On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> Although the user notes have been discussed many times*, I reckon
> nothing new has been implemented because current ideas either don't
> feel right and/or require too much work. So let's define what user
> notes are for:
>
> - Original p
On Aug 31, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Adam Harvey wrote:
>> On 31 August 2012 21:56, Daniel Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Hannes Magnusson
>>> wrote:
>>>I don't know exactly what the solution is, but I do believe i
On 08/31/2012 08:50 AM, Andrew Faulds wrote:
> On 31/08/12 16:41, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> I think that is a terrible idea. Yes there is some junk in there, but
>> there are also a lot of useful stuff and it is something most users
>> love. With a bit more attention from people we can improve the q
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 31 August 2012 21:56, Daniel Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Hannes Magnusson
>> wrote:
>>>
>> I don't know exactly what the solution is, but I do believe it is
>> best managed in-house.
>
> On that, there seems to be
On 31/08/12 16:57, Adam Harvey wrote:
So, assuming we're going to keep notes as seems to be the consensus so
far: what can we do to make them more manageable? (Yes, I'll help
write code.)
Hmm, on second thoughts, something like StackOverflow's "community wiki"
posts might be good. Being able to
On 31 August 2012 21:56, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Hannes Magnusson
> wrote:
>>
>> It isn't scaling, but we do have crapload of people with php.net
>> karma, and all of them have the ability to edit/reject notes.. Most
>> simply don't know it.
>> I think we should try
On 31/08/12 16:41, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I think that is a terrible idea. Yes there is some junk in there, but
there are also a lot of useful stuff and it is something most users
love. With a bit more attention from people we can improve the quality
and I think that could start with a better UI a
On 08/31/2012 08:31 AM, Andrew Faulds wrote:
> On 31/08/12 08:50, Adam Harvey wrote:
>> 2. Kill user notes completely. The new site design (I'm getting to
>> that in another e-mail in the not-too-distant future, hopefully) has
>> more prominent links for reporting bugs and going to the online
>> ed
On 31/08/12 08:50, Adam Harvey wrote:
Type NotesPercentage
Non-useful code sample 3920%
Something already in the manual 2613%
Support request 2513%
Reply to previous note 2211%
A
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
>
> It isn't scaling, but we do have crapload of people with php.net
> karma, and all of them have the ability to edit/reject notes.. Most
> simply don't know it.
> I think we should try to reach out the individual extension
> maintainers an
>
> As a normal user who copy pastes from the comments
> keep
>
> Just because the supply of good v bad is a low percentage
> does not mean the system is bad
>
> I agree. User notes have saved me lots of times when it seemed everything
is impossible.
I remember that I proposed to change the system
As a normal user who copy pastes from the comments
keep
Just because the supply of good v bad is a low percentage
does not mean the system is bad
Dave Caroline long time lurker
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Adam Harvey wrote:
> 1. No change. As things stand, the only people who seem to look
> regularly at the new notes are Dan and myself, with a few others
> (including Sherif, Nikita and Peter) cleaning out particular pages. If
> you pick a reasonably commonly hit pa
tl;dr: I am become death, the destroyer of user notes. (I hope.)
Hi everyone,
As many of you know, user notes have been a long-standing hobby horse
for me. About six weeks ago, I decided to do something useful about
them, and subscribed to the mailing list to try to help moderate the
stream of in
14 matches
Mail list logo
