Re: Wikipedia

On 2019-01-09 07:58, Mattias Sundblad wrote: > Hi, > >> "IA-32" is not explicitly supported. It would rather be "C" for pil32 >> and "emu" >> on pil64. But this is probably too confusing for a Wikipedia article ;) > > Yes, most likely :) > >> Other supported architectures (besides "x86-64") a

Re: Function similar to Scheme 'foldl'?

Add foldl to standard library? > 9 okt. 2018 kl. 20:59 skrev r...@tamos.net: > >> On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 19:31 +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 01:21:07PM -0400, John Duncan wrote: >>> Yes, you couldn't reuse the same initial value for a data structure like >>> you would in

Re: Embedding and such

The 32 bit version was simple to link with other programs when I tried it several years ago. > 13 sep. 2018 kl. 06:59 skrev Alexander Burger : > > Hi Johan, > >> >> Is there a way of embedding the 64-bit version in a C-program, or > > As freemint said, this is not possible, or at least not me

Re: GitHub sold out to Microsoft

> 5 juni 2018 kl. 14:05 skrev Nehal : > > Hello Jakob, > > I believe it's ultimately about principle -> design -> philosophy (of > course security features matter!) of any software/service. Otherwise > why even invest time on picolisp, Java (or similar othe

Re: GitHub sold out to Microsoft

THE selling point of github for individuals and small projects, is the social aspect. And you have to think about what you are securing yourself from. It’s not like GitHub is going to take your code and run. But if you dislike GitHub on principle or because the data mining and the surveillance

Hacker News

PicoLisp made hacker news front page. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16980640

Re: AdventOfCode 2017

Tank feeder? > 2 jan. 2018 kl. 17:47 skrev r...@tamos.net: > >> On Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:39 +0200, Mike Pechkin wrote: >> p.s. Author of PicoLisp (Alexander Burger) is free for hiring and >> CV available by request. > > Nice touch, tankfeeder. > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.d

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Android Apps in PicoLisp

Back when I played with it, it could also run ARM apks via emulation. On 2017-09-18 19:52, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 07:10:01PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote: >> What went of Android x86? > > Would work if somebody compiles the bin/picolisp binary for

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Android Apps in PicoLisp

What went of Android x86? > 18 sep. 2017 kl. 18:19 skrev Alexander Burger : > > Hi Rick, > >> BTW, since I don't have an Android device, I assume that there is a way >> to VM my way to glory and fame in PilBox dev. :) > > The closest thing I can think of is using the emulator(s) that come with

Re: (rand) audit

What does that mean? > 29 aug. 2017 kl. 16:47 skrev Mike Pechkin : > > hi all, > > Buildin (rand) function (D. Knuth's book) passed all tests > by Practically Random software (v0.93). > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pracrand/ > > > While testing I've also implement jsf and sfc RNGs (64bit v

Re: Floating Point numbers vs Fixpoint numbers

Oh, that was quite mundane - as most bugs are when found. :) Huge props to you for finding it so very fast. On 2017-07-15 14:45, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 02:02:00PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote: >> What was it? > > The diff is: > >2460a2461 &

Re: Floating Point numbers vs Fixpoint numbers

What was it? On 2017-07-15 13:51, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: >> I cound not locate the exact location of the bug yet. It is a Heisenbug, >> because >> it only occurs if the garbage collector runs in the right moment. I know this >>

Re: Compiling to bytecode

Still, PicoLisp source, I mean the program you write in PicoLisp, (not the C code) can become quite large depending on your application. We mitigated this, not by storing the "compiled" structures of pointers to pointers. (Although we could have - but that would have been complicated to implemente

Re: Introduction

I enjoyed the writeup On 2017-05-24 21:00, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote: > While your long write-up is certainly welcome it is also unnecessary in > my humble opinion. > We gladly welcome you in the community. Just visit the IRC-channel > #picolisp on freenode.net > > > 2017-05-24 1

Re: picoLisp in custom Buildroot container now enhanced with vip!

