On 7/28/24 20:59, Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users wrote:
How do folks monitor the health of their postfix installations?
I am using https://github.com/kumina/postfix_exporter for metrics collection
and to spot anomalies if there are any. But it is definitely not a silver
bullet, I am intere
On 28.07.24 16:59, Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users wrote:
How do folks monitor the health of their postfix installations?
log monitoring seems to be essential, rates of warning/error messages
seem meaningful. Then there are the statistics regularly emitted, but
these seem more indicative of
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 04:59:48PM -0400, Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Finally, what are the various queues?
> https://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html mentions maildrop, hold,
> incoming, active & deferred,
Which are where you might find a given message.
> but I also see bounce
Hi,
How do folks monitor the health of their postfix installations?
log monitoring seems to be essential, rates of warning/error messages
seem meaningful. Then there are the statistics regularly emitted, but
these seem more indicative of busyness.
Finally, monitoring queue sizes is probably
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 07:48:30PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Problem found via:
>
> danesmtp ()
> {
> local host=$1;
> shift;
> local opts=(-starttls smtp -connect "$host:25" -verify 9
> -verify_return_error -dane_ee_no_namechecks -dane_tlsa_domain "$host");
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:27:37AM +0200, juan smitt wrote:
>
> > How can one directly monitor the effectiveness of the increased number
> > of Postfix SMTP server processes?
> > (https://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html)
> >
> > Is it true that this scales up dynamically unt
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:27:37AM +0200, juan smitt wrote:
> How can one directly monitor the effectiveness of the increased number
> of Postfix SMTP server processes?
> (https://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html)
>
> Is it true that this scales up dynamically until the limit,
Yes, a new smtpd
juan smitt:
> Hi,
>
>
> How can one directly monitor the effectiveness of the increased number
> of Postfix SMTP server processes?
> (https://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html)
Each Postfix SMTP server process handles one remote SMTP client at
a time. The number of processes can be zero up to a
Hi,
How can one directly monitor the effectiveness of the increased number
of Postfix SMTP server processes?
(https://www.postfix.org/STRESS_README.html)
Is it true that this scales up dynamically until the limit, which
means I can monitor it indirectly by counting the number of processes
(and a
Yeah, it basically seems that there are no native capabilities in Postfix for
what I’m looking for, and so everyone pretty much needs to roll whatever ad hoc
log monitoring they want. It’s a challenge because of the diversity of
responses that MTAs can respond when there are problems with your
Hi Justin,
I work for a young startup called Lightmeter and we have been developing
an open source (AGPL licensed) tool that aims to fit needs similar to yours.
It's called Lightmeter Control Center and we've developing it for the
past ~1 year, so it's not full featured, but we have been work
>
>
> Postfix have any native capabilities good for detecting these issues and
> acting on them, or would I just need to do some kind of checks on the
> pflogsumm output each day? Obviously the sooner I can catch these messages
> and act on them, the better, so the more realtime I can do this, the
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this list is completely appropriate for this question, so let
me know if it's not.
I have a couple of Postfix servers that are the MX servers for a couple of
domains that handle a total of around 160-180k messages each week. They servers
are just relays (no local accoun
> max_idle was the option I was looking for. Thank you.
>
> I always grepped for something like timeout/daemon/time and I never
> found max_idle. :-)
Lowered here as well...
--
[*] sys4 AG
https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München
> It could also be very great to have Postfix like this, showing some
> informations about the connection:
>
> smtpd [unused/virgin]
> or
> smtpd [, , , ]
>
> Could be great for analysis and to get a quick overview about what's
> going on on busy servers.
That's a nice idea on systems where this
> On Oct 21, 2018, at 5:14 PM, Peer Heinlein
> wrote:
>
> If a client connects to smtpd and then breaks the connection because
> there's only STARTTLS or AUTH ONLY we have those remaining smtpd
> processes -- which makes the server looking busy, while he isn't.
>
> If there's really a long p
ver IS busy and I WANT to have
an alarm.
>> In that situations we're seeing false positives in our monitoring.
> Please fix your monitoring!
Yes, I do that -- that's why I'm requesting help (thanks for max_idle)
or some additional changes to enable a better mo
we're monitoring the amount of active smtpd processes to make sure, that
we do not reach the max-proc limit from master.cf.
