Hi,
I'm getting closer, now with SMTP permitted to whole of Internet to
connect to my SMTP/postfix server for my postfix server to
connect out to public Internet on tcp 25 as well.
I send emails from permitted SMTP servers with Receipt acknowledgemt
the ack returned said it was delivered but
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Wietse Venema wrote:
Please file a ZFS bug reportug. As per POSIX, when the O_CREAT is
specified to open(),
The third argument does not affect whether the file is open
for reading, writing or for both.
In other words, read/write access is controlled with the
of virus signature
database 5892 (20110221) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
will keep an eye out for the new versions!
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5892 (20110221) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Hello i've read something about grey list and i've a question about
it:
Is it better to use postgrey or i can use directly postfix greylist
mechanism (http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#greylist)
to realize greylist system? what the difference ?
And then can i use postscreen to
Hi
In a local machine i have the following setup to prevent sending outside
and catch some domain local, but why in the world is the second log-entry
relayed instead reject like the first one?
default_transport = error:5.1.2 mail to remote domains not permitted
Now i fixed this problem with
On 2011-02-21 7:43 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Feb 21 13:41:52 postfix/smtp[14418]: warning: relayhost configuration problem
Feb 21 13:41:52 postfix/smtp[14418]: 2D60D3DF7: to=t...@test.thelounge.net,
relay=none, delay=0.05,
delays=0.03/0.01/0/0, dsn=4.3.5, status=deferred (mail for 127.0.0.1
Zitat von Matteo Cazzador mat...@netlite.it:
Hello i've read something about grey list and i've a question about it:
Is it better to use postgrey or i can use directly postfix greylist
mechanism (http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#greylist)
to realize greylist system? what the
It seems you did not read my mail
Am 21.02.2011 13:51, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2011-02-21 7:43 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Feb 21 13:41:52 postfix/smtp[14418]: warning: relayhost configuration problem
Feb 21 13:41:52 postfix/smtp[14418]: 2D60D3DF7:
to=t...@test.thelounge.net, relay=none,
Matthias Andree:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Wietse Venema wrote:
Please file a ZFS bug reportug. As per POSIX, when the O_CREAT is
specified to open(),
The third argument does not affect whether the file is open
for reading, writing or for both.
In other words, read/write
Hello,
We have a postfix system which handle many alias and users with virtual
transport. The backend used is LDAP.
Now, I have to use mysql backend for some other specific domains.
How can I set this to make postfix looking to ldap for a list of
domain and looking to mysql for an other
Zitat von Erwan Loaëc erwan.lo...@cgin.fr:
Hello,
We have a postfix system which handle many alias and users with
virtual transport. The backend used is LDAP.
Now, I have to use mysql backend for some other specific domains.
How can I set this to make postfix looking to ldap for a list of
Erwan Loa?c:
Hello,
We have a postfix system which handle many alias and users with virtual
transport. The backend used is LDAP.
Now, I have to use mysql backend for some other specific domains.
How can I set this to make postfix looking to ldap for a list of
domain and looking to
Hey!
Wonderful :o)
I don't know why I've never read this before. I'm going to take a look
of theses two parameters.
Thanks
--
Erwan
Wietse Venema wrote:
Erwan Loa�c:
Hello,
We have a postfix system which handle many alias and users with virtual
transport. The backend used is LDAP.
Thank's a lot
Zitat von Matteo Cazzador mat...@netlite.it:
Hello i've read something about grey list and i've a question about
it:
Is it better to use postgrey or i can use directly postfix greylist
mechanism (http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#greylist)
to realize greylist
I suspect there is a simple explanation to this I've overlooked.
We have a problem delivering to one address @eastlink.ca
The odd thing is that the bounce is from google mail, and this Canadian ISP
does not use google mail services.
I've tested that 'host -t mx eastlnk.ca' returns the
Zitat von D G Teed donald.t...@gmail.com:
I suspect there is a simple explanation to this I've overlooked.
We have a problem delivering to one address @eastlink.ca
The odd thing is that the bounce is from google mail, and this Canadian ISP
does not use google mail services.
I've tested that
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:01 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von D G Teed donald.t...@gmail.com:
I suspect there is a simple explanation to this I've overlooked.
