v0id null:
one in /usr/bin one in /usr/local/bin
Ran /usr/local/bin/newaliases and problem was resolved.
I hope this gets indexed by search engines because this took a few
days for me to solve heh
1) I suggest that you let the system work for you, instead of
working around it,
$
Otandeka Simon Peter:
Anyone used wildcards in aliasing in postfix.
What I want to do is lets say all emails sent using digits forexample
[EMAIL PROTECTED] redirect them to my email address.
How do I do that?
man pcre_table
man regexp_table
man aliases (format of lookup key and expected
Mark Watts:
I think my original question still stands; why do connections to
one server not generate verification messages, while connections
to a third server do. Both remote servers have self-signed ssl
certificates.
Presumably, those certificates are signed with different keys. I
run
Mark Watts:
I think my original question still stands; why do connections to
one server not generate verification messages, while connections
to a third server do. Both remote servers have self-signed ssl
certificates.
Wietse:
Presumably, those certificates are signed with different keys. I
To stop receiving mail from the network, comment out the network
facing smtpd entry in master.cf, do postfix reload, and look
for warnings in the maillog file.
You can get a lot fancier and set up an access rule that replies
with 421 Service unavailable for migration.
Wietse
Sripati prasad padhy:
Hi Team,
I have created an alias account; any mails send to the alias account is
forwarded to the user accounts added in the alias account.
Since few days duplicate mails are coming from that account created in
hash :/etc/aliases; whenever a mail is sent to that
Matt Galloway:
Hi,
I've been playing with my own transport in Postfix and I have
successfully managed to get it working using pipe to pipe the mail to my
script. However, I notice it only works when I have something after the
command in the argv line.
i.e.:
argv=/usr/bin/script
This
Matt Galloway:
Hmmm, it just doesn't work for me. So i am using argv=/usr/bin/script
test so that it works.
I'm sorry to hear that, but this demonstrates that your script has
a bug. You can easily convince yourself that the example with
argv=logger properly passes the message via standard
Matt Galloway:
But even if I just make the script write out what it recieves on
stdin, then it doesn't work, so clearly it's not my script...
You can easily convince yourself with argv=logger that Postfix
properly passes the email message on standard input.
This is my last word.
Rob Kelledy:
Hi,
I'm getting timeouts to a particular domain. When testing the
receiving server manually (telnet) I noticed?there is a long delay
between the connection starting and the 220 Ready message and if
anything is transmitted during that time the connection is
terminated. I'm
Michael De Groote:
i have a very simple postfix setup running at school.
now the principal wants to send mails to all the parents that registered
their emailaddress and signed on for a newsletter every week.
This causes him to get a 452: 4.5.3 Too many recipients.
The internet mail standard
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:39 AM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you have no domains in relay_domains, then you don't need
relay_recipient_maps nor reject_unverified_domains.
you are using a non standard setup in the sense that you are declaring
the domains as virtual_alias_domains when
Khosrow Ebrahimpour:
Hi postfix-users,
We recently migrated from a Sendmail/Cyrus environment to a Postfix/Courier
setup. Some of the users had .forward files that would forward their mail
to an exchange server in our network, and this was done with a file like this
one :
===
Ville Walveranta:
I'll continue here since Krosrow's issue has been resolved (so I'm not
really hijacking the thread).
I now have the following defined in mailbox_transport_maps:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]smtp:mx.myexternaldomain.com
Yet when I attempt to send mail to the local
Jos Chrispijn:
Uit een eerder bericht (21-11-2008 13:41):
blockquote
cite=mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
type=citei have a very simple postfix setup running at school.br
br
now the principal wants to send mails to all the parents that
registered their emailaddress and signed on for a newsletter
bsd:
Hello folks,
I am actually working for an African country where the electricity is
not as stable as one could expect - even in the infrastructure of the
historical telco operator_
With all the care that we have been able to devote to this project,
stability is still very very limited.
Sturgis, Grant:
Hey all,
I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message headers of
outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found two
solutions:
1. Using masquerade_domains like this
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#masquerade
This
George Vilches:
Is there something else in Postfix I can do that could force the
address resolution to be fully resolved before relaying?
