On Tue, Jan 26, 2010, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
>> The other thing that I find tiresome with PowerMail's monolithic
>> database is that the entire database needs to be backed up on a daily
>> basis. With Apple Mail, the only mailboxes that get backed up in an
>> incremental backup are the ones th
Jeremy Hughes said:
>Here in the office, people who have switched from PowerMail to Apple
>Mail have much smaller backups.
So CTM Dev are responsible for you choosing an inferior backup strategy?
I think not and I also find your reasnoning to not be sound in this case.
There are backup apps tha
Michael J. Hußmann (26/1/10, 19:58) said:
>> The other thing that I find tiresome with PowerMail's monolithic
>> database is that the entire database needs to be backed up on a daily
>> basis. With Apple Mail, the only mailboxes that get backed up in an
>> incremental backup are the ones that have
Michael J. Hußmann (26/1/10, 19:58) said:
>> The other thing that I find tiresome with PowerMail's monolithic
>> database is that the entire database needs to be backed up on a daily
>> basis. With Apple Mail, the only mailboxes that get backed up in an
>> incremental backup are the ones that have
Michael J. Hußmann (26/1/10, 19:58) said:
>> The other thing that I find tiresome with PowerMail's monolithic
>> database is that the entire database needs to be backed up on a daily
>> basis. With Apple Mail, the only mailboxes that get backed up in an
>> incremental backup are the ones that have
Jeremy Hughes wrote (Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:05:50 +):
> I've been using PowerMail for maybe eight years, and Claris Emailer for
> about six years before that. The only way I have managed to continue
> using PowerMail is by moving some of my older mailing list emails
> (Carbon-Dev, Cocoa-Dev etc.
Jeremy Hughes (jer...@softpress.com) wrote:
> I've been using PowerMail for maybe eight years, and Claris Emailer for
> about six years before that. The only way I have managed to continue
> using PowerMail is by moving some of my older mailing list emails
> (Carbon-Dev, Cocoa-Dev etc.) into Apple
Tobias Jung (22/1/10, 11:37) said:
>Don't get my wrong - I don't want to critisize or anything, I'm really
>just curios:
>How many messages do you get?
242179 messages at the moment. I've recently had to prune the database
to continue using it.
>I'm using PowerMail for a year now and PowerMail's
Tobias Jung (new...@tobiasjung.net) on 2010-01-22 06:37 said:
>>> 1. Larger than 2GB archive sizes (I have two suggestions: a) a way to
>>> create folders that use separate DBs, and/or a DB per email account
>>
>> That's my #1 request as well.
>>
>> I have one email account, and PowerMail's 2GB
George Henne quoted:
>
> and so on
Man, that HTML was dreadful.
Peter Lovell (plov...@mac.com) wrote:
> The naming is done by the sender as part of the MIME stuff.
> Powermail might change the name by adding a number if the name is
> already used, but that's all the change I've ever seen.
The Image001 ... part would be the filename chosen by the sender. If
th
>On Fri, Jan 22, 2010, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
>
>>> Here's the html in the message. The attachments get named Image001.jpg,
>>> Image002.jpg ..., probably by PowerMail.
>>
>>That's odd. I've never seen anything like that, in all the years I've
>>been using PowerMail.
>
>The naming is done by t
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
>> Here's the html in the message. The attachments get named Image001.jpg,
>> Image002.jpg ..., probably by PowerMail.
>
>That's odd. I've never seen anything like that, in all the years I've
>been using PowerMail.
The naming is done by the sender
George Henne (g...@nsbasic.com) wrote:
> Here's the html in the message. The attachments get named Image001.jpg,
> Image002.jpg ..., probably by PowerMail.
That's odd. I've never seen anything like that, in all the years I've
been using PowerMail.
- Michael
Michael J. Hußmann
E-mail: mich...@
>George Henne (g...@nsbasic.com) wrote:
>
>> An html mail with embedded images is a perfectly reasonable thing to
>> expect your browser to display properly.
>
>And PowerMail does. Depending on your preferences settings, PM will
>either display all the embedded images in HTML mail, or just those se
Jeremy Hughes wrote (Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:51:15 +):
> Lane Roathe (19/1/10, 20:38) said:
>
>> 1. Larger than 2GB archive sizes (I have two suggestions: a) a way to
>> create folders that use separate DBs, and/or a DB per email account
>
> That's my #1 request as well.
>
> I have one email a
on Sat, Jan 16, 2010 PowerMail discussions may have said:
>I've been a Powermail fan for years, but I'm getting impatient for some
>improvements.
I an agree with that, there are several things I'd like to see improve;
my list:
1. Larger than 2GB archive sizes (I have two suggestions: a) a way to
George Henne (g...@nsbasic.com) wrote:
> An html mail with embedded images is a perfectly reasonable thing to
> expect your browser to display properly.
And PowerMail does. Depending on your preferences settings, PM will
either display all the embedded images in HTML mail, or just those sent
with
Lane Roathe (19/1/10, 20:38) said:
>1. Larger than 2GB archive sizes (I have two suggestions: a) a way to
>create folders that use separate DBs, and/or a DB per email account
That's my #1 request as well.
