What OS? What compiler? What is your ./configure command line?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:12 AM, SyRenity stas.os...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to compile a 32-bit protobuf on 64-bit machine.
No matter what I tried (changing build option, host option or setting -
m32 flag), I
There's a bug in your code, but I don't know what. Can you please reduce it
to a small, self-contained example and send it to the list?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:47 AM, iWalsh iain.d.wa...@googlemail.comwrote:
Ah Sorry I should also mention that leaving the mac address field
empty/default
. Where is it?
On Jan 28, 9:22 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
What OS? What compiler? What is your ./configure command line?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:12 AM, SyRenity stas.os...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to compile a 32-bit protobuf on 64-bit machine
On Jan 28, 8:48 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
There's a bug in your code, but I don't know what. Can you please
reduce it
to a small, self-contained example and send it to the list?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:47 AM, iWalsh iain.d.wa...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Ah Sorry I
.
Regards, Jacob
2010/1/28 Kenton Varda ken...@google.com:
Your new results seem to indicate that the extra malloc/free can cost
between 300ns and 1500ns. At the low end, the overhead is negligible and
not worth complicating the interface. At the high end, your results seem
hard to believe
I've added this to the wiki:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:47 PM, ninjudd goo...@justinbalthrop.com wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a clojure library that provides a wrapper around Java protocol
buffers for clojure. Of course, you can call Java
The official implementation does #1: It assumes that if there are 10 bytes
or more in a row with the high bit set when a varint is expected, then some
sort of corruption must have occurred. It's impossible to reasonably
recover from such corruption, so the parser just gives up and returns an
We'd like to make it possible to override options from the command-line, but
no one has gotten around to implementing it. How best to do this is
unclear, particularly when you consider message-level and field-level
options as well. What should the flag syntax be to, say, set packed =
true on all
.
Regards,
Iain
On 29 January 2010 19:20, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Sorry, I can only debug something small, but your example is 1000 lines
of
code, most of it unrelated to protobufs. Please reduce this to a
program
that simply initializes your message, writes it to a file
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Jacob Rief jacob.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Please just don't add anything new. If you are unhappy with what
ZeroCopy{Input,Output}Stream provide, you can always just create your own
stream framework to use.
Well, I have to live with that decision. Maybe in
: Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [protobuf] Re: Cross-compiling protobuf to 32-bit
To: Kenton Varda ken...@google.com
Hi.
And when you configure other autotool-based packages the same way, it
works?
Yes, it is.
You said you were using the -m32 flag. Where
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm one of the Debian maintainers for protobuf and 2.3.0 fails during
unittests on the armel architecture (only on it). This might be a host
issue or a CFLAGS issue (we had something like this for sh4, where
'-mieee' is
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm one of the Debian maintainers for protobuf and 2.3.0 fails during
unittests on the armel architecture (only on it). This might be a host
issue
Either approach can work. It depends on whether you're willing to switch to
a C++ compiler, whether your C code compiles correctly when interpreted as
C++, and which protobuf interface you like better. If your app is pure C
than I'd think using protobuf-c would be easier, but I haven't used it
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Mohan
mohan.narayanasw...@credit-suisse.com wrote:
I have a situation to create 1000's of objects inside loop, I am bit
worried cause those manny builder objects are also created. is there
any workaround for that?
With a modern JVM, creating short-lived
It's up to the compiler what kind of binaries it wants to build. There's
probably some flag you can pass to make it build 32-bit. You could give
this flag to the configure script like:
./configure CXXFLAGS=--compiler-flag LDFLAGS=--liker-flag
I don't know what flags you need -- check your
/protobuf-2.3.0/examples:1015:15$
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
What does protoc --version print?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:31 AM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile protobuf cpp example.
$ cd /media/EXTDIV/src/protobuf-2.3.0
instead in
/meda/EXTDIV/bin', I am not sure if that is a problem. And I am using
ubuntu 9.10 which has gcc 4.4.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Did you previously compile the examples with an older protoc? You need
to
make clean before trying to compile
You need to ask the appengine people about this.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:27 AM, alf alberto@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Any Idea of when will be available protol buffers in appenige
natively.
thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol
What does protoc --version say?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Yang Y tedd...@gmail.com wrote:
I downloaded the source, installed on my box, but it gave me the
following error
$ echo $CLASSPATH
:../java/target/protobuf-java-2.3.0.jar
$ uname -a
Linux yyang-laptop
The methods are on the parent class, google::protobuf::MessageLite. (It is
a parent class of non-line messages as well.)
