On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> firefox 52 requires sqlite 3.15.1 at least; so let's jump to 3.16.2
> directly. Bumped the major to be on the safe side, but nm showed no
> differences between libs, but there are always defines lurking around in
> headers...
just committed, will be in the next series of snapshots.
so, basic installs create /etc/installurl
now, pkg_add uses it "by default" to create an installpath.
pkg.conf(5) takes precedence (user defines are stronger than
automatic defines):
installpath = anything
in pkg.conf will replace the inst
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:47:51AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:14:15AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2017/01/23 11:55, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > > 2017-01-23 4:04 GMT+03:00 Peter Hessler :
> > > > Here are some bits to add arch defines to the ports infrastruture f
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:02:57AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> The simple fix for your issue would be to add a ${BASE_CXXLIB}, stdc++
> on base-is-gcc arches, c++ on base-is-clang ones, and replace all
> stdc++ in WANTLIB with that variable.
>
> But this is part of a wider problem that we don
I'd like to remove
extract-dependencies
find-build-order
(dpb does it and more)
portslogger
(haven't used it in ages, again, dpb)
and maybe
retrieve-index
does anyone actually use that one ?
(personally, I do either grep on INDEX, or I use
sqlports whenever I really need something)
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:47:00PM +, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> On 02/20/17 09:44, David Coppa wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> >> I'd like to remove
> >> extract-dependencies
> >> find-build-order
> >> (dpb doe
A few oddities in bsd.port.mk
- does anyone still use WRKOBJDIR=
(which used to create w-* directly in each port's directory)
- CDROM_SITE ?
- link-categories/unlink-categories ?
- homepage-links ?
Since we have caching running, "modern ports" uses a mechanism
like 'show-run-depends' to yield a recursive trimmed dependency list
quickly.
We also have an older mechanism (*-dir-depends) that yields a full list
suitable for tsort.
Con: show-run-depends does NOT show the parent of each dependenc
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:11:18PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2017-02-21, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > A few oddities in bsd.port.mk
> >
> > - CDROM_SITE ?
>
> This is somewhat useful. Not for actual CDROM distribution, but
> for opportunistically get
I've recently streamlined a bit the fetch/checksum/makesum code...
too many tests.
One *wanted* side-effect is to make it slightly harder to have distfiles
without checksum.
Doesn't change anything for normal port users.
When you're creating a new port, however, you will probably want to run
"ma
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:37:09PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> I'd like to point out that it harms a process I have as a port user. If
> projects published signatures for their releases, I want to check them,
> because I can have a trust relationship with upstream.
> So the process t
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:48:30PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Marc Espie writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:37:09PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> I'd like to point out that it harms a process I have as a port user. If
> >>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:05:30PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Yes, "make extract' wouldn't deal with it, but the file would still be there
> > and extractible manually. It is harder to do now.
>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:21:05PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Send diff :)
Rather, do not.
Removing keywords from pkg tools is somewhat tricky.
There are some steps you have to take to keep pkg_add -u working.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:36:44PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/03/01 18:07, sven falempin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:21:05PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > Sen
This is what the actual proper removal code looks like when you don't
miss the finer points of the framework.
Index: OpenBSD/Add.pm
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/Add.pm,v
retrieving revision 1.172
diff -u -p -r1.172
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Matthias Kilian
> wrote:
> > Also, I've no idea wether --with-clang=${CC} will work after the
> > switch to clang. On the other hand, the diff is just a workaround,
>
> > +MODGHC_SETUP_CONF_ARGS +=
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:01:53PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Ports that use CONFIGURE_STYLE=imake don't actually honor the CC,
> CFLAGS, CXX, CXXFLAGS settings. They just pick up whatever is
> hardcoded in devel/imake-cf. This behavior has grown historically
> and there is really no go
I just spent a few hours removing some extra error messages from pkg_add
e.g.,
$ doas pkg_add screen--
will just say:
http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.0/packages/amd64/screen-4.0.3p6.tgz:
unsigned package (signify(1) doesn't see old-style signatures)
instead
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:07:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> There's also an annoying UK webshop (broadbandbuyer.co.uk) that also tries
> to force a recaptcha if I use it from OpenBSD (I guess they're doing some
> user-agent check or something), I get a similar thing where the recaptcha
> ju
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:00:06PM +0300, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some time ago I made an OpenBSD port for Tapper testing system.