Now this is great! > 8 maj 2017 kl. 04:34 skrev David Bloom : > > I humbly submit to you an enhanced version of my small picoLisp container. > This comes from a desire to include Alex's vip into the small picoLisp > container for others to use and learn from as I intend to. The idea behind

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Mobile Apps in PicoLisp

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13852666 On 2017-03-13 00:20, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > > It made Hacker News! > > http://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp@software-lab.de/msg07233.html > > > On 2017-03-12 17:10, Alexander Burger wrote: >> Hi all, >> >&

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Mobile Apps in PicoLisp

It made Hacker News! http://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp@software-lab.de/msg07233.html On 2017-03-12 17:10, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > it is now possible to build Android Apps completely in PicoLisp! > -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Mobile Apps in PicoLisp

> 12 mars 2017 kl. 20:16 skrev Alexander Burger : > I see no technical reason against it. It is also Arm64. Only that I have no > experience with iOS development. And - the biggest problem perhaps - the > political issues: How to bring such a beast to the apple store? AFAIK no problem given: "

Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Mobile Apps in PicoLisp

Fantastic! On 2017-03-12 17:10, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > it is now possible to build Android Apps completely in PicoLisp! > > > I have prepared an environment which lets you run normal PicoLisp (Web-) > applications on Android devices, without the need to write Java code. I'm > us

Re: Unclear licensing

The middle road is something like: /* Copyright 2017 Author. License: XXX */ or /* Copyright 2017 Author. SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ But there is NO REQUIREMENT for such a thing. What I do when incorporating a source file which has no license or copyright information at the top: I just

Re: future?

> 10 mars 2017 kl. 01:17 skrev : > > Thanks for your comments and insights, Jakob. > I just want to shortly assure you that I really liked your emails and your > participation. Thanks. > Sidenote: > Before GitHub, sourceforge.net was the singular main hoster for FOSS

Re: in the spirit of RosettaCode...

Another clue could be to look at the server end: For instance one in Python https://github.com/KixPanganiban/todo-falcon/blob/master/todo.py AFAIK the whole thing is like a "hello world" for persistence on the server and a very light GUI on the client. On 2017-03-01 08:46, Alexander Burger w

Re: Future of PicoLisp?

And I would be interested in working on a package or module system similar to "pip" for Python. I must confess that most discussions about namespaces etc on this list is way over my head... however could I be on the right track if I were to assume that using "local" in such modules would be a g

Re: Future of PicoLisp?

s (users) and "upstream" (LKML and Linus). Maybe one of the PicoLisp repos on Github already has that role, I don't know, I have not been in the loop about PicoLisp development. (Only lurking on this list.) best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Future of PicoLisp?

https://medium.com/@sitapati/the-impact-github-is-having-on-your-software-career-right-now-6ce536ec0b50#.krwczgbrq > 23 feb. 2017 kl. 07:55 skrev Alexander Burger : > > Thanks to all who contributed to this thread!! I agree with most of what you > said. > > However, we are mixing up three diff

Re: future?

little in private communication with Regenaxer over the years. Even if you totally disagree with me, I want you all to know I appreciate the labor of love you all have put in over the years. I'd be just a little bit poorer in my life as a human if PicoLisp had not existed. I think that is why I feel so strongly, that more people should have a chance to discover something so beautiful as PicoLisp. best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Future of PicoLisp?

saying that the only tradeoff with using GNU Social instead of Twitter is that sometimes the messages may arrive a little slow. Another tradeoff is that there are very few people and projects on any site besides Github. This is the reality. -- Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-la

Re: Future of PicoLisp?

I would love for the public repo to be on github! I think for many, an open source project does not really exist, unless it is on Github. We should also try to resurrect somehow, the [picolisp] tag on Stack Overflow. Given that it is encouraged to put in official documentation in the form of Q/

Appimage.org

Could someone check out http://appimage.org ? It seems to gain momentum now and PicoLisp in that format would make it really easy to use. Best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: French localization

I will cheer on. Salut! > 24 jan. 2017 kl. 08:18 skrev CILz : > > Hello guys, > > I'd be happy to help on that task. If anyone else want to step up on this > let's join our forces. > > Best, > > EricC > > >> Le 24/01/2017 à 07:49, Alexander Burger a écrit : >> Dear PicoLispers, >> >> is an

