On Feb 16, 2015, at 2:54 AM, "Alan W. Irwin" wrote:
> On 2015-02-15 23:04-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
>
>> I think I successfully got my master updated and rebased my branch. I have
>> attached a patch that captures my work relative to the current master. I
>> really hope this patch works withou
> @Phil: Those conflicts from the rebase are expected from such an
> intrusive change. That was what I was trying to avoid by choosing my
> timing such that you could abandon your old topic branch and start
> with a fresh branch from master before doing any further changes
> beyond what is committ
On 2015-02-15 16:43-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Probably you will be able to follow these [uncrustify build] directions on
> Cygwin, but it
> will only work if you have the appropriate Cygwin autotools
> (autoconf, automake, and libtool) packages installed. Also, I assume
> you will want to use s
On 2015-02-15 23:04-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
> I think I successfully got my master updated and rebased my branch. I have
> attached a patch that captures my work relative to the current master. I
> really hope this patch works without conflicts!
Please use the correct term which is "patch seri
Grr, here is the patch. Coding with a cold is *no* fun.
plbuf_plmem.patch
Description: Binary data
On Feb 15, 2015, at 11:04 PM, Jim Dishaw wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 10:35 PM, "Alan W. Irwin"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-02-15 21:15-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
>>
>>> Did the patch I sent earli
On Feb 15, 2015, at 10:35 PM, "Alan W. Irwin" wrote:
> On 2015-02-15 21:15-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
>
>> Did the patch I sent earlier work?
>
> The last I saw from you was the patch (actually a patch series) you
> sent 3 days ago. That got into the integrated series by Phil (which
> worked, whi
On 2015-02-15 21:15-0500 Jim Dishaw wrote:
> Did the patch I sent earlier work?
The last I saw from you was the patch (actually a patch series) you
sent 3 days ago. That got into the integrated series by Phil (which
worked, which I think answers your question). Because that worked,
Phil pushed
Did the patch I sent earlier work?
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> On 2015-02-15 23:07- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alan
>> How do you perform the style changes and do you know if I can do the
>> same with Cygwin.
>> I just did a rebase and all my changes confl
On 2015-02-15 23:07- Phil Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi Alan
> How do you perform the style changes and do you know if I can do the
> same with Cygwin.
> I just did a rebase and all my changes conflicted - presumably because
> MSVC++ uses tabs rather than spaces. If I can replicate the restyle on
> my
Hi Alan
How do you perform the style changes and do you know if I can do the
same with Cygwin.
I just did a rebase and all my changes conflicted - presumably because
MSVC++ uses tabs rather than spaces. If I can replicate the restyle on
my commits before I do any further work I can avoid that happe
I hope I chose my timing well for this intrusive style change that I
have just pushed so that you guys can easily carry on tomorrow with
further work on your plbuf and wxwidgets topic branches that you
branch from the (now restyled) master branch.
@Phil: One potential issue I noticed as a result o
11 matches
Mail list logo
