If memory serves correct those very same apple docs linked to were used to get
us the accessibility we have to day during the initial work.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2012, at 7:26 PM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
> Its not really a case of them lacking knowledge N
Hello,
You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant tempo, you
see it does the same thing there. Infact you will notice it does the same in
all edit fields in all of the different event dialog boxes.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM
ed to keep a lion partition around for a
little bit.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 16, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
> I still haven't updated my HD system to version 10 but, since I also have a
> 003, I decided to update my regular LE version to 10. I
do you set a tempo for any of your projects or do any recording hat requires
you to change settings at the start of each project?
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 14, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote:
> Hi, I use pro tools 10.1 on mountain lion with no problems. A
it may also only be in the software mixer for the MBox, which isn't accessible.
U would find this in system preferences by clicking on the MBox iCon there.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 6, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Chris Norman wrote:
> I have no idea, but as no one
read, has led me to believe.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:45 AM, "Christopher-Mark gilland"
wrote:
> Unfortunately, Kevin, no, I do not have Bookshare.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "Kevin Reeves"
rding side, and once you feell confident about
that with your current gear work on the mixing side a bit.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
wrote:
> OK, I did mark this message with low importance, however it would be
> int
It still tells you its an edit field, it just doesnt read the values in the
edit field where it used to
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jul 25, 2012, at 10:17 PM, "Christopher-Mark Gilland"
wrote:
> So, then, how do you know if it actually was an edit field?
>
if memory serves correct edit fields werent reading wit pt 10 on ml. like if
you go into the tempo dialog box it wouldn't read any of the edit fields. You
could make changes and they would stick, but it wouldn't read the edit field.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Ju
> OK. How do I split a stereo track into two monos?
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "The Oreo Monster"
>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 7:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Balancing channels
>
>
> There is no way to match the gain k
There is no way to match the gain knob other than using your ears really. You
can record with the gain all the way down so u know they are even and use a
gain plug in in PT to bring the level up evenly. Also you can split your stereo
track into two mono track and pan then hard right and hard le
e and find the audio files folder
and then you can import that file or files into a new protools project.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:26 PM, "Christopher-Mark Gilland"
wrote:
> So, I just had my worst moment. I did a track, and oh, my, God! It
gear is just icing on the cake
if you can afford it. So don't let any of that discourage you keep learning Pro
TOols and understanding how things like eq and compressors and other plug ins
work and you will be well on your way.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jun 20, 2012, at
check ebay, u should still find dealers selling a boxed version of 9 with a
free upgrade to version 10. install 9 activate and download 10 so u don't loose
the liscense to it but hold off on installing it till you hear its ready.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jun 18, 2012,
You can try importing the the audio to the regions list or clips list and see
if you can follow the steps below to put it on the track u want.
Note someone posted this to the list sometime in the past, just passing along
the info here.
Below are the steps I found on the internet for drag and d
I believe i saw somewhere window eyes has a sonar plug in available in its app
central area. Don't know how well it works though. Garage band has gotten quite
useful for basict tracking and mixing needs as well. Just another options to
considr based on your workflow.
The Oreo Mo
You could always find a dealer on ebay willing to ship to the netherlands. Of
course you loos all Local Avid Support and warranty most likely. Check out the
Allen & Heath ZED R16. Not full control surface but its its a full on analog
mixer with 18x18 i/o via firewire and can do more with adat ad
not sure if this will hep but here is something chuck posted to the list
sometime ago about doing something like what you asked about. Hope it helps.
Elastic audio is usable! :)
Long explanation Read the PT manual! ;)
Short story!
Import a drum loop in to PT.
Click on the Elastic Audio Plug-in s
27;t understand
> there's a band width tab
> there's a bunch of boxes i can check and uncheck
> the drums recorded fine i was only doing a instrument track
>
> On May 26, 2012, at 11:56 AM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>
>> yeah once you select it on that drop down m
list on the tacks
again.
On May 26, 2012, at 11:46 AM, chad baker wrote:
> hi when i open playback engine it says fast track pro where's the drop down
> thanks
> On May 26, 2012, at 11:40 AM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>
>> did u go into playback engine under the setup menu
did u go into playback engine under the setup menu and change the playback
engine to your M-Audio Card?
On May 26, 2012, at 9:42 AM, baker420 wrote:
> hi i have a drum track recorded it sounds great
> now my friend came over to put a guitar track down
> but under in and out it don't show my fas
when in finder do command+comma to enter finder preferences. under the general
tab, make sure always open folders in new finder window or something like that
is unchecked.
On May 24, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
> I know this isn't particularly a PT question, but it is causing me to ha
if you want/are able to, post a link to a zip of the session and one of us can
try it and take a look at it.
On May 11, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Brian Howerton wrote:
> Hello all,
> I still cannot get protools to play back a session through my built-in mac
> sound card. The only thing I have checked
Rip the cd, then import it into Pro Tools. It will import into a stereo track.
Then record your intro. Select the audio track you just imported and do the
cut command. move the cursor to the end of you intro or about where you want
the music to start, and paste. Then select the intro of the m
Try setting the playback engine to your mac soundcard before opening the
project. Not sure why the settings reverted back not sure, but try resetting it
in system preferences again.
On May 10, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Brian Howerton wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Here's what I want to do. I am not hooked up t
for the export.
>
> HTH,
>
> Slau
>
> On May 9, 2012, at 7:49 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>
>> Earlier someone mentioned there was a way to export selected clips or
>> regions from a project with out doing a bounce. Could someone mention how to
>> do that
Earlier someone mentioned there was a way to export selected clips or regions
from a project with out doing a bounce. Could someone mention how to do that
again, it seems to have been accidentally deleted from my mail archives.
f I seem a little snappy, it's not you, believe me. It's jsut I
> don't know how to make this any simpler in explaination.
