> “replace Amavis with something faster”
>
> Any suggestions ?
Add the following to amavisd.conf and restart:
$log_level = 2;
$log_templ = $log_verbose_templ;
That way amavisd should log info about timing and rules
which you can use to calculate how long it takes to
process your average email
ers@postfix.org"
*Subject: *Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mail queue took 3 hours to recover from
a flood. Suggestions ?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:06:34PM +, White, Daniel E.
(GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] wrote:
There was no outage.
The queue filled faster than the processes could process them th
> On 23 Jan 2023, at 18:43, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]
> wrote:
> When I checked, I found max_servers = 2 and max_requests is not set,
You _must_ make sure that whatever you set for $max_servers matches what you
have in your master.cf otherwise it is a pointless exercise - Postfix nee
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]:
> postfix/qmgr[PID]: warning: mail for [127.0.0.1]:10024 is using up NUMBER of
> NUMBER active queue entries
As Viktor noted, Amavis is unable to keep up with incoming mail.
Find out why it is slow. This will require diving into details.
Wietse
Thanks, Arrigo
This helped.
When I checked, I found max_servers = 2 and max_requests is not set,
From: Arrigo Triulzi
Date: Monday, January 23, 2023 at 12:37
To: Daniel White
Cc: "postfix-users@postfix.org"
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Mail queue took 3 hours to recover from a flood.
S
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:30:00PM +, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]
wrote:
> “replace Amavis with something faster”
>
> Any suggestions ?
Well, how about *nothing*. If "nothing" is not the right answer, then
perhaps you know what you're using Amavis for, which can be used to
set cri
On 23 Jan 2023, at 18:30, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]
wrote:
>
> “replace Amavis with something faster”
> Any suggestions ?
Start by tuning amavis, see the end of
https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.postfix.html - if you do not have
enough copies and they don’t match what you
d side provides anything, but Viktor
or Wietse will likely correct me if I'm wrong.
From: Wietse Venema
Date: Monday, January 23, 2023 at 11:28
To: Daniel White
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mail queue took 3 hours to recover from a
flood. Suggestions ?
White, Daniel E
“replace Amavis with something faster”
Any suggestions ?
From: on behalf of Viktor Dukhovni
Reply-To: "postfix-users@postfix.org"
Date: Monday, January 23, 2023 at 12:28
To: "postfix-users@postfix.org"
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mail queue took 3 hours to
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:06:34PM +, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]
wrote:
> There was no outage.
> The queue filled faster than the processes could process them through.
>
> I do not know which limit to increase to accommodate such bursts of traffic.
>
> I did find 27 instances of th
smtp_helo_timeout = 300s
But where do I find smtp-amavis connect timeout ?
Is it the milter_connect_timeout ?
From: Wietse Venema
Date: Monday, January 23, 2023 at 11:28
To: Daniel White
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mail queue took 3 hours to recover from a flood.
Suggestions ?
White, Daniel
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]:
> Around 12000 messages.
> The queue went from ~3000 to over 12000 in about 30 minutes and then took 3
> hours to grind through all of them.
>
> I am still trying to determine if this was an accident or not.
> The source claims it was not intentionally malici
Around 12000 messages.
The queue went from ~3000 to over 12000 in about 30 minutes and then took 3
hours to grind through all of them.
I am still trying to determine if this was an accident or not.
The source claims it was not intentionally malicious.
Some postconf values:
default_destination_
an...@ursc.gov.in:
> Want to run a separate instance of postfix and make 2 incoming queues
> (one each for a domain).? The new instance will listen on a new IP on
> the same server.
>
> I have configured, spfpolicy for incoming mails in the already
> existing queue (master.cf) and I want to
Hello,
Want to run a separate instance of postfix and make 2 incoming queues
(one each for a domain). The new instance will listen on a new IP on
the same server.
I have configured, spfpolicy for incoming mails in the already
existing queue (master.cf) and I want to do the same in new instanc
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: 02 April 2019 13:16
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: nfs as storage for mail queue
De Petter Mattheas:
> Hello
> Can somebody help me?
$ su
[password here]
# postfix set-permissions
# postfix
De Petter Mattheas:
> Hello
> Can somebody help me?
