Jonathan Tripathy:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On 21/02/2010 19:34, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Sorry I forgot to state that im only concerned with MY server here.
For example, I don't want someone to telnet to MY postfix server, and
give
Wietse Venema:
Jonathan Tripathy:
On 21/02/2010 19:34, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Sorry I forgot to state that im only concerned with MY server here.
For example, I don't want someone to telnet to MY postfix server, and
give m...@mydomain.com for both sender
Jonathan Tripathy:
You forgot to set an owner rule for @domain.
How would I do that? I'm not sure if this is relavent but I'm currently
using:
For complete description of
a) the smtpd_sender_login_maps database queries
b) the order of queries
See:
Wietse Venema:
Jonathan Tripathy:
You forgot to set an owner rule for @domain.
How would I do that? I'm not sure if this is relavent but I'm currently
using:
For complete description of
a) the smtpd_sender_login_maps database queries
b) the order of queries
See: http
Jonathan Tripathy:
You can also specify MULTIPLE maps:
/etc/postfix:main.cf
smtpd_sender_login_maps = mysql:whatever hash:/etc/postfix/default
/etc/postfix/default:
@example.com root
Don't forget to postmap the /etc/postfix/default file.
Great! That seemed to have
Jonathan Tripathy:
My main issue is that my backup mx doesn't have sasl enabled (It's relay
only..)
Why would your users submit mail to the backup MX host?
Wietse
Jonathan Tripathy:
[The backup MX host accepts mail from forged local sender
addresses, but the backup MX does not support SASL].
Actually, the MAILER-DAEMON message doesn't get queued at all! It just
discards it when it can't find the user (If the from address was
ram:
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:30 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:43:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
One of our clients sends contract notes to their customers and they
require to store all logs of deliveries/bounces by some law.
They have requirements like
Magnus B?ck:
On Mon, February 22, 2010 9:50 am, Jon Tullett said:
[...]
My smtpd_banner is set to $mylocalhost ESMTP. The localhost is the
full localname+domain. I took (Postfix) out of the banner because
I'm paranoid and don't like advertising what specific software is
offering a
ram:
Record status=deferred just like status=bounced or status=sent,
and when a message expires, use the last status=deferred information.
Thats a painful workaround. :-( Writing a clean log parser especially
when your logs can get rotated anytime in between.
For the next time that
Shameem Ahamed:
Currently, when the postfix forwards the mails to the forward
server it is not adding any headers for the e-mail for which it
forwards.
As required by the SMTP protocol, Postfix prepends a Received:
message header with the local queue ID, a date stamp, and other
trace
Shameem Ahamed:
Yes it adds received header. But it doesn't add the user details.
Below is the header details.
Received: from mx1 (INBOUNDSERVER [IPADDRESS])
by FORWARDSERVER (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA40E4940D6
for RECIPIENT; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:19:28
Shameem Ahamed:
Yes it adds received header. But it doesn't add the
user details.
Received: from mx1 (INBOUNDSERVER [IPADDRESS])
by FORWARDSERVER (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA40E4940D6
for RECIPIENT; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:19:28 + (GMT)
Eric Haszlakiewicz:
I'm trying to set up my mail server so it blocks emails that appears to
come from the same address that they are going to. i.e.
From: u...@example.com
To: u...@example.com
I figured a good way to do this would be with the reject_sender_login_mismatch
which,
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
But Exchange forgets the and just encodes
L?stn?me, Firstn?me
instead of
L?stn?me, Firstn?me
thus the quoted-string encapsulation is wrong?!
RFC822..RFC5322 do not need quotes around text inside the
=?iso-8859-1
AMP Admin:
is there away to stop prepend: header from being added to the logs?
No. If it bothers you, use grep.
Wietse
ram:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:23 +0200, Razvan Cosma wrote:
Hello,
While moving the IMAP services to a new host, I'd need to copy all
messages addressed to anyu...@example.com to the old inbox, and to the
new at anyu...@tempsubdomain.example.com
Virtual maps allows this, but needs
Borja Marcos:
Is there, maybe, a guarantee (due to the program flow in smtpd)
that the message-id= line from cleanup will always be logged
before the disconnected line from smtpd?