Yes. Do not use wild-card rewriting rules (@xxx - @yyy) and list
all valid recipients in appropriate tables.
- List recipients in virtual_alias_maps for
George Vilches:
On Nov 24, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
George Vilches:
Is there something else in Postfix I can do that could force the
address resolution to be fully resolved before relaying?
Yes. Do not use wild-card rewriting rules (@xxx - @yyy) and list
all valid
ram:
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
configure postfix to send using different bind addresses
I know I can
Sturgis, Grant:
I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message headers of
outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found two
solutions:
...
2. Use header_checks like this
http://www.nabble.com/Hide-internal-address-(Postfix)-td2300995.html
Wietse Venema
Barney Desmond:
This is what we thought *should* work, but apparently it doesn't. I'd
love to be told that it actually works.
1. Add an extra smtp service to master.cf:
smtphotmailinet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtp_bind_address=1.1.1.2
2. Add a
ram:
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 09:21 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can
Jan P. Kessler:
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
The topmost header by your-MTA is trustworthy, as are any headers
above it.
That makes sense, of course.
Is there any good reason why smtpd_tls_received_header does not include
the ccert_fingerprint when available?
Perhaps it is because
Alessandro Ballestriero:
Thanks for quick answers.
I ask you an ulterior information, is possible that the same problem was
introduced also with the version postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 official centos,
or this version is automatically patch with the VDA?
If you have a question about the behavior
Simone Felici:
Hi to all!
I've tested successfully a simple smtp server with SMTP authenticated.
Now I would like do the following:
My server has two interfaces with IP1 and IP2.
I would like to setup postfix to permit AUTH-SMTP only for sessions incoming
on IP1 and normal SMTP sessions
Josep M.:
Hello.
Time ago I was using this for see what addresses had verify_sender
feature, is just for my own domain.
egrep '(Address verification in progress)' /var/log/maillog
This REJECT message is logged only if it takes too long to find out
the address status.
You will have
Reinaldo de Carvalho:
Hi,
The smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords and
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps can replace
disable_vrfy_command, then it can be removed?
Clients can send VRFY without ever sending EHLO.
Wietse
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?am=E9d=E9e_dugenou?=:
- have a catch-all for example.com forwarded to another domain. thus,
mails received for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is delivered to local virtual
mailbox if it is a known user, otherwise the mail is redirected to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (the part before @ should be the
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?am=E9d=E9e_dugenou?=:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Use one-to-one virtual alias mappings for the users that must not
be sent to the catch-all address.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@example.com[EMAIL
To whitelist an email address, configure Postfix to use a persistent
address verify database.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#caching
Once an email address is known to be deliverable, Postfix will
only check it once a week, without delaying email delivery.
Wietse
Victor Duchovni:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:24:25PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
john mickler wrote:
As for the newline insertion mentioned on the website, I'm wondering
if using a pcre instead of standard regex would allow this. I'm going
to translate and give it a try.
Don't
john mickler:
I have one other question about BCP for mailing infrastructure.
In our current setup we have:
INBOUND
a.mx --
b.mx mail
c.mx --
OUTBOUND
{local servers} --
remote-smtp-auth -- smtp -- {INTERNET}
Makes sense to me, but then it's been a while since I set
Daryl:
Greetings,
For the second time in a month I have a postfix/sendmail: fatal:
chdir
/var/spool/postfix Permission denied error.
There are no possible solutions in my logs, and googling, has found nothing.
My permissions
for postfix are correct;
#ls -ld
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:58:42AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/1/2008 11:54 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
There is nothing wrong with lost connections after QUIT. Newer versions
of Postfix only log lost connection in the SMTP server during data
transfer or when
David Jonas:
We provide forwarding to external accounts (e.g. gmail.com) and it
appears that in some cases postfix is invalidating the DKIM signatures.
The most prominent and obvious case is eBay and PayPal where gmail is
now bouncing/dropping messages where the signature doesn't match.
