** Reply to note from "David A. Desrosiers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 29 Nov 2001
10:31:30 -0800 (PST)
> I'd love to see if I can "contract" out the role of whipping up a
> Java-based Palm Desktop clone for us to use, something that models what they
> have almost perfectly, but more portable (w
** Reply to note from John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:57:18 +
> > > A discussion group for Unix Palm users probably isn't a bad idea... I'll
> > > see about getting one added...
> >
> > ahem, don't narrow it to just *nix users, how about for non-windoze users;
> >
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:45:27AM +, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> ** Reply to note from Ben Steeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 29 Nov 2001 14:06:25 -0400
>
>
> > A discussion group for Unix Palm users probably isn't a bad idea... I'll
> > see about getting one added...
>
> ahem, don't narrow it to jus
** Reply to note from Ben Steeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 29 Nov 2001 14:06:25 -0400
> A discussion group for Unix Palm users probably isn't a bad idea... I'll
> see about getting one added...
ahem, don't narrow it to just *nix users, how about for non-windoze users;
I use Palm Link on OS/2
Voy
> A discussion group for Unix Palm users probably isn't a bad idea... I'll
> see about getting one added...
Let's be careful not to fracture this list. How about just adding a
mention here and there about the pilot-unix mailing list on the main forum
and point to the archives in your .si
> Is this sort of idiocy representative of Palm's attitude?
Some of the representatives, yes. There are some people within Palm
(if they still have jobs after this week's layoffs) that agree with us, and
some who believe we are "subverting profit" which should be going to Palm
for softwa
Engineer
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
> Brodbelt
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: (no subject)
>
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 13:48, Mike Brodbelt wrote:
>
> Is this sort of idiocy representative of Palm's attitude? It really
> amazes me - I've owned 3 different Palm handhelds, and would not have
> bought any of them without the Linux support provided by pilot-link. Are
> they really so stupid t
David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> I asked some people about this at last year's Palmsource,
> specifically around borrowing code in POSE (which supports the "pseudo" VFS
> api to write to these devices) in pilot-link, and I was threatened with
> lawyers. They said that I am *NOT* allowed to "hij
> It does not have to be pilot-link. Maybe there is some other software
> doing this. Only requirement is to run under unix. I even thought about
> writing myself simple pilot application with linux part which will
> upload fies over serial/IR and save them to memory stick.
I asked some
perhaps cfzap is sort of like what you're looking for? (app that
works on the trgpro, and lets beamed stuff go directly to CF card.
Not sure how portable those APIs are.)
___
Pilot-unix mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hcirisc.cs.binghamton.edu/mai
11 matches
Mail list logo