When an SMTP client aborts prematurely, then the Postfix smtpd
process will immediately log the disconnected
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
The rules for display names are in RFC*22. Look for the ABNF for
display-name, phrase, word, and atom.
Short answer: as long as =?iso
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/23/2010 10:39 AM:
Not all the world
is Linux. In fact there are 10 times as many Macs.
Wietse Venema put forth on 2/16/2010 10:01 AM:
This is a technical mailing list. When you claim that something is
bad, you need to support that claim
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
The problem is that on some mails sent from Outlook it is not
possible to answer with Thunderbird because the sender address is
split into two invalid mailadresses
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
There is no wrong To-Header. File a bug-report with Mozilla.
That's what i tried to find out: Who is at fault and what is the root-case...
If the bug is still present in TB3 i will bother to file a bug.
If software X mis-handles a correctly-formatted message header,
Kim Albee:
What we want is the ability to have users send email from their email -- and
have that email be represented in the From Email line (which is by default
envelope-sender), and use SPF record for identifying our server as
authorized to send emails on behalf of their domain,
For that,
Niemi Hannu:
Hello I have now tried to form a log file that contains both happy case (500
recipients) and unhappy one (501 recipients)
To debug the case I created 999 bogus users with username
us...@listserv.kuntaliitto.fi to user...@listserv.kuntaliitto.fi
Because the log file is quite
Pavel Urban:
Hello,
I've tried to migrate some 90 servers from Sendmail to Postfix, trying
to keep the behavior as similar as possible. They were all simple null
clients, sending mail via relayhost only. After some time I've noticed
that some servers are sending their daily logwatch outputs
Niemi Hannu:
Feb 26 08:41:43 listserv postfix/smtpd[32326]: unknown[10.0.17.127]: RCPT
TO:user...@listserv.kuntaliitto.fi
Feb 26 08:41:43 listserv postfix/smtpd[32326]: unknown[10.0.17.127]: 250
2.1.5 Ok
Feb 26 08:41:43 listserv postfix/smtpd[32326]: unknown[10.0.17.127]: RSET
Feb 26
Wolfgang Zeikat:
The relay_domains documentation says:
Specify a list of host or domain names, /file/name patterns ...
Would /file/name contain one domain per line?
Zero or more patterns per line, with patterns separated by one or
more space, tab, carriage return or newline characters, and
David Schraeder:
How are you guys getting those stats on the blocks?
awk '
/blocked using [^;]+;/ { stats[$20]++ }
END { for (name in stats) print name, , stats[name] }
' /var/log/maillog
Wietse
David Touzeau:
Dear
I would like to implement multiple instances on my 2.7 postfix.
After read the documentation (perhaps my english is very poor) i need to
have a confirmation.
did i need to disable master_service_disable and specify an IP address
for each instance in inet_interfaces
David Touzeau:
David Touzeau:
Dear
I would like to implement multiple instances on my 2.7 postfix.
After read the documentation (perhaps my english is very poor) i need to
have a confirmation.
did i need to disable master_service_disable and specify an IP address
for each
Jack Knowlton:
I would like Postfix to
accept mail for any recipient of that particular domain and create the
matching Maildir once the first message has been received.
Thanks,
This is possible but I don't think it is a good idea to auto-create
maildirs for users whose name starts with
Yves Kreis:
Dear,
Does Postfix invoke milter when sending a DSN for local mail?
Postfix does not filter messages that it creates itself. That
includes bounces.
As of Postfix 2.3 this is configurable for before-queue filters
(i.e. milters and header/body_checks). For details, see:
Gregory BELLIER:
Ok then, no problem, I'll just build in a different way and at the make
makefiles, I use the option CCARGS='-DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=\/opt/postfix\'
Then, the make install, root_folder = /opt/postfix
When the make install procedure says:
Please specify the prefix for installed
Charles Marcus:
On 2010-03-02 2:51 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
You've likely been using STARTTLS only, which doesn't require a key exchange
as SSL/TLS does.
? You sure about that? I use only STARTTLS, and I always have to do the
'Confirm Security Exception' dance to accept the certificate
donovan jeffrey j:
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
this is default on all my systems.