$ su
[password here]
# postfix set-permissions
# postfix check
Repeat until there are no warnings.
BTW I cannot confirm whether a WINDOWS server can satisfy the file
system properties that Postfix requires: see the section "Postfix file
system
N.V.
T +32 (0)53 73 95 53
F +32 (0)53 21 00 31
www.jandenul.com<http://www.jandenul.com/>
From: De Petter Mattheas
Sent: 02 April 2019 08:39
To: Postfix users
Subject: nfs as storage for mail queue
Hello
Can somebody help me?
So I have setup the nfs share on a windows server 2016 with nfs
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 07:40, De Petter Mattheas <
mattheas.depet...@jandenul.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
>
>
> Can somebody help me?
>
>
>
> So I have setup the nfs share on a windows server 2016 with nfs server
> role.
>
>
>
> Security is set on the device ip of the postfix server read-write with
> all
Hello
Can somebody help me?
So I have setup the nfs share on a windows server 2016 with nfs server role.
Security is set on the device ip of the postfix server read-write with allow
root access.
In the main conf of postfix I have set the queue to the right dir
queue_directory = /mnt/mail
fst
Thanks again. I will do so as soon as the problem recurs.
On 1/18/2018 3:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Jan 18, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Dennis Putnam wrote:
>>
The messages show in mailq as having timed
out and are a few days old.
>>> They've probably maxed out the maximal_backoff_time
> On Jan 18, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
>>> The messages show in mailq as having timed
>>> out and are a few days old.
>> They've probably maxed out the maximal_backoff_time and are tried
>> infrequently, but are not forgotten.
> The default is 4000 seconds according to the docs.
Thanks for the reply. See embedded comments. Also note that all messages
go through the same destination server.
On 1/18/2018 2:55 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Jan 18, 2018, at 2:44 PM, Dennis Putnam wrote:
>>
>> I occasionally encounter a strange problem with the
> On Jan 18, 2018, at 2:44 PM, Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
> I occasionally encounter a strange problem with the mail queue seemingly
> not retrying failed messages.
What is your definition of "not retrying"? Messages are retried
periodically, with exponen
I occasionally encounter a strange problem with the mail queue seemingly
not retrying failed messages. The messages show in mailq as having timed
out and are a few days old. In the mean time other messages are going
through just fine. As soon as I run postqueue -f those messages go
through as well
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:30 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> If you have a shortage of entropy, and you require it for your random
> number source, it can slow TLS connections. The typical solution is
> to use either a pseudo-random source or a hw-based entropy source.
Not in Postfix. Postfix us
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:55:46PM -0300, Roberto Carna wrote:
> So should we use this setting for TLS options in main.cf in order to
> slow down the key generation time:
>
> tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom
>
> ???
>
>
> Thanks again.
Yes, that is what we use here.
Regards,
Ken
So should we use this setting for TLS options in main.cf in order to
slow down the key generation time:
tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom
???
Thanks again.
2017-03-27 16:30 GMT-03:00 Kenneth Marshall :
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:06:46PM -0300, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
>> Dear, thanks
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:06:46PM -0300, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
> Dear, thanksis it possible that the STARTTLS settings slow down mail
> processing? In this mail relay server, the connections as "client" to the
> corporate mail server are always encrypted with the TLS, with the
> corres
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 3:06 PM, Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
>
> Dear, thanksis it possible that the STARTTLS settings slow down mail
> processing? In this mail relay server, the connections as "client" to the
> corporate mail server are always encrypted with the TLS, with the
> correspon
nks to all.
Roberto
2017-03-27 15:56 GMT-03:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
>
> > On Mar 27, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Roberto Carna
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear, yesterday I realized that the mail queue of my SMTP relay server
> > is about 110.000 mails,
>
>http://www.postfix.org/QSH
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 06:45:05PM +, chaouche yacine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am curious to know why do you have 110 000 mails in the mail queue
> to begin with ? are they all deferred mail ? and if so, can you report
> the log line that could contian the reason of the def
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Roberto Carna wrote:
>
> Dear, yesterday I realized that the mail queue of my SMTP relay server
> is about 110.000 mails,
http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html
> and the warning log file tell me:
>
> Mar 20 10:00:08 RELAY1 postfix
Hello,
I am curious to know why do you have 110 000 mails in the mail queue to begin
with ? are they all deferred mail ? and if so, can you report the log line that
could contian the reason of the defer ?
