seriously, i don't think this thread is about who's better than the other.
it's about correcting the __disinformation__ against both GNU/Linux
and *BSD (unfortunately, he's not giving any justice to it). i think some
of us have zero tolerance to such.
i don't know if you've noticed the same but t
AGREE!!
On 2/8/07, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think one of the reasons why people shy away from this list or don't
give a damn is because of this bickering, don't you guys ever heard of the
phrase "DIVIDED WE FALL'? i know i was once guilty. when will guys stop?
look what happen
i think one of the reasons why people shy away from this list or don't give
a damn is because of this bickering, don't you guys ever heard of the phrase
"DIVIDED WE FALL'? i know i was once guilty. when will guys stop? look what
happened to the FOSS bill, did all the noise and bickering we did in
hello, i have a friend who needs help implementing the hula project for
an academic institution (not ateneo). is anybody familiar with this? or
willing to experiment? i believe they are willing to pay for a freelance
consultant for this project. thanks!
--
.
On 2/7/07, Keech Angelo Famorca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ariz again! :)
> Some of you can refer to the Internet2 Land Speed Record
> as it is currently being dominated by Linux v2.6.x (a single
> entry from NetBSD is also present on the list).
> http://www.internet2.edu/lsr/history.ht
.
On 2/7/07, Keech Angelo Famorca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was talking about NetBSD not FreeBSD :)
i dont see the relevance of your post if you're putting in FreeBSD,
rather than NetBSD (which we are actually talking about see topic) as
point of comparison.
ok, you asked for it. :)
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 17:31 +0800, Happy Kamote Foundation wrote:
> > Linux Testing Standard? you must be looking for this
> > _ISO_ standard:
> >
> > Linux Standard Base (LSB) core specification 3.1
> > (http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43781
> > )
>
> Oops
Give http://www.pclinuxos.com/ a try, a new and promising mandriva-based
desktop linux.
Froilan Romualdo wrote:
Doc kumusta na po. I think you can also consider Linspire
(http://www.linspire.ph/).
On 2/5/07, Raul Limos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anybody know where to get locally this versio
On 2/7/07, fooler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Michael Berris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] [OT] NetBSD 3.1 LiveCD r o c k s !
> los
On 2/7/07, Happy Kamote Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi dean!
Hello, whoever you are...
On 2/7/07, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/07, Happy Kamote Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/5/07, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The
"fooler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> from the famous cartoon... "on the internet... nobody knows you are a
> dog"... you can easily pretend by somebody else... if i use Gill Bates
> here in plug... are you sure i am really gill bates? for me there is
> nothing wrong with being anonymous...
Quit
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Michael Berris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] [OT] NetBSD 3.1 LiveCD r o c k s !
lose the anonymity cloak --
from the famous ca
"Happy Kamote Foundation" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yumyum.
>
> Ill cough out something.
>
> linux may be ahead in performance but not in filesystem. What advanced
> feature of
> the filesystem that linux is advanced of? having more filesystems that
> all do the
> same thing with varying degre
"Dean Michael Berris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Check your facts first, and lose the anonymity cloak -- makes you look
> stupid no matter how "smart" you seem.
Actually his cover was blown in one of the earlier emails, but I'll
agree with what is factual.
Cheers,
Zakame (testing an SMTP cli
Commercial purposes, and NOT technical purposes. If apple produces
supercomputers and got included at the top 500, I bet they wouldnt
use
linux, they will use their flagship MacOSX.
actually Apple does have a cluster on the top 500. Virginia Tech (an
engineering school in the US) has a c
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
hi dean!
On 2/7/07, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/7/07, Happy Kamote Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 1st and 2nd most powerful in the top 500 supercomputers are
> > cluster of nodes running Linux. Wh
On 2/7/07, Happy Kamote Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/5/07, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 1st and 2nd most powerful in the top 500 supercomputers are
> cluster of nodes running Linux. Why?
>
> I'd guess because advances in the Linux Kernel features -- some of
>
Hi Ariz again! :)
Some of you can refer to the Internet2 Land Speed Record
as it is currently being dominated by Linux v2.6.x (a single
entry from NetBSD is also present on the list).
http://www.internet2.edu/lsr/history.html
Uh, Ariz did you check and compare the hardware notes of both?
he
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 15:40 +0800, Happy Kamote Foundation wrote:
>
> Im sorry I dont follow you on this. If we are going to count it all
> "per chip/cpu" that netbsd supports or runs on nicely, then probably
> this will be a reaaally long email.
>
> For those interested to check every
On 2/5/07, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The 1st and 2nd most powerful in the top 500 supercomputers are
cluster of nodes running Linux. Why?
I'd guess because advances in the Linux Kernel features -- some of
which are not found in the BSD kernel (last I checked) --
Oh, when d
I was talking about NetBSD not FreeBSD :)
i dont see the relevance of your post if you're putting in FreeBSD,
rather than NetBSD (which we are actually talking about see topic) as
point of comparison.
no-flame-flag ;)
Linux Testing Standard? you must be looking for this
_ISO_ standard:
Li
Yumyum.
Ill cough out something.
linux may be ahead in performance but not in filesystem. What advanced
feature of
the filesystem that linux is advanced of? having more filesystems that
all do the
same thing with varying degress of data loss and corruption? that's
not advancement
for me.
and fo
"Happy Kamote Foundation" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I beg to disagree on this assertion for the following reasons: 1.)
>> Linux and NetBSD do not have the same qualifications for
>> architectures. Linux counts architectures according to chip/CPU
>> families. NetBSD counts ports as architectur
24 matches
Mail list logo
