great Guille!
On May 5, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
> Comes with tests :) (wow, fileIn tests! :P).
>
> It's probably not complete, because I couldn't in this two hours chase all
> the fileIn code, but it already reads methods, classes, class organizations,
> doits, class comments
On Saturday, 5. May 2012 02:38:11 Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 5 May 2012 01:43, Martin Drautzburg wrote:
> > On Saturday, 5. May 2012 00:17:09 Igor Stasenko wrote:
> >> may i ask you, what is your plans?
> >> say, you want to implement a particle system which can be animated at
> >> decent frame rat
On May 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
> So...what do we do? we just accept the depedency?
>
> Why not use a CompiledMethod instead? More on, the TraitMethodDescription
> already knows the selector, so storing only the behaviors containing related
> methods should be enough
what for? applied to?
Esteban
On May 5, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Milan Mimica wrote:
> What are you feelings about dependency injection?
>
>
> --
> Milan Mimica
> http://sparklet.sf.net
On May 5, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> what for? applied to?
>
> Esteban
>
> On May 5, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Milan Mimica wrote:
>
>> What are you feelings about dependency injection?
>>
This discussion might be better for the Pharo Users mailinglist as
it is not directly relat
Good idea guys. I am trying now...
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On May 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
> >
> > So...what do we do? we just accept the depedency?
> >
> > Why not use a CompiledMethod instead? More on, the
> TraitMethodDescription alread
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good idea guys. I am trying now...
>
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > So...what do we do? we just accept the d
20050
-
Issue 5813: remove empty packages
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5813
Issue 5811: Put comment in #methodsWithUnboundGlobals
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5811
Issue 5807: basic fixes for Pharo Kernel 2.0
h
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> marianop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Good idea guys. I am trying now...
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On
20051
-
Issue 5562: TestCase>>#assert:equals: optimization
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5562
Issue 5810: KMPragmaKeymapBuilder needs better cleanup
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5810
Issue 5798: Enable again bac
Hi Marcus:
On 05 May 2012, at 13:17, Marcus Denker wrote:
> 20051
> -
>
> Issue 5562: TestCase>>#assert:equals: optimization
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5562
What is wrong with the changed proposed here:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5487
?
On May 5, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Stefan Marr wrote:
> Hi Marcus:
>
> On 05 May 2012, at 13:17, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
>> 20051
>> -
>>
>> Issue 5562: TestCase>>#assert:equals: optimization
>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5562
>
> What is wrong with the changed proposed
Sorry for the lag, I'm in holidays (off line and high priority for childs) ;-)
Artefact is just a response at my needs. For my work, I need faster of a PDF
library to generate letters and reports. I have used the Infinite Improbability
Drive to build a thin library. In my mind, Artefact is not a
Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 2 May 2012 19:47, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
First class instance variables will bring a lot to the system:
foundation for a lot of innovation
- relationships support
- meta description.
- bitfields descrip
Hi Hannes,
On 05 May 2012, at 11:53, H. Hirzel wrote:
> Thank you Sven for your follow up of the recent JSON/STON/Tirade
> discussion by providing an STON implementation for Squeak 4.3 and
> working with Dale to get it to other Smalltalks (github). [1]
>
> I think your STON implementation will b
On 5 May 2012 09:39, Martin Drautzburg wrote:
> On Saturday, 5. May 2012 02:38:11 Igor Stasenko wrote:
>> On 5 May 2012 01:43, Martin Drautzburg wrote:
>> > On Saturday, 5. May 2012 00:17:09 Igor Stasenko wrote:
>> >> may i ask you, what is your plans?
>> >> say, you want to implement a particle
did you check the mail of simon allier?
ConfigurationOfManifest...
> Hi,
>
> I do not have a clue how to load Slint in Pharo 1.4. Is there something to
> use it with Nautilus (altough, I dont really need a GUI)?
>
> Cheers,
> Francois
>
we should migrate the system to use it so that we can deprecate the old code.
> Now that Filesystem is built-in, how about starting to add some convenience
> methods, like this simple one...
>
> FileReference>>#fileIn
>
> FileStream fileIn: self fullName.
>
> --
> View this message in co
Thanks mariano. I love when you write your phd this is so boring that you have
to do something else :D
And this is great to have a real layered system.
Stef
>
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck
> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck
>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> Hi, David, all
>
> i just want to know, if we can use FFI calls, for implementing an
> OSProcessPlugin functionality (or at least most of it).
> and if there parts which is hard to implement, i would like to know
> what and why.