I
Spahn, Daniel:
Spahn, Daniel wrote:
I am running A recent build of Postfix on a Gentoo server- I am pretty
sure it is about 3-4 months old. The problem I have is that the line the
mail is sent out on is buggy- I get lots of packet sequence errors, slow
speeds, etc. I need any advice I can
Sebastien Marion:
I've been bashing my head at this for 2 days now.
I can send and receive emails nicely from my address.
My colleagues however cannot receive emails as postfix bounces them
back. They are part of the system (debian users).
mydestination = whizlogic.co.uk,
Sebastien Marion:
Thank you Terry,
Logs say:
Dec 3 17:06:09 stock postfix/local[9123]: 1B5CA10369:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=local, delay=0.04, delays=0.02/0.02/0/0,
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to maildir)
But nothing actually appeared in that very Mailbox...
This
M. Fioretti:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 00:02:33 AM +0100, mouss wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson a ?crit :
Magnus B?ck wrote:
[snip]
Why do you insist on testing this with telnet?...
Because I can do it one step at a time and see the results that
Postfix sends back. I hadn't thought
brian dodds:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
So I've done a bit of reading on postfix's internal chrooting
capabilities and I thought it would fit exactly what I'm trying to do
perfectly. Here is the simple desired functionality:
. I want outbound email name lookups to
M. Fioretti:
above, one quickly learns that searching directly via Google *without*
site restrictions is *better*, as in more efficient than the
postfix.org search box.
Because, very often, it returns at least one or two task-focused
tutorials, pages from
Anant Athavale:
Dear List,
I have a basic question. Which is parameter I need to use to change
in order to change the mailq refresh time.
I have the following problem.
Many of my users have their quota filled up and we have set maximum
queue lifetime to default 5d. When postfix
Brian Evans - Postfix List:
Dec 3 15:56:23 serverA postfix/tlsmgr[4776]: fatal:
tls_prng_exch_open: cannot open PRNG exchange file
/opt/zimbra/postfix-2.5.1/data/prng_exch: Permission denied
You moved the file from /etc to /opt/zimbra/postfix-2.5.1/data
but did not follow RELEASE_NOTES
Kai Wang:
Greetings,
We run Postfox (postfix-2.3.3-2.pcre.sasl2.rhel4) and MailScanner
(mailscanner-4.66.5-3)
together. A user reported that he lost a message. I checked into our log
and found 4 entries
about the message, all from postfix.
Dec 7 16:04:47 smtp2 postfix/smtpd[12441]:
Michael Brennen:
The mail from puremail was sent from ip address 66.81.101.50, which reverses
to 'mx.puremail.com'. A forward lookup on 'mx.puremail.com' results in a
truncated DNS result and TCP retry, returning 23 ip addresses.
From the remote end's view the 220 return message is
Agnello George:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agnello George:
how do i tell postfix to send mail out using multiple ips (
192.168.1.201to
192.168.1.206 )... is there a way to tell postfix to rotate the use of
these
ip's. in sending out
Agnello George:
how do i tell postfix to send mail out using multiple ips ( 192.168.1.201to
192.168.1.206 )... is there a way to tell postfix to rotate the use of these
ip's. in sending out mails .
No. If you want multiple IP addresses, Postfix lets the kernel choose.
Wietse
J Sloan:
Alexander Gr_ner wrote:
Open SUSE includes more recent posfix rpms (but in the factory not
the repos):
http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/postfix-2.5.5-6.6.x86_64.rpm
http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/i586/postfix-2.5.5-6.5.i586.rpm
Wietse Venema:
Mark A. Olbert:
That's what I did, but it didn't work. Nor did chgrp nogroup.
Postfix does not use the group of the aliases file. You may have
to re-compile mailman so it expects the right group.
To clarify, Postfix uses the UID of the file owner, then it looks
Daniel Funke:
Hi Brian and others,
thank you, for your answer.
I think, you're right, but does this mean, there is no possibility to
have different destinations (some lokal and some relayed to other
servers) for different mailaddresses in the same domain?
List the domain in the class
Victor Duchovni:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:59:41AM +0100, klondike wrote:
According to section 4.2.4 on the RFC 282, the SMTP server should return
502 only when a command is recognised but not implemented, and 500 if it
isn't recognised.
