Tom mentioned previous, we are aiming for 7.4.1 on Wednesday of next
week ... is anyone sitting on anything that they feel *just has to* be in
it?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outstanding
right now ...
This means it will be tag'd/bundled on Sunday ...
M
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
> > release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
> > something that needs to be fixed first ... we kno
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
> > > fixed.
> >
> > Does anyone have a patch for this?
>
> I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
Is tha
time.
My delay here ... I've been down with the flu for the past little while,
and have been grabbing emails as I can .. will try and get you setup
during the day tomrorow, sorry ;(
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTE
a
slave, the IP would be the master server itself ... in the case of
pg_upgrade, it would be localhost?
Then again, in the case of pg_upgrade, wouldn't just disabling access from
anywhere except localhost prevent others from getting in?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking
might not be slower
> than copying all the files to a new PGDATA ...
being able to do a dump to a gzip'd tar file might be an option here also
... should take a significantly less footprint to create the "backup", and
on an idle server, shouldn't take any longer then other
out if user is part of GroupA and, if so, increment that count ...
no?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
idea.
>
> Probably we ought to go with that, on backwards-compatibility grounds.
why not do both, but deprecate the use of all in the docs? say with an
eventual goal of removing the use of all altogether in 2 releases?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://w
e could just forward them all through to the PostgreSQL project?
>
> Would this be at all useful?
Someone mentioned that the 'fees' were relatively high though ... that you
lose a fair amount off the top *to* Sourceforge?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Servic
ave yet to any major complaints about
their services ... we haven't found any major complaints about our current
one, but we just find we're losing too much money in the way of fees ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.h
will do a general announce Monday afternoon, but if someone can test and
confirm that I haven't missed anything, that would be great...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 76
target, so that
it happens as part of the bundle build? or maybe a 'make release_prep'
target could be created, that would include stuff like this that gets done
just before release?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROT
INSTALL too.
Confused here, but how "up to date" is HISTORY in CVS to start with? I
don't go out of my way to watch for them, but commits to HISTORY don't
seem to be all that often to start with ... and how many ppl actually look
at the HISTORY file *except* at relea
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > The only problem with removing HISTORY from CVS is that we will not have
> > > an easily reable list of release changes _until_ we pack
STORY' in CVS would
just be a URL to that online version, while 'HISTORY' in a release would
be the full HISTORY file ... ?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
_
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archiv
/pgsql/win32.html
>
> The first isn't new, but as for what I know, it's a new aproach that Jan has for
> adding replication to the server.
Nope, pgreplication has nothing to do with Jan ... he's working on
Slonik-1 ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Servi
lar things. "Psql" for the client and "postmaster" for the daemon
> are the ones that really confuse people, I think.
I don't know, doesn't one of the databases out there use 'monitor' as
their equivalent to psql?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org N
t is the process that sorts
out the incoming connections and assigns them to backend processes ...
just like the postmaster does with your mail ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
>From the Firebird FAQ:
"The first beta was released on January 29, 2003. We are hoping to be
close to a full release some time around Easter 2003."
They are at RC8 right now ... running a *wee* bit behind scheduale :)
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking S
h, keeps it short ... or we could go even shorter with
just pgd ...
But, I'm not, in any stretch of the imagination, advocating for change on
this ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
rycolumn" line 19 at execute statement
the database was created as:
CREATE DATABASE WITH OWNER =
and I'm connected to the database as the owner ... shouldn't the "system
tables" also be owned by the owner?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Service
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just had a client point this out to me, and am wondering if its supposed
> > to happen:
>
> > 420_test=> select
> > dropgeometrycolumn('420_test',&
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> in particular, what SQL command is it trying to execute when it chokes?
>
> > The function is executing:
>
> &
we lost a mail relay, so teseting to make sure configuration is still
working after replacing it with other local machines we have more contrl
over ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
maybe Robert can comment on what is on it before u spend alot
of time recreating it? It might be something you two can collaborate on,
if it doesn't contain everything your Japanese version already does?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Em
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Robert Bernier wrote:
> I recompiled the kernel to get the 'elephant' (does it have a name??)
Slonik ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
care of this problem?
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
Marc G. Fournier
ABORTng Trans1 will rollback to the original value, no?
Or am I reading that section wrong? :(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:33:48PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > What happens if I abort on the first transaction? If I'm reading this
>
> Doesn't matter, because your second transaction doesn't read a
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What happens if I abort on the first transaction? If I'm reading this
> > right, if Trans2 does the exact same as above, and COMMITs before Trans1
> > Aborts,
1301 - 1400 of 1762 matches
Mail list logo