>
Once we ha
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> Hi, David, all
>>
>> i just want to know, if we can use FFI calls, for implementing an
>> OSProcessPlugin functionality (or at least most of it).
>> and if there parts which is har
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> Thanks mariano. I love when you write your phd this is so boring that you
> have to do something else :D
>
hehehehhehe 5 hours per day. That's my maximum hahaha
> And this is great to have a real layered system.
>
Indeed. Before this ch
Hello all,
I've been happily using #handlesMouseWheel: and #mouseWheel until I had to
"ousource" parts of my Morph to a Submorph for layout reasons. The part which
shall respond to mouseWheel is no longer the Morph itself but a Submorph
thereof.
Of course this Submorph does not respond to mous
20052
-
Issue 5812: Add new Chunk format importer
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5812
Issue 5808: SimpleCodeLoader not needed
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5808
--
Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
>
> Thanks mariano. I love when you write your phd this is so boring that you
> have to do something else :D
>
> hehehehhehe 5 hours per day. That's my maximum hahaha
>
> And this is great to have a real layered system.
>
> Indeed. Before this change:
>
> 1) Traits were not working without R
Yes! Yes! Yes!
Indeed removing such logic from streams and friends is good.
I remember removing html support some time ago :)
Stef
> great Guille!
>
> On May 5, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
>> Comes with tests :) (wow, fileIn tests! :P).
>>
>> It's probably not complete, because
On 5 May 2012 17:00, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>> Hi, David, all
>>
>> i just want to know, if we can use FFI calls, for implementing an
>> OSProcessPlugin functionality (or at least most of it).
>> and if there parts which is hard to imple
Hi,
I'm trying to work my way through the Pharo by example book on my Ubuntu
12.04 LTS box. Unfortunately, things in the book don't look like they
do on my setup. For example, I can't work out what the key combination
is to get the 'Morphic Halo'. I can get it from a menu, but not from a
k
On Saturday, 5. May 2012 19:06:38 Martin Drautzburg wrote:
Sorry, that was a bit fuzzy.
My Morph is in a GeneralScrollPane. The GeneralScrollPane first sends
mouseWheel event to the scroller (my Morph). My Morph can scroll horizonally
infinitely and handles the horizontal scrolling itself. Its
On 05 May 2012, at 15:58, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> Maybe I should add some invocation examples to the paper to explain the API.
https://github.com/svenvc/ston/blob/master/ston-paper.md#usage
Sven
welcome peter
> I'm trying to work my way through the Pharo by example book on my Ubuntu
> 12.04 LTS box. Unfortunately, things in the book don't look like they do on
> my setup. For example, I can't work out what the key combination is to get
> the 'Morphic Halo'. I can get it from a menu,
The Atoms and other friends are available on a monticello repository. It is
something like morphic-examples. It was squeaksource I think.
Philippe
Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung
Peredur a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to work my way through the Pharo by example book on my Ubuntu
12.04 LTS box
Yes probably in PharoNonCorePackages
in the near future we will clean all this mess :)
MCHttpRepository
location: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoNonCorePackages'
user: 'sd'
password: ''
Apparently some examples are depending from SketchMorph. I'm trying to have a
look and cleani
Fixed now it loads well in 1.4
Stef
On May 5, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Philippe Back wrote:
> The Atoms and other friends are available on a monticello repository. It is
> something like morphic-examples. It was squeaksource I think.
>
> Philippe
>
>
> Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung
>
>
>
> Pe
El 05/05/12 21:12, Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
welcome peter
Thank you
I'm trying to work my way through the Pharo by example book on my Ubuntu 12.04
LTS box. Unfortunately, things in the book don't look like they do on my
setup. For example, I can't work out what the key combination is to
Peredur wrote
>
> I'm trying to work my way through the Pharo by example book on my Ubuntu
> 12.04 LTS box.
>
This comes up every so often, so here's a one-click image adapted from the
Pharo 1.4 one click, but with the Jenkins Stack VMs, briefly tested on
Debian and OS X...
I will host it tem
On 5 May 2012 18:00, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>> Hi, David, all
>>
>> i just want to know, if we can use FFI calls, for implementing an
>> OSProcessPlugin functionality (or at least most of it).
>> and if there parts which is hard to imple
Stephan Eggermont wrote:
Hi Olivier,
I've taken a look at the state of Artefact. Don't you think it would be much
less work
to port Christian Haider's work to Pharo? The namespace extensions to ring
should
be helpful to make two-way changes from both the VW and Pharo side.
Stephan Eggermont
38 matches
Mail list logo