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Animosity animosi...@gmail.com wrote:
So I've downloaded the 2.3.0 version of the win binary
I've created a tutorial.proto file (
s/non-line/non-lite/
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
The methods are on the parent class, google::protobuf::MessageLite. (It is
a parent class of non-line messages as well.)
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Animosity animosi...@gmail.com wrote:
So
Please provide more information:
- What OS?
- What error messages did the test print before failing?
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, idleman evoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been playing around with protobuf a while and should today
update from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0. Everything
You need to use AddExtension() to add a new value to a repeated field.
SetExtension() is for modifying an existing value. In fact, you're
supposed to pass the index of the value you want to modify to SetExtension,
e.g.:
fltData.SetExtension(FilterData::filter_columns, 5, TEST);
Due to a bug
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:35 PM, idleman evoo...@gmail.com wrote:
c:\protobuf-2.3.0\src\google\protobuf\compiler
\command_line_interface_unittest.cc(341): error: Value of:
expected_substring
Actual: --badplug_out: prefix-gen-badplug: The system cannot find
the file specified.
Expected: a
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:59 PM, idleman evoo...@gmail.com wrote:
hehe no, xxx = The system cannot find the file specified on Swedish:
Det går inte att hitta filen , I have a Swedish installation of
windows, I assumed it would not do any help so I just removed it.
Ah, then the problem is
for symbian, which source code I need
to build to get protoc.exe for symbian.
I may be asking too many questions, but please help me in this regard.
Thanks in advance
Vinayaka Karjigi
On Feb 10, 12:02 am, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
I imagine that the lite version of protobufs should
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Kartik Iyer iyerkart...@gmail.com wrote:
My requirement :
I have a .NET client( Windows) and my server is a C++ server running
on Unix (listening on a port).
Wanted to understand if I can use protocol buffers to transport the
requests from client to server
the network.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Kartik Iyer iyerkart...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank Kenton.
This tutorial only has C++,Java and Python examples, I want to look at a
.NET (C#) example, client sending request to another OS.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com
, in compression or non-compression mode, the dumped out bytestream
is the same.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
You should verify that the bytes that come out of the InputStream really
are the exact same bytes that were written by the serializer
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Romain Francois
romain.francois.r.enthusi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/17/2010 12:51 AM, Kenton Varda wrote:
The Reflection interface already provides a way -- FieldSize() and
GetRepeatedX(). The only problem is that it's a bit slower than the
generated
to delimit the input? I'm not familiar with
SplitterInputStream, but I'm wondering if it does the right thing for this
to work.
--Chris
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Please reply-all so the mailing list stays CC'd. I don't know anything
about
at the
byte stream itself
can we figure it out. but when we write the stream, the underlying stream
could insert some markers itself, and utilize it later.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Two options:
1) Do not use parseFrom(InputStream). Use
This is up to the Go developers. You'll have to ask them.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:09 PM, hutuworm hutuw...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I've not found any information about Protocol Buffers with Go on
the project page, so please help me to find the answer.
Thanks.
--
You received this
Cool! I've added this to the list:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Ralf ralf.kist...@gmail.com wrote:
I created a new lightweight Java port, specifically intended for J2ME.
It is not ready for production yet, but comments are welcome.
I've added this to the RPC system list:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/w/edit/ThirdPartyAddOns
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Jarl Lindrud jarl.lind...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I would like to announce native Protocol Buffer support in RCF (Remote
Call Framework) 1.2. RCF is a portable
Right, Descriptor.toProto() returns a DescriptorProto, which is itself a
protobuf type. So, calling newBuilderForType() on that is going to return a
builder for DescriptorProto, not a builder for the type described.
What you want is com.google.protobuf.DynamicMessage.
Note that DynamicMessage
,
Mark
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
My only guess is that your protobuf type wasn't actually referenced
anywhere in your program and so was dropped from the binary. Some linkers
do this. But it's weird that you have a pointer to an object whose class
(But to answer your question: Compiled-in types are almost always faster
than DynamicMessage.)
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
I'm not sure how your approach works, but since it looks like you're using
Java reflection, my guess is that it will only work
and
I have method name.
ServiceDescriptor has descriptors of all types I possibly need, but
unfortunately I looks like there is no way to construct message from
byte array having MessageDescriptor (which I can get from
ServiceDescriptor).