> This port depended from huge amount of Perl modules and I made port
> for each of them. Right now Tapper development is discontinued
> and I removed Tapp
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 05:12:51PM +0300, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> OpenBSD ports contains many applications useful for different kinds of
> testing: load, performance, functional, fuzzing etc.
> Load and performance tests locate in benchmarks subdir mostly,
> but other tests locate in different su
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 08:57:42PM -0500, mitchell wodach wrote:
> Someone correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't you want to pkg_add -Uu. Which
> updates dependent packages also?
Nope.
pkg_add -U exists for when you want to install a package in a hurry,
and don't want to update your whole base of
Just so that the subject makes it clear. This info already made it in
various messages ont the mailing list.
Right now, if you install OpenBSD, it says 6.1 without beta.
So pkg_add will look for the release directory, and not find it yet
because it's not out yet.
pkg_add -Dsnap
will make pkg_ad
Oh I missed the Cc to ports.
Well, I got a more sturdy patch for check-lib-depends (to be
tested/documented). The gist is to be able to generically be able to add
some lib variables into WANTLIB and have check-lib-depends recognize them.
Basically, this would need some support in bsd.port.mk as
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 02:41:26PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> With this PERMIT_* I'm not sure if it's really worth bothering with.
>
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/agrep/Makefile,v
> retrieving revisi
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 02:41:26PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> With this PERMIT_* I'm not sure if it's really worth bothering with.
>
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/agrep/Makefile,v
> retrieving revisi
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:46:28AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> We already have the superior TRE version of agrep in ports. Why
> do we need the old agrep?
>
> - todd
We don't really need it, indeed, but quirks should have an update path
then.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:49:20PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> * In the clang module, also link /usr/local/bin/clang and clang++
> into the leading PATH directory.
Should that actually be default ? it will make sure the clang from ports
is used on clang architectures, if that's the in
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 01:17:43PM +0300, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> ok to commit?
>
> On 22:46 Tue 28 Mar , Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> > On 08:58 Tue 28 Mar , Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:20:06AM +0300, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> > > > > Call it test, rather.
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:24:55PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I tried to get boost to build with clang, but failed pretty miserably
> because I don't know what I'm doing.
>
> If anybody wants to look into this, here's what I got:
> * Configure with --with-toolset=clang
> * Fix boost_has_
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:29:36AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/05/08 23:15, Andrew Aldridge wrote:
> > On 2016-05-07 17:37, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > > databases/mongodb failed to build in my latest amd64 bulk build:
> > >
> > > scons: ***
> > > [build/opt/third_party/mozjs-38/p
A few days, we changed from PLIST_DB to PLIST_REPOSITORY, so that it looks
a lot more like PACKAGE_REPOSITORY.
(specifically, having to figure out MACHINE_ARCH in one case and not in the
other was turning to be a pain for some scripts and some installations).
If you didn't even know about PLIST_D
By default, it now does unpopulate_light. I'm now reasonably confident
the avoidance mechanisms for not deleting important stuff are good enough,
so it will wipe chroots of anything that doesn't belong there.
See the man page which was updated accordingly. Some fringe case scenarios
may need to us
For those interested, I added a man page called bulk(8) to
ports/infrastructure recently.
It does explain in some details how to setup a cluster for package
building.
This is *de facto* the standard you have to deal with for all ports.
Official and development build clusters are built using tho
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:24:30AM +0200, Adam Wolk wrote:
> The error report is quite deep in Subst.pm handle_fragment which is
> called from PkgCreate.pm. Is there a way to obtain the ports/package
> name or folder in a nice way inside handle_fragment? Adding a package
> name to the error report
I've added some new annotation for plists (@option is-branch) that's going
to be used by pkg_info (soon) to figure out stuff like autoconf%2.13
(to display for quick reinstalls instead of full pkgnames).
All fast arch snapshots have the new pkg_add code already
I committed a set of "useful features" that go together and will be in
OpenBSD 6.0.
- branch info choice on package stems.
when you say
pkg_add php
you end up having to choose which php you want.
now you can say
pkg_add php%5.5
this "selects the 5.5 branch", which is already encoded as
pkgpath w
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 05:02:31PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 04:04:40PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to add 'exfat-fuse'.
> > >
> > > It is an exFAT file system implementation working on FUSE. It's
> > > useful t
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 09:25:31AM +0200, Remi Pointel wrote:
> On 07/09/16 23:06, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >The current ports version of youtube-dl cannot handle vine anymore.
