Great image Gregg! It took no longer to download than a 'regular' message.
But then, I'm on a cable modem connected 24/7. BTW even the high speed
connection slows to a crawl when there is heavy traffic.
I think it would be nice to be able to post images to the list, but the
format would have to
guy,
i must say that the photograph
that pops up on your main page
under straight photography is the
most beautiful color print i have
seen. nice work!
noa
Return-Path: jmwo...@att.net
Delivered-To: pinhole-discuss...@pairlist.net
Received: from vala.pair.com (vala.pair.com [209.68.1.127])
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I didn't want to spend too much time with
yet another administrative issues, but I believe the list should serve the
interests of all. There have been several good arguments why we should NOT
send images in postings, so I think we should continue our old
I'm posting an image to the list to test out a couple of things.nbsp;
First, to be sure the list will handle it. And second, to find out
how it might affect various user's mail.
Not all of use read mail with browsers, so sending images in messages
is hard to handle. Better to post to
Gregg Kemp wrote:
[nothing but headers, the message body was a pair of HTML attachments
and an image attachment]
Although I'd probably have no major techincal problems with images on
the mailing list (assuming that I jump through enough hoops), I would
really like it if images (and other
Guy, I really loved your pinholes. Many have such a
beautiful, painterly quality. I felt full of images
after just a few and will revisit to view some more
later. I especially loved number 14, very
impressionistic.
I had a slight problem with number 13, couldn't get it
to show me the right
That is the nice thing about having the image as an attachment. Replies
normally don't get it you don't have to consciously remove it before
replying...
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Gregg
I know that with my previous server and modem it was a
total pain in the arse to receive images in email,
REALLY slow and often my server would time me out and
I'd have to go in via Telnet to delete the offensive
email, never having seen what image was sent.
Thus, while it is not a problem for me
Looks good to me, and created no download burden. I am on a 56K modem.
I thought at first that I hadn't received it, because there was a
broken-link icon where I would have expected the image to be, but later
I scrolled down past that box and found it.
I'm new here and completely new to
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:09:35 -0400, Gregg Kemp
gregg.kemp@p at ??? wrote:
html
I'm posting an image to the list to test out a couple of things.nbsp;
First, to be sure the list will handle it.nbsp; And second, to find out
how it might affect various user's mail.br
br
This is, what I got. I
Another potential problem - replying without deleting the original image.
-Original Message-
From: William Erickson [mailto:erick...@ic.mankato.mn.us]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 9:52 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] posting of images to the list?
I think the ability to post individual images by e-mail is an advantage, if we
can ask for some parameters such as a problem with something or some other need
for a shared single image.
- Original Message -
From: Gregg Kemp
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday,
A couple of problems I've seen so far with posting images in email:
- The archive wasn't able to display the image, but does display the binary
file as text - very ugly and takes up just as much space.
- The entire email arrive to me at work using MS Outlook, as an attached
html file
--- G.Penate pen...@home.com wrote:
If this image goes through ok, I ask everyone to NOT start posting images.
Instead, let's discuss the pros and cons of doing this through the list.
For example, we can limit the size of postings to prevent anyone from sending
any really large files. Or
-Original Message-
From: G.Penate [mailto:pen...@home.com]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 9:12 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] posting of images to the list?
If this image goes through ok, I ask everyone to NOT start posting images.
Instead,
I'm a little confused because I used to be on a mailing list
where I would
get multiple email letters on one email and now I am getting
bombarded
daily
by 10 to 15 emails from people
Not that I don't want to receive Pinhole email information, but what
happened to the other method???
Same story with me. I apparently am now on the list that passes the
individual e-mails, not the group.
H E L P
Harry
-Original Message-
From: Cugnasca, David cugn...@chesterton.com
To: 'pinhole-discussion@p at ???' pinhole-discussion@p at ???
List-Post:
HI,
I'm a little confused because I used to be on a mailing list where I would
get multiple email letters on one email and now I am getting bombarded daily
by 10 to 15 emails from people
Not that I don't want to receive Pinhole email information, but what
happened to the other method???
If this image goes through ok, I ask everyone to NOT start posting images.
Instead, let's discuss the pros and cons of doing this through the list.
For example, we can limit the size of postings to prevent anyone from sending
any really large files. Or we could come up with some guidelines
I'm posting an image to the list to test out a couple of things.
First, to be sure the list will handle it. And second, to find out
how it might affect various user's mail.
It has long been against the policy of the list to send images for
several reasons - primarily, the increased space
In a message dated 8/24/00 9:15:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time, pen...@home.com
writes:
Guillermo
Guillermo,
I just picked up HP5 4x5 for my Bender pinhole and my BJ press camera.
I really appreciate your precise answers to complicated questions. When I
began to read this response, I
22 matches
Mail list logo
