If you want some others changes, tell me ! ;)
Best,
Yannick
2013/9/14 Chris Wright
> On 13 September 2013 20:28, Yannick Torrès
> wrote:
> > Fixed ;)
> >
>
> Awesome, thanks :-)
>
>
> >
> http://git.php.net/?p=web/doc-editor.git;a=commit;h=a9d929f161ebf9a4685167d5b65367e42e81c592
> >
> > Best
On 13 September 2013 20:28, Yannick Torrès wrote:
> Fixed ;)
>
Awesome, thanks :-)
> http://git.php.net/?p=web/doc-editor.git;a=commit;h=a9d929f161ebf9a4685167d5b65367e42e81c592
>
> Best,
> Yannick
>
>
> 2013/9/13 Yannick Torrès
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm on it.
>>
>> Best,
>> Yannick
>>
>>
>> 2
Fixed ;)
http://git.php.net/?p=web/doc-editor.git;a=commit;h=a9d929f161ebf9a4685167d5b65367e42e81c592
Best,
Yannick
2013/9/13 Yannick Torrès
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm on it.
>
> Best,
> Yannick
>
>
> 2013/9/13 Philip Olson
>
>>
>>
>> > I'd open a bug, but since this is a bug in the bug tracker it
Hi guys,
I'm on it.
Best,
Yannick
2013/9/13 Philip Olson
>
>
> > I'd open a bug, but since this is a bug in the bug tracker it would
> > need to be reported on bugs.bugs.php.net which doesn't exist. Perhaps
> > this is a bug.
> >
> > :-)
>
> Good idea, although we should consider features.fe
> I'd open a bug, but since this is a bug in the bug tracker it would
> need to be reported on bugs.bugs.php.net which doesn't exist. Perhaps
> this is a bug.
>
> :-)
Good idea, although we should consider features.features.php.net
Regards,
Philip
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> Hello all
>
> It has just been brought to my attention that these two commits:
>
> http://svn.php.net/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=331339
> http://svn.php.net/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=331381
>
> Automagically posted messages here:
>
>
Hello all
It has just been brought to my attention that these two commits:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=331339
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/?view=revision&revision=331381
Automagically posted messages here:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33404
This is (I presume) because the
Dear Translators
As you are probably aware of, we are planning on upgrading our
documentation to DocBook5.
This change will allow several nice things to take place :
* Nicer and more semantical markup
* Come up with a solution to our Object Oriented style documentation problem
* Rewrite
Nuno Lopes wrote:
It allows a 'normal' user to see a manual in html, pdf, ..., but it
builds all that off-line. In the display area, I think livedocs is better.
In the edit mode, it allows an editor to edit a file in text, xml, html
or Latex mode. This can be good if a translator doesn't know ho
Hi,
I've taken a look to DocBookWiki and I think it doesn't worth to invest
our time on it.
I've installed it and I've used both in user and superuser mode, but it
didn't convinced me
It allows a 'normal' user to see a manual in html, pdf, ..., but it
builds all that off-line. In the display
Hi,
I found this via the Drupal Docs mailing list:
http://doc-book.sourceforge.net/homepage/
It might be worth looking into for easy docbook editing.
Goba
Hi,
I've taken a look to DocBookWiki and I think it doesn't worth to invest our
time on it.
I've installed it and I've used both in
That would be a good idea to set up. It would save a lot of trouble
getting things like CygWin set up at least.
Not really sure about:
DocBookWiki uses xsltproc (in Linux), so the only supported platform is
Linux.
Xsltproc obviously works on windows. Maybe the author have not looked
into making
That would be a good idea to set up. It would save a lot of trouble
getting things like CygWin set up at least.
Not really sure about:
DocBookWiki uses xsltproc (in Linux), so the only supported platform is
Linux.
Friedhelm
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
That would be a good idea to set up. It would save a lot of trouble
getting things like CygWin set up at least.
Not really sure about:
DocBookWiki uses xsltproc (in Linux), so the only supported platform
is Linux.
