Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Alex Esplin" on Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:25:19 MST: > Yes. Ben Bernanke is an idiot. But we're only 8 posts away from 100, > so keep at it guys. We can do it. I have faith in us. For your enjoyment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u2qRXb4xCU Andy -- [---[system uptime]--

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Charles Curley on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:56:21 MST: > A lot of Austrian economists are to be found, not on campus, but on > Wall St. making money with investments, Alan Greenspan formerly > being an example. Peter Schiff is another. Walter Block, at Loyola > University in New

Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Corey Edwards
full disclosure: I work for an ISP On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 13:23 -0700, Lonnie Olson wrote: > ISPs have always over subscribed their links. And be grateful they do! Try to price out a line with dedicated bandwidth and you'll see it's significantly more expensive. I can't give you any exact numbers

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Levi Pearson on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:17:18 MST: > The BYU economics department, by the way, is heavily influenced by the > Chicago school of economic thought. There are also quite a few real > economists out there who believe in it, while those of the Austrian > school are a bit har

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Alex Esplin
Yes. Ben Bernanke is an idiot. But we're only 8 posts away from 100, so keep at it guys. We can do it. I have faith in us. -- Alex Esplin /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Levi Pearson on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:40:52 MST: > http://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021121/default.htm Bernanke is anti-prophetic (in 2002). From the article, and I quote: ``A particularly important protective factor in the current environment is the strength of

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Levi Pearson
Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thus said Von Fugal on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:39:59 MST: > >> I'm not at all surprised that's what is taught. But that's my >> conspiracy side coming in, so I'll be quiet now. ;) > > It's no conspiracy really that government (and hence government s

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kyle Waters on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:41:20 MST: > I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I've only tried a few, but found MediaWiki to be fairly decent. I didn't much like twiki, even though it was easier to setup. You'll have to try a few and see what you think to really learn

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Von Fugal on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:39:14 MST: > I feel that inflation is inevitable in many respects. Well > distributed, limited inflation is acceptable and manageable. Are you talking about monetary inflation (the classical definition of inflation) or the more modern defi

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Von Fugal on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:39:59 MST: > I'm not at all surprised that's what is taught. But that's my > conspiracy side coming in, so I'll be quiet now. ;) It's no conspiracy really that government (and hence government schools; which oddly enough doesn't apply to BYU) fa

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Levi Pearson
Charles Curley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 09:17:18PM -0700, Levi Pearson wrote: >> Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >> The BYU economics department, by the way, is heavily influenced by the >> Chicago school of economic thought. There are also quite a few

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 09:17:18PM -0700, Levi Pearson wrote: > Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The BYU economics department, by the way, is heavily influenced by the > Chicago school of economic thought. There are also quite a few real > economists out there who believe in it, whi

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:14:47AM -0700, Nicholas Leippe wrote: > On Friday 05 December 2008 09:18:21 am Von Grant Fugal wrote: > > There is less MONEY to go around, but I will say it time and time again, > > MONEY IS NOT WEALTH! > > I agree. Money is not wealth. Money is a means of wealth transf

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Levi Pearson
Charles Curley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here we have profound disagreement: if it's theft when a private > individual does it, it's theft when a government does it. Governments > are composed of people, and morality doesn't magically change just > because one is anointed king or elected senato

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Von Grant Fugal on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:21:01 MST: > Price inflation IS monetary inflation. The only other way to get price > inflation is with severe economic downturn. That is to say, a > pronounced decrease in production, in wealth. Keep it up, you're starting to sound mor

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Levi Pearson
Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The same is true of paper money. When you use paper as money, it wears > two hats; there is a demand for the paper qua money, and there is a > demand for paper in other uses. In addition, the nominal value of the > paper money far exceeds the ma

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 09:56:10AM -0700, Nicholas Leippe wrote: > On Friday 05 December 2008 09:18:21 am Von Grant Fugal wrote: > > How do you propose to distribute this new money in lockstep with capita > > changes? > > Perhaps you could give each newborn an average savings worth of > > money in

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Nicholas Leippe on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:14:47 MST: > I agree. Money is not wealth. Money is a means of wealth > transferrence. Money is a medium of exchange. Wealth (and perhaps more correctly capital) transfers from those who provide the best stewardship of it. T

