The thing that annoy me the most with C2 is that almost each time I googled
Smalltalk when I wasstill a beginner with Pharo and Smalltalk this came up
often
http://wiki.c2.com/?WhyIsSmalltalkDead
But yes I agree, its nice to have a place to put information and never
worry about it getting delete.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:51:23PM +, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
> wiki. They end messy and very badly documented. Especially c2 is quite a
> mess, probably the worst wiki I have ever seen.
To me the lack of organization is in the nature of a wiki. It's like a place to
be explored. Must be said
On 13/02/17 16:39, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
If haven't used the c2 wiki or the squeak wiki then you haven't
experienced what it meant, at that time, to find everything there, or
expand articles with your own content. It was really useful, c2 still
is.
The squeak wiki is also still very valua
> It's not a problem, it's a dynamics thing. GitHub isn't the same, I
> haven't seen big wikis hosted there for a long time. In the long run
> Pareto appears, and only a fraction of the users create most of the
> content, but it is still useful.
>
>
There is a very good reason for this. The rise o
On 14 February 2017 at 02:39, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> ...
> In my previous job we used Squeak's Swiki for years and then we
> migrated it to Atlassian's Confluence (due to better user support),
> and it is amazing how powerful and undervalued a wiki is.
>
> Wiki's value is like compound inte
2017-02-10 21:09 GMT-03:00 Dimitris Chloupis :
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:52 AM p...@highoctane.be
> wrote:
>>
>> Am still finding useful stuff on Squeak wiki, sorry.
>> The point of a Wiki is to capture discussions over a given topic and make
>> it grow into something more structured over time.
I fail to see the problem here
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:52 AM p...@highoctane.be
wrote:
> Am still finding useful stuff on Squeak wiki, sorry.
> The point of a Wiki is to capture discussions over a given topic and make
> it grow into something more structured over time. Like original c2 wiki.
>
Am still finding useful stuff on Squeak wiki, sorry.
The point of a Wiki is to capture discussions over a given topic and make
it grow into something more structured over time. Like original c2 wiki.
Phil
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Dimitris Chloupis
wrote:
> If you miss it so much we have
If you miss it so much we have something much better
Github wikis, we never use
Each of our books is hosted in a Github repo and each repo always comes
with its own wiki using very simple markdown as everything else in Github
You do not have content but only a snippet of code to offer ? No probl
I miss the Squeak wiki Pharo style.
Phil
Le 10 févr. 2017 19:06, "Esteban A. Maringolo" a
écrit :
> 2017-02-10 14:59 GMT-03:00 p...@highoctane.be :
> > Mass adoption and hyper reduced friction to get people on board.
> >
> > For me: I have 10+ slack teams in my slack client and there is really
2017-02-10 14:59 GMT-03:00 p...@highoctane.be :
> Mass adoption and hyper reduced friction to get people on board.
>
> For me: I have 10+ slack teams in my slack client and there is really no
> point in having more clients on the desktop.
+1 to this. This is key.
Maybe what we're missing is a sim
Mass adoption and hyper reduced friction to get people on board.
For me: I have 10+ slack teams in my slack client and there is really no
point in having more clients on the desktop.
Phil
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Hilaire wrote:
> Please excuse my ignorance but what are the advantages o
Please excuse my ignorance but what are the advantages of Slack over
other instant messaging system like IRC or Jabber?
Hilaire
Le 10/02/2017 à 10:27, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
> The past year we have started using Slack to communicate in real-time
> about Pharo. It has nice (mobile) clients an
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
>> On 10 Feb 2017, at 10:27, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
>>
>> The past year we have started using Slack to communicate in real-time about
>> Pharo. It has nice (mobile) clients and makes it easy to share pictures and
>> sn
Hi Stephan,
> On 10 Feb 2017, at 10:27, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
>
> The past year we have started using Slack to communicate in real-time about
> Pharo. It has nice (mobile) clients and makes it easy to share pictures and
> snippets. As a result a large part of the communication about design
The past year we have started using Slack to communicate in real-time
about Pharo. It has nice (mobile) clients and makes it easy to share
pictures and snippets. As a result a large part of the communication
about design and how to do things has moved from the mailing lists to
Slack. As we're u
16 matches
Mail list logo