MX1
/dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
MX2
/dev/disk0s3 234G46G 187G20%/
It may be worthwhile to run the Postfix
Wietse Venema:
donovan jeffrey j:
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
this is default on all my systems.
MX1
/dev/disk1s3 77G51G26G66%/
MX2
/dev/disk0s3 234G46G 187G20%/
It may
donovan jeffrey j:
On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
It may be worthwhile to run the Postfix fsspace test program.
- Download any Postfix source code that compiles on your system.
- cd into the source tree, then execute the following commands:
make makefiles
donovan jeffrey j:
Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054]: name_mask: resource
Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054]: name_mask: software
Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/qmgr[603]: 0529299C4604: removed
Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054]: 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: 220
[127.0.0.1] ESMTP
Noel Jones:
This patch adds a reject_rhsbl_reverse_client function that
uses the unverified client hostname for the RBL lookup.
The idea is that this might increase rhsbl hit rates if the
hostname is more frequently available. On the other hand,
spam-only domains seem to usually have
Erik Logtenberg:
Hi,
I noticed that Postfix doesn't fall back on other IP addresses
associated with a certain MX-server when it fails to accept mail, but
only uses the firs IP address it finds. If that fails, Postfix will move
on to the next MX-server, but won't try any other available IP
Erik Logtenberg:
If your system has no useful IPv6 connectivity, disable IPv6 in Postfix.
http://www.postfix.org/inet_protocols
The issue is that other people with broken IPv6 connectivity have
trouble delivering mail to me, because my mailservers have many
different IP
1. all mail from inside goes to this (edge - 1 ) postfix box.
2. if from trusted/don't-scan-it listsen...@domain.tld, then don't go to
edge/out-MX relayhost, resolve/send directly to Internet.
Use an access map with a nexthop-less FILTER action:
FILTER smtp:
This requires Postfix 2.7. See
motty cruz:
Mar 5 21:25:18 dagan pipe[4378]: fatal: pipe_command: execvp /var/mail:
Permission denied
and my master.cf
maildrop unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail argv=/var/mail -d ${user}
You are trying to EXECUTE a command /var/mail -d
Roel van Meer:
Victor Duchovni writes:
This would be wrong. The ssmtp service, if it existed, is generally
for submission, not inbound MX delivery, and almost always requires
authentication, which you will not be able to provide. You would get
random rejection of your email if you guess
John WInther:
Hi
I host 6 mail domains. When I validate my mx configuration online
with mxtoolbox.com, I got a fail with reverse dns lookup, my
localhostname of the server is bsd5.homedom.local, and that is
the domain reverse dns tested, ofcourse it fails hense it is not
a public domain,
mouss:
RFC 5321 (the same sentence is in 2821) says
In any case, the SMTP client SHOULD try at least two addresses.
so a client that only tries two addresses is compliant. If you use
twenty IPs, be prepared to see clients ignore most of them (and no
tuning of _your_ postfix will help).
As
Timo Sirainen:
On 8.3.2010, at 1.26, Wietse Venema wrote:
smtp_address_preference (default: ipv6)
Probably the whole reason for this thread was because of me. I
used to have a working IPv6 setup, and then switched to a different
ISP and just copied all my configs. Everything worked fine
Leonel Flor??n Selles:
I have a problem, I'm configuring a mail server with postfix, to handle local
mail, I have a mail server, in which I going to relay all the mails that my
users send, I enter to my server via telnet, and I use the command ehlo to
know all the option he have, this option
Jerry:
FreeBSD 7.3-PRERELEASE
Postfix (2.7-20100117)
From time to time, when mail is being sent internally from one user to
another on the same network, I see this warning message in the mail-log:
warning: network_biopair_interop: error reading 5 bytes from the network:
Connection reset
Davy Leon:
Hi folks
I've been trying postfix version 2.3.3 + amavisd-new + clamav for a while
and it's working pretty cool.