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Levi Pearson
Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thus said Von Grant Fugal on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:18:21 MST: > >> You mention astrian economics. I haven't delved to deep into it >> myself, but from most of my conversations with other subscribers to >> austrian economics, I was under the dist

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Von Grant Fugal on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:18:21 MST: > You mention astrian economics. I haven't delved to deep into it > myself, but from most of my conversations with other subscribers to > austrian economics, I was under the distinct impression my views were > highly aligned wi

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Nicholas Leippe on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:19:46 MST: > I disagree. I think silver is better as a money than gold for > precisely the same reason--it is far less scarse than gold. Both are good for money because they both meet all the requirements. As a store of value (one propert

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Barry Roberts
On 12/05/2008 01:53 PM, Levi Pearson wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Wade Preston Shearer [1]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5 Dec 2008, at 13:18, Stuart Jansen wrote: I know it's aiming low, but seriously. If you can't find any pros for using a wiki you either aren't trying very hard

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Wade Preston Shearer
On 5 Dec 2008, at 14:19, Stuart Jansen wrote: On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 13:54 -0700, Wade Preston Shearer wrote: How about Google Docs? Seriously? I've never understood the willingness of some companies to surrender critical knowledge to the whims of a third party. Kyle didn't mention that his

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Stuart Jansen
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 15:07 -0700, Wade Preston Shearer wrote: > I mentioned Google Docs as an example of a better solution, not to > suggest that you actually use Google's version of it to host corporate > files. It's not a better solution if it's not a solution. But I've already outlined my

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Jared Ottley
On Dec 5, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Wade Preston Shearer wrote: On 5 Dec 2008, at 13:18, Stuart Jansen wrote: I am not aware of any pros for using a wiki. Here's one: Wikis are better than a bunch of Word documents saved on a Windows share running on the bosses desktop. I know it's aiming low,

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Wade Preston Shearer
On 5 Dec 2008, at 14:01, Kyle Waters wrote: Why use a wiki when there are so many better options for collaboration and/or group content management? Because they are dead simple to learn and use. There's nothing simpler than the pile of papers on your desk or bunch of electronic documents on

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:18:28PM -0700, Peter McNabb wrote: > > Since you brought it up, I'll toss out a link for one of Andrew McNabb's > projects, smug ("smugly superior to wikis"): > > http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/smug/ And by the way, if any of you web programmer types want to help out, w

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Stuart Jansen
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 13:54 -0700, Wade Preston Shearer wrote: > How about Google Docs? Seriously? I've never understood the willingness of some companies to surrender critical knowledge to the whims of a third party. 1) Security. Internal documentation should be exactly that: internal. 2) Relia

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Aaron Toponce
Kyle Waters wrote: > I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that > swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple > to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be > nice. What are the pros and cons of various wikis. I lik

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Kyle Waters
Wade Preston Shearer wrote: On 5 Dec 2008, at 13:53, Levi Pearson wrote: Why use a wiki when there are so many better options for collaboration and/or group content management? Because they are dead simple to learn and use. There's nothing simpler than the pile of papers on your desk or bunc

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Wade Preston Shearer
On 5 Dec 2008, at 13:53, Levi Pearson wrote: Why use a wiki when there are so many better options for collaboration and/or group content management? Because they are dead simple to learn and use. There's nothing simpler than the pile of papers on your desk or bunch of electronic documents o

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Levi Pearson
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Wade Preston Shearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5 Dec 2008, at 13:18, Stuart Jansen wrote: >> I know it's aiming low, but seriously. If you can't find any pros for >> using a wiki you either aren't trying very hard, or have never worked on >> a team. > > Great p

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Wade Preston Shearer
On 5 Dec 2008, at 13:18, Stuart Jansen wrote: I am not aware of any pros for using a wiki. Here's one: Wikis are better than a bunch of Word documents saved on a Windows share running on the bosses desktop. I know it's aiming low, but seriously. If you can't find any pros for using a wiki you

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Kyle Waters
Stuart Jansen wrote: On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:45 -0700, Wade Preston Shearer wrote: I am not aware of any pros for using a wiki. Here's one: Wikis are better than a bunch of Word documents saved on a Windows share running on the bosses desktop. I know it's aiming low, but seriously. I

Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Lonnie Olson
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Von Grant Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Net neutrality, unless you plan to violently kill the internet. > I'd like to echo the other comment: > Was there ever a case for net neutrality? > Well, it's a noble thought, and not without it's merits, but the > downs

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Stuart Jansen
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:45 -0700, Wade Preston Shearer wrote: > I am not aware of any pros for using a wiki. Here's one: Wikis are better than a bunch of Word documents saved on a Windows share running on the bosses desktop. I know it's aiming low, but seriously. If you can't find any pros for u

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Peter McNabb
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:41:20PM -0700, Kyle Waters wrote: > I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that > swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple > to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be > nice. Wha

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread justin
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Kyle Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that swear > by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple to set > up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be nice. W

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Jonathan Duncan
On 05 Dec 2008, at 12:41, Kyle Waters wrote: I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be nice. What are the pros and co

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Hans Fugal
Siddharth Patwardhan wrote: >> I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that >> swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple >> to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be >> nice. What are the pros and cons of vario

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Hans Fugal
Kyle Waters wrote: > I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that > swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple > to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be > nice. What are the pros and cons of various wikis. Insti

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Doran L. Barton
On Friday 05 December 2008 12:41:20 Kyle Waters wrote: > I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that > swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple > to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be > nice. What are the pr

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Siddharth Patwardhan
> I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that > swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple > to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be > nice. What are the pros and cons of various wikis. This page compares va

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
On Friday 05 December 2008 12:41:20 pm Kyle Waters wrote: > I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that > swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple > to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be > nice. What are the

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Topher Fischer
Kyle Waters wrote: > I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that > swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple > to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be > nice. What are the pros and cons of various wikis. Inste

Re: wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Wade Preston Shearer
On 5 Dec 2008, at 12:41, Kyle Waters wrote: I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be nice. What are the pros and cons

wikis!

2008-12-05 Thread Kyle Waters
I just wanted to get input on various wikis. I know some people that swear by moinmoin but they are python fanatics. I want something simple to set up, authentication via ldap would be nice, and images would be nice. What are the pros and cons of various wikis. Kyle /* PLUG: http://plug.o

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> On Friday 05 December 2008 11:25:00 am Von Fugal wrote: > > Obama is still going to "buy a yacht." He's just going to do so on a > > smaller budget. You're solving the amount of inflation, but not the > > distribution problem. > > > > > > The printers benefit (the government gets more power, mor

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
On Friday 05 December 2008 11:25:00 am Von Fugal wrote: > Obama is still going to "buy a yacht." He's just going to do so on a > smaller budget. You're solving the amount of inflation, but not the > distribution problem. > > > > The printers benefit (the government gets more power, more pet > > > p

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Von Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, a proponent for inflation then. Then by necessity you must oppose > > gold. And I guess your reasons for proposing inflation are different > > then some others have been. > > Actually all I've meant to do is say "Thi

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Von Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, a proponent for inflation then. Then by necessity you must oppose > > gold. And I guess your reasons for proposing inflation are different > > then some others have been. > > Actually all I've meant to do is say "Thi

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> On Friday 05 December 2008 10:58:33 am Von Fugal wrote: > > > However, you're forgetting, that with a static currency supply, the per > > > capita purchasing power has now decreased inversely proportional to the > > > increase in capita. > > > > The money supply per capita has decreased, but not

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Daniel C.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Von Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, a proponent for inflation then. Then by necessity you must oppose > gold. And I guess your reasons for proposing inflation are different > then some others have been. Actually all I've meant to do is say "This is what I w

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> On Friday 05 December 2008 10:21:01 am Von Grant Fugal wrote: > > Ok, there are probably other ways to fairly distribute new money, but > > centralized injection is not one of them. How does the government not > > benefit by having brand new money? You say "well the government is the > > people.

