Hi Viktor,
> > Yes, but this doesn't work if you need to adjust outgoing IP based on
> > the sasl user (published solutions insist on using FILTER :-( [1])
>
> Then perhaps we should provide a way of doing the same thing by
> SASL login. Both the envelope address and the SASL login name are
> re
Thank you. I will go with central RBL service and a policy service script.
Sent from phone
-Original Message-
From: "Wietse Venema"
Sent: 9/11/2015 2:15 AM
To: "postfix-users@postfix.org"
Subject: Re: Check NS (name or IP) against RBL
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:2
Marius Gologan:
> Thank you. I will go with central RBL service and a policy service script.
>
FYI, check_sender_ns_access does not require a policy server.
Wietse
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Wietse Venema"
> Sent: ?9/?11/?2015 2:15 AM
> To: "postfix-users@postfix.org"
>
You could use virtual_alias_maps to rewrite the envelope recipient
to a bit-bucket address (virtual aliases take effect unless you
specify alias expansion with receive_override_options).
Either way, the sender-dependent delivery agent would need to be
able to deliver the bit-bucket address to a d
How can I add a bcc recipient using a policy daemon
I have written a custom policy daemon , and the logic requires that for
some conditions the mail needs to be bcc'ed to a program
Can this be done ?
Thanks
Ram
Hi Christian,
Hi Wietse,
I only have 1 IP address (2 if you count the IPv6 address). A reverse
DNS lookup will always find my primary domain so even if I used
'sender_dependent_default_transport' and set up multiple switches just
to change HELO name, they still have to point to the same IP. I
Ram:
> How can I add a bcc recipient using a policy daemon
>
> I have written a custom policy daemon , and the logic requires that for
> some conditions the mail needs to be bcc'ed to a program
>
> Can this be done ?
Postfix 3.0 and later:
BCC user@domain
Send one copy of
On 09/11/2015 08:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ram:
How can I add a bcc recipient using a policy daemon
I have written a custom policy daemon , and the logic requires that for
some conditions the mail needs to be bcc'ed to a program
Can this be done ?
Postfix 3.0 and later:
BCC user
Ram:
> On 09/11/2015 08:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Ram:
> >> How can I add a bcc recipient using a policy daemon
> >>
> >> I have written a custom policy daemon , and the logic requires that for
> >> some conditions the mail needs to be bcc'ed to a program
> >>
> >> Can this be done ?
> > Pos
Thank you Wietse and Viktor.
I know check_{sender,helo,client}_{ns,mx}_access files and played a bit with
them, but I already run a granular RBL service.
Unfortunately I'm not winning the game with some type of spam sent
repeatedly during night time using:
IPs from class B, multiple domains, uniq
Im trying to filter broken PGP mail into usable mail with body checks.
I have selected to use pcre: when defining body_checks.
The problem is that certain PGP useragents, inserts a \r charachter, a tab,
space, or any other whitespace char immediately before or after the “-BEGIN
PGP MESSAGE--
I have started to get a lot of those when I send messages to some lists.
I understand what is happening, dmarc identifies my domain as DKIM/SPIF
enabled but when sending a message to a list, both of those will fail.
I don't think there is anything I can do about that in my dmarc
configuration
On 12/09/15 06:29, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> So the rule is as follows:
> /[ \t\r\f]*-(BEGIN|END)([^-]*)-[ \t\r\f]*/ REPLACE -$1$2-
>
> The problem with this, is that this removed the whole body of the mail
> except for the -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- line.
>
> What are im doin
On 12/09/15 08:24, Stuart Longland wrote:
> This is just a wild guess on my part, but could that possibly be matching:
>
>> > -BEGIN BLAH-
>^^^
>> > yadda yadda yadda
> ^
>> > -END BLAH-
> ^
>
> and giving you: $1="BEGIN", $2=" B
Yep. On top of that: ([^-]*) means any charachter except for -, so it
shouldn't match any -, and thus $2 cannot contain the charachter "-" at all.
I suspect that postfix in some way matches the whole message in once, and
when the REPLACE word is given, the whole message, even including parts of
On September 12, 2015 12:03:21 AM Alice Wonder wrote:
I don't think there is anything I can do about that in my dmarc
configuration, but I just want to make sure.
dmarc pass is fine for me, if it fails on other maillists its not your fault
On 12/09/15 08:31, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Yep. On top of that: ([^-]*) means any charachter except for -, so it
> shouldn't match any -, and thus $2 cannot contain the charachter "-" at
> all.
>
> I suspect that postfix in some way matches the whole message in once,
> and when the REPLACE word
17 matches
Mail list logo