On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:47:27PM -0500, Ilia A. wrote:
I would like to propose that we drop the old ereg library and use only
a single regular expression library, PCRE. For BC purposes I've written a
patch (see attached file), which emulates the old ereg_* functions for people
who still
The following patch allows to find the kerberos libraries to
be found in /usr, /usr/local, /usr/kerberos
and a given path. If there are no objections i will commit this.
marcus
cvs -z3 -q diff ext\imap\config.m4 (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\)
Index: ext/imap/config.m4
-Original Message-
From: Seth Price [mailto:sprice;wisc.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-QA] 64-bit SGI account offer
It sounds like there is a need to get some 64-bit test systems to work
What about an additional cronjob for automated builds
which could then be included in snaps.php.net. This
way all of us could verify the build results?
marcus
At 12:18 01.11.2002, Sebastian Nohn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Seth Price [mailto:sprice;wisc.edu]
Sent: Friday,
Hi,
attached a patch:
1) To get the right compiler version (see php-qa thread on this)
2) Add option to save results, by Michael Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any objections?
With kind regards,
Melvyn Sopacua
?php include(not_reflecting_employers_views.txt); ?
--
PHP Development Mailing List
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
Hi,
attached a patch:
1) To get the right compiler version (see php-qa thread on this)
2) Add option to save results, by Michael Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any objections?
We can't object if there is no attachment :)
Derick
--
At 15:37 1-11-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
Any objections?
We can't object if there is no attachment :)
?php while($i100) { echo substr('#*!$%', mt_rand(1,6), 1); $i++; } ?
With kind regards,
Melvyn Sopacua
?php include(not_reflecting_employers_views.txt); ?
Index: run-tests.php
Hey,
See backtrace, it's immediate clear what happens... the filename is
already freed.
(gdb) run -X
Starting program: /dat/dev/php/apache_1.3.27/src/httpd -X
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x080afdbf in php_strlcpy (dst=0x832bdc0
/home/httpd/html/pres/show.php,
The only thing I see wrong, is perhaps that Shane and I are working on a
new run-tests script (see run-tests2.php)
Since the script (at least the CLI class) basically works just as well
as the current run-tests.php (as far as I've seen thus far)... Well, I'm
just worried your patch will end
On November 1, 2002 10:05 am, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 15:37 1-11-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
Any objections?
We can't object if there is no attachment :)
?php while($i100) { echo substr('#*!$%', mt_rand(1,6), 1); $i++; } ?
With kind regards,
Melvyn Sopacua
?php
I've added similar patch. Please test. :)
(I don't have kerberos enabled in my c-client lib)
--Jani
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Marcus Boerger wrote:
The following patch allows to find the kerberos libraries to
be found in /usr, /usr/local, /usr/kerberos
and a given path. If there
Ouch,
I really thought you we're working on 'run-tests2.php - the web edition'.
Currently there's still a number of issues being worked on, with the
current CLI interface, so your fork of that version, may be premature,
or you should consider working on run-tests.php for the web, without
Wait wait wait..
I think I've been misunderstood... I'm not talking about the version 4.3
release, and yes we are working on the web edition of the test script..
However, Shane (rightly so, IMHO) re-wrote run-tests (now run-tests2)
and made it a class (testHarness) from which to base the
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Sander Roobol wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:47:27PM -0500, Ilia A. wrote:
I would like to propose that we drop the old ereg library and use only
a single regular expression library, PCRE. For BC purposes I've written a
patch (see attached file), which emulates the old
At 18:23 1-11-2002, John Coggeshall wrote:
Wait wait wait..
sleep(3);
I think I've been misunderstood... I'm not talking about the version 4.3
release, and yes we are working on the web edition of the test script..
However, Shane (rightly so, IMHO) re-wrote run-tests (now run-tests2)
and
On November 1, 2002 12:23 pm, John Coggeshall wrote:
Wait wait wait..
I think I've been misunderstood... I'm not talking about the version 4.3
release, and yes we are working on the web edition of the test script..
However, Shane (rightly so, IMHO) re-wrote run-tests (now run-tests2)
and
At 18:44 01.11.2002, Ilia A. wrote:
On November 1, 2002 12:23 pm, John Coggeshall wrote:
Wait wait wait..
I think I've been misunderstood... I'm not talking about the version 4.3
release, and yes we are working on the web edition of the test script..
However, Shane (rightly so, IMHO)
|Ok - so unless Shane disagrees and gets physical,
|run-tests.php should be in 4.3 and will have a totally
|different code-base than the version for php 4.4/5.0.
Exactly.
|The features addressed in the patch, are IMO important though.
I haven't looked at the patch in great detail, can
|What made you decide to go for the OO model of the run-tests
|script, there
|does not seem to be any advantage in adding this overhead (imho)?