It happened to me once when I have (mis)configured quotas for my users. When a
user
Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Roberto Carna
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 2:28 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Mail queue with 110.000 mails
Dear, yesterday I realized that the mail queue of my SMTP relay server
is
Dear, yesterday I realized that the mail queue of my SMTP relay server
is about 110.000 mails, and the warning log file tell me:
Mar 20 10:00:08 RELAY1 postfix/qmgr[55666]: warning: mail for
[10.0.0.1] is using up 2 of 2 active queue entries
Mar 20 10:00:09 RELAY1 postfix/qmgr[55666
On Sat, March 18, 2017 4:06 am, Sean Son wrote:
> Hello all
>
>
> We would like to monitor Postfix mail queues using SMNP so we can receive
> alerts whenever the mail queue reaches a certain threshold. What OID and
> MIB would we have to use to be able to monitor Postfix mail
Geert Stappers:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:25:45PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > On Mar 17, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Sean Son
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all
> > >
> > > We would like to monitor Postfix mail queues using SMNP so we
&
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:25:45PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Mar 17, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Sean Son
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello all
> >
> > We would like to monitor Postfix mail queues using SMNP so we
> > can receive alerts whenever the mail queue
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 1:06 PM, Sean Son
> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> We would like to monitor Postfix mail queues using SMNP so we can receive
> alerts whenever the mail queue reaches a certain threshold. What OID and MIB
> would we have to use to be able to monitor
Hello all
We would like to monitor Postfix mail queues using SMNP so we can receive
alerts whenever the mail queue reaches a certain threshold. What OID and
MIB would we have to use to be able to monitor Postfix mail queues?
Thank you for all of your help in this post and other posts of mine
Wietse Venema:
> The code in question is
>
> double smtpd_space_multf = 1.5;
>
> #define BLOCKS(x) ((x) / fsbuf.block_size)
>
> if (BLOCKS(var_queue_minfree) >= fsbuf.block_free
> || BLOCKS(var_message_limit) >= fsbuf.block_free / smtpd_space_multf) {
> (void) smtpd_chec
Sorry, I knew I forgot a detail. I'm running 2.11.0 on Ubuntu 14.04
(their build).
I'm not expecting 10GB emails; that's purely lazy administration on my
part. I'm expecting larger than average attachments, saw some bounces
due to size, and just tacked several zeroes onto the end of the limit.
I'm
Hi Andy
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:24:16AM -0500, Andy Theuninck wrote:
> message_size_limit = 1024000
Are you seriously accepting 10GB mails? This number is larger then
2^32.
Bastian
--
History tends to exaggerate.
-- Col. Green, "The Savage Curtain", stardate 5906.4
CKS(var_message_limit) >= fsbuf.block_free / smtpd_space_multf) {
(void) smtpd_check_reject(state, MAIL_ERROR_RESOURCE,
452, "4.3.1",
"Insufficient system storage");
msg_warn("not enoug
2:13 steve postfix/smtpd[30459]: warning: not enough free
space in mail queue: 908328873984 bytes < 1.5*message size limit
postconf -nf:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
inet_interfaces
Cheers! Very thanks boy :-)
Pol
> Am 23.02.2014 19:22, schrieb Pol Hallen:
>> Hi all :-) I'm searching for how notify by email the mail queue... (if
>> there're emails inside queue). Any idea?
>
> will not help much if it's too late and you reveive
> no
Am 23.02.2014 19:22, schrieb Pol Hallen:
> Hi all :-) I'm searching for how notify by email the mail queue... (if
> there're emails inside queue). Any idea?
will not help much if it's too late and you reveive
no mails at all but in most caes enough to realize
that there
Hi all :-) I'm searching for how notify by email the mail queue... (if
there're emails inside queue). Any idea?
thanks!
Pol
On 09/12/2013 03:17 AM, Josh Cason wrote:
The two entries in log file. I change a few things to protect my mail
server, client and sender. But you should get the idea.