The number I found most useful to indicate something was going wrong
is the number of messages in the queue. For the servers I manage,
normally that number wou
On 10/20/2018 7:24 AM, Peer Heinlein wrote:
we're monitoring the amount of active smtpd processes to make sure, that
we do not reach the max-proc limit from master.cf.
If a client disconnects very early, the smtpd is still "unused" and
remains in server memory, waiting for the
Peer Heinlein:
>
> Hi,
>
> we're monitoring the amount of active smtpd processes to make sure, that
> we do not reach the max-proc limit from master.cf.
>
> If a client disconnects very early, the smtpd is still "unused" and
> remains in server memory, waitin
We simply monitor established tcp sessions to smtpd port. if client flies
away, tcp session does as well:
lsof -i tcp:25 | grep ESTABLISHED | wc -l
Am Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018 schrieb Peer Heinlein :
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> we're monitoring the amount of active smtpd processes
Hi,
we're monitoring the amount of active smtpd processes to make sure, that
we do not reach the max-proc limit from master.cf.
If a client disconnects very early, the smtpd is still "unused" and
remains in server memory, waiting for the next connection.
If a server was flood
Thank you. I have to get all these message and try to build script which
send me an email with specific number of emails send from particular email
account.
2018-04-05 16:00 GMT+02:00 chaouche yacine :
>
> Yes, more specifically you should grep on 'Relay' to avoid other amavis
> lines
>
> root@me
Yes, more specifically you should grep on 'Relay' to avoid other amavis lines
root@messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # grep amavis /var/log/mail.log | grep -v Relay
| head
Apr 1 06:59:29 messagerie-prep amavis[25741]: starting. /usr/sbin/amavisd-new
at myhost.mydomain.tld amavisd-new-2.10.1 (20141025
I wasn't able to find text "amavis" in log file. I tried production server
and finally I see it and I know what you suggest me. It looks like:
Apr 5 15:11:56 s1 amavis[26789]: (26789-13) Passed CLEAN
{RelayedOutbound}, LOCAL [127.0.0.1] -> <
s...@domain.com>
Is it the line about which you said?
You didn't say what's wrong the line grepping on amavis ? it should give you
what you want : one line by sender.
On Thursday, April 5, 2018, 1:51:28 PM GMT+1, Poliman - Serwis
wrote:
I used this script and after comparison result generated by collate.pl and
mail.log file I think tha
I was talking about collate.pl
On Thursday, April 5, 2018, 12:04:45 PM GMT+1, Poliman - Serwis
wrote:
Yacine, do you say about collate.pl script or "from=" part from log file? I
suppose that abotu script. If collate.pl could group by some id, it would be
nice, because I would have on
Yacine, do you say about collate.pl script or "from=" part from log file? I
suppose that abotu script. If collate.pl could group by some id, it would
be nice, because I would have only one line from log dependent from
particular email sent.
2018-04-05 12:31 GMT+02:00 chaouche yacine :
> No it won
No it won't, it will simply group qids together so that you can trace
individual e-mails, instead of having intermingled log lines from different
e-mails.
On Thursday, April 5, 2018, 7:10:11 AM GMT+1, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:07 AM, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:07 AM, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
>
> Using collate.pl script I won't have to count "from=" from mail log, this
> script merge it, am I right?
Try it and see what you get. You may need to make some adjustments to the
regular expressions
depending on how your syslog forma
Using collate.pl script I won't have to count "from=" from mail log, this
script merge it, am I right?
2018-04-05 7:57 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
>
>
> > On Apr 5, 2018, at 1:39 AM, Scott Kitterman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, April 05, 2018 07:34:44 AM Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> >> Unfortunate
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 1:39 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 05, 2018 07:34:44 AM Poliman - Serwis wrote:
>> Unfortunately I use Postfix from Ubuntu repos.
>
> apt-get source postfix
> cd postfix-[version] (depends your Ubuntu release)
> cd auxiliary/collate
> ls
>
> and you'll
On Thursday, April 05, 2018 07:34:44 AM Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> Unfortunately I use Postfix from Ubuntu repos.
apt-get source postfix
cd postfix-[version] (depends your Ubuntu release)
cd auxiliary/collate
ls
and you'll see both collate.pl and the associated README.