I have one email account, and PowerMail's 2GB limit combined with its
monolithic database i
On 2010/01/19, at 12:25, George Henne wrote:
> PS. What is the danger in displaying inline images?
My question exactly :-)
--
- Hiro
Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Greater Boston
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=pearflame&search_type=&
Lane Roathe wrote at 2:38 PM (-0600) on 1/19/10:
>Well, for one they are almost always used as a way to track you.
In my experience, they are almost always used as a way to... include
images with the message. The tracking thing probably happens, but come
on, isn't your e-mail address already bom
>>1. .ics files can't update Calendar.
>
>Works for me, this is actually a OS thing, PM is just telling the system
>to open the file; whatever application is assigned to that filename
>suffix with handle it. (Don't get me started on losing one of the best
>features of Mac OS X w/the loss of creator
Paul, some decorum please. Now you're just spamming the list (i.e. the
rest of us) with your profanities.
-ben
Paul Schatzkin (mobile) wrote at 11:19 AM (-0600) on 1/19/10:
>AT LEAST MY APPLE MAIL DOESNT CONTINUOUSLY SPAM ME.
>
>--PS
>
>Sent from my iPhone, which is why it's so short.
>
>On Jan
Does your Apple Mail not show you the headers like my Apple Mail does? You can
find the unsubscribe email address there, as is usual for most compliant email
list services. You will, most likely, need to unsubscribe from the original
address you used to subscribe.
--
Michael Lewis
Off Balance P
On 19/01/2010 12:16 PM, Paul Schatzkin (mobile) wrote:
And I would NEVER used an e-mail program whose "support" srvice t
relentlessly spams NON USERS with unwanted support e-mails without so
much as an " unsubscribe" link in the msgs. This is lame, stupid and
fucked up. How do I make it stop??
I think you're missing my point.
An html mail with embedded images is a perfectly reasonable thing to
expect your browser to display properly.
I used Apple Mail as a comparison, since it's reasonable to expect
PowerMail to work at least as well. I could have used almost any other
modern mail read
AT LEAST MY APPLE MAIL DOESNT CONTINUOUSLY SPAM ME.
--PS
Sent from my iPhone, which is why it's so short.
On Jan 16, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Michael Lewis
wrote:
On Jan 16, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
Anyway, if Apple Mail was the yardstick against all other mail
clients
w
And I would NEVER used an e-mail program whose "support" srvice t
relentlessly spams NON USERS with unwanted support e-mails without so
much as an " unsubscribe" link in the msgs. This is lame, stupid and
fucked up. How do I make it stop???
--PS
Sent from my iPhone, which is why it's so sh
On Jan 16, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
> Anyway, if Apple Mail was the yardstick against all other mail clients
> were to be measured, why would anyone be using something else? I for one
> am glad there are alternatives to Apple Mail. PM could surely be
> improved, but making it
I agree with Michael. I would never allow my employees to use an email
client that did not allow me to turn off the display of inline images.
To display inline images by default is inconsiderate because it is too
dangerous.
Richard Hart
You wrote:
>A-NO-NE Music (anonemu...@mac.com) wrote:
>
>>
George Henne (g...@nsbasic.com) wrote:
> The messages are in html, with embedded images. Once again, something
> PowerMail should handle gracefully.
But PM already does display images inline if they are embedded within
HTML messages (if you have set its preferences that way). What it
doesn't do i
A-NO-NE Music (anonemu...@mac.com) wrote:
> What standard now is Apple Mail.
Apple Mail has a hidden preference ("DisableInlineAttachmentViewing";
you can set it using the shell) governing whether attachments are
displayed inline. Contrary to what George supposed, Apple Mail doesn't
care about th
>George Henne (g...@nsbasic.com) wrote:
>
>> For me, the attachments end up as part of the body of the text version
>> of the message - Powermail does not detect the attachment. The mail
>> program on the iPhone recognizes the attachment properly.
>
>I've just tried sending from iCal 4.0.1 to PM 6
On 2010/01/16, at 9:35, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
> I was wondering about the "as the author intended" part - is there
> actually a standard way to specify that images should be displayed
> inline, other than using HTML? Because technically those inline images
> are still attachments.
What stand
George Henne (g...@nsbasic.com) wrote:
> For me, the attachments end up as part of the body of the text version
> of the message - Powermail does not detect the attachment. The mail
> program on the iPhone recognizes the attachment properly.
I've just tried sending from iCal 4.0.1 to PM 6.0.3 and
More inline...
>George Henne (g...@nsbasic.com) wrote:
>
>> 1. .ics files can't update Calendar.
>
>Works for me; double clicking an .ics attachment opens iCal which offers
>to add it to some calendar.
For me, the attachments end up as part of the body of the text version
of the message - Powerma
George Henne (g...@nsbasic.com) wrote:
> 1. .ics files can't update Calendar.
Works for me; double clicking an .ics attachment opens iCal which offers
to add it to some calendar.
> 2. Links inside html emails do not open in many cases.
Yep. Works a little better than before, but still not compl
I've been a Powermail fan for years, but I'm getting impatient for some
improvements. These are basic things that other mail clients (like
Apple's Mail) do just fine.
1. .ics files can't update Calendar.
2. Links inside html emails do not open in many cases.
3. Emails with inline pictures do not
38 matches
Mail list logo