There is most definitely an advantage. Using the OO model, we
essentially created
A test engine which had some default output code (direct to stdout)
At 19:02 1-11-2002, John Coggeshall wrote:
I haven't looked at the patch in great detail, can someone forward me
The commitlog?
It hasn't been committed yet, as we agreed that only persons in 'Authors'
should do that and agree, otherwise it'll be a mess.
|Yep.
|So the real question is: how
Ok - so unless Shane disagrees and gets physical,
/me jumps around screaming after hiking up a large mountain carrying 2
40lb. boulders...physical enough? :)
run-tests.php should
be in 4.3 and will have a totally different code-base than the version
for php 4.4/5.0.
I don't expect we'll
On November 1, 2002 01:08 pm, John Coggeshall wrote:
|What made you decide to go for the OO model of the run-tests
|script, there
|does not seem to be any advantage in adding this overhead (imho)?
There is most definitely an advantage. Using the OO model, we
essentially created
A test
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 15:37 1-11-2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
Any objections?
We can't object if there is no attachment :)
?php while($i100) { echo substr('#*!$%', mt_rand(1,6), 1); $i++; } ?
Looks fine to me.
Derick
--
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, John Coggeshall wrote:
The only thing I see wrong, is perhaps that Shane and I are working on a
new run-tests script (see run-tests2.php)
Since the script (at least the CLI class) basically works just as well
as the current run-tests.php (as far as I've seen thus
This would make a simpler test, which would not need to rely on more
advanced
features like OO, which may change in their functionality once ZE2 comes
around, as Marcus had pointed out. Since at this point we could have
people
running both ZE1 and ZE2 use the test, I think relying on OO is
The build system complains that LIBZEND_DLSYM_CHECK
is not available. Should this be provided in Zend/Zend.m4?
marcus
cvs -z3 -q diff Zend\Zend.m4 (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\)
Index: Zend/Zend.m4
===
RCS file:
Your version is a bit nicer work, too.
marcus
At 17:46 01.11.2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I've added similar patch. Please test. :)
(I don't have kerberos enabled in my c-client lib)
--Jani
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Marcus Boerger wrote:
The following patch allows to find the kerberos
Steph asked me to apply via this form. I'll be helping with the PHP-Gtk manual.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Would like an account to contribute to the pres2 system. Have experience in advanced
DOM/CSS2 work. Also would like to help in improving XML tagging syntax, features to
the project.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 18:28, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Sander Roobol wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:47:27PM -0500, Ilia A. wrote:
I would like to propose that we drop the old ereg library and use only
a single regular expression library, PCRE. For BC purposes I've written
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 01:47, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
moriyoshi Thu Oct 31 15:23:53 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/php4/ext/iconv config.m4
Log:
Fixed library capability detection behaviour.
# Whew! I've fixed all the known
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 09:35, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Colin Viebrock wrote:
I really think the best solution (not perfect, but best) is to specify
some fonts so the pages look nice, and hard code in the ISO-8859-1 font
hard code in the ISO-8859-1 font means assuming ISO 8859-1 and
use ISO
At 01:40 02.11.2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 09:35, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Colin Viebrock wrote:
I really think the best solution (not perfect, but best) is to specify
some fonts so the pages look nice, and hard code in the ISO-8859-1 font
hard code in the ISO-8859-1 font
gfdgddstretryytuyyuyiitt
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 02:09 2-11-2002, guifox wrote:
gfdgddstretryytuyyuyiitt
Sorry, welsh is not considered an official language, so no translators are
requested at this time.
Thank you for you interest in PHP.
Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
Webmaster IDG.nl
Melvyn Sopacua
--
PHP
Ok, under 4.2.3 or 4.0.3pre2, when running the configure line:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/php_4.2.3 --without-mysql
--disable-session --disable-pcre-regex --disable-xml
Everything seems to go fine, till the end where it says:
creating ./config.status
creating php4.spec
sed: file
Some people don't bother doing MFZE1...
--Jani
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Marcus Boerger wrote:
The build system complains that LIBZEND_DLSYM_CHECK
is not available. Should this be provided in Zend/Zend.m4?
marcus
cvs -z3 -q diff Zend\Zend.m4 (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\)
Index:
Just installed 4.2.3 from 4.2.2. Now when I have a PHP script that takes
some time to process it will wait to send any of the HTML to the client.
On 4.2.2 I could just include the PHP code after the HTML that I wanted to
display, it would display the HTML before the PHP and when the PHP had
I somehow don't like the idea. Mostly because I fear we
introduce some BC change regarding to the ereg*
functionality we yet do not forsee which brings us in the end
more trouble (i.e. use complaining) then it's really worth.
Just let ereg* functions stay where they are, if
39 matches
Mail list logo
