Hi there.
Moving from sendmail to a macos 10.6 server that ships with postfix..
There are a few things that I'm trying to replicate from sendmail into
postifx, but I'm not having much luck.
Problems:
1- People on local network (e.g. from 192.168.0.0/24) can send email
without authentication (so
Hi again
On 30 August 2010 22:56, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> 4- I have added in sendmail a very simple rule allowing to create
> dummy email address such as:
> reg-username-ser...@domain.com
>
> this is equivalent to usern...@domain.com
>
> In sendmail, I would ad in the main .mc file:
>
> LOCAL_
On 2010-08-30 8:56 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Moving from sendmail to a macos 10.6 server that ships with postfix..
Per the welcome message you received when you joined the list:
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
This means, at a minimum, postfix version
Jean-Yves Avenard:
> > I thought I could add something like this in the canonical file:
> > /^(reg)-(.*)-(.*)$/ ${2}
> >
> > However, I read in a few place that this would break recipient validation.
>
> Should add that while with the canonical above I do get the email to
> the proper mailbox deli
Hi
On 30 August 2010 23:25, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-08-30 8:56 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
>> Moving from sendmail to a macos 10.6 server that ships with postfix..
>
> Per the welcome message you received when you joined the list:
>
> TO REPORT A PROBLEM see:
> http://www.postfix.org/DE
Hi
On 30 August 2010 23:43, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I kindly suggest that you read the manual (RTFM) before asking
> questions that are already answered there.
>
> Canonical mappings can rewrite the envelope addresses (i.e. what
> Postfix delivers) without changing the addresses in the message
On 30 August 2010 23:58, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> I did *not* define remote_header_rewrite_domain anywhere, yet the
> recipient is being rewritten. Unless I misread how this configuration
> parameter actually works.
>
Oh, I see what's going on, as I'm doing my test from a local subnet,
the add
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:56 +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hi there.
> Moving from sendmail to a macos 10.6 server that ships with postfix..
> There are a few things that I'm trying to replicate from sendmail into
> postifx, but I'm not having much luck.
> Problems:
> 2- When using a non encrypt
Hi
On 31 August 2010 01:00, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> "A separate parameter controls Postfix SASL mechanism policy during a
> TLS-encrypted SMTP session. The default is to copy the settings from the
> unencrypted session:"
>
> smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext
> smtpd_sasl
Jean-Yves Avenard:
> Hi
>
> On 31 August 2010 01:00, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > "A separate parameter controls Postfix SASL mechanism policy during a
> > TLS-encrypted SMTP session. The default is to copy the settings from the
> > unencrypted session:"
> >
> > smtpd_sasl_security_options = no
Hi
On 31 August 2010 02:38, Wietse Venema wrote:
> When reporting a problem, please follow the mailing list
> welcome message's instructions.
>
> In particular, use "postconf -n" command output instead
> of cut-and-paste from main.cf.
I already posted those in an earlier message, am I supposed t
Jean-Yves Avenard:
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes
> smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext
> smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
If this does not announce the SASL mechanisms that you expect, then
the missing mechanisms are not inst
Wietse Venema:
> Jean-Yves Avenard:
> > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> > smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes
> > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext
> > smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
>
> If this does not announce the SASL mechanisms that you expect, then
> the
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:57:05AM +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> smtpd_pw_server_security_options = gssapi,cram-md5,plain,login
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated
> permit_mynetworks reject_unauth_destination check_policy_service
> unix:private/policy permit
> smtpd_sa
I just started to follow this thread and had deleted the rest before. If I can
be of any assistance in terms of Cyrus SASL let me know. Mac OS X runs its own
special Cyrus SASL and I might not be able to help all the way. Anyway...
p...@rick
* Wietse Venema :
> Wietse Venema:
> > Jean-Yves Aven
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 13:04 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jean-Yves Avenard:
> > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> > smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes
> > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext
> > smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous
> If this does not announce the SASL m
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:32:25PM -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 13:04 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Jean-Yves Avenard:
> > > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> > > smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes
> > > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext
> > > sm
Hi
On 31 August 2010 03:04, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> If this does not announce the SASL mechanisms that you expect, then
> the missing mechanisms are not installed with the Cyrus SASL library.
I do appreciate that you took the time to answer my questions..
Especially as I understand it you're th
Hi
On 31 August 2010 03:42, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
>
> Probably not surprising when the Cyrus library is pre-empted by Apple's
> "pw" server, and the mechanism list is defined in an Apple-specific
> configuration parameter.
I just compiled sendmail for mac os 10.6.
And it's behaving perfectly w
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:53:21PM +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 31 August 2010 03:42, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> >
> > Probably not surprising when the Cyrus library is pre-empted by Apple's
> > "pw" server, and the mechanism list is defined in an Apple-specific
> > configuration
20 matches
Mail list logo