> >Downloading a new version, 2016.07.09.2, works fine manually. However,
> >when I update the port to use this version, it fa
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:17:02PM +0100, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
> databases/sqlite3
> https://www.korelogic.com/Resources/Advisories/KL-001-2016-003.txt
Does not affect sqlite3 in a standard OpenBSD install
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:45:46PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I was recently discussing this with edd@, who suggested that I pull in
> ports@ and Marc.
>
> Syncthing is a daemon that lets you sync data between devices. By
> default, both metadata and user data are stored
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> The problem is that these messages are displayed at update time.
> I assume because from pkg_add's point of view it's a delete+add.
> IMHO UNMESSAGE and @extraunexec stuffs should not be displayed at update time.
UNMESSAGE is alre
Got the question in private mail.
Yes, we need to take control of shared library versions.
You may have to explain things to upstream, but they do NOT
have full control over the ABI.
You may need to explain to them the difference between API and ABI.
Even if their prototypes don't change, that d
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:01:53AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given that:
>
> - lang/g77-old devel/libf2c-old are long dead
>
> - lang/gfortran will go to the Attic in the same way
>
> - to use the newer fortran (egfortran) from gcc 4.9, it's better
> to use the MODGCC4_* macros (
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:03:16PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> > On 2016-08-22, Marc Espie wrote:
> >
> > >> - to use the newer fortran (egfortran) from gcc 4.9, it's better
> > >
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 06:42:36PM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
> While attempting to trouble shoot minidlna (21 Aug 2016 snap) I found
> that the package has no docs, either as minidlna, minidlnad, or
> readymedia. Checked for man and info pages both. In addition to not
> running on my machine.
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
> sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
>
> Go ahead and play with it.
I'd vote that you put it in, unlinked, and we can play in tree.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 03:32:05AM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Jiri B writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > lftp man pages is odd, see section for 'mirror' command.
>
> The lftp(1) manual uses tbl(7) macros, which need extra preprocessing.
> pkg_create(1) doesn't do any preprocessing... although that's
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:45:24AM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is on a current system (fresh install):
>
> # sysctl kern.version
> kern.version=OpenBSD 6.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #2510: Fri Sep 30
> 09:49:52 MDT 2016
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compil
About a week ago, we switched to the new signing scheme by default.
There are good reasons to bury the old signing scheme completely, so
this is what's currently happening, there are some rough edges.
Technically speaking, the new signatures are "outside", they're in
the gzip header, and the only
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> - the new scheme is slightly more unflexible with respect to unsigned
> data: by default, every .tgz is piped thru signify -Zs, so
> pkg_add/pkg_info/fw_update WON'T even see any data if it's not signed.
&
Note that if you want to sign packages yourself, your private key *MUST*
be name "something.sec", so that the proper comment says something.pub
to be able to decode things.
This is weird and nonsensical behavior on signify's part, which enforces
that, but silently, without any error message when t
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 08:24:15PM -0400, trondd wrote:
> I had this problem in 5.9 and forgot about it until 6.0, but DPB can't
> successfully build the sendmail package.
>
> DPB is using the default _pbuild, etc users so the build is not running as
> root. Is there some work around for this?
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:49:43AM +0200, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:37:50AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/10/16 10:27, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > "pkg_info -S" used to show the "update signature" for a package, i.e.
> >
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:34:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I'm going to do a bulk build with this to see if it shakes anything out.
> Any comments on whether it's worth committing?
>
> Index: bsd.port.mk
> ===
> RCS file: /cv
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 08:15:55PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Any objections or OKs?
The principle is good.
> - Forwarded message from Stuart Henderson -
>
> From: Stuart Henderson
> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 11:54:15 +
> To: ports
> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
> Subject: RFC:
Adding more fluff to bsd.port.mk to support this style of code is fairly
disturbing.
I don't like the github stuff too much, it's somewhat error-prone and there
is regular traffic on ports-changes proving it.
Adding a SECOND source of problems does not seem like the way to go.
There's also the i
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Adding more fluff to bsd.port.mk to support this style of code is fairly
> > disturbing.