I sent an email with a .EXE attached just for testing purposes, so I
received a message from content-filter .. saying that's not allowed, but
I can see in
Jerry:
Mar 10 04:59:46 xxx postfix/smtpd[93352]:
xx.my_domain.com[192.168.1.101]: QUIT
Mar 10 04:59:46 xxx postfix/smtpd[93352]:
xx.my_domain.com[192.168.1.101]: 221 2.0.0 Bye
Mar 10 04:59:46 xxx postfix/smtpd[93352]: warning:
network_biopair_interop: error reading 5
Gijs:
On 3/10/10 15:05 , Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-03-10 Gijs wrote:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
virtual_mailbox_domains = mydomain.com myotherdomain.com
virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/lib/imap/socket/lmtp
/etc/postfix/virtual:
t...@mydomain.com
Gijs:
On 3/10/10 15:37 , Wietse Venema wrote:
Gijs:
On 3/10/10 15:05 , Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-03-10 Gijs wrote:
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
virtual_mailbox_domains = mydomain.com myotherdomain.com
virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/lib/imap/socket/lmtp
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:23:00AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mar 10 04:59:46 xxx postfix/smtpd[93352]:
xx.my_domain.com[192.168.1.101]: QUIT
Mar 10 04:59:46 xxx postfix/smtpd[93352]:
xx.my_domain.com[192.168.1.101]: 221 2.0.0 Bye
Mar 10 04
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:08:18PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
With TLS sessions, after QUIT processing, the server tries to perform
a clean SSL_shutdown() of the SSL/TLS session. If the client closes
the connection without performing the SSL_shutdown(), you'll see
Jerry:
Wietse and Victor, from what I have deduced from reading your posts is
that I can safely ignore the warning. Is that correct? I am really
interested though in why this has suddenly started happening. I have
not touched Postfix or claws-mail, my MUA, in months. Except for
updating
Bacfd Bubb:
Hi,
I've got a virtual domain setup with a box dedicated to spam filtering
in front of it, to keep the hungry spam and av checks away from the
mail server itself.
Mail between domains is delivered as expected, but the behaviour I'm
after is one where if the sender domain is
Richard Cooper:
Hi All,
Is there any way to tell Postfix to not add the X-Original-To
header to messages it delivers?
Have you tried:
postconf | grep original_recipient
Wietse
Michael Alan Dorman:
Hey, all,
I manage a high-volume mail installation, using an after-queue content
filter for spam filtering.
We use an ldap transport map (actually a couple of them) to direct each
recipient's email to it's appropriate final destination.
I recently got some errors
Jeff Huang:
I found that the Return-Path is null when postfix send bounce mail.It =
like this:
Return-Path:
This is required by the Internet mail protocol (RFC 821, RFC 2821,
RFC 5321).
It means that the bounce mail has no from,and some mailServer reject
these email.
Then those servers
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz:
Hi,
i have a question, about return-path header in emails.
Can i configure postfix to don't override this tag if it is alredy present?
No. The Return-Path: header is added at the time of FINAL delivery.
Regarding this question, I have other. Dont ask why
Erik Logtenberg:
Thanks, this works like a charm!
Small question though, was there any way for me to figure this out by
myself using the documentation? I notice that for each daemon there is
extensive documentation on which configuration directives are supported,
but I didn't see the
Stefan Foerster:
Now, feature request is actually not the right word - it's more an
idea, and probably somebody just needs to tell me it's a bad one.
With the postscreen_dnsbl_sites setting, each site administrator can
configure a list of DNS blacklists that new SMTP connections will be
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I think that a design (the stage before code is written) should
consider how scoring would play with the other tests that postscreen
implements, and how it would play with things that I intend to add
such as light-weight greylisting.
We can model postscreen-like
Noel Jones:
On 3/13/2010 10:38 PM, Adam Lanier wrote:
I've inherited a relatively large Postfix installation. Servers have a
range of Postfix versions from 2.1.1 to 2.6.5. Master.cf and main.cf are
included below.
The inbound mail gateways are connected to the internet behind a
Stefan Foerster:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
I created postscreen because it is becoming too expensive to spend
one server process per zombie connection. Instead, one postscreen
process manages up to thousands of inbound connections
VR:
On a test box in Postfix 2.5.5 I tried putting myhost.domain.tld in
/etc/postfix/myhostname.cf and then defined myhostname =
/etc/postfix/myhostname.cf in main.cf.
