epoch1970 wrote:
(I *think* win xp can't see above 2TB ?)
WinXP 32-bit can only see 2TB. I believe the 64-bit version can see
drive space larger than that.
the nightfly's Profile:
Mnyb wrote:
The Apple II dad borrowed one when i was a child ,memories (we could not
afford such thing back then ) later on friends had the typical Vic C64
etc and transferred software over the phone line from cassettes :)
C64, preserved and stuffed: http://www.kingsquare.nl/jsc64 ;)
(USB
Mnyb wrote:
The Apple II dad borrowed one when i was a child ,memories (we could not
afford such thing back then ) later on friends had the typical Vic C64
etc and transfered software over the phone line from cassettes :)
A, I fondly remember using my Apple II with an attached cassette
It seems I had my dates wrong:-)
I placed the order for the computer on January 18, 2004 and the date of
manufacture is 1/20/2004. It has a Pentium 4 CPU 2.66 GHz and came with
512 MB of RAM (I later added two GB of RAM).
It was in 2009 (when I purchased my first Squeezebox) I added the RAM
Hi!
I have Smart RG enabled on the iPeng player but it sounds as it don't
have any effect then playing random song mix.
Tried both RG enabled and disabled and I can' t hear any difference.
Works with my SB.
bernt's
Replay gain and cross fade are both currently not supported in iPeng.
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51929
CharlieG wrote:
It seems I had my dates wrong:-)
I placed the order for the computer on January 18, 2004 and the date of
manufacture is 1/20/2004.
Ok, you need not worry much about the HDD then. If you're looking for a
new one, it's going to be crazy expensive anyway (factories only do SATA
pippin wrote:
Replay gain and cross fade are both currently not supported in iPeng.
Ouch! I hope ReplayGain is one of the future possibilities. For
complete albums it is irrelevant for me, but I do like the effect when
playing dynamic playlists of tracks from many different albums.
epoch1970 wrote:
:)
Our (I commandeered it switfly) Apple //e has twin floppy readers too. I
was holding the guys fiddling with cassette tapes in utmost contempt. We
still have the machine, a few years ago it was still in service for
playing a few games, before being replaced by a retired
Currently the maximum number of tracks that can be displayed in
TrackStat within the iPeng app is 50, yet you can display 100 on the web
interface. Is it possible to get iPeng to display the same number of
tracks in TrackStat in IPeng as in the LMS web interface?
Is this an iPeng issue or a
It's a TrackStat issue.
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51929
___
sander wrote:
Adding more thread drift, albeit in a new direction, what do you gain
from the musicbrainz tags? I'm experimenting with the mirror sever for
stuff like jaikos, but I've found anything interesting in their tags.
To be honest, so far nothing. I tried to use SugarCube (even bought
After the power surge I replaced the 80 Gb HDD with a 1 TB HDD. This
allowed me to move my music from an external HDD to the internal HDD. I
figured this would improve some operations. So, I moved the collection,
cleared the LMS database, deleted all caches, rescanned my collection,
reestored the
I posted the following in the iPeng support thread, but Pippin says he
thinks the issue is with TrackStat itself. So I am posting this in a
separate thread hoping Erland will pick this up.
Currently the maximum number of tracks that can be displayed in
TrackStat within the iPeng app is 50, yet
prabbit wrote:
1. The 1 TB HDD allows for a greater virtual memory for the server,
which seems to help with performance. [...]
2. I did increase the cache_size in SQLLiteHelper.pm like pallfreeman
suggested. That should help some.
Increasing the cache size is (arguably) pointless if you
pallfreeman wrote:
Increasing the cache size is (arguably) pointless if you don't have
enough physical memory for it. If you're already using virtual memory,
you don't. So I'm not quite sure how greater virtual memory helps with
performance. A faster drive, sure, but not a bigger paging
prabbit wrote:
My system does have the RAM for it.
OK. Ug understand now.
pallfreeman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37667
View this thread:
Are there inherent limitations to a UPnP controller and player posed by
the API itself? Can a user interface controlling a player that is
connected to a UPnP server be just as rich as one connected to a
Squeezebox Server? Is it possible to implement much of the same
functionality, such as gapless
JJZolx wrote:
Are there inherent limitations to a UPnP controller and player posed by
the API itself? Can a user interface controlling a player that is
connected to a UPnP server be just as rich as one connected to a
Squeezebox Server? Is it possible to implement much of the same
norderney wrote:
Currently the maximum number of tracks that can be displayed in
TrackStat within the iPeng app is 50, yet you can display 100 on the web
interface. Is it possible to get iPeng to display the same number of
tracks in TrackStat in IPeng as in the LMS web interface?
It can
The main problem I have found with WOL in ML is that OSX goes back to
sleep after 30 sec unless some application sets a power assertion to
prevent it. The attempts to use ReallyPreventStandby I proposed earlier
in this thread, and also the new version of PreventStandby in the
current 7.8
21 matches
Mail list logo