This is how my mailserver system is setup.
cisco router - assp spam filter - postfix mailserver with mailscanner.
Mailscanner
nal Message -
From: "Viktor Dukhovni"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: 1 mail being stuck in incoming mail queue.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:15:34PM -0600, Josh Cason wrote:
I have this 1 email from 1 company from 1 person who for some
reason gets stuck i
Wietse Venema:
> Josh Cason:
> > I have this 1 email from 1 company from 1 person who for some
> > reason gets stuck in the incoming folder. Mail After it goes
> > through. Mail Before it goes through. The maillog show the message
> > showing up. Then that is it. The file stays in chmod 600. I fou
Josh Cason:
> I have this 1 email from 1 company from 1 person who for some
> reason gets stuck in the incoming folder. Mail After it goes
> through. Mail Before it goes through. The maillog show the message
> showing up. Then that is it. The file stays in chmod 600. I found
A file with mode 600
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:15:34PM -0600, Josh Cason wrote:
> I have this 1 email from 1 company from 1 person who for some
> reason gets stuck in the incoming folder. Mail After it goes through.
> Mail Before it goes through. The maillog show the message showing
> up. Then that is it. The file st
I have this 1 email from 1 company from 1 person who for some reason gets stuck
in the incoming folder. Mail After it goes through. Mail Before it goes
through. The maillog show the message showing up. Then that is it. The file
stays in chmod 600. I found a suggestion of putting -v behind picku
b...@indietorrent.org:
> For the sake of thoroughness, and because I'm expected to perform a
> root-cause-analysis, I'm following-up on this after noticing that there was
> a missing comma in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions directive (after
> check_recipient_access on the third line):
>
> smtpd_r
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:25:16PM -0700, b...@indietorrent.org wrote:
> For the sake of thoroughness, and because I'm expected to perform a
> root-cause-analysis, I'm following-up on this after noticing that there was
> a missing comma in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions directive (after
> check_
On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:34:37 -0400, Ben Johnson
wrote:
> On 5/28/2013 1:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Viktor Dukhovni:
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:18:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>
I strongly suggest that you swap the order of the following
two rules in main.cf:
c
On 5/28/2013 1:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:18:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>>> I strongly suggest that you swap the order of the following
>>> two rules in main.cf:
>>>
>>> check_recipient_access mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_recipien
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:18:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > I strongly suggest that you swap the order of the following
> > two rules in main.cf:
> >
> > check_recipient_access mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_recipient.cf,
> > reject_unauth_destination,
> >
>
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:18:25PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I strongly suggest that you swap the order of the following
> two rules in main.cf:
>
> check_recipient_access mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_recipient.cf,
> reject_unauth_destination,
>
> This should be:
>
> r
Wietse Venema:
> Ben Johnson:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am experiencing something very similar to, or exactly the same as,
> > what is described at
> > http://www.tolaris.com/2009/07/15/stopping-spam-botnets-with-fail2ban/ .
I strongly suggest that you swap the order of the following
two rules in main
Ben Johnson:
> Hello,
>
> I am experiencing something very similar to, or exactly the same as,
> what is described at
> http://www.tolaris.com/2009/07/15/stopping-spam-botnets-with-fail2ban/ .
You need to show Postfix logs of the unwanted mail as it arrives
**from the internet**, not as it comes
Hello,
I am experiencing something very similar to, or exactly the same as,
what is described at
http://www.tolaris.com/2009/07/15/stopping-spam-botnets-with-fail2ban/ .
Basically, someone/something has been attempting to relay mail through
my server (at least I believe that to be what's happenin
software you might have installed outside
the OS's packaging system?
> as content filter, recently mail server not responding because of
> huge mail queue, content filter cpu usage is 100%, my investigation
> found more than 18k mails are in que, sender email address is
> m..
Hi All,
Greetings!
