If you have a structure. A-C, B-C then you might actually want back
functionality. Otherwise you have to create two copies of C (A-C1, B-C2)
wasting bandwidth and space for what is essentially the same page.
This makes no sense to me whatsoever. You don't need more than one
copy of C
Laurens M. Fridael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] The Adobe SVG plug-in, for instance, is still way too heavy compared
to Flash and there aren't enough good SVG authoring tools for designers,
nothing that can compare with Flash MX, that is. [...]
There's a conversation just started on [EMAIL
If you have a structure. A-C, B-C then you might actually
want back functionality. Otherwise you have to create two
copies of C (A-C1, B-C2)
This makes no sense to me whatsoever. You don't need more
than one copy of C at all, just keep referencing C from
wherever you call it. This is how
MJ Ray wrote:
There's a conversation just started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
it seems that SVG may not be in a happy place for free software
either, because of patents held on some of its core methods.
Akin to the LZW patent used by GIF? I'll take a look.
Please, get your hands dirty and start
Blake Winton wrote:
What do you mean by a dedicated conduit? Plucker has had
a (Win32) conduit for quite a while now.
Where?
Regards
-Laurens
___
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
What do you mean by a dedicated conduit? Plucker has had
a (Win32) conduit for quite a while now.
Where?
Right! That was harder to find than I would have hoped.
(Google gave me nothing for Plucker conduit, so I had to go
back through my saved email from the list to find it.)
It's called
Laurens M. Fridael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems that SVG may not be in a happy place for free software
either, because of patents held on some of its core methods.
Akin to the LZW patent used by GIF? I'll take a look.
Actually, I think they're far more pervasive than that. With the GIF
It seems to me that a Bulletin Board for communication would have some serious
advantages over this mailing list:
- It would be searchable
- It would be easier to jump into out of conversations
- It would be easier to locate previous threads of discussion (history)
phpBB would be good.
Can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/02 02:29PM
Since I haven't gotten any more feedback, I finished up icon functionality
my way and have tossed her up on the web.
http://kittycentral.net/Plucker/PlkrData.html
snip
Feedback would be very appreciated.
-Tony McNamara
At 03:09 PM
I understand that, but if Plucker Desktop is invoking PlkrData, then it knows that
something has changed and can just set ITSELF up.
I guess what I'm calling for is for whoever is working on Plucker Desktop (sorry, I
don't know who's who yet) to work with you to add your functionality to that
What about writing a Plucker authoring guide, with guidelines specifying
which parts of HTML are supported, how to achieve particular formatting,
what to do and what not to do, etc.? Or is there such a thing already?
I'm planning to write a reference for JPluck that explain how HTML is
parsed,
It seems to me that a Bulletin Board for communication would have some
serious advantages over this mailing list:
We've talked about this before. I've been wanting to create a nice
search engine for the list(s) and FAQ and docs, and I have something very
similar working on
Oh, OK... Thanks... Looking forward to it...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/02 03:45PM
At 03:35 PM 11/19/2002 -0500, TIM CONSTANTINE wrote:
I understand that, but if Plucker Desktop is invoking PlkrData, then it
knows that something has changed and can just set ITSELF up.
I guess what I'm calling
Yes, I know different mailing lists could be created, but the whole
Plucker system needs to work together, and you may need to jump into and
out of different conversations to do what it is that you want to do.
As long as it works directly with the mailing lists, and does not
obsolete
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002, TIM CONSTANTINE wrote:
It seems to me that a Bulletin Board for communication would have
some serious advantages over this mailing list:
As have already been pointed out the advantages are already
available for the mailing list.
If you started to use a differet system for
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002, TIM CONSTANTINE wrote:
It seems to me that a Bulletin Board for communication would have
some serious advantages over this mailing list:
As have already been pointed out the advantages are already
available for the mailing list.
Not all of the advantages. If I
At 10:37 PM 11/19/2002 +0100, Michael Nordström wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002, TIM CONSTANTINE wrote:
It seems to me that a Bulletin Board for communication would have
some serious advantages over this mailing list:
As have already been pointed out the advantages are already
available for the
On 19 Nov 2002 at 11:12, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
Ugh, the worst of the offenders. There are no forms on the Onion's
website, yet they still need to rely on this pods://avantgo/back syntax?