Re: back to the future in bench game

This was interesting! Just saw pixielang on HN. > 17 jan. 2017 kl. 22:28 skrev Mike Pechkin : > > Author of http://pixielang.org/ in the city. > Welcome to community > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Timothy Baldridge >> wrote: >> > Check link in archive: >> >https://web.archive.org/web/20

Re: Copy A to B, so that no change in A affects B

I like how you give both a rationale (of sorts) against, then a demonstration nevertheless of a deep copy. Very friendly! :) > 5 dec. 2016 kl. 08:43 skrev Alexander Burger : > >> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:44:53AM -0500, Bruno Franco wrote: >> Is there a function that would copy A so that no cha

Re: FreeBSD 11

On 14/10/16 23:03, r...@tamos.net wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:12 +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote: >> On 14/10/16 22:01, r...@tamos.net wrote: >>> But picolisp is for experienced programmers[1], a class of people who >>> have no problem building software. >> >&

Re: FreeBSD 11

r. Because of various particulars, the barrier is higher to get started in for a random stranger, but nothing that can't be fixed eventually. best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: task db example

It can apply to docs but a more fitting license might be one if the Creative Commons licenses. CC0 is roughly equivalent to MIT. > 6 sep. 2016 kl. 14:33 skrev Alexander Burger : > > Hi Rowan, > >> How is stuff posted on the wiki copyrighted/licensed? >> Public Domain? GPL? > > Uh, good questio

Re: PicoLisp as Femto extension language

These questions go a bit over my head, but Femto with Pico has a nice ring to it. :-) > 4 sep. 2016 kl. 19:38 skrev Thorsten Jolitz : > > > Hi List, > recently I found out about Femto, a minimal Emacs implementation in less > than 2k lines of C (including ncurses, though): > > , > | git cl

Re: Ubuntu does not update PicoLisp

It would be helpful if we could find out how the build process fails. > 3 sep. 2016 kl. 16:04 skrev Alexander Burger : > > Hi all, > > Ubuntu stopped to update PicoLisp in its distribution. I noticed that > the next Ubuntu release (yakkety) still has only PicoLisp 15.11 !! > > This is rather b

Re: PicoLisp Blog

Good initiative > 30 aug. 2016 kl. 22:41 skrev Anas Drak : > > Basic information on PicoLisp and introductory material: > http://pico-lisp.blogspot.gr/ >

Re: Windows x64 PicoLisp preview

This is really good, thank you. On 17/08/16 14:13, Joe Bogner wrote: > I've been working on a port of PicoLisp 64 to Windows. The port is ready > for an early preview for anyone who wants to try it out > > The goal of the initiative is to allow PicoLisp development on Windows. > This may impro

Re: Best way to learn picolisp

It's more like Common Lisp is a derivative of PicoLisp, seriously. :-) So I'd go for pico first, it's easier to understand. > 8 juni 2016 kl. 14:08 skrev Lawrence Bottorff : > > So, what would the best way to learn picolisp be for a total beginner? It > might seem like you should just bite the

Re: OpenGL and miniPicoLisp

You are welcome to. I have been exploring Lua lately and have been longing to do some PicoLisp again. Lua is nice but it ain't no Lisp. :) > 24 apr. 2016 kl. 11:31 skrev Robert Herman : > > I might take you up on that, Jakob! At the moment, I am exploring options > regardles

Re: OpenGL and miniPicoLisp

IMHO it should be trivial to get SDL working with miniPicoLisp. I'd wrap enough of SDL to get a minimal example running and extend it from there. If you put it on GitHub I might help out too! :-) > 24 apr. 2016 kl. 09:50 skrev Robert Herman : > > Well, that answers a lot, thanks. Textures are g

Re: OpenGL and miniPicoLisp

016 at 01:06:46PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote: >> That support is not going to be widely spread until >> a few years down the road. > > Oh, I see :( > > If portability is an issue, and miniPicoLisp is both too limited and > tedious to extend, then Rob should indeed also

Re: OpenGL and miniPicoLisp

That support is not going to be widely spread until a few years down the road. Even so, I expect it (Ubuntu on Windows) to be a downloadable server component rather than standard on all Windows client versions. best regards, Jakob On 23/04/16 12:57, Robert Herman wrote: > Thanks, I'l

