From: Marcello Perathoner
Lambert, Mark wrote:
But it is low-hanging fruit that would make it simpler for
those that
have HTML.
If they have HTML, of course I use HTML. But more than half
of them don't.
No worries. I wasn't sure if you were or not so I thought I'd mention
I don't know if this would help or not, but I always go off the HTML
version and break on any H1 or H2. That isn't perfect either, but is
easier to do.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcello
Perathoner
Sent: Wednesday, November 02,
On Behalf Of Marcello Perathoner
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 1:37 PM
To: plucker-dev@rubberchicken.org
Subject: Re: Plucker server on Project Gutenberg
Lambert, Mark wrote:
I don't know if this would help or not, but I always go off the HTML
version and break on any H1 or H2
-
From: Jeffrey A. Krzysztow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:30 PM
To: Lambert, Mark
Subject: David and group has taken over JPluck, so to speak...
Mark,
David and group has taken over JPluck, so to speak and I do
not know if you were invited
This one only runs on Java 1.5 for now because of some severe image
processing bugs in 1.4.
I have included with the JAR all of the source for anyone who wants to
look at it (and fix bugs).
It still has the bug where it will lock up on certain files while trying
to clean up the REFs. To get
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Hoyle
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:24 PM
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 at 16:38, Lambert, Mark wrote:
If I pluck a large document with Jpluck the resulting file is
9,561,208 bytes, but if I pluck it in the Desktop (with matching
settings as far
Understand that I am not trying to start a good versus bad or Python
versus Java discussion with this topic. I am, however, trying to point
out the various weaknesses in the tools. In my mind the best scenario
would be that both tools would produce very similar output in about the
same amount of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alexander R. Pruss
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Progress note
Wouldn't allowing decryption of Peanut Press stuff be a DMCA
liability?
I guess it
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jewett, Jim J
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:26 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Progress note (other formats)
Lambert, Mark:
I would like to add my vote to somehow speed up table
I haven't made a whole lot of headway on extended table support
for Jpluck, but I have made some. In the process, I have decided I
would like to add my vote to somehow speed up table rendering (i.e. font
change or something).
On a bit happier note one of the reasons that I haven't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jeffrey A. Krzysztow
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Progress note
Lambert, Mark said the following on 5/19/2004 9:45 AM:
Great! They have a large
Got it, but can't find how to do an annotation.
Any help?
Thanks,
Mark
E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the
message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for
taking protective action against such code. Sender
It would be nice to be able to set up separate icons for various books
so that clicking on them would take you directly to the book instead of
where you were last.
Mark
--
In the digital world, we don't need back-ups, because a digital copy
never wears out.
--Jack Valenti, head of the Motion
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lambert, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Feature Request
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Replying to myself.
Ah, I found the information on the launchable flag for the
windows conduit. Now I just need to find out how to set it
with Jpluck or on my palm.
If I do this for documents on the VFS, will I need to move
all of my books somewhere specific?
OK, using utilities like
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alexander R. Pruss
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: annotation branch binary
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Lambert, Mark wrote:
Got it, but can't find how
Sorry I am the whole list today. If I set a plucker document as
launchable in 1.7.1 (annotation build if it makes a difference) I get a
Fatal Alert when I select it in Form.c Line:5094, No form to return to
If anyone can dupe it, I'll enter it into the bug database.
Mark
E-Mail messages may
I'll try it if you can send me a binary or tell me where to get one.
I'm not set up to compile it right now.
Mark
E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the
message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for
taking
Download the jpluck2.jar from http://xmission.com/~mlambert/jpluck2.jar
.
Rename the jpluck2.jar in Jpluck 2/build and put the new one in.
Run it.
It also adds the ability to drag a file to the URL field when creating a
new site.
You should be able to pluck DOC files now. If you can't; let me
If you could, run it like D:\Java\JDK1.4\bin\java.exe -jar C:\Program
Files\JPluck 2\jpluckx.jar so that it shows the console output. That
will give me a better idea of what is happening and if it actually is in
the DOC format. The one I would also really like to do is Mobi format
because I have
This one has added support for bookmark conversion from DOC files.
It also spits out the html it generates to \\palmdochandlertest.html if
you want to suggest P instead of BR or something.
The jar to replace is jpluck2.jar
It is accessible now from xmission.com/~mlambert/jpluck2.jar
--
In the
21 matches
Mail list logo