Scott K
> 2018-04-04 13:08
Unfortunately I use Postfix from Ubuntu repos.
2018-04-04 13:08 GMT+02:00 Wietse Venema :
> Poliman - Serwis:
> > Could you tell me I could add e-mails together from mail.log which are in
> > line with "from=" part? Hmm I hope I say clear. I need count emails from
> > particular mailbox. Can I ba
I am not sure I understood well. There are three "from=", and you said
which one repond to which behavior, so I think I could base on "from=" from
log file but I should divide by three number of emails send by specific
user. Am I right?
2018-04-04 11:11 GMT+02:00 chaouche yacine :
> The log line
Poliman - Serwis:
> Could you tell me I could add e-mails together from mail.log which are in
> line with "from=" part? Hmm I hope I say clear. I need count emails from
> particular mailbox. Can I base on "from="? For example:
> Apr 3 11:49:48 s1 postfix/qmgr[722]: 3B8C313BE2D: from=,
> size=4000,
The log line from avmavis already has the sender a single time, regardless of
the number of recipients.
Also, if you grep on from, keep in mind that the email first goes from outside
to postfix (1st from), the from postfix to amavis (second from), then from
amavis back to postfix (third from).
Or maybe I could base on this value but divided by 3.
2018-04-04 9:43 GMT+02:00 Poliman - Serwis :
> Hmm, probably I can't base on this, because when I send one email I have
> in log three lines with "from=" and value .
> 1st line --> Apr 4 09:32:41 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd[5622]: NOQUEUE:
>
Hmm, probably I can't base on this, because when I send one email I have in
log three lines with "from=" and value .
1st line --> Apr 4 09:32:41 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd[5622]: NOQUEUE:
filter: RCPT from host-X.Y.Z.W.static.com[X.Y.Z.W]: < t...@example.com >:
Sender address triggers FILTER amav
Could you tell me I could add e-mails together from mail.log which are in
line with "from=" part? Hmm I hope I say clear. I need count emails from
particular mailbox. Can I base on "from="? For example:
Apr 3 11:49:48 s1 postfix/qmgr[722]: 3B8C313BE2D: from=,
size=4000, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
201
Thank you for answer. I am going to use your command - without any typos :P
- and wrap it by some bash script which will check the "Hits" value and
send email with report. I hope I will do it. :)
2018-03-30 17:52 GMT+02:00 chaouche yacine :
> Absolutely. Amavis comes with a default score of 5.0.
Absolutely. Amavis comes with a default score of 5.0. Any e-mail which has a
5.0 score or higher is considered spam. You might have false positives though,
for example if the user's ISP addresses are blacklisted, which might be the
case dependning on the country and ISP.
Yassine.
On Friday
Yassine, appreciate your answer. I will check further in it but do you
think that spam score could help with estimate which mail from which
account is or not spam?
2018-03-30 9:27 GMT+02:00 chaouche yacine :
> Here are some ideas :
>
> 1/ Create a directory somewhere in /var/, for example mailst
Here are some ideas :
1/ Create a directory somewhere in /var/, for example mailstats2/ The directory
will contain one file per sender3/ Your bash script will parse the mail log
file in real time (tail -f) then tee each matching line to the corresponding
mailstats/user file, for example if the
Some emails has "Hits" value even, for example 2,5. What is (if it's
possible to say) good value? I am going to create script in bash which
send me an email when from particular email account will outbound for
example 300 emails per day. Kind of warning. But I am not sure I could use
spam score to
It is, that's the spam score. It helps to visualise if a particular mailbox is
bombarded with spam (can happen with lots and lots of e-mails from qq.com, I
have that domain banned in postfix itself).
Yassine.