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
On Friday 05 December 2008 10:58:33 am Von Fugal wrote: > > However, you're forgetting, that with a static currency supply, the per > > capita purchasing power has now decreased inversely proportional to the > > increase in capita. > > The money supply per capita has decreased, but not the purchasi

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Von Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You opponents of gold talk about how fiat helps poverty, now here you're > > contempting the poor and saying we don't have to be fair to them! You > > talk about keeping up with inflation. Why does there have to be > > inf

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
On Friday 05 December 2008 10:21:01 am Von Grant Fugal wrote: > Ok, there are probably other ways to fairly distribute new money, but > centralized injection is not one of them. How does the government not > benefit by having brand new money? You say "well the government is the > people." Nice try.

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> On Friday 05 December 2008 09:18:21 am Von Grant Fugal wrote: > > There is less MONEY to go around, but I will say it time and time again, > > MONEY IS NOT WEALTH! > > I agree. Money is not wealth. Money is a means of wealth transferrence. > Wealth, is measured in property. An interesting asid

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Daniel C.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel C. eats kittens for breakfast! I can neither confirm nor deny the presence of kittens in my breakfast cereal cupboard, either this morning or on any other morning. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.ne

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Grant Fugal
> On Friday 05 December 2008 09:18:21 am Von Grant Fugal wrote: > > How do you propose to distribute this new money in lockstep with capita > > changes? > > Perhaps you could give each newborn an average savings worth of > > money in a trust fund. Anything less than this is redistribution of > > w

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
On Friday 05 December 2008 09:18:21 am Von Grant Fugal wrote: > There is less MONEY to go around, but I will say it time and time again, > MONEY IS NOT WEALTH! I agree. Money is not wealth. Money is a means of wealth transferrence. Wealth, is measured in property. An interesting aside is, when yo

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Stuart Jansen
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 11:55 -0500, Daniel C. wrote: > I'm not an opponent of a gold standard, and I have never said anything > about wanting to help out the poor. Daniel C. eats kittens for breakfast! /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/optio

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
On Friday 05 December 2008 09:18:21 am Von Grant Fugal wrote: > How do you propose to distribute this new money in lockstep with capita > changes? > Perhaps you could give each newborn an average savings worth of > money in a trust fund. Anything less than this is redistribution of > wealth and is

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Daniel C.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Von Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You opponents of gold talk about how fiat helps poverty, now here you're > contempting the poor and saying we don't have to be fair to them! You > talk about keeping up with inflation. Why does there have to be > inflation for

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Andy Bradford > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A small amount of inflation is healthy. > > > > For whom? > > For the economy as a whole... or at least that's what I've been > taught. Individual people may occasionally get screwed over, yes - > especially those

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Fugal
> > Thus making it too expensive to use for industrial uses. Eliminating > > an entire class of goods. > > And what's wrong with that? If something is too expensive to be used for > one type of use, then it won't be used for that particular use. So what? > How does that strengthen the argument

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Von Grant Fugal
> On Thursday 04 December 2008 09:17:16 pm Von Fugal wrote: > > I'm curius why since you are so adamantly oppose to the federal reserve > > and central banks, yet you seem to think the function they perform > > (expanding the money supply) is so necessary. I agree with all you said > > about the f

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Daniel C.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A small amount of inflation is healthy. > > For whom? For the economy as a whole... or at least that's what I've been taught. Individual people may occasionally get screwed over, yes - especially those on fixed incomes,

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
I suppose it may be useful to state I am a proponent of austrian economic theory, and disagree with keynesian economics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_School http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_Business_Cycle_Theory /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: ht

Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:58:24AM -0700, Michael Torrie wrote: > > Bittorrent's new udp protocol is an attempt to address the problems > and make bittorrent more palatable to business users and isps because > it does have it's own built-in controls now to make it coexist better > with other forms

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
On Thursday 04 December 2008 09:17:16 pm Von Fugal wrote: > I'm curius why since you are so adamantly oppose to the federal reserve > and central banks, yet you seem to think the function they perform > (expanding the money supply) is so necessary. I agree with all you said > about the fed, but not

Re: [OT] Ameros will clog the tubes - was Re: Network Neutrality

2008-12-05 Thread Nicholas Leippe
On Thursday 04 December 2008 09:48:06 pm Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Michael Torrie on Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:54:42 MST: > > Besides all that, what makes gold valuable? If gold is just sitting in > > a bank somewhere, it's doing no one any good. Arguably the industrial > > uses of gold are far m