Viktor Dukhovni:
>
>
> > On Sep 14, 2018, at 5:41 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> > wrote:
> >
> > Postfix 2.3-20051202 introduced conditionally compiled code for a "DELAY"
> > access(5) action, but this never became a default-enabled feature. You'd
> > need to compile Postfix with "-DDELAY_ACTION" to
> On Sep 14, 2018, at 5:41 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> Postfix 2.3-20051202 introduced conditionally compiled code for a "DELAY"
> access(5) action, but this never became a default-enabled feature. You'd
> need to compile Postfix with "-DDELAY_ACTION" to get it, and I don't know
> how
> On Sep 14, 2018, at 4:51 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
>> It happened just one time too many today, in a rushed moment
>> sending the wrong email to the wrong person.
>>
>> Is it possible to exclusively delay sending mail to specific
>> recipients that appear on in a list?
>
> That is logically
On 14 Sep 2018, at 16:00, Eric Smith wrote:
Hi List,
It happened just one time too many today, in a rushed moment
sending the wrong email to the wrong person.
Is it possible to exclusively delay sending mail to specific
recipients that appear on in a list?
That is logically a feature that
Hi List,
It happened just one time too many today, in a rushed moment
sending the wrong email to the wrong person.
Is it possible to exclusively delay sending mail to specific
recipients that appear on in a list?
This way I suspected such an error of an email to one the special
recipients,
Wietse Venema:
> Stefan Bauer:
> > Am Freitag, 14. September 2018 schrieb Wietse Venema :
> > > Stefan Bauer:
> > >> verify_cache.db seems to get corrupted or at least not updated properly
> > as
> > >> new/updated entries do not get correctly verified and postfix logs:
> > >>
> > >> close
Stefan Bauer:
> Am Freitag, 14. September 2018 schrieb Wietse Venema :
> > Stefan Bauer:
> >> verify_cache.db seems to get corrupted or at least not updated properly
> as
> >> new/updated entries do not get correctly verified and postfix logs:
> >>
> >> close database
On 9/14/2018 12:41 PM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
>
> Am Freitag, 14. September 2018 schrieb Wietse Venema :
>> Stefan Bauer:
>>> verify_cache.db seems to get corrupted or at least not updated
> properly as
>>> new/updated entries do not get correctly verified and postfix logs:
>>>
>>> close database
Am Freitag, 14. September 2018 schrieb Wietse Venema :
> Stefan Bauer:
>> verify_cache.db seems to get corrupted or at least not updated properly
as
>> new/updated entries do not get correctly verified and postfix logs:
>>
>> close database /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db: No such file or
Stefan Bauer:
> verify_cache.db seems to get corrupted or at least not updated properly as
> new/updated entries do not get correctly verified and postfix logs:
>
> close database /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db: No such file or directory
> > (possible Berkeley DB bug
That is logged after
Hi,
we use reject_unverified_recipient and have
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
after changes in aliases and issuing postalias /etc/aliases
verify_cache.db seems to get corrupted or at least not updated properly as
new/updated entries do not get correctly
Hi Fantomas,
It's very kind of you for all the details of your answer.
I would like just a bit more information.
1. If I change "smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes" in main.cf,
Is there any issue with "smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous" ?
This option will be apply to submission and smtps in
In order of messages. ( i got 11 message for 1 postfix list mail ).
I only see this these when .
1) someone tries to mail out of my domainname.
2) when i mail the postfix list.
I never figured this out, why this happens at the postfix list.
This is an authentication failure report for
On 2018-09-14 11:11, Benny Pedersen wrote:
B. Reino skrev den 2018-09-14 10:52:
So in a way this message is just a test, but hopefully also a
clarification :)
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
header.d=bbmk.org
B. Reino skrev den 2018-09-14 11:02:
Well I guess the above test failed :(
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none)
header.from=bbmk.org
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bbmk.org header.i=@bbmk.org
header.b=sOJs04Hw;
B. Reino skrev den 2018-09-14 10:52:
So in a way this message is just a test, but hopefully also a
clarification :)
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
header.d=bbmk.org header.i=@bbmk.org header.b=I6ED3eZq;
do not sign
I had a simular things.
.. Waiting for the bounce...
Greetz,
Louis
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: rei...@bbmk.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
> Namens B. Reino
> Verzonden: vrijdag 14 september 2018 10:52
> Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Onderwerp: Re:
On 2018-09-14 10:52, B. Reino wrote:
I think the postfix ML is not so "DKIM safe". In my case, it causes my
DKIM signature to fail. I have now compared a message sent by me
against other messages sent e.g. by Benny Pedersen, and concluded that
my configuration (using rspamd) was signing way
On 2018-09-14 10:36, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 07:14, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Benny Pedersen skrev den 2018-09-14 08:08:
Dominic Raferd skrev den 2018-09-14 07:33:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 00:29, Julian Opificius
wrote:
Why is it that my system marks everything from you
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 07:14, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Benny Pedersen skrev den 2018-09-14 08:08:
> > Dominic Raferd skrev den 2018-09-14 07:33:
> >> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 00:29, Julian Opificius
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Why is it that my system marks everything from you as spam, Benny? Is
> >>>
On 13.09.18 17:51, edg973 wrote:
Unfortunatly, in my config, there is in main.cf:
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
change this to "no"
In master.cf, there is :
smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o
content_filter=spamassassin
smtps inetn - n
Benny Pedersen skrev den 2018-09-14 08:08:
Dominic Raferd skrev den 2018-09-14 07:33:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 00:29, Julian Opificius
wrote:
Why is it that my system marks everything from you as spam, Benny? Is
it
your tld? I've added you to my address book, but my server keeps
spitting you
Dominic Raferd skrev den 2018-09-14 07:33:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 00:29, Julian Opificius
wrote:
Why is it that my system marks everything from you as spam, Benny? Is
it
your tld? I've added you to my address book, but my server keeps
spitting you out.
Because the domain that he uses to
23 matches
Mail list logo