On Feb 23, 7:28 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote
Actually, it's append(), not add():
a2.device_tokens.append(a byte string)
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Bytes are represented using the str type. So you do:
a2.device_tokens.add(a byte string)
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Garry ga
Weird, read() on a socket should return as soon as *any* data is available,
not wait until the entire buffer can be filled. Have you set some unusual
flags on your socket which may be causing it to behave this way?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Patrick schultz.patr...@gmail.com wrote:
When
that the buffer wasn't being
flushed; I should of realized this earlier.
Any reason why the Java CodedInputStream has a flush method but the c+
+ API has no equivalent?
On Feb 25, 9:04 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Weird, read() on a socket should return as soon as *any* data
documentation.
at the moment i am completely lost how to begin to write the plugin.
but i dont want to whine: protobufs other documentation is excellent,
so maybe i am just getting too comfortable ;)
On Jan 6, 7:01 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Yes. Sorry, I haven't had a chance
Why does this need to be built into DiskSourceTree? Just map the virtual
path back to a disk path, then use the OS APIs to iterate over the
directory.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Hassan Syed h.a.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Kenton Co,
I was wondering if their exists, or if I may request
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:47 AM, adamdms adam.kwintkiew...@gmail.comwrote:
I created (from tutorial example) below message.
Person ID: 1
Name: Adam
E-mail address: adam...@tlen.pl
Home phone #: 12345
Mobile phone #:
Person ID: 2
Name: Honorata
E-mail address: hon...@wp.pl
trying to benefit from protobuf as a more extensible
and generic platform for creating types usable not only serving the
purpose of a over-the-wire format and a portable message
specification.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com
wrote:
Why does this need to be built
Please check config.log for a more detailed error message.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Steven Ong stevenong2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to run 'configure' for the 'protobuf-2.3.0' on an Intelx86 and
Solaris 10 machine. It's failed and I saw the following error message:
Sean: The Google-internal version of this function wouldn't work for you
because we actually use an alternate (non-COW) string class. Also, our
resize function violates aliasing rules, which may be a problem if you don't
use -fno-strict-aliasing.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Jason Hsueh
This was fixed in 2.3.0.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Franz See franz@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know where to start. Any ideas?
#
# An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine:
#
# SIGBUS (0xa) at pc=0x6bed752c, pid=467, tid=42
#
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM)
You need to use either Cygwin or MinGW+MSYS. Either of these will be able
to run the configure script and make just like on Linux.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Chiang chiangk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Does anyone know how to compile protobuf using g++ in windows? I have
an
Protocol Buffers are binary data, not text. You can't store them in String
(or CharSequence) objects because those are meant only for Unicode text. If
CMeCab tries to transfer protobuf messages as Strings then it is,
unfortunately, broken.
If you want to figure out how you are hitting that log
: http://www.twitter.com/franz_see
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Protocol Buffers are binary data, not text. You can't store them in
String (or CharSequence) objects because those are meant only for Unicode
text. If CMeCab tries to transfer protobuf
You would have to manually convert it to/from a string. Or, for more
efficiency, you could convert to a byte array (each byte being a base-256
digit) or perhaps a packed repeated fixed64. The protobuf library doesn't
provide any helpers for this but they should not be too hard to write.
On Tue,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Evan Jones ev...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:21 , Paul Rudd wrote:
Which actually brings up a feature request -
MessageLite.Builder.mergeDelimitedFrom(InputStream) is too inefficient
for small streamed messages, since it creates a new CodedInputStream
There are three J2ME implementations on the third-party list:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns
I'd be happy to list yours as well if you'd like.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi protobuf team,
Have you guys considered
such support?
The changes I've made seem to match with the current architecture. I've
added extended protoc to accept a new file option java_platform (where user
may specify J2SE(default) or J2ME) which makes it produce J2ME compatible
sources.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Kenton Varda ken
I'd be careful about this. Currently parsers will accept it, but there are
good arguments for why perhaps they should not. In UTF-8, overlong byte
sequences are rejected for security reasons. The same security reasons
don't quite apply to protobufs but nevertheless, relying on this seems like
a
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Evan Jones ev...@mit.edu wrote:
Kenton Varda wrote:
The output of your serializer will no longer be canonical. People won't
be able to, say, used serialized messages as map keys or to compute hash
values. That alone is probably enough reason not to do
Note that to write your plugin, you do *not* have to copy the CppGenerator
sources. Instead, write your plugin to use
output_directory-OpenForInsert() to insert additional code into what the
C++ code generator already generated. Specifically, you want to insert at
the namespace_scope insertion
though.
