Have you people lost it???
One of the MAJOR features is working with Apache2.
But bug 16475 is still open and unresolved. Its been
reported by several different people, all having the same effect.
Why would you release this version until after this bug is closed
and gone through at least one RC
Apache 2 was released extremely quickly during the PHP 4.2 QA cycle.
There really is no huge motivation to switch to Apache 2 right now. If
the perchild mpm ever becomes stable it will be cool to use Apache 2 with
PHP, but right now you are going to run into a whole lot of trouble with
non-thread
FYI: The apache2 support in PHP is new and experimental.
And in that bug report, one of the apache developers has
already added a note that he's working on it so the
fix will be in the next release. (PHP 4.2.1)
Patience, please.
--Jani
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002,
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> FYI: The apache2 support in PHP is new and experimental.
> And in that bug report, one of the apache developers has
> already added a note that he's working on it so the
> fix will be in the next release. (PHP 4.2.1)
> Patience, plea
That is exactly my point. I no more than read the encouraging report that
its been identified and is close to a fix, and the next message says
4.2 has been released.
It couldn't have waited just another week to get this fix in and tested?
Looking at the 4.2 announcement on the web page states..
> That is exactly my point. I no more than read the encouraging report that
> its been identified and is close to a fix, and the next message says
> 4.2 has been released.
>
> It couldn't have waited just another week to get this fix in and tested?
No, because it wouldn't make much of a differen
Personally, I completely understand that is all new code and bugs will
occur. I won't be going to Apache 2 for some time to come. The only
reason I even tried it at all is I already was already getting requests on
php-tuxedo for that combo so I thought I should give it a try.
But I hope the Bug
> As for Apache being at fault too, they very well could be. But the
> fact remains that PHP runs INSIDE Apache, and Apache starts fine without
> PHP, hence PHP must be at fault. Simply stating the obvious facts from
> the public point of view.
Well, with that sort of logic we are completely sc
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Brian Foddy wrote:
> That is exactly my point. I no more than read the encouraging report that
> its been identified and is close to a fix, and the next message says
> 4.2 has been released.
>
> It couldn't have waited just another week to get this fix in and tested?
Becau
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:56:28 -0700 (PDT), Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> As for Apache being at fault too, they very well could be. But the
>> fact remains that PHP runs INSIDE Apache, and Apache starts fine without
>> PHP, hence PHP must be at fault. Simply stating the obvious facts from
>> the publ
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:44:17AM -0500, Brian Foddy wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:56:28 -0700 (PDT), Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> >> As for Apache being at fault too, they very well could be. But the
> >> fact remains that PHP runs INSIDE Apache, and Apache starts fine without
> >> PHP, hence P
: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:44 AM
> To: Rasmus Lerdorf
> Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.2.0 Release Announcement
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:56:28 -0700 (PDT), Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> >> As for Apache being at fault too, they very well could
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Brian Foddy wrote:
> That's a very frustrating scenario that will be occuring countless
> times probably right now. Why does PHP want to intentionally
> frustrate and turn off its own user community? What does
> that say about the PHP testing process and commitment to use
I disagree whole heartedly. It doesnt look bad at all.
>From the public angle, it looks like the PHP Group are holding back on
Apache 2 support until they can endorse its stability - but giving the PHP
developers access to current research into the integration.
If you want to play with with Apac
You make it sound like it will core dump immediately for everyone. That's
obviously not the case. It does work for most people. Well, for some
anyway. Works fine on my test server, for example.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Brian Foddy wrote:
> So they download both and start building. What do they g
PHP Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.2.0 Release Announcement
>
>
> You make it sound like it will core dump immediately for
> everyone. That's
> obviously not the case. It does work for most people. Well, for some
> anyway. Works fine on my test
]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:06 AM
> > To: Brian Foddy
> > Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.2.0 Release Announcement
> >
> >
> > You make it sound like it will core dump immediately for
> > everyone. That&#x
At 05:30 23/04/2002, Brian Foddy wrote:
>Experimental kinda implies that its at least usuable and might be
>fun to play with. Not recommending for production is a long ways
>from saying ohh, I guess it will coredump on startup...
Experimental means experimental, and that it may very well crash o
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]% (Brian Foddy):
> So they download both and start building. What do they get?
> Core dump. Usually before people will start opening trouble
[cut]
> with these two latest releases. "Experimental, not for production"
> just doesn't cut it. Not when we KNOW there is a definat
> It didn't coredump for me on startup.
Nor for I, and I've done quite a lot of testing on this thing. The
startup error has been identified (even though not reproduceable by me
for some reason) and I will supply a patch for that later today. There
is still another bug (also nonreproduceable by m
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:20:18AM -0500, Rose, Billy wrote:
> I have Apache 2.0.25 with PHP 4.2.0RC2 running in production now. Been
> running since it was released.
Can you please describe your architecture (platform, os rev, etc...)
and tell us what configure parameters you gave to both apache
Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:16 AM
> To: Rose, Billy
> Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.2.0 Release Announcement
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:20:18AM -0500, Rose, Billy wrote:
> > I have Apache
Aaron Bannert wrote:
>>It didn't coredump for me on startup.
>>
>
> Nor for I, and I've done quite a lot of testing on this thing. The
> startup error has been identified (even though not reproduceable by me
> for some reason) and I will supply a patch for that later today. There
> is still anoth
23 matches
Mail list logo