We have a problem delivering to one address @eastlink.ca
The odd thing is that the bounce is from google mail, and this
Is there a way to get pflogsumm work with logfiles without
a machine name because the hostname is useless overhead
as long it is the same in every line
/etc/rsyslog.conf:
$template myFormat,%TIMESTAMP%
%syslogtag%%msg:::sp-if-no-1st-sp%%msg:::drop-last-lf%\n
$ActionFileDefaultTemplate myFormat
On 02/21/11 15:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Is there a way to get pflogsumm work with logfiles without
a machine name because the hostname is useless overhead
as long it is the same in every line
You could just reinsert the hostname with sed:
sed -e 's/ postfix\// localhost postfix\//'
On 2/20/2011 8:05 AM, Matthias Egger wrote:
Background:
After getting complaints about mails which could not be delieverd to
us i checked the logfiles and found nothing. By nothing i really mean
nothing. Postfix did not even log a connect from.
So i started to snoop on the network and found
On 2/21/2011 5:16 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 02/21/2011 11:09 PM, John wrote:
On 2/20/2011 8:05 AM, Matthias Egger wrote:
Background:
After getting complaints about mails which could not be delieverd to
us i checked the logfiles and found nothing. By nothing i really
mean nothing. Postfix
On 02/21/2011 11:09 PM, John wrote:
On 2/20/2011 8:05 AM, Matthias Egger wrote:
Background:
After getting complaints about mails which could not be delieverd to
us i checked the logfiles and found nothing. By nothing i really mean
nothing. Postfix did not even log a connect from.
So i
We recently ditched M$Exchange and went to googleApps. Unfortunately we have
some windows servers that need to send notification emails, but can't use
TLS.
I setup postfix on an ubuntu 10.04 server. It is configured to send all
outbound email to google apps. This works without a problem. And I
Hi everyone. I'm new to the list and I'm trying to gather some information
about Postfix for my documentation notes. I looked all over the place to try
and find the answer to this question, but I was unable to, so I thought I
would ask the list.
Will Postfix always accept mail from null
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Linda Pagillo wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm new to the list and I'm trying to gather some information
about Postfix for my documentation notes. I looked all over the place to try
and find the answer to this question, but I was unable to, so I thought I
would ask the list.
On 2/21/2011 6:10 PM, Linda Pagillo wrote:
Hi everyone. I’m new to the list and I’m trying to gather some
information about Postfix for my documentation notes. I looked
all over the place to try and find the answer to this
question, but I was unable to, so I thought I would ask the list.
Will
Linda Pagillo:
Will Postfix always accept mail from null senders by default or is there
something I have to add or change in my main.cf file to make Postfix do
this? Thanks.
As documented, Postfix implements RFC 5321 (the Internet SMTP protocol).
On 2/21/2011 6:09 PM, Jean-Francois Cantin wrote:
We recently ditched M$Exchange and went to googleApps.
Unfortunately we have some windows servers that need to send
notification emails, but can't use TLS.
I setup postfix on an ubuntu 10.04 server. It is configured to
send all outbound email to
On Feb 21, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Jean-Francois Cantin wrote:
We recently ditched M$Exchange
Don't do that. It doesn't reflect well upon you.
and went to googleApps. Unfortunately we have some windows servers that need
to send notification emails, but can't use TLS.
I suspect you mean SASL;
I guess I lost sight of the goal. It works like a charm now using delivery
as a peer, and is a much simpler solution.
Thank you,
-JF
Sending outgoing emails from this dovecot/postfix server is Ok
(ie emails received at destination) but incoming mails keep
getting the logs below :
smtp.myportaltech.com[202.6.163.31]:25: Connection timed out
Feb 21 16:37:04 hostname postfix/smtp[1381]: 8B35C200060:
On 2/21/2011 9:36 PM, sunhux G wrote:
Sending outgoing emails from this dovecot/postfix server is Ok
(ie emails received at destination) but incoming mails keep
getting the logs below :
smtp.myportaltech.com[202.6.163.31]:25: Connection timed out
Feb 21 16:37:04 hostname postfix/smtp[1381]:
This log snippet is postfix trying to send mail. Did you mean to explain
that this
is your own host trying to send to itself? Some routers don't allow loopback
connections, so you can't always connect to your own external IP.
I'm sending from external Outlook/Exchange to my SMTP postfix.
34 matches
Mail list logo