Monty
On 03/03/2010 11:03 AM, Kenton Varda wrote:
Please check config.log for a more detailed error message.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Steven Ong stevenong2...@gmail.com
mailto:stevenong2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to run 'configure
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Is your implementation a modification of the official Java
implementation? If so, how much is shared? Could you send me a diff via
codereview.appspot.com?
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com
file-service($index$).
I'd rather hide the details of descriptor initialization from plugins as
it's something that has changed many times and could change again.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Kimpton awkimp...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Kenton Varda ken
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:01 AM, NoamC noam1...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a lightweight RPC in C/C++ between VxWorks and linux
(both embedded systems) and started looking at protobuf for this
purpose.
The 3rd party addons (RPC implementations) I saw in the doc looks
either heavy
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:01 AM, NoamC noam1...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Why was the current method of services deprecated? will it be
removed in the future?
It's deprecated in favor of code generator plugins
OK, so, which pointer is null?
We can't do this for you. You are the only one who can run your code in the
debugger.
If you want us to debug it, you need to provide a small, self-contained
example program demonstrating the problem. Just C++ code and input data is
needed -- the C# part is not
of the CodedInputStream, is null.
(the buffer_ field is not null ).
since I can't delve into ReadBytes, I have no idea what's causing the
access violation
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
OK, so, which pointer is null?
We can't do this for you
The license is displayed prominently on the project page as well as in the
file COPYING.txt which comes with the source package. It is the New BSD
license.
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi protobuf team,
, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
On the first call to your descriptor() or GetDescriptor() method, you
could look up the ServiceDescriptor in
google::protobuf::DescriptorPool::generated_pool().
I think that's what my generated code is essentially now doing :
In my
in advance for your help.
Steven
On Mar 10, 11:18 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Oops, it looks like it's actually gtest/config.log that you need to look
at,
since the failure happened when configuring the gtest sub-package.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:44 PM, stevenong2007
On what line do you get the error?
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:29 AM, mk apollo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to send a proto over a socket, but i am getting
segmentation error. Could someone please help and tell me what is
wrong with this?
file.proto
message data{
required
Wait.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:29 AM, mk apollo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to send a proto over a socket, but i am getting
segmentation error. Could someone please help and tell me what is
wrong with this?
file.proto
message data{
required string x1 = 1;
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com wrote:
*- Why did you eliminate the builder pattern?*
To save jar space. J2ME environment is pretty restricted. Many devices have
a few kilo bytes size limit (e.g 128K, 256K). An empty class adds about 200
bytes to jar file. The
).
After upgrade from 2.0.1 to 2.3.0 we got 4x-6x performance boost
(python 2.5.2, Ubuntu 8.04) - it's great!
Do you know about Petar's timeline for the new version with more power
for Python code?
On Jan 20, 10:45 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
In 2.3.0, the Python implementation
This may solve the problem but adding code to every setter may have a
significant cost. It's harder to inline the setter this way. But it's hard
to say exactly what the cost will be without some sort of benchmarks.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Please read the tutorial:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/cpptutorial.html
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:39 PM, mk apollo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please help me with serialization/deserialization
classes defined in .proto (protobuf). here is an exp that I am
Having Chinese documentation would be great. I would be very happy to link
to your documentation if you put it on the internet somewhere. For example,
you could put it on Google Sites, or maybe create a separate
code.google.comproject to use its wiki. This way you can manage your
documents
You might be able to solve this by setting LD=gcc, like:
./configure LD=gcc
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Steven Ong stevenong2...@gmail.com wrote:
One more thing...
I discovered that the whole root cause is as the following:
Although the code was compiled by CSW gcc4, Sun's linker
I actually maintain the project files using VS2008, but I run a hack script
that downgrades them to VS2005 (by simply replacing the version number)
before release so that VS2005 users can use the package.
I'm confused about how you managed to compile the project using VS2008
without it
to your implementation separately from
the protobuf release cycle, which is probably far too slow for a new
project. With the decentralized approach, you do not have to depend on me
and I do not have to depend on you.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote
=true is applied to a non-
repeated or non-primitive field).
I don't have a strong opinion about delimiters in the option syntax; I
just chose some that should hopefully work without ambiguity.
-dave
On Jan 31, 6:58 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
We'd like to make it possible
What would this return?