> >
> > I don't like the github stuff too
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 12:47:26PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31 2018, George Koehler wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:15:56 -0700 (MST)
> > lan...@openbsd.org wrote:
> >
> >> http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//powerpc/2018-12-14/x11/qt5/qtbase.log
> >
> > Fails to #i
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 10:16:16PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/12/28 02:53, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > +.if ${_LD_PROGRAM} != ${_LD_DEFAULT}
> > > +_NONDEFAULT_LD = Yes
> > > +.else
> > > +_NONDEFAULT_LD = No
> > > +.endif
> > > +
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 07:15:00PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 17:11:01 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2019/01/04 17:57, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > > This switches aarch64 to use GCC 8.2.0 as default. Doesn't do any harm
> > > because this is the first GCC port that works
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:32:54PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> $ doas pkg_delete gnupg-1.4.23p1
> can't delete gnupg-1.4.23p1 without deleting password-store-1.7.3
> Delete them as well ? [y/N/a]
>
> but password-store has security/gnupg2 as dependency, not gnu
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:10:02AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Go tries to use NCPU cpus. Unfortunately, half of them are turned off because
> hw.smt=0 by default, and then go spends a lot of time fighting against itself.
>
> The diff below, against go/src/runtime, changes to use the number of CPU
hey, your commit to install(1) broke something.
Specifically lang/go-boostrap now produces a broken package which can't
be used to build go.
All the go/bootstrap/pkg/tool/openbsd_amd64/*
have lost their x bit
Relevant fake install information, it definitely looks like the last line
is now a no-o
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:23:09PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Marc Espie wrote:
> > hey, your commit to install(1) broke something.
> >
> > Specifically lang/go-boostrap now produces a broken package which can't
> > be used to build go.
> >
> >
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:23:09PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Marc Espie wrote:
> > hey, your commit to install(1) broke something.
> >
> > Specifically lang/go-boostrap now produces a broken package which can't
> > be used to build go.
> >
> >
Something similar to this perhaps ?
Not fully tested yet, but it should avoid the race of trying to
unlink tempfile several times, and also fix the file name in error messages.
Index: xinstall.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/xinsta
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 03:55:41PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> Something similar to this perhaps ?
> Not fully tested yet, but it should avoid the race of trying to
> unlink tempfile several times, and also fix the file name in error messages.
That's now been tested (gone thru a
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:48:03PM -0500, George Koehler wrote:
> There are probably more packages that lang/gcc/8 can't build, but the
> only ones that I know are x11/qt4 and games/stone-soup. Our
> stone-soup is an old version; an update might fix it.
Maybe you should start with stone-soup ?
O
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:21:07PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Some notes: make update-plist seems to remove lib/ghc/unregister.sh
> from pkg/PLIST, I've no idea, why.
ghc is about the only port left with major @exec/@unexec in the plist.
it would be great if those scripts could be abstracte
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 08:43:49PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 04:54:51PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:21:07PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > > Some notes: make update-plist seems to remove lib/ghc/unre
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 06:57:51PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun Mar 03, 2019 at 02:16:18PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2019/03/03 14:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > comments/ok?
> >
> > Also about adding this:
> >
> > # For ports using C++, except in special cases you should
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:19:51AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 02:11:42PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > comments/ok?
>
> OK
> I wish we could somewhat automate this.
More CONFIGURE_STYLE to get rid of more do-gen style targets would be
welcome. If you can find so
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 03:12:40PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 03:04:22PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:19:51AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 02:11:42PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
&
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:07:25AM +0200, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:02:19AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> > Hi!
> > What is the reason to split 15 MiB package and complicate the port?
> > Some games using such a split to save space on mirrors, but they
> > have more than 10
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> Hi Paul, ports,
>
> Here is an update for youtube-dl. Our current version doesn't
> work with Soundcloud anymore.
>
> Upstream changes [1] includes mostly extractors fixes and
> additions/deletions. Curl infinite retries has be
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:55:53PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> switching sysutils/opam to a source distribution including all
> (partly patched) dependencies, the following OCaml libraries are no
> longer used by other ports. Since active OCaml users will use opam
> instead of O
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:33:40AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:24:55PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > I tried to get boost to build with clang, but failed pretty miserably
> > because I don't know what I'm doing.
> >
> > If an
If you don't follow ports-changes, you may not have noticed that I've
finally given up and completely replaced update-patches with perl code.
This allowed me to implement several improvements.
- instead of diffing file.orig and file, if update-patches finds a
file.beforesubst, it will diff file.o
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:14:56PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> modify -> derived work?
>
> isn't it? I do not think our ports are derived works (maybe some
> patches we have really are intrusive?)