Re: Spring 2016 Lisp Game Jam

t; thing? I'd say I meant that. :) // Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Spring 2016 Lisp Game Jam

I'd say it's rather simple to embed minipico into any framework which can be used with plain C. So that should open up Android and iOS too. Although never underestimate the practical troubles with compiling on 4 platforms if you are only one developer. :) Been there, done that. :)

Re: Spring 2016 Lisp Game Jam

Actually, I find that you can statically link most libraries on Linux and that tends to remove almost all distribution problems. best regards, Jakob On 20/04/16 07:57, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Rob, > >> HTML5, JS and family come into the picture when you want to distribute or &

Re: Function browser in Emacs

sweet! :) On 10/04/16 01:43, Henrik Sarvell wrote: > This is a bit off topic but my new function browser does support > Picolisp out of the box :) > > It might come in handy for all Picolispers on Emacs. > > https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/list-functions > > http://www.prodevtips.com/2016/04/09

Re: Redesigned Wiki is Live

It's good to see the details worked out here. But the main take away for me, is that in today's stylish web landscape, it's important that sites look stylish. And the site now looks stylish. Great and thanks to all involved. best regards, Jakob On 24/03/16 16:34, Erik Gustaf

Re: Tractatus Pico-Blaesicus

Hey, I love this Tractatus! Very unbiased and fair. (Even acknowledging 2.4!) On 07/03/16 19:25, Alexander Burger wrote: > Dear PicoLisp List, > > let me announce a strange little piece of [code?, documentation?, > pamphlet?] which I wrote up to summarize some of the positions and > philosoph

Re: Backspace across wrapped line

r 5, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Jakob Eriksson > wrote: > >> A shotgun approach would be to create a screen editor of sorts, >> with a repl in it. That is probably overkill. >> >> >> >> On 05/03/16 16:18, Alexander Burger wrote: >>> Hi all, >>&g

Re: Backspace across wrapped line

A shotgun approach would be to create a screen editor of sorts, with a repl in it. That is probably overkill. On 05/03/16 16:18, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > since early versions of PicoLisp I have a problem with the behavior of > terminals. > > It concerns the REPL line editor in deb

Re: a floating point math library for 64 bit PicoLisp

I like it! Back when we needed float, we just used C, but your way is nicer 😀 > 25 jan. 2016 kl. 06:12 skrev Alexander Williams : > > Hi Greg, > > This is quite impressive, particularly for a first time Lisper. Great job! > > I haven't tested it, but the code looks good. Thanks for the contribu

Re: PicoLisp available under Termux/Android

Oh, thanks for the double tip there. On 27/11/15 13:30, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > PicoLisp is running now on Android, directly installable in Termux! > > Termux is a great terminal emulator and Linux environment, see > >http://termux.com >http://termux.com/help > > I'm using

Re: Announce ARMv8 (arm64) version of 64-bit PicoLisp released

Awesome. Does this planner have a site on the Web or is that after the meeting with Google On November 18, 2015 3:19:07 PM GMT+01:00, Azul Echidna wrote: >Alex: > >Congrats! > >I know I'm new, but I've been working a joint Open Source civilian / >military transportation planner in PicoLisp. >(

Re: Announce: MCU based PicoLisp machines for sale

Oh, this is really nice, thank you! These boards, do they have some kind of digital or analog I/O for easy interfacing? On 04/11/15 03:03, Raman Gopalan wrote: > > Dear PicoLisp community, > > Greetings! I trust you're all doing well! Thank you for all the > interesting discussions in the maili

Re: PicoLisp on PowerPC-64

Hey this is really nice. Another architecture is nice not only in itself, which it is, but also from a documentation point of view. On October 13, 2015 6:15:18 PM GMT+02:00, Alexander Burger wrote: > >Hi all, > >PicoLisp is now running on PowerPC-64 (again)! > >I implemented the generic asse

Re: ins@nity

Haha, I looked at it but what is it? :-) On August 25, 2015 6:32:28 AM CEST, Erik Gustafson wrote: >What's good everyone? > >I've really been liking the function 'map@' from a few threads back. I >wrote a little library that follows this idea to its logical >conclusion. >It's mostly a joke, so

Re: unusbscribe

It's spelt wrong :-) On August 10, 2015 8:26:04 AM CEST, Christopher Lozinski wrote: > > Me >-- >UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.