This is not a bug, but it is admittedly an
Ville Walveranta:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Moreover, Postfix was written before RFC2821. Declaring error
replies buggy after the rules change is not useful.
But if the rules do change, would you not alter Postfix accordingly? (I
don't
klondike:
When I first wrote began this thread I did it thinking that knowing this
issue, could be helpful.
I didn't expect it to end as a flame war neither did I knew how complex
could be to solve the issue. But it was my first thread on this list,
and probably last. Anyway, its not due to
Zhang Huangbin:
Hi, all.
Normally, i use 'domain.ltd/username/Maildir' as users' maildir path, if
i change them to hash style, e.g. 'A0/B0/domain.ltd/C0/D0/username/Maildir',
will it speed up the index operation for MDA? If we have 1 users,
which maildir path style will improve
tony liu:
Is it possible, or does someone know of a way to control send rate to a
destination[ip], ex: less than 30 mails can be sent to hotmail in one
minute. Thanks for any comments.
With Postfix 2.5 and later:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtp_destination_rate_delay = 2
This feature is
You can set different rates for different destinations. For this,
you MUST READ the rest of the URLs in my response.
- specify a different (master.cf) transport for rate limited
destinations.
- specify (main.cf) mumble_destination_rate_delay values in main.cf.
- specify a (main.cf) transport
#1 0x0806d01f in read_wait (fd=-4, timeout=3600) at read_wait.c:120
#2 0x08072241 in timed_read (fd=13, buf=0x8092d60, len=4096, timeout=3600,
unused_context=0x0) at timed_read.c:73
That makes no sense. timed_read() does not change its argument as shown
below. But it does not matter. The
Konrad Rzepecki:
Dnia _roda, 17 grudnia 2008, Wietse Venema napisa_:
Your defer daemons aren't working.
If you mean this one:
postfix 29426 0.0 0.1 6472 1740 ?S14:24 0:00 bounce
-z -n defer -t unix -u
it seems running...
And what is it doing?
You
Konrad Rzepecki:
#3 0x0806f20f in vstream_buf_get_ready (bp=0x80918f0) at vstream.c:731
#4 0x0806eaf7 in vbuf_get (bp=0x80918f0) at vbuf.c:157
#5 0x08063bcb in attr_vscan0 (fp=0x80918f0, flags=3, ap=0xafb16988
\001) at
attr_scan0.c:272
#6 0x08063f9b in attr_scan0
klondike:
Bernhard Fischer escribi?:
I'd like to use DNSSEC with Postfix.
I did some research on the web but although DNSSEC is there nobody really
cares about it.
The most recent patch for Postfix is for release 2.3 and is based on libs
(libval, libsres) I didn't find any download
Asif Iqbal:
I could skip the signing part and just a .pem file. But seems like I
will also need a Thawte certificate.
You need no certificate to SEND mail.
Wietse
Asif Iqbal:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Asif Iqbal:
I could skip the signing part and just a .pem file. But seems like I
will also need a Thawte certificate.
You need no certificate to SEND mail.
I am trying to use gmail as my relayhost
Terry Carmen:
Is there any way to have special routing for mail that's created on the
postfix server(localhost), destined for mydomain?
As far as I recall, internally generated messages are not subject
to the content_filter setting. Thus, you can use the content_filter
parameter to send
Asif Iqbal:
need to test it. Just set:
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
Thanks, I will put that in
Just checked here that Postfix can talk SSL with [smtp.gmail.com]:587
just fine. But you need to set up client-side SASL authentication.
Wietse
Pedro Augusto:
If the problem is Mailscanner mangling the files, would an upgrade solve the
problem?
How can I test if the problem is concurrent access? Just to be sure which of
these are the problems...
Null bytes in mailbox files are usually the result of incorrect
file locking.
To find
Asif Iqbal:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Asif Iqbal:
need to test it. Just set:
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
Thanks, I will put that in
Just checked here that Postfix can talk SSL with [smtp.gmail.com]:587
just fine
Asif Iqbal:
Dec 20 21:25:20 improvise postfix/smtp[7157]: warning: SASL
authentication failure: No worthy mechs found
This means that the SASL (NOT: SSL) mechanisms are not properly
configured.