Xsltproc obviously works on windows. Maybe the author have n
That would be a good idea to set up. It would save a lot of trouble
getting things like CygWin set up at least.
--
Regards,
David Mytton
http://www.olate.co.uk
Hi,
I found this via the Drupal Docs mailing list:
http://doc-book.sourceforge.net/homepage/
It might be worth looking into for easy docbook editing.
Goba
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
> > And I only get the two abs ones...
>
> @Derick: which version of (open)jade ?
> mine: 1.3.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] derick]$ rpm -qf `which openjade`
openjade-1.3.1-4
Derick
--
"my other box is your windows PC"
-
> > > /usr/bin/jade:././dsssl/docbook/html/../common/dbl10n.dsl:987:30:E:
> > > reference to undefined variable "%gentext-zhhk-listcomma%"
> > > /usr/bin/jade:././dsssl/docbook/html/../common/dbl10n.dsl:1031:30:E:
> > > reference to undefined variable "%gentext-zhhk-lastlistcomma%"
> > > /usr/bin/j
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
> Am Montag 31 März 2003 22:03 schrieb Sara Golemon:
> > Just a few errors (warnings?) which popped up during a recent manual
> > compile:
> >
> > /usr/bin/jade:././dsssl/docbook/html/../common/dbl10n.dsl:987:30:E:
> > reference to undefined variable "%ge
Am Montag 31 März 2003 22:03 schrieb Sara Golemon:
> Just a few errors (warnings?) which popped up during a recent manual
> compile:
>
> /usr/bin/jade:././dsssl/docbook/html/../common/dbl10n.dsl:987:30:E:
> reference to undefined variable "%gentext-zhhk-listcomma%"
> /usr/bin/jade:././dsssl/docbook
Just a few errors (warnings?) which popped up during a recent manual
compile:
/usr/bin/jade:././dsssl/docbook/html/../common/dbl10n.dsl:987:30:E:
reference to undefined variable "%gentext-zhhk-listcomma%"
/usr/bin/jade:././dsssl/docbook/html/../common/dbl10n.dsl:1031:30:E:
reference to undefined v
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, reven wrote:
> Is there any way or link to download the PHP manual in docbook format? I'm
> not able to get CVS going and I would like to build a printable format.
THe only way is CVS, what are the problems with it?
Derick
--
"my oth
Hi,
Is there any way or link to download the PHP manual in docbook format? I'm
not able to get CVS going and I would like to build a printable format.
Thanks,
Reven
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
just stumbled across
http://www.caldera.de/~eric/crash-course/HTML/index.html
haven't really looked at it yet and won't find the time until
maybe saturday, but it might be a usefull resource for the
howto, so i wanted to share :)
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.six.de
all translations in current CVS should now be prepared for the
conversion to DocBook 4, i've done final tests and fixes yesterday
i'd like to perform and commit the actual conversion on late friday
(european time), so if you have pending contributions, especialy for
the reference part, you shoul
> cd scripts; php -q process.php func2methodsyn.php ../en
>
> you need to have ext/sablot enabled in the php
ext/xslt that is
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77
i've now finished the final steps needed for the long due update
to the current DocBook XML DTD release, version 4.1.2
the last big showstopper have been the funcion prototype conversions
(actualy those with optional parameters), and as we have quite a lot
of these automatic conversion was a must
> We don´ t use the rules written in some PEAR standards. If you want
> document some undocumented functions, you have to use the function
> name AS IS from the source code. The preferred naming scheme is
> prefix_get_settings. Only the ID attribute should have minus signs
> instead of underscores
From: "Morgan Christiansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi, what is the standard for function naming in docbook?
>
> It's basically saying this in the various docs:
>
> Comply with pear standards but you must use lowercase.
> And pear standards say use getSettings instead of get_settings.
> And phpdoc
Hi, what is the standard for function naming in docbook?
It's basically saying this in the various docs:
Comply with pear standards but you must use lowercase.
And pear standards say use getSettings instead of get_settings.
And phpdoc standards say getsettings instead of getSettings.