What are MyRpcOne and MyRpcTwo?
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:19 PM, rthompson.dtisoft@gmail.com
rthompson.dtisoft@gmail.com wrote:
DynamicServiceFactory-New(MyRpcOne,MyRpcTwo,...)
This type of functionality doesn't appear to exist. Is there an
alternate way to
. It makes more
sense to keep my implementation in a separated project. Thanks for all the
advices.
Thanks,
-Gatis
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
I wonder if we should consider making mutable-message mode a feature of
the base implementation, rather
compilation failed with the 2005
version.
Linking with the 2005 version failed, the linker error I got was something
to do with std::Base_container contstructor/destructor. I guess that's what
changed between VS2005 and VS2008.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com
You can, of course, modify the value all you want in your copy of the code.
However, the value is only useful if it is a compile-time constant, so we
can't really parameterize it in general. Note that if you change the value,
you must recompile libprotobuf and anything you have that depends on
, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
You can, of course, modify the value all you want in your copy of the code.
However, the value is only useful if it is a compile-time constant, so we
can't really parameterize it in general. Note that if you change the value,
you must recompile libprotobuf
You need to link the example against libprotobuf.lib.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:43 PM, mohito moh...@inbox.ru wrote:
Hi.
I use MSVS2008 and I have next problem:
I installed protocol buffers from vsprojects folder in Debug mode,
like it was recomended in readme.txt.
Next step I took
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Austin Ziegler halosta...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
I do test each release with both VS2005 and VS2008, and haven't seen that
problem before. Odd.
Do you have 2005 and 2008 on a single system
You need to edit the project settings to tell it to actually link in
libprotobuf.lib. Simply putting it in a particular directory is not enough.
Please consult the MSVC docs.
You don't need libprotobuf-lite.lib (unless you're using optimize_for =
LITE_RUNTIME) or libprotoc.lib (unless you're
For GWT in particular, you might ask them directly if they have any plans
with protobufs.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Romain Francois
romain.francois.r.enthusi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone tried to use nixysa to build NPAPI plugins for
compatible browsers to
versions of protobufs actually used this approach. Unfortunately,
having the extra vtable pointer in every object increased memory usage
enough to significantly affect performance.
Thorsten
On Mar 16, 10:02 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
We can't make it a template parameter because
When you call Builder.getXXXList(), the underlying list is still modifiable
because it's still being built, so it has to convert the list to
unmodifiable before returning. But when you call Builder.build(), the
underlying list is made unmodifiable. Thus the message's getXXXList() does
not need
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Austin Ziegler halosta...@gmail.comwrote:
Except in the case where the user has both VS2005 and VS2008 installed
on the same system.
Oh, right. Sorry.
Urgh. I'll think about it. This is the first I've heard of this problem,
though. Is it really that
If you're asking whether text format supports expression evaluation, the
answer is no. Implementing this would probably add more complication to the
parser than it already has, and it would never be good enough to satisfy
everyone. If you need computed values, you should write code in a real
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Ron Reynolds tequila...@ymail.com wrote:
seems odd that you can delete all via clearXXX() or add via addAllXXX() and
addXXX() but not remove a single element by index...
Our experience is that if we provide a way to remove a single element by
index, people
:31 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Ron Reynolds tequila...@ymail.comwrote:
seems odd that you can delete all via clearXXX() or add via addAllXXX()
and addXXX() but not remove a single element by index...
Our experience is that if we provide a way
OK, can you file an issue report, then? I suppose it would not be too
terrible to make this part of the release post-processing step.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Austin Ziegler halosta...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar
All implementations are advised to output tags in order by field number, in
which case they should all produce the same bytes... unless there are
unknown fields, which are always written at the end. In C++ you can use
DiscardUnknownFields() to make sure all unknown fields are discarded.
But I
) option (which i'm pretty sure
is more costly than removing a single element from an ArrayList by
index...).
--
*From:* Kenton Varda ken...@google.com
*To:* Ron Reynolds tequila...@ymail.com
*Cc:* protobuf@googlegroups.com
*Sent:* Wed, March 17, 2010 1:32:50 PM
TextFormatter runs? I
guess it's an overall design question. I realize this is not the
intention of ProtoBuf but the simplistic file format lends itself well
to disseminating configuration information across many processing
nodes.
On Mar 17, 10:09 am, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote
701 - 800 of 1054 matches
Mail list logo