So I tried the openssl test and looks like I need a real certificate?!
No, you need to fix the
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:05:12AM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
I suggest update transport documentation changing '*' to last lookup order.
Beacause users can to deduct erroneously that '*' is a wildcard, and
isn't. '*' is choosed caracter to represent a default
Bas van Schaik:
Hi all,
I have two company mailservers, both running Postfix. One of them is
public (accessible from the internet) and the other is used for
internal purposes only (i.e.: sending/recieving internal mail and
sending mail to the internet via the public mailserver).
The
J. Bakshi:
error3 warning: lookup owner-postmaster, NIS domain infoservices.in,
map mail.aliases: internal yp server or client error
~~~`
When reporting a problem, please do NOT remove useful information
such as the name of the program that reports the
Darren Pilgrim:
Is it possible to alter how postfix sets the username and realm used by
the smtp client? Is the problem within cyrus-sasl or postfix?
The Postfix SMTP client sends no realm information. If the server
expects a login name in the form u...@domain then it is up to you
to
Linux Addict:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Linux Addict wrote:
Hello, I have clients sending mails to an non-existent email
address/domain, emailerm...@exchange.example.net. I want to discard any
mail sent to this address. I looked at smtpd_recipient_restrictions, but
cant figure
/dev/rob0:
First problem: well, I thought the alias would still have the Tag
extension, but no, ~rob0/.forward+Postfix was not used. According to
local(8), SECURITY: The local(8) delivery agent disallows regular
expression substitution of $1 etc. in alias_maps, because that would
open a
Vidar Salberg Normann:
Does this mean you can't make postfix treat traffic on port 587 exactly like
normal SMTP traffic on port 25, while also accepting SASL and/or AUTH
LOGIN if used?
The only difference between 25 and 587 is in the Postfix master.cf file.
Wietse
punit jain:
Don't look under the hood unless you know what you are looking at.
I agree with you Viktor but i am just trying to get a clear picture of
postfix as a novice.
What my concern is what will happen after setting fast_flush_domains to
relay domains and flushing the queue say
Xn Nooby:
I am using Postfix to replace an existing email system, and I am
inheriting usernames that are in uppercase. Apparently Postfix
converts all email addresses to lowercase, so I cannot receive mail to
the accounts that are in uppercase. This surprised me, because the
linux user
Jesper Dybdal:
I have just installed a mailing list manager (Mailman) for use with my
Postfix installation (which has just been upgraded to 2.5.5). I have
patched Mailman to use the XVERP option on MAIL FROM.
This works, but I was surprised to see that when the recipient address
provided
Xn Nooby:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Xn Nooby:
I am using Postfix to replace an existing email system, and I am
inheriting usernames that are in uppercase. Apparently Postfix
converts all
Xn Nooby:
Your options are:
1) Create lower-case UNIX password file entries with the same
numerical UID and GID fields as the upper-case names, and with a
* password.
I was able to resolve my problem by creating the duplicate entry in
the /etc/passwd file, I will use this method.
Jesper Dybdal:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:10:16 +0100, I wrote:
Since my first mail, I have tried an experiment where the rewriting of
the sender address is done by a .forward file instead of by
virtual_regexp; in that case, VERP actually uses the recipient address
before it has been changed by
ram:
If I am getting bounces for VERP ids
With VERP, the envelope recipient rcptn...@rcptdomain is embedded
in the bounce address as
owner-listname+rcptname=rcptdom...@example.com
(assuming recipient delimiters of +=).
The postfix VERP HOWTO describes how to handle the emails that bounce
webmas...@aus-city.com:
Hi,
I keep getting these errors in /var/log/messages and can't work out why..
Dec 31 10:07:59 server kernel: postfix-queue[1323]: segfault at
2068616e ip 08049f09 sp bfc13920 error 4 in postfix-queue[8047000+e000]
Dec 31 10:12:01 server kernel:
Sahil Tandon:
Joselito wrote:
I'm moving an existing domain to virtual mailboxes. All the info is
stored in a mysql database. Currently all devlivery and alias mapping
is working correctly; I'm using virtual_mailbox_maps,
virtual_alias_maps and virtual_mailbox_domains stored in the
Jacob Anawalt:
Hello,
My configured mailbox_command has been 'procmail -a $EXTENSION' for
the longest time. I did not notice the difference between emails
'delivered to command: procmail -a $EXTENSION and those 'delivered
to command: /usr/bin/procmail' because it was procmail in both cases.