Perhaps surprisingly, Postfix actually behaves as documented.
Where does Postfix documentation say that myhostname
Security Admin (NetSec):
Running Postfix as a mail gateway, version 2.6.5 and am finally
getting around to implementing SPF in Postfix. I thought the
TXT record in DNS would suffice which is how I have been running
it.
Found this how-to link http://www.howtoforge.com/postfix_spf
Is
Erik Logtenberg:
Is there a possibility to use a DNS-based RBL whitelist in Postfix? In
The Netherlands we have an NL-Whitelist, which contains the IP's of all
major ISP's. By using this whitelist one can make sure that accidental
automatic blacklisting won't disrupt regular email traffic.
Victor Duchovni:
With explicit DNSWL lookups, indeed defer_if_reject is acceptable, since
the DWL is operated locally or by a competent provider and persistent temp
failure of lookups is less likely. So it seems to me that this has cleaner
semantics than check_client_access with name-based OK
Erik Logtenberg:
However in the case where the whitelist is (completely) unavailable for
some period of time, I still think that my suggestion applies, don't you
agree?
No. It is assumed that you use a sufficiently reliable DNSWL. Ideally
a local mirror, and if it becomes
Wietse Venema:
Erik Logtenberg:
However in the case where the whitelist is (completely) unavailable for
some period of time, I still think that my suggestion applies, don't you
agree?
No. It is assumed that you use a sufficiently reliable DNSWL. Ideally
a local mirror
Aaron Roberts:
Hi all,
Can anyone suggest a way to force all NDRs generated by
the bounce daemon to be delivered by a particular transport?
You need to solve the right problem. Eliminate the reason why those
bounce messages are sent.
Wietse
Manuel Mely:
Do you have a monitoring tool in your network? Maybe it's a Nagios testing
your smtp server.
That also happens to me in my loadbalancer, keepalived test smtp port
with a telnet and then disconnects and i have a lot of this message in
my logs too.
Is there a way to avoid this?
Ing. Andr?s E. Gallo:
Hi there,
I am running a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0, with Postfix 2.8-20100306,
amavisd-new, SA like MTA, besides Squid and Bind DNS.
It was running as secondary MX, and not sending mails -besides bounces-
for a week or so since install without problems.
On-campus:
...
250-STARTTLS
...
Off-campus:
250-XXXA
CISCO fixup mode is an amazing technical achievement.
It will XXX server words not on a whitelist (and as the A
at the end demonstrates, it does this close to perfection).
It will XXX client commands not on a whitelist, as
Postfix runs fine on FreeBSD 8 (here, since November 2009) as well
as any FreeBSD vesion that I have been running since I started work
on Postfix in 1997.
Your problem is a broken operating system that causes timeouts in
Amavis, Postfix, and in other programs.
This is the Postfix mailing list.
Carlos Mennens:
I noticed today that many items expressed in main.cf appear to be what
I think is default value and should not be expressed. I was
wondering if this logic is correct:
If the following two values are identical, can I simply remove the
parameter from 'main.cf'?
r...@mail:~#
Stephen Carville:
I am trying to get delay warnings to be sent to users with no success.
How do you know the difference between not sent and not received?
Wietse
Sasa:
I can this errore in log:
Mar 17 11:47:36 mail postfix/smtp[7690]: 77F5726A1E9:
to=fili...@domain.biz, orig_to=fili...@domain.biz,
relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=1868, delays=0.36/1568/300/0,
dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (conversation with 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out
Jesus Cea:
Hi all.
Sorry if the question is a FAQ, but I am a new postfix user, Google has
not helped me, neither the postfix online docs.
If I send a mail to jcea+...@jcea.es, Postfix checks j...@jcea.es in
the virtual table and recognizes the user. But when Postfix sends the
message to
Jesus Cea:
If I send a mail to jcea+...@jcea.es, Postfix checks j...@jcea.es in
the virtual table and recognizes the user. But when Postfix sends the
message to the storage backend, via LMTP, the destination is
jcea+...@jcea.es, and I would like to get the LMTP rcpt to
j...@jcea.es.
ram:
I need to implement smtpd login maps on our postfix servers so as
minimize the chances of a compromised client machine screwing our smtp
relay.