Our mail server configured Postfix version 2.4.5 with mailmarshal as content
filter, recently mail server not responding because of huge mail queue, content
filter cpu usage is 100%, my investigation found more than 18k mails are in
que, sender email address is m
On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:16, Goutam Baul wrote:
> We are running postfix-2.3.3-2 on RHEL 5.4 (32bit). The reason for running
> such an old version is the non-availability of the currently used security
> suite on newer version of OS and this issues are likely to be addressed
> within a couple of
Dear List,
We are running postfix-2.3.3-2 on RHEL 5.4 (32bit). The reason for running
such an old version is the non-availability of the currently used security
suite on newer version of OS and this issues are likely to be addressed
within a couple of weeks.
Our system is handling mails of
Noel,
> max_queue_lifetime will reduce the amount of time undeliverable mail
> hangs around in the queue, regardless of the reason.
>
> You can set it lower, but with caution -- postfix can't tell the
> difference between a domain that will never work and some legit
> domain that happens to be do
On 11/7/2012 8:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/7/12 6:37 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> On 11/07/2012 10:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Non-deliverable mail is returned to sender when either the remote
server gives a 5xx "undeliverable" response, or $max_queue_lifetime
expires.
On 11/7/12 6:37 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 10:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Non-deliverable mail is returned to sender when either the remote
>>> server gives a 5xx "undeliverable" response, or $max_queue_lifetime
>>> expires.
>>>
>>> Undelivered mail will hang around in the queue if
On 11/07/2012 10:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Non-deliverable mail is returned to sender when either the remote
server gives a 5xx "undeliverable" response, or $max_queue_lifetime
expires.
Undelivered mail will hang around in the queue if the remote server
gives a 4xx "retry" response, or the remot
> Non-deliverable mail is returned to sender when either the remote
> server gives a 5xx "undeliverable" response, or $max_queue_lifetime
> expires.
>
> Undelivered mail will hang around in the queue if the remote server
> gives a 4xx "retry" response, or the remote server exists but is
> unreach
On 11/7/2012 2:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We had to restore a mailing list (mailman) from an old backup. This
> means it included hundreds of now-invalid email addresses.
>
> As such, I set up mailmain to remove addresses on the first b0unce, and
> set up postfix to b0unce outgoing m
Folks,
We had to restore a mailing list (mailman) from an old backup. This
means it included hundreds of now-invalid email addresses.
As such, I set up mailmain to remove addresses on the first b0unce, and
set up postfix to b0unce outgoing messages on the first refusal (I thought).
The way I di
Put mail "on hold" so that no attempt is made to deliver it.
Move one message with the named queue ID from the named mail queue(s) (default: incoming,
active and deferred)
to the hold queue.
If a queue_id of - is specified, the program reads queue IDs
Hi all
I need to manage message in hold queue according to domain of recipient
address. How can I do that ? I thought of edit mailq command but it's not
readable when I tried to edit .any suggestions?
On 05/29/2012 04:09 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:54:19PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I have a request from staff here.
They need to manually post personalized emails to around 100 professors
the person who will send those emails wants to verify each email before
sending
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:54:19PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> I have a request from staff here.
>
> They need to manually post personalized emails to around 100 professors
> the person who will send those emails wants to verify each email before
> sending it but all emails have to be send at th
Hello
I have a request from staff here.
They need to manually post personalized emails to around 100 professors
the person who will send those emails wants to verify each email before
sending it but all emails have to be send at the same time for
administratives reasons ...
Is it possible to
Thanks for your response.
I read the RELEASES_NOTES and my upgrade was fine.
Cheers
Daniel Madaoui
--On 26 janvier 2011 07:04:11 -0500 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Daniel Madaoui:
if I migrate from postfix 2.2.7 to 2.8.0 postfix, what 's up with the
mails contained in the mails queues. Will th
Daniel Madaoui:
>
> if I migrate from postfix 2.2.7 to 2.8.0 postfix, what 's up with the mails
> contained in the mails queues. Will they be recovered ?
Perhaps surprisingly, Postfix can read the queue/config/etc. files
from earlier Postfix versions.
Incompatibilities with earlier versions ar
if I migrate from postfix 2.2.7 to 2.8.0 postfix, what 's up with the mails
contained in the mails queues. Will they be recovered ?