BIOS limitations

This link mentions extended read. Could this be relevant to read blocks larger than 32 or 64 kbytes? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/856050/how-to-load-kernel-into-memory-from-cd-rom-using-assembly-nasm -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: PilMCU is dead - Long live PilOS!

Thank you! On 19/06/15 22:16, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm happy to announce PilOS - The PicoLisp Operating System! > > It is a modification of the infamous PilMCU, which unfortunately doesn't > seem to get off the ground. So in order not to have wasted all that > effort, I decided

Re: PicoLisp now detected on GitHub

This is great! On 17/06/15 17:48, Christophe Gragnic wrote: > Hi list. > > They even spelled it correctly ! > https://github.com/github/linguist/pull/2449#issuecomment-112829159 > See one of your repos or this one: > https://github.com/Microalg/Microalg > > chri > -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolis

Re: Test - Please ignore

It was s hard to resist and now I can't. On 01/06/15 21:52, Rick Hanson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: >> This is a test mail. Please ignore. > I feel like being a contrarian today. :) -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: 4clojure tasks in PicoLisp

What tasks?, what even is this? :) On April 29, 2015 at 10:57 AM Mike Pechkin wrote: > hi, > > With backbone support from Mr.Burger all tasks were implemented. > Sources in bitbucket here: http://goo.gl/fhymP8 > > Notes: > o) favourite - #52 Intro to Destructuring (easy.l) > o) the most inter

Re: MySQL native C wrapper

Good initiative - the more ways to connect, the better, IMHO. On 26/04/15 23:00, Henrik Sarvell wrote: > Hi list, I'm announcing this at a very early stage, earlier than I > would like to, in case someone else is also thinking about doing a > MySQL wrapper, to avoid duplicate work. > > I'm not d

Re: New article - Installing local wiki with Kerberos authentication

Interesting. Is the server a Windows server or Linux? On 14/04/15 14:19, Mansur Mamkin wrote: > Hi all! > I'm happy to announce a litle article: > Installing local wiki with Kerberos authentication > > http://picolisp.com/wiki/?localwikikerberos > > Best regards, > Mansur Mamkin -- UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Building picolisp on (some) BSDs

Excellent work! On March 25, 2015 4:18:15 PM CET, Rick Hanson wrote: >Hello, list! > >I thought I should write a few words on some information I’ve gleaned >trying to build picolisp on some of the BSDs. There are people on this >list >with more experience than I with both BSD and picolisp; so pl

Re: Sorry, no repo (Was: Google Code closing)

Fair enough! Whatever works best for you is for the best. On March 17, 2015 7:34:09 AM CET, Alexander Burger wrote: >Hi Jon, hi all! > >I'm very sorry, but from now on I won't support any repo for PicoLisp. > > >As ever, the most up-to-date version can be downloaded from > > http://softwa

Re: Google Code closing

And github.com has like, what, 1000 times more developers. :-) On March 13, 2015 4:32:05 PM CET, Alexander Williams wrote: >Everyone's comments are valid, but we need to remember: > >For PicoLisp's user base to grow, lowering barriers to entry should be >the >first priority. > > >On Fri, Mar

Re: Google Code closing

Github.com is more than a repo, it's a community of developers. On March 13, 2015 12:56:32 PM CET, Alexander Burger wrote: >Hi all, > >Alea iacta est :) > >Mike Pechkin has set up a repo at bitbucket. More next week. > >♪♫ Alex >-- >UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscr

Re: Google Code closing

Github.com is really nice. On March 13, 2015 9:02:10 AM CET, Jon Kleiser wrote: >Hi, > >It looks like PicoLisp will have to move from Google Code: > > >Maybe GitHub could be a good alt

Re: Announce: 7fach BlitzMenu

Congratulations! On March 12, 2015 7:29:02 PM CET, Alexander Burger wrote: >Hello list, > >let me announce 7fach BlitzMenu, our first attempt for a public >application since 9 years :) > >It is for gastronomers, restaurants or canteens, to maintain their >dishes and beverages in a database, an

