hi,
I have the following problem coming from sendmail:
This is how it is set up in virtusertable:
@domain.nl %1...@otherdomain.nl
us...@domain.nl localuser1
us...@domain.nl localuser2
us...@domain.nl localuser3
I am using postfixadmin and the local users are working.
But how do I fo
R. Berger:
> hi,
>
> I have the following problem coming from sendmail:
> This is how it is set up in virtusertable:
> @domain.nl %1...@otherdomain.nl
> us...@domain.nl localuser1
> us...@domain.nl localuser2
> us...@domain.nl localuser3
If you can explain what the above means for Se
Wietse Venema schreef op 8-1-2014 20:20:
R. Berger:
hi,
I have the following problem coming from sendmail:
This is how it is set up in virtusertable:
@domain.nl %1...@otherdomain.nl
us...@domain.nl localuser1
us...@domain.nl localuser2
us...@domain.nl localuser3
If you can explai
R. Berger:
> It's not exactly a catchall.
> @domain.nl%1...@otherdomain.nl
> means that somen...@domain.nl is send to somen...@otherdomain.nl
I wrote that you will accept mail for non-existent recipients in
otherdomain.nl.
That is bad.
Your system will be sending backscatter mail to inno
Wietse Venema schreef op 8-1-2014 20:47:
R. Berger:
It's not exactly a catchall.
@domain.nl%1...@otherdomain.nl
means that somen...@domain.nl is send to somen...@otherdomain.nl
I wrote that you will accept mail for non-existent recipients in
otherdomain.nl.
That is bad.
Your system w
R. Berger:
> > R. Berger:
> >> It's not exactly a catchall.
> >> @domain.nl%1...@otherdomain.nl
> >> means that somen...@domain.nl is send to somen...@otherdomain.nl
> > I wrote that you will accept mail for non-existent recipients in
> > otherdomain.nl.
> > That is bad.
> > Your system wil
Wietse Venema schreef op 8-1-2014 21:46:
R. Berger:
R. Berger:
It's not exactly a catchall.
@domain.nl%1...@otherdomain.nl
means that somen...@domain.nl is send to somen...@otherdomain.nl
I wrote that you will accept mail for non-existent recipients in
otherdomain.nl.
That is bad.
You
On 2014-01-08 3:18 PM, R. Berger wrote:
In sendmail, when I use "@domain.nl %1...@otherdomain.nl" domain.nl
wil automatically have 29 users also.
If there is a mail send to n...@domain.nl and n...@otherdomain.nl does
not exist, it will be rejected.
In postfixadmin this will be a domain alia
Hi,
I need some help configuring canonical maps.
Suppose you have two lookup tables listed in canonical_maps and each of
these tables uses all three pattern types (user@domain, user, @domain).
Now from what I see Postfix looks for a match when rewriting addresses
in the following order
I'm having difficulty getting the canonical_maps function to work as needed
to repair some incorrect addresses from a legacy client. Here's the
situation and what I've tried so far:
Legacy client (oldhost.legacy.org) does not append its domain (legacy.org)
to addresses in the envelope or the mess
Ond?ej Lyson?k:
> Hi,
>
> I need some help configuring canonical maps.
>
> Suppose you have two lookup tables listed in canonical_maps and each of
> these tables uses all three pattern types (user@domain, user, @domain).
> Now from what I see Postfix looks for a match whe
this?
Ondra
On 09/15/2016 03:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ond?ej Lyson?k:
Hi,
I need some help configuring canonical maps.
Suppose you have two lookup tables listed in canonical_maps and each of
these tables uses all three pattern types (user@domain, user, @domain).
Now from what I see Postfix look
(5) and the canonical_maps section of postconf(5), I think it's
> not clear which of the processing orders, mentioned in the first email,
> it actually uses. Would you like me to write a patch for this?
>
> Ondra
>
>
> On 09/15/2016 03:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
ing orders, mentioned in the first email,
it actually uses. Would you like me to write a patch for this?
Ondra
On 09/15/2016 03:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Ond?ej Lyson?k:
Hi,
I need some help configuring canonical maps.
Suppose you have two lookup tables listed in canonical_maps and each of
bit ambiguous on this topic. After reading
>>> canonical(5) and the canonical_maps section of postconf(5), I think it's
>>> not clear which of the processing orders, mentioned in the first email,
>>> it actually uses. Would you like me to write a patch for this?
>&
Michael Fox:
> If I set local_header_rewrite_clients = static:all or permit_mynetworks or
> some other option that would cause a match of the legacy client, then the
> append_dot_domain option takes over and appends the domain of the postfix
> host, rewriting the address as u...@oldhost.standard.or
Thanks much, Wietse.
A couple of follow-ups:
> As documented in ADDRESS_REWRITING_README, canonical mapping happens
> after append_dot_mydomain.
O.K. I read that document but did not see that statement. I just went back
and read it again and I still don't see that. Perhaps the order of
proces
Michael Fox:
> Thanks much, Wietse.
>
> A couple of follow-ups:
>
> > As documented in ADDRESS_REWRITING_README, canonical mapping happens
> > after append_dot_mydomain.
>
> O.K. I read that document but did not see that statement. I just went back
> and read it again and I still don't see tha
Thanks again Wietse.
> Hmm. ADDRESS_REWRITING_README describes the address manipulations
> in the order as executed. Presenting these descriptions in a different
> order would be misleading.
Yes. And it's very well written. But assuming or inferring information
that is not in a technical docume
Hi all,
Apologies in advance if this is a redundant query. I did some searching on
the previous list posts and wasn't able to find a definitive recommendation
on this.
What I am trying to do is:
Setup a SMTP relay for outgoing mail where:
(a) All From: headers of the form u...@cooldomain1.com (e
Venkat:
> What I am trying to do is:
>
> Setup a SMTP relay for outgoing mail where:
> (a) All From: headers of the form u...@cooldomain1.com (example) are
> rewritten to be no-re...@cooldomain2.com
> (b) A Reply-To: header with the original u...@cooldomain1.com is added
>
> I have achieved this
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation Wietse, it makes more
sense to me now re: the order of operations.
Cheers,
VM
On Aug 21, 2014 5:31 AM, "Wietse Venema" wrote:
> Venkat:
> > What I am trying to do is:
> >
> > Setup a SMTP relay for outgoing mail where:
> > (a) All From: headers o
22 matches
Mail list logo