On Thursday, March 29, 2018, 3:21:16 PM GMT+1, Alex JOST
wrote:
Am 29.03.20
Am 29.03.2018 um 15:30 schrieb Poliman - Serwis:
This one works well. One question based on one from generated lines:
Mar 26 11:47:41 ORIGINATING LOCAL [127.0.0.1]:38920
-> ,, Hits: 0.742
Mar 26 11:47:41 --> this is date and hour when mail from
i...@klub-biosfera.pl was sent to i...@klub-biosf
-line-buffered -v '
> > (Process_Control| notifications.systemes|
> PODCAST-|Admin-ch|PUB_CONTROL| @mydomain.tld|rpub@mydomain. tld'
> > | sed -u 's/messagerie-prep amavis.*},//;s/Hits:\([^,]\+\) .*/HITS:\1/;
> s/\
> > (Queue-ID\|Message-ID\).*, HITS/Hits/&
> (Queue-ID\|Message-ID\).*, HITS/Hits/'|grep "$REGX_EMAIL ->"
>
> This will strip out automatic notifications and give me output like this :
>
> Mar 28 16:25:24 LOCAL [127.0.0.1]:47600 ->
> ,, Hits: -0.999
>
> One can tee this into a file and build from ther
ffered 'Relay' | egrep
> --line-buffered -v '
> > (Process_Control| notifications.systemes|
> PODCAST-|Admin-ch|PUB_CONTROL| @mydomain.tld|rpub@mydomain. tld'
> > | sed -u 's/messagerie-prep amavis.*},//;s/Hits:\([^,]\+\) .*/HITS:\1/;
> s/\
> > (
:
>
> Mar 28 16:25:24 LOCAL [127.0.0.1]:47600 ->
> ,, Hits: -0.999
>
> One can tee this into a file and build from there. You can do basic stuff
>with the (sort | uniq -c
> | sort -n) pipe machine.
>
> On Wednesday, March 28, 2018, 3:09:24 PM GMT+1, Poliman - Serw
IL ->"
> >
> > This will strip out automatic notifications and give me output like
> this :
> >
> > Mar 28 16:25:24 LOCAL [127.0.0.1]:47600
> ->
> > ,, Hits: -0.999
>
> >
> > One can tee this into a file and build from there. You can d
dnesday, March 28, 2018, 3:09:24 PM GMT+1, Poliman - Serwis
>
> wrote:
>
> Thank you, I will check it. I am looking for information which linux user
>sends email and how
> many, for example, per hour, day. That would be perfect plugin.
>
> 2018-03-28 15:59 GMT+02:0
a file and build from there. You can do basic
> stuff with the (sort | uniq -c
> > | sort -n) pipe machine.
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 28, 2018, 3:09:24 PM GMT+1, Poliman - Serwis <
> ser...@poliman.pl>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thank you, I will che
| sort -n) pipe machine.
>
> On Wednesday, March 28, 2018, 3:09:24 PM GMT+1, Poliman - Serwis
>
> wrote:
>
> Thank you, I will check it. I am looking for information which linux user
> sends email and how
> many, for example, per hour, day. That would be perfect plugin.
March 28, 2018, 3:09:24 PM GMT+1, Poliman - Serwis <
> ser...@poliman.pl> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you, I will check it. I am looking for information which linux user
> sends email and how many, for example, per hour, day. That would be perfect
> plugin.
>
> 2018-03-28 15:59
ect
plugin.
2018-03-28 15:59 GMT+02:00 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
Poliman - Serwis:
Hi people. Do you know is there any tool/plugin for monitoring outgoing
emails from server with postfix? Maybe postfix has this feature?
On 28.03.18 09:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix logs all transactions.
ny tool/plugin for monitoring outgoing
>>> emails from server with postfix? Maybe postfix has this feature?
>>>
>>
> On 28.03.18 09:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Postfix logs all transactions. I suggest that you look for tools
>> that analyze Postfix logs.
>
Poliman - Serwis:
Hi people. Do you know is there any tool/plugin for monitoring outgoing
emails from server with postfix? Maybe postfix has this feature?
On 28.03.18 09:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix logs all transactions. I suggest that you look for tools
that analyze Postfix logs
Poliman - Serwis:
> Hi people. Do you know is there any tool/plugin for monitoring outgoing
> emails from server with postfix? Maybe postfix has this feature?
Postfix logs all transactions. I suggest that you look for tools
that analyze Postfix logs.
Wietse
Hi people. Do you know is there any tool/plugin for monitoring outgoing
emails from server with postfix? Maybe postfix has this feature?
--
*Pozdrawiam / Best Regards*
*Piotr Bracha*
I am pleased to offer to the DANE user community a new monitoring
and diagnostic utility. This is a one-shot variant of my survey
code specialized for monitoring cron jobs and troubleshooting.