So what s
From: "Hojtsy Gabor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > I'm just trying it out, and there are a LOT of error, yes.
:(((
> > > > The first 200 errors, are all about missing replaceable
tags.
> > > > We use other tags (eg. link), where the DTD nearly only
accepts
> > > > replaceable now...
> > >
> > > It
> > > I'm just trying it out, and there are a LOT of error, yes. :(((
> > > The first 200 errors, are all about missing replaceable tags.
> > > We use other tags (eg. link), where the DTD nearly only accepts
> > > replaceable now...
> >
> > It seems most of the errors are generated because the ch
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> > I'm just trying it out, and there are a LOT of error, yes. :(((
> > The first 200 errors, are all about missing replaceable tags.
> > We use other tags (eg. link), where the DTD nearly only accepts
> > replaceable now...
>
> It seems most of the err
> I'm just trying it out, and there are a LOT of error, yes. :(((
> The first 200 errors, are all about missing replaceable tags.
> We use other tags (eg. link), where the DTD nearly only accepts
> replaceable now...
It seems most of the errors are generated because the changes
in tag's content
Jouni Ahto wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
>
> > Is anybody against upgrading the current DTD to the actual 4.1.2?
> > I would happyly do the updates the weekend if nobody complains
> > (sure I would test the whole module before, so it is working with
> > the new DTD set).
>
> > Is anybody against upgrading the current DTD to the actual 4.1.2?
> > I would happyly do the updates the weekend if nobody complains
> > (sure I would test the whole module before, so it is working with
> > the new DTD set).
>
> Please don't do it yet... because our docs do *not* conform to it
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> Is anybody against upgrading the current DTD to the actual 4.1.2?
> I would happyly do the updates the weekend if nobody complains
> (sure I would test the whole module before, so it is working with
> the new DTD set).
Please don't do it yet... becaus
Hi!
Is anybody against upgrading the current DTD to the actual 4.1.2?
I would happyly do the updates the weekend if nobody complains
(sure I would test the whole module before, so it is working with
the new DTD set).
Goba
> sorry to bother you with this newbie question.
>
> As I would like to join the team maintaining the German version of the
> PHP manual later this year, I am trying to get familiar with DocBook.
>
> I've been reading the DocBook manual (O'Reilly) and I've been checking
> the DocBook Repository
Dear list,
sorry to bother you with this newbie question.
As I would like to join the team maintaining the German version of the
PHP manual later this year, I am trying to get familiar with DocBook.
I've been reading the DocBook manual (O'Reilly) and I've been checking
the DocBook Repository at
Sorry, one test bug left inside. Now corrected.
Goba
Hi!
I have corrected the hungarian entites, that
were bogus in the DSSL entity definitions.
Please update the autogenerator framework,
to use this file instead of the old one.
Hope it will be good, make said nothing bad.
This replaces docbook/common/dbl1hu.ent
I will post this to Normal Walsh,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David Elrom wrote:
> So why in gods name r we using this crapy docbook and TeX ?
> why do we have to be limited to one language and one language only ?!
We aren't.
> Q. any one here want the pdf in a language other than english ?
> A. i dunno what about u guys, but i do..
So why in gods name r we using this crapy docbook
and TeX ?why do we have to be limited to one language and one language only
?!
Q. any one here want the pdf in a language other
than english ?A. i dunno what about u guys,
but i do...
who decided to use docbook / TeX, why cant we
use som
Anderson Fortaleza wrote:
> Today I got my first contact with DocBook and I see
> that yo guys use it to build the doc page.
Yes thats true.
> I'd like to translate to portuguese BR this page, in
> HTML format, so I really want to use DocBook for it. I
> think that I can get a copy of your Doc
Hello!
Today I got my first contact with DocBook and I see
that yo guys use it to build the doc page.
I'd like to translate to portuguese BR this page, in
HTML format, so I really want to use DocBook for it. I
think that I can get a copy of your DocBook file and
translate it to pt_BR.
I noticed
46 matches
Mail list logo
