> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
>
>> Or should we patch all references of lowercase sysconfdir to uppercase
>> them? :P
>
> No, this looks fine as is, thanks.
> I think this is the most correct solution, benoit?
>
ok for me !
>
>> Index: Makefile
>>
www.incriveisofertas.com
[IMAGE]2� Round!!! 1h de Paintball + 100 Bolinhas + Equipamento com 50%
de desconto no Danger Zone Paintball! Divers�o garantida de R$20,00 por
R$9,99!
de R$ 20,00 por R$ R$ 9,99
[IMAGE]� de dar �gua na boca! 1 Kg de Fil� de Peixe � Urucum Congelado de
R$ 43,00 por ape
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> Or should we patch all references of lowercase sysconfdir to uppercase
> them? :P
No, this looks fine as is, thanks.
I think this is the most correct solution, benoit?
> Index: Makefile
>
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
> > On 29/08/11 6:29 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 29/08/11 6:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
>> On 29/08/11 6:29 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 29/08/11 6:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>> > > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrot
bsd.port.mk no longer warns about xz/sparc issues, so it seems like
bsd.port.mk.5 shouldn't need to either.
ok?
Index: bsd.port.mk.5
===
RCS file: /home/mdempsky/anoncvs/cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v
retrieving revision 1.28
> Ports -current.
> Package builds fine, but won't install.
>
> ===> Installing edje-1.0.0v2 from /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/
> Can't install edje-1.0.0v2 because of libraries
> |library curl.18.0 not found
> | /usr/local/lib/libcurl.so.19.0 (curl-7.21.7): bad major
that's the answer right the
Ports -current.
Package builds fine, but won't install.
===> Installing edje-1.0.0v2 from /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/
Can't install edje-1.0.0v2 because of libraries
|library curl.18.0 not found
| /usr/local/lib/libcurl.so.19.0 (curl-7.21.7): bad major
Direct dependencies for edje-1.0.0v2 reso
Thanks. New patch below. Ok?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:46:34AM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Mikolaj Kucharski
> wrote:
> > One more request Wen, if you could add:
> >
> > REGRESS_DEPENDS= devel/p5-Test-Pod
>
> if suite test requires p5-Tes-Pod,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Mikolaj Kucharski
wrote:
> One more request Wen, if you could add:
>
> REGRESS_DEPENDS= devel/p5-Test-Pod
if suite test requires p5-Tes-Pod, use like it:
MAKE_ENV+=TEST_POD=1
>
> that would be look good to me. All regress tests pass.
>
> Regards,
>
One more request Wen, if you could add:
REGRESS_DEPENDS=devel/p5-Test-Pod
that would be look good to me. All regress tests pass.
Regards,
Mikolaj
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 04:40:26PM +0800, wen heping wrote:
> Revised again again.
>
> Comments?
>
> wen
>
> 2011/8/19 Mikolaj Ku
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
> On 29/08/11 6:29 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
> >
> > > On 29/08/11 6:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
> On 29/08/11 6:20 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> > Maybe... I'm unsure why the release tarball ships with a Makefile... if
> > there is
> > a reason...
>
> There is.. try reading INSTALL.
You mean this?
"
Alternatively you can use autoconf generated
On 29/08/11 6:29 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
On 29/08/11 6:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
You shouldn't hardcode '/etc' but use ${SYSCONFDIR} instead.
--
Antoine
I'm sur
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brad wrote:
> On 29/08/11 6:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> >
> > > Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > >
> > > > You shouldn't hardcode '/etc' but use ${SYSCONFDIR} instead.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Antoine
On 29/08/11 6:20 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
Maybe... I'm unsure why the release tarball ships with a Makefile... if there is
a reason...
There is.. try reading INSTALL.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
On 29/08/11 6:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
You shouldn't hardcode '/etc' but use ${SYSCONFDIR} instead.
--
Antoine
I'm sure I was missing something...
Reroll diff:
Can't the port just use CONFIGURE_STY
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
>
>> Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>
>> > You shouldn't hardcode '/etc' but use ${SYSCONFDIR} instead.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Antoine
>> >
>>
>> I'm sure I was missing something...
>>
>>
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>
> > You shouldn't hardcode '/etc' but use ${SYSCONFDIR} instead.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Antoine
> >
>
> I'm sure I was missing something...
>
> Reroll diff:
Can't the port just use CONFIGURE_STYLE=gnu so that
-
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> You shouldn't hardcode '/etc' but use ${SYSCONFDIR} instead.
>
>
> --
> Antoine
>
I'm sure I was missing something...
Reroll diff:
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/git/Makefile,v
retrievin
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> This patch sets sysconfdir to our default value (/etc/)
> instead of it's previous value (/usr/local/etc).
>
> This makes some utilities (like git config --system -l) work again,
> config files were read from /etc/ some versions ago...
This patch sets sysconfdir to our default value (/etc/)
instead of it's previous value (/usr/local/etc).
This makes some utilities (like git config --system -l) work again,
config files were read from /etc/ some versions ago...
Index: Makefile
===
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 04:11:06PM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
>> This surely breaks apps, it changes module names, adds functions, etc.
>>
>> Tested on amd64 with some custom apps, I cannot find ports that depend
>> on th
Hi.
I'm planning to remove mail/mail-notification from the tree. It's been
unmaintained for years and prevents other ports from being updated.
Unless anyone strongly objects very soon, I'll move it to the attic. The
other solution would be to take some patches from Fedora but they are
huge beca
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:35:44 +0200 (CEST)
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This diff updated gpgme to the latest release which I need for other
> ports I'm working on.
>
> Comments/OK?
Hi,
ok for me.
Cheers,
Remi.
Hi.
This diff updated gpgme to the latest release which I need for other
ports I'm working on.
Comments/OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/gpgme/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.24 Makefile
--- Mak
Circulation: 26,069 29/08/2011 Sent to:ports@openbsd.org
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
---
27 matches
Mail list logo