Code and instructions at https://github.com/vdukhovni/danecheck
While Haskell may be an unfamiliar
On Sat, March 18, 2017 4:06 am, Sean Son wrote:
> Hello all
>
>
> We would like to monitor Postfix mail queues using SMNP so we can receive
> alerts whenever the mail queue reaches a certain threshold. What OID and
> MIB would we have to use to be able to monitor Postfix mail queues?
Sean,
I us
gt; > > can receive alerts whenever the mail queue reaches a certain
> > > threshold. What OID and MIB would we have to use to be able to
> > > monitor Postfix mail queues?
> >
> > I don't recall a specific MIB that covers mail queues, however
> >
reaches a certain
> > threshold. What OID and MIB would we have to use to be able to
> > monitor Postfix mail queues?
>
> I don't recall a specific MIB that covers mail queues, however
> I recommend against monitoring the queue's message count, too
> many false
Postfix mail queues?
I don't recall a specific MIB that covers mail queues, however
I recommend against monitoring the queue's message count, too
many false alarms from spikes in traffic. What is more useful
to monitor is average time from queue entry to queue exit, and
also ave
Hello all
We would like to monitor Postfix mail queues using SMNP so we can receive
alerts whenever the mail queue reaches a certain threshold. What OID and
MIB would we have to use to be able to monitor Postfix mail queues?
Thank you for all of your help in this post and other posts of mine!
zzina, Angelo
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:21 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: SMTP round-trip monitoring
Hello,
I don't know of a service, but we have a Zabbix server and I wrote a python
script that is run from a server not in our mail infrastructure(Azure) to
verify mail
UITS, SSG-Linux/ M&C
860-486-9075
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Rosenbaum, Larry M.
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 4:22 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: OT: SMTP round-trip monitoring
We are interested in getting an out
We are interested in getting an outside service to do round-trip monitoring of
our mail servers (i.e. check that SMTP mail is flowing in and out and send a
notification if it isn't). [We are not interested in services that send an
email to one of our mailboxes and checks it with POP or
Andrew Beverley:
> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 15:09 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Postfix already logs the script's output (stdout and stderr) streams,
> > and it already logs and reports a non-zero exit status.
>
> The problem is monitoring this though: it seems that w
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 15:09 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix already logs the script's output (stdout and stderr) streams,
> and it already logs and reports a non-zero exit status.
The problem is monitoring this though: it seems that when the above are
logged they are logged at a
Andrew Beverley:
> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 14:24 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Andrew Beverley:
> > > So, is there a way to either change the return-path for all external
> > > commands, or alternatively set a higher log level for any errors?
> >
> > If the error happens in the external command, t
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 14:24 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrew Beverley:
> > So, is there a way to either change the return-path for all external
> > commands, or alternatively set a higher log level for any errors?
>
> If the error happens in the external command, then you could configure
> the
Andrew Beverley:
> So, is there a way to either change the return-path for all external
> commands, or alternatively set a higher log level for any errors?
If the error happens in the external command, then you could configure
the pipe(8) daemon to run the command under strace and capture
strace o
Dear all,
I have some external scripts that are executed through a variety of
aliases[1]. I just discovered recently that one of the external commands
was dying prematurely, so I wondered: what is the best way for
monitoring this happening?
I tried setting alerts on my mail.log for messages with
On 22.10.2014 04:03, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> as for 'cleanup' : if this user's home PC is 'infected/hacked', if I just
> issue a new password, spam will start again ?
Do you limit the amount of mails a user can send per time slot? (like
100 mails in a 6 hour period). If not, please do, you can u
Hi,
On 10/22/2014 04:03 AM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
[snip]
is monitoring blacklists just 'a good idea'? a must ? or?
[snip]
I use this:
http://whmscripts.net/tips/2010/rbl-check-initial-release/
HTH,
Mikael
> # grep username /var/log/maillog.4 | wc
> 22 3644692
> I've now edited that username sasl password
> what sort of monitoring can one do to have a chance to pick up such
> 'failure' earlier ?
You can use something like policyd (http://wiki.policyd.or
d
what sort of monitoring can one do to have a chance to pick up such
'failure' earlier ?
is monitoring blacklists just 'a good idea'? a must ? or?
as for 'cleanup' : if this user's home PC is 'infected/hacked', if I just
issue a new password, spam will start again ?
thanks for any pointers, sorry for ot post
V
+1 for mailgraph and queuegraph!