PicoLisp on machines with more than 32 gigabyte of RAM?

sp would fare on large machines with large sets of data? I have a feeling "really great". :) Has someone on the list tried PicoLisp on a monster PC? best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Yet another JSON lib, and a tutorial

Hey, cool. Now you lured me into reading about nanomsg. :-) On March 10, 2015 2:53:58 PM CET, Alexander Williams wrote: >Hi list, > >I've written yet another JSON encoder/decoder for PicoLisp. I know, >they >already exist.. > >This library is using a native C library for JSON parsing, so it'

Re: Solaris 10 picolisp 64 build

.sunOs.tgz`) I hereby turn in any computing creds I've garnered over >>> the years to be thrown into burning inferno where they belong, and I'll go >>> live in a box down my the river. :) Thanks! >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Jakob Eriksson

Re: Solaris 10 picolisp 64 build

You are not by any chance on a Sparc platform? On 03/03/15 20:57, Rick Hanson wrote: > Sorry in advance if you’ve already covered this issue in the past. > > I’m on Solaris 10; I can build the 32-bit picolisp (3.1.9) with no problem. > Then, I go do a (cd src64; make) (which is GNU make btw);

Re: A PicoLisp native library tutorial

Yep. Definitely interesting. On 03/03/15 18:50, Joe Bogner wrote: > Nicely done. Thanks for sharing > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Henrik Sarvell wrote: > >> Nice! >> >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Williams >> wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> >>> Some of you might know me from IRC

Re: modules?

Even if that were so, couldn't we fix this with a convention in the module loader? That is, the loader concatenates all files into one upon loading. Is this crazy talk? On February 10, 2015 9:47:54 AM CET, andr...@itship.ch wrote: >Hi Lawrence > >Nice you're taking part here! >You're basical

Re: modules?

Could we cook up a convention? On February 9, 2015 6:12:17 PM CET, Henrik Sarvell wrote: >Hi Lawrence, if you're talking about something like Ruby's gems, then >no. > >On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Lawrence Bottorff >wrote: > >> I'm wondering what you offer in lieu of modules (as with, say, >

Re: Java Interoperability - Why bother with Clojure?

On 02/02/15 15:50, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Jakob, > >> Which makes me wonder about Ersatz PicoLisp though. >> How would it stand against other JVM alternatives? I know that Ersatz is >> not as >> fast as native PicoLisp. But for instance Groovy, is really sl

Re: Java Interoperability - Why bother with Clojure?

Interesting development you have there, connecting the JVM to PicoLisp proper. Which makes me wonder about Ersatz PicoLisp though. How would it stand against other JVM alternatives? I know that Ersatz is not as fast as native PicoLisp. But for instance Groovy, is really slow on the JVM. Maybe Ersa

Re: A Minimal PicoLisp DB/GUI Application

It's a really good example. On January 12, 2015 8:34:08 AM CET, Alexander Burger wrote: >Hi all, > >perhaps this is useful: > > A Minimal PicoLisp DB/GUI Application > > http://picolisp.com/wiki/?minDbGui > >♪♫ Alex >-- >UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe --

Re: Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas to you too :-) On December 24, 2014 9:37:30 AM CET, Mattias Sundblad wrote: >Hi, > >I'd like to wish everyone on the list a merry christmas and a happy new >year. Learning Picolisp is a great and fun challenge for me at least >and >I'm looking forward to continuing the journey.