Thanks in advance
Daniel Madaoui
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:26:58PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> Due to hardware problems, I had to move our "graveyard mailout" to
> another server. So I copied the relevant configuration files and then
> moved the mailqueue to the new server using rsync. After that, I
> executed
>
> postmulti
Stefan Foerster:
> Due to hardware problems, I had to move our "graveyard mailout" to
> another server. So I copied the relevant configuration files and then
> moved the mailqueue to the new server using rsync. After that, I
> executed
>
> postmulti -i postfix-gy -x postsuper -s
>
> I expected a
d that the "postfix-gy" instance is working properly by
destroying it, recreating it and feeding it some mails via SMTP. I can
easily write a few lines of Perl to feed the backup of the old mail
queue to the new instance that way - would that be a viable
workaround?
Thanks
Stefan
sed through milters then only email is received
> fully from foreign email server.
Conforming to the SMTP standard, the Postfix SMTP server replies
"250 OK" to end-of-data AFTER the message is committed to the mail
queue.
This is regardless of whether there is a filter between the
P
from foreign email server.
2. In after queue content filter, the email is passed to the content filter
from postfix queue and only if it's reinjected back into postfix, postfix have
a reference of it else the email is lost and no reference etc is maintained in
the postfix mail queue.
Am
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:39:34PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> > If the node doesn't have to process any new incoming mail, will qmgr
> > be able to handle six digit deferred queues?
>
> So long as you just drain this queue, and don't take in any new mail,
> the large def
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:39:34PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> > Only needed when restoring from backups, copying queue files, ... Not
> > needed when mounting a filesystem.
>
> I think the manpage for postsuper recommends executing it at least
> once before starting up Postfix. Can it do any
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:13:33PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> > If in a mail cluster, with multiple machines having access to a shared
> > storage device (SAN, iSCSI) which is presented to the host as a normal
> > block device (e.g. /dev/sda, hosting a normal ext3 filesys
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:13:33PM +0100, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> If in a mail cluster, with multiple machines having access to a shared
> storage device (SAN, iSCSI) which is presented to the host as a normal
> block device (e.g. /dev/sda, hosting a normal ext3 filesystem), one of
> the mail nod
If in a mail cluster, with multiple machines having access to a shared
storage device (SAN, iSCSI) which is presented to the host as a normal
block device (e.g. /dev/sda, hosting a normal ext3 filesystem), one of
the mail nodes fails, what are the necessary Postfix steps to take
over the queue on a
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote:
> here's mine, very fast with "find":
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> for Q in incoming active deferred hold
> do
> SIZE=`find /mail/spool/postfix/$Q -maxdepth 5 -type f | wc -l | tr -d ' '`
> dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=$SIZE of=/var/db/postfix/q_siz
>2009/9/30 Scott Miller :
>> In case anyone is interested, I've attached a working Postfix Mail Queue
>> Monitor for nagios - It's working for me as is, but if anyone has any
>> suggested modifications I'd be glad to look at them.
>
>We do something like
2009/9/30 Scott Miller :
> In case anyone is interested, I've attached a working Postfix Mail Queue
> Monitor for nagios - It's working for me as is, but if anyone has any
> suggested modifications I'd be glad to look at them.
We do something like this where I work, a
In case anyone is interested, I've attached a working Postfix Mail Queue
Monitor for nagios - It's working for me as is, but if anyone has any
suggested modifications I'd be glad to look at them.
Thanks,
Scott Miller
#! /usr/bin/perl -w
# Copyright (c) 2002 Oregon State Unive
On Sep 28, 2009, at 10:27 AM, "Scott Miller"
wrote:
I’m wondering if there is a script available that will send out an S
MS or e-mail message when the postfix mail queue reaches a certain t
hreshold, for instance, 100 or 1000 messages.
Sounds more like a cron or logwatch tas
I'm wondering if there is a script available that will send out an SMS or
e-mail message when the postfix mail queue reaches a certain threshold, for
instance, 100 or 1000 messages.
I've searched google, but haven't had much luck, or have searched for the
wrong thing. Any
Alejandro Facultad:
> Dear all, I have Debian Etch + Postfix 2.3.8 and I want to fast
> up te mail queue, because sometines I notice that the messages
> are delivered with some delay.
The reason for the delay is logged in the maillog file.
> How can acelerate the sending of message
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