Hanspeter Kunz:
well, my intention was to use /etc/aliases for forwarding mail adresses
like root, webmaster, logcheck, etc. to real users. This would be
different users on every host. That's why I want first to
process /etc/aliases and then route the mail to our central mail server.
Hwan Dong:
Hi there,
?
Instead of?paying email professionals, I set up a postfix SMTP server to s
-end emails to the club members. I have also successfully enabled the delay b
-etween sending to some ISPs. But as more as I am sending, I could still get
-rejection. Do you have similar
Your measurements use two different users, one with .procmailrc
file and one without .procmailrc file.
To prove that the difference in behavior is caused by the presence
or absence of .procmailrc files, you need to deliver mail to the
EXACT SAME user and change NOTHING except the
Jacob Anawalt:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
To prove that the difference in behavior is caused by the presence
or absence of .procmailrc files, you need to deliver mail to the
EXACT SAME user and change NOTHING except the presence/existence
Dennis Putnam:
I have a machine running postfix that is required to relay mail
through my ISP's mail server. When I try to send mail, I get this error:
550 [PERMFAIL] destination not valid within DNS (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
Can someone explain what this error means? If I use
ja...@monsterjam.org:
hey folks.. Im running the latest postfix on an ubuntu server with
mailmain for mailing list management.. everything is pretty much working
fine except that Im trying to get some kind of rate-limiting or
throttling working for all outbound messages. Ive searched all over
ja...@monsterjam.org:
The following requires Postfix 2.5 or later:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
# Deliver all mail via the smtp transport in master.cf.
# Use [] to suppress MX lookup.
relayhost = [mail.example.com]
default_transport = smtp
smtp_destination_rate_delay
Ralf Hauser:
Since certain MUAs such as MS Outlook allow the user to label messages as
confidential which according to http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1327.html gets
translated into MIME header Sensitivity=Company-Confidential, quite some
secure mail gateways ensure higher transmission secrecy
Jeff Weinberger:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:30 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the PREPEND
action as follows:
main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
Jesper Dybdal:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:54:52 +0100, I wrote:
... I was surprised to see that when the recipient address
provided by Mailman is rewritten by Postfix' virtual_regexp, then the
recipient address that Postfix encodes in the envelope return path is
the rewritten address, rather
Jason Welsh:
my apologies.. here is the output of postconf -n
Did you notice that there is no smtp_destination_rate_delay
Wietse
Jan 2 16:04:57 ohs postfix/smtp[18389]: B08B018A00:
to=someu...@monsterjam.org, relay=outgoing.verizon.net[206.46.232.12]:25,
delay=0.89, delays=0.08/0.28/0.35/0.17, dsn=2.5.0, status=sent (250 2.5.0 Ok.)
Jan 2 16:04:57 ohs postfix/qmgr[18371]: B08B018A00: removed
Jan 2 16:05:12 ohs
Ralf Hauser:
Hi Wietse,
Thx for the quick reply.
This can cause contents to be disclosed since not treated properly by
above-mentioned gateways (in particular, if the main.cf doesn't say
bounce_size_limit=1 [the value 0 is not permitted??]).
Normally, zero means no limit in
Drew Derbyshire:
I've got a postfix server running which accepts several domains on it's
primary smtpd (kew.com, *.wild.kew.com, thinfilmmfg.com,
*.wild.thinfilmmfg.com, ...), all protected by the usual (and some
unusual) SPAM filters. Life is good.
I'd like to set up a secondary smtpd
Drew Derbyshire:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Wietse Venema wrote:
The problem is that the distinction between domain classes
(mydestination, relay_domains, virtual_alias_domains,
virtual_mailbox_domains) is made by the trivial-rewrite daemon.
Make sense
1801 - 1900 of 13245 matches
Mail list logo