Re: Minor diff between 32-bit and Ersatz re. "redefined"

t; > may not matter very much, I just wanted to mention it. (I haven’t tried > > 64-bit.) > > Oops, yes, very good! That's a bug in 'dm', in the place where the > values are compared. I've fixed it. A bug in Erzats? --jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: pilMCU progress (slowed)

"regular" PicoLisp, can, and has been, ported to various microcontrollers. Any 32 or 64 bit microcontroller can have PicoLisp ported to it. best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Strange PicoLisp site

On October 27, 2014 at 10:20 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Jakob, > > our mails just crossed ;-) > > > "someone" registered that domain for PicoLisp, then did not renew the fee. > > Yes, javuchi messed it up somehow, but it may not be only his fault. It >

Re: Strange PicoLisp site

o keep the page in google's index, to keep the value of the domain up a tiny little bit. --jakob On October 27, 2014 at 9:49 AM Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > > Hi List, > > have you seen this website: > > , > | http://www.picolisp.org/ > ` > > Its a nice looki

Re: The many uses of PilMCU

I don't understand the leftmost column with the dollars. On 2014-10-13 22:38, Heow Goodman wrote: I've started a wiki document: http://picolisp.com/wiki/?pilMCU Will flesh it out over the next few days. - h On 2014-10-7, 4:36 PM, Christophe Gragnic wrote: Hi list ! This thread is mean

Re: pilMCU progress

Great news :-) On October 12, 2014 4:23:07 AM CEST, gpor...@yahoo.com wrote: >Hi List! > > >Just want to share another finished module: ttyIn is working well with >ttyOut now 😊 > >Will proceed to EEPROM so that we can load the ROM image for pilMCU >bytecodes 😉 > > >Keep you all posted cheers! >

Re: The many uses of PilMCU

I would want to use pilmcu for realtime applications, with no ram cache, just RAM. It would be really easy to allocate time slots and calculate an upper bound for how long a function could run. --jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: MiniPicoLisp Code in ROM

ntime environment. I do not see > significant advantages for pilMCU. > > So I have no plan at the moment to do that. But if the need would arise, it would not be exactly hard to implement? best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: MiniPicoLisp Code in ROM

Great news On October 7, 2014 8:27:45 AM CEST, Alexander Burger wrote: >Hi all, > >definitions in miniPicoLisp can now be put into ROM space. This helps >to >save precious RAM on embedded systems. > >I've put an article about how to do this into the Wiki: > > http://picolisp.com/wiki/?miniCod

Re: Picolisp Specific Training

Maybe Alex could for a price? On September 25, 2014 5:54:02 PM CEST, jerome moliere wrote: >Hi all, >I think that everything is in the title... >Do you know if someone supplies such training ? >Kind regards > >-- >J.MOLIERE - Mentor/J -- Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäk

Re: Announce: PicoLisp in Hardware (PilMCU)

l to make a very nice and successfull > kickstarter project, so why not try to build a business idea around it > instead of just giving away the verilog source and build files? +1 regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

PicoLisp on Raspi

in the pi is not a natural fit, it is not 64 bit, only 32. So it would be more of a promo thing. But very cool in its own right. --jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Announce: PicoLisp in Hardware (PilMCU)

> project. On existing hardware you may be served better with a standard > OS. I read that as, "when PicoLisp" is seen running on _actual_ hardware. (Not currently existing.) Was I right Alabhya? best regards, Jakob -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Announce: PicoLisp in Hardware (PilMCU)

Fantastic, this is truly great. I have been hoping for years someone would pull this off. Congratulations. best regards, Jakob On September 19, 2014 at 1:39 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hello List, > > we are proud to announce PilMCU, the Lisp Machine on a Chip! :) > > We,

Re: try picolisp

Maybe not with Emscripten. On August 28, 2014 7:41:12 PM CEST, Mike Pechkin wrote: >hi, > >Is it hard to implement minimalist version of minipicolisp in browser ? >Like http://tryclj.com/ ? > >Mike -- Skickat från min Android-telefon med K-9 E-post. Ursäkta min fåordighet.

Re: Pico/Ersatz diffs: chain, link, yoke

You would be mad to use Erzats for performance anyway, so I'd wish for correctness or similarity. It would also serve as a documentation of what it takes to implement a full PicoLisp. Sort of a portable spec. On June 25, 2014 4:45:12 PM CEST, Alexander Burger wrote: >Hi Jon, > >> If you in nor

Re: Regarding the implementations of PicoLisp

Sorry for ranting the list again but... On 2014-05-14 19:17, andr...@itship.ch wrote: > true, but then the leaking memory wouldn't have been restricted on > critical data like private keys and password traffic. so more probing > would have been necessary to gain exploitable data. which of course i

  1   2   3   >