Useless. On that page, _ALL_ articles reference index.html, and to all
articles, index.html is
Robert O'Connor wrote:
On 18 Nov 2002 at 21:43, Laurens M. Fridael wrote:
complying with W3C standards is hardly a priority or
even a consideration.
I would tend to differ on that point.
You're quoting out of context! I already had a lengthy discussion with David
about this. I'm not going
On 25 Oct 2002 at 10:35, Wayne A. Arthurton wrote:
What are people doing to install your Plucker DBs to a memory card w/o
having to manually change the location on each one?
I'm considering making all my DBs start with pkr e.g. pkrSlashDot and
then have in script run a move all DBs that
At 10:53 PM 11/19/2002 +, Robert O'Connor wrote:
On 18 Nov 2002 at 21:43, Laurens M. Fridael wrote:
complying with W3C standards is hardly a priority or
even a consideration.
I would tend to differ on that point.
Over the next few years, Plucker is going to become the dominant force as
On 19 Nov 2002 at 15:22, Fringe Ryder wrote:
At 10:53 PM 11/19/2002 +, Robert O'Connor wrote:
On 18 Nov 2002 at 21:43, Laurens M. Fridael wrote:
complying with W3C standards is hardly a priority or
even a consideration.
I would tend to differ on that point.
Over the next few
Fringe Ryder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find a mailing list nearly ideal. The only detriments to it are that the=
odd message is flagged as spam by my filters and I haven't determined why,=
You need to add the lists to your whitelist or scorefile.
and that threads I care nothing about still
At 11:54 PM 11/19/2002 +, Robert O'Connor wrote:
On 19 Nov 2002 at 15:22, Fringe Ryder wrote:
At 10:53 PM 11/19/2002 +, Robert O'Connor wrote:
On 18 Nov 2002 at 21:43, Laurens M. Fridael wrote:
complying with W3C standards is hardly a priority or
even a consideration.
I
At 12:17 AM 11/20/2002 +, MJ Ray wrote:
Fringe Ryder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find a mailing list nearly ideal. The only detriments to it are that
the=
odd message is flagged as spam by my filters and I haven't determined why,=
You need to add the lists to your whitelist or scorefile.
Robert O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Others: maybe the marquee tag from MSIE 3.x days, and all the other non-
standard crap that has come and gone over the years.
Yes! We want blink in Plucker now!
Seriously, has anyone who asks for support for standards-breaking actually
thought the
On 19 Nov 2002 at 16:37, Fringe Ryder wrote:
At 11:54 PM 11/19/2002 +, Robert O'Connor wrote:
On 19 Nov 2002 at 15:22, Fringe Ryder wrote:
At 10:53 PM 11/19/2002 +, Robert O'Connor wrote:
On 18 Nov 2002 at 21:43, Laurens M. Fridael wrote:
complying with W3C standards is
On 20 Nov 2002 at 0:55, MJ Ray wrote:
Robert O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Others: maybe the marquee tag from MSIE 3.x days, and all the other non-
standard crap that has come and gone over the years.
Yes! We want blink in Plucker now!
I enjoyed the Python comment next to the
Yes! We want blink in Plucker now!
I enjoyed the Python comment next to the 'blink' on the list of currently
unimplemented tags in the Parser (TextParser.py, around line 855). Props
to whoever wrote that in.
Appears to be Ondrej back in Parser.py, almost to the day 11/22/99.
On 19 Nov 2002 at 11:29, Fringe Ryder wrote:
Since I haven't gotten any more feedback, I finished up icon functionality
my way and have tossed her up on the web.
http://kittycentral.net/Plucker/PlkrData.html
Both sources and a Windows binary are there.
All the basics work -
At 02:01 AM 11/20/2002 +, Robert O'Connor wrote:
Looking through, I think it is very nicely done. Great work!
Thanks.
For exclusion lists, this has come up before with regards to how to
package these with
descriptions of sites, since that is arguably the most important part, as
it is
31 matches
Mail list logo