But this cannot be done overnight. There are various clients who use
different envelope sender domains (for perfectly legitimate reasons) and
Giovanni Mancuso:
Hi,
i have a question about message_size_limit parameter.
Can i set this parameter to get the value from ldap?
Else, can i write a Policy Delegator that do it?
The policy delegation protocol allows you to reject arbitrary
message sizes.
However, you do not know the
Stephen Carville:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Stephen Carville:
I am trying to get delay warnings to be sent to users with no success.
How do you know the difference between not sent and not received?
Good point. All I know is to look
Oleksii Krykun:
If I use smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient=yes or
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=reject_unlisted_recipient options all
messages to non-existant addresses are rejected.
But if anybody sends message to multiple addresses in same domain and
one of them doesn't exist then postfix
Sean Reifschneider:
I'm reporting this primarily because the other searching I've done has
turned up this same error message, but with nothing that clearly points out
what the root of the issue really is. I'm hoping someone can shed some
light on it.
We've been having little if any luck
Michael Tokarev:
A few years ago I implemented a new dict for Postfix, dict_fnmatch.
It is a shell-style pattern matcher with patterns placed _inline_,
right in the config file, without any additional files like
pcre/regex (the simplest dictionaries which does not use indexed
files) and
Jonathan Tripathy:
So, back to postfix, can it do such a thing? Act as a proxy and
not a store and forward relay
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html
Someone will still have to monitor the logfile, and deal with
postmaster notification email depending on how the notify_classes
Sasa:
I have disabled amavisd-new and the new mail are deliveriy quickly but for
all mails that stay in queue I have:
mail transport unavailable
??
what I can to delivery all mails ?
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Dimitrios Karapiperis:
Hi
When someone sends an e-mail to multiple recipients and requests
read receipt the MDN mechanism works fine but on the receipt
message itself, the sender receives that recipie...@domain.tld,
recipie...@domain.tld have read the message without knowing who
exactly is
-
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Sasa s...@shoponweb.it
Cc: Vladimir Dvorak vladimir.dvo...@vdsoft.org;
postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: delivery temporarily suspended
Sasa:
I have disabled amavisd-new and the new mail
Please follow instructions in:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Do not change the logging. Use the EXISTING logging.
Wietse
H Wietse Venema:
Postfix does not send mail read notifications.
Hi Wietse
You mean that these notifications are not part of the Postfix System?
Postfix sends *delivery* notifications; for examples of these, see
the output from the postconf -b command.
*Delivery* notifications are send
Sean Reifschneider:
On 03/18/2010 05:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
If the Postfix milter_protocol setting specifies a too high
version, the libmilter library simply hangs up without logging
We've tried protocol versions 2, 4, and 6 with the same error. We've also
tried two
Wietse Venema:
Sean Reifschneider:
On 03/18/2010 05:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
If the Postfix milter_protocol setting specifies a too high
version, the libmilter library simply hangs up without logging
We've tried protocol versions 2, 4, and 6 with the same error. We've
Patrick Ben Koetter:
When a message reenters from an instance that uses XFORWARD, for example
amavis, will Postfix count the IP used twice and, for example,
add that to smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit?
Rate limits apply to the real client IP address not the forwarded one,
subject to
Robert Schetterer:
Hi @ll,
is there a way to overide
transport table for specific
sender domains
Content filter overrides transport_maps.
Wietse
Robert Schetterer:
Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Robert Schetterer:
Hi @ll,
is there a way to overide
transport table for specific
sender domains
Content filter overrides transport_maps.
Wietse
Thx Wiestse for info, such was i expected,
in my/this case
Sam Przyswa:
Hi,
On last Postfix install on new server some mails are refused with error
550 5.7.1 se the report :
x...@aflo.be: host gw.aflo.be[87.66.26.108] said: 550 5.7.1 Your email
messages have been blocked by the recipient OR
1301 - 1400 of 13247 matches
Mail list logo