Very often, it will trigger a move to include our patches upstream, which
is a good
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 03:31:24PM -0400, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/glimpse/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.27
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.27 Makefile
> --- Makefile 11 Apr 2017 13:57:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:05:52AM -0400, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> I contacted the person currently listed as maintainer, who replied:
> "I am not involved neither with that port nor with OpenBSD anymore".
>
> I'd like to take maintainership, unless someone already wants it.
> Hopefully we won't ne
gcc4 is wildly incompatible with base clang. More precisely the C++
library.
So, yeah, MODGCC4 on aarch64 ? not that useful.
I've now polished WANT_CXX enough to commit it.
It's simply there to choose base clang, or gcc4 according to the architecture.
I also introduced LIBECXX so that wantlib can be adjusted without needing
a lot of conditionals.
lang/clang is more complex so this will happen later.
I'm in the process
There are actually two patches, one for src, the other for port.
1st patch unconditionally regenerates special files, even in -n mode,
so that they can be checksummed. As a result, the printed plist contains
@sha256 markers for these.
Con: very slightly slower.
2nd patch allows register-plist t
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An update to textproc/ripgrep 0.5.2.
>
> See https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/releases/tag/0.5.2 for
> changelog.
>
> While here, adds gcc4 MODULES in order to use egcc as linker. It should
> let ripgrep to build wit
Forget hope, I forgot about the symlinks registration and everything.
I guess I'll have to do something smarter in register-plist, should be
feasible.
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:21:21PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> Forget hope, I forgot about the symlinks registration and everything.
> I guess I'll have to do something smarter in register-plist, should be
> feasible.
More specifically, my current plans involve being able to &quo
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:38:54PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> 5. If possible, install to man/language/manN, without any "_", ".",
> or "@": KISS. There are rare exceptions, most notably zh_CN
> vs. zh_HK vs. zh_TW.
> Never include the encoding in the path name, and make sure
>
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Marc Espie wrote on Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:38:07AM +0200:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:38:54PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> >> 5. If possible, install to man/language/manN, withou
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:42:32PM -0300, Diogo Galvao wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> >> Then there are a number of /pt_BR/ in addition to /pt/.
> >> That looks suspicious, but i don't speak Portuguese,
> >> so it may or may
So we got a building, working boost now.
What I did was fairly stupid: simply copy the gcc autoconfig configuration,
and use it for now. We can always activate the remaining stuff afterwards.
While running boost, I found two issues:
- excessive warnings, because boost hardcode __attribute__((unuse
there are 13 ports that don't link because of the confusion between
standard library and internal variables:
comms/minicom: R_X86_64_PC32 against `COLS'
devel/arm-elf/gdb: R_X86_64_PC32 against `PC'
devel/avr-gdb: R_X86_64_PC32 against `PC'
devel/msp430/gdb: R_X86_64_PC32 against `PC'
editors/el
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 02:27:51PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> apcupsd tries to link its binaries using cc (rather than c++) with a static
> link to -lsupc++, for people who "care about binary portability between
> Linux distributions".
>
> the simplest fix seems to be to just use c++ to link
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:36:46AM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> This allows to handle --tag=... args in the middle of options list.
> Unbreaks multimedia/lives with base Clang. I don't see any potential
> breakage because compilers and linkers do not accept --tag= anyway.
>
> Okay?
>
> --
> WBR,
while checking eduke32 for clang, I ran into a weird compile error.
Turns out eduke32 includes an (old?) version of lz4 that doesn't look quite
like the one in archivers/lz4.
The following patch makes eduke32 just use archivers/lz4 so it won't miscompile
if lz4 happens to be installed.
Index: Ma
Here's a small update to scheme48.
I'm not sure what changed, but this one actually builds and works with clang.
1.9 does segfault once built:
./build/build-usual-image . \
"`(cd . && pwd)`/scheme" "`pwd`/c" 'scheme48.image' './scheme48vm' \
'./build/initial.image-64'
Segmentation
While trying to get everything to work with clang, I've stumbled on
gprolog.
Here is an update to 1.4.4. It doesn't make it work with clang either,
but at least it's newer (I peeked: FreeBSD does compile gprolog with gcc)
The most important improvement in the port is doing OpenBSD detection
in c
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 02:16:26PM -0400, H. Ishikawa wrote:
> 3. Why so many connections?
> When I tried to investigate why the update was so slow, I saw that
> pkg_add was making one HTTPS connection per package! Tools like
> wget from Linux can reuse a single connection for many downloads.
> Cou
501 - 600 of 1855 matches
Mail list logo