Joe
On 07/17/2013 05:23 AM, José Luís Faria wrote:
I'm using
http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/
Em 17-07-2013 13:14, Roman Gelfand escreveu:
Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
I am looking to see if there is somethi
On 17/07/2013 15:14, Roman Gelfand wrote:
Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc...
Thanks in advance
mailgraph: http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/
queuegraph: http://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix
On 13-07-17 09:14 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
>
> I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc...
>
> Thanks in advance
Nagios has a "check_mailq" plugin that works very well with P
I'm using
http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/
Em 17-07-2013 13:14, Roman Gelfand escreveu:
Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc...
Thanks in advance
smime.p7s
Description: Assin
W dniu 17.07.2013 14:14, Roman Gelfand pisze:
Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc...
Thanks in advance
Cacti + some scripts on server for SNMP for examle something like this
http://www.pitt
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:14:39PM CEST, Roman Gelfand
said:
> Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
>
> I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc...
>
> Thanks in advance
>
munin has some postifx monitoring plugins (am
Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc...
Thanks in advance
On 04 Jun 2013, at 10:27 , Robert L Mathews wrote:
> "In general, the thing I've learned about monitoring is that when possible,
> check the system by using it, rather [than] looking for changes in side
> effects (such as logs, or number of processes running, etc.). That&#
subject.
That's all it takes. Each time the check runs, (1) should find the
message sent by (3) of the previous check. The "timestamp in the
subject" can be as simple as the epoch seconds.
As I wrote on this list 11 years ago(!), "In general, the thing I've
learned about m
On 06/02/2013 06:55 PM, Erwan David wrote:
Le 02/06/2013 18:12, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Lars Nielsen:
s?n, 02 06 2013 kl. 12:14 -0300, skrev Mike:
On 13-06-02 11:52 AM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
Hey List,
What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix
mailservers?
I use Icinga and
Le 02/06/2013 18:12, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Lars Nielsen:
s?n, 02 06 2013 kl. 12:14 -0300, skrev Mike:
On 13-06-02 11:52 AM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
Hey List,
What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix mailservers?
I use Icinga and Munin. Is there a good integration to these
Lars Nielsen:
> s?n, 02 06 2013 kl. 12:14 -0300, skrev Mike:
> > On 13-06-02 11:52 AM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> > > Hey List,
> > >
> > > What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix mailservers?
> > > I use Icinga and Munin. Is there a goo
On 13-06-02 12:34 PM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
My primary use is to recieve emails for my domains. Next I want to relay
general emails for a limited amount of authenticated users.
Ok, so with step one, you're going to want to have another system send
email to a mailbox you host once every 'n' min
søn, 02 06 2013 kl. 12:14 -0300, skrev Mike:
> On 13-06-02 11:52 AM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> > Hey List,
> >
> > What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix mailservers?
> > I use Icinga and Munin. Is there a good integration to these?
> >
> Tha
Hey List,
What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix mailservers?
I use Icinga and Munin. Is there a good integration to these?
Best regards
Lars Nielsen
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:31:21PM +1100, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> we have a contractor given an email address for use in contacting
> clients, the boss would like to bcc all his outbound mails, is
> there a way to bcc all outbound emails for one user ?
>
> (I realize he can simply change his s
we have a contractor given an email address for use in contacting clients,
the boss would like to bcc all his outbound mails, is there a way to bcc
all outbound emails for one user ?
(I realize he can simply change his smtp to another smtp server to
overcome this, but, that's what the boss wants..
accept a message for onward delivery; I
>> need to be able to notice delivery issues and initiate a meatware
>> interface. Once the message is accepted by the remote server, onward
>> delivery is monitored by another system that I have no control over.
>>
>> I bel
message is accepted by the remote server, onward
> delivery is monitored by another system that I have no control over.
>
> I believe I am limited to monitoring the local mail queue to see if
> messages are being deferred, and reporting accordingly?
>
> The postqueue(1) command d
y the remote server, onward
delivery is monitored by another system that I have no control over.
I believe I am limited to monitoring the local mail queue to see if
messages are being deferred, and reporting accordingly?
The postqueue(1) command doesn't appear to generate output in a format
pa
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