>
> If I'm going about this the wrong way, do tell. Don't imtimidate.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: &qu
Yeah once again, given everything you just said, especially the part about not
wanting to use stands, avoid condensor microphones for now.Personally i have a
few decent condensor mics and dynamic mics and to be honest after doing shoot
outs before tracking vocals, majority of the time we aall a
te where I want the insertion to be, and
> boom, but that's not exactly what I'm trying to do.
>
> I'm wanting to insert something which hasn't even yet been recorded. I guess
> almost like a punch in, but not exactly.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Me
wanting to insert something which hasn't even yet been recorded. I guess
> almost like a punch in, but not exactly.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "The Oreo Monster"
>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 6:59 AM
> Subject: Re: Two,
As for your second question, From the things you been saying you been doing
with ProTools, I think you should know how to do the second one. So here is a
challenge, Tell us how you think it could be or should be done, and We will
throw in suggestions/corrections if needed.
On May 8, 2012, at 10
I'll attempt to tackle the automation question here. Simplest, quick and dirty
way to do what you want to do. On the track you want to automate set it up
the way you want it to be when its not muted. in the mix window, go to that
track, find the automation mode pop up button and select write.
everb effects they offer for doing some backings.
>
> Again, I totally like, agree with you. Like totally! NOrmally, I'd not do
> it, but in this one case, I think it fits the mood of the track.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "The Oreo Monster
just out of curiosity which effect is this? But to answer your question.
Garage band uses AudioUnit as its plug in format, and ProTools uses RTAS. If
you can find a wrapper for audio Unit plug isn so they can be seen as an RTAS
plug in then its possible. Not sure if such a tool exist.i Know the
ard drive or a mac book pro
> because of heat and do you think a wind screen on the microphones will help
> on the background room noise? Nick Gawronski
>
> On 5/7/2012 5:20 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>> Which microphones do you currently have? Those sound like condensors
Which microphones do you currently have? Those sound like condensors but yet
you say they don't require phantom power.Personally i think every studio should
own a Behringer xm8500 or two. Yeah they may only be $20 but they are every bit
as good in build/sound quality as the shure SM58 they are
another mac or a pc? Nick Gawronski
>
> On 5/4/2012 10:28 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I believe SeroTek makes a product that should do what you want in an
>> accessible manner. not sure if it works on teh mac though. Check their site.
>> On Ma
Hello,
I believe SeroTek makes a product that should do what you want in an accessible
manner. not sure if it works on teh mac though. Check their site.
On May 4, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote:
> Hi, I am aware that it is more of a remote control application for usage with
> an i phon
i think the app Gord mentioned was pro control
- T.O.M
On May 2, 2012, at 4:13 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
> I dimly recall Gord having a tinker with it a month or so back. He put
> up a post saying it looked pretty usable from a brief inspection.
> Would definitely be interested in a more thorou
th times, nada, at least
>>>> nothing up front, even though the timings suggest that accessibility
>>>> work on GB would likely have already been underway to some extent when
>>>> my report was submitted. The only difference I can see here, is that
>>>&g
the track it says I don't have both my input and output selected.
> Thanks,
> Courtney
> On Apr 29, 2012, at 2:01 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>
>> on the track its saying that the internal mic isn't an option?
>> On the input pop up menu on the track you should be
I am not sure bombarding apple is the way to go either, or that it will Yield
any results. Apple is notorious for shifting resources around as needed, and
are also notorious for not responding to or saying anything about future
products untill the features are done and they are ready to make an
the headphones okay, but it still says I don't have an
> input set up, I'm trying to make the input my internal mic.
> Thanks,
> Courtney
> On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:30 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>
>> IF you don't have any other hardware audio interfaced connected
IF you don't have any other hardware audio interfaced connected then it should
be that way by default. However its in playback engine under the setup menu.
There you can select which soundcard you want ProTools to use.
- T.O.M
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Courtney Curran wrote:
> Hi,
> I have
head and a couple of essential pedals on a small
> board. Bit heavier to carry around and more expensive than a pod or
> similar, but I'm happy with my tone for the first time in quite a
> while and can't say I miss being baffled by menues. Worth the extra
> cost for the impro
Well a work around and back up plan, Record in Sonar, then wehn you are done
export all the tracks to wav, imprt in PT and set up the PT Session. Then you
will have aPT session to give them. Just saying since its all new it may be
good to keep a sonar session ready to go as a back up if the tim
Personally I kind of see that asa positive. Find the few tools that work well
and learn them inside out. No mucking about with 5 or 6 of one type of effect
to see which one works better when they all come fairly close. Yeah choice is
nice, but sometimes limitations free us up to get more done an
me to have a tinker with it.
>
> On 4/26/12, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>> Is the SamsAmp PSA1 included with sonar or is that an extra cost. I hear
>> people like tht one alot and keep forgetting to look for it.
>> - T.O.M
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Sc
ment has seemed to hault
> without any notice, but it of course is workable for the moment according to
> the educated few!!
>
> Just to balance this thread as much as possible!
>
> Brian.
>
> From: The Oreo Monster
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:53 PM
> To:
main daw for someone starting out quite yet, but again, that's an
> opinion.
>
> From: The Oreo Monster
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:44 PM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Pro tools or Sonar?
>
> Ditto to everything brian said. It really comes down to
As for control
>> serfases I use a Mackie onyx board, but may have to spring for at least a
>> 002 or 003 to get a little more flexability. Pro Tools was at first a back
>> up DAW that I was going to slowley learn to get my feet wet, but now I have
>> some client pros
Ditto to everything brian said. It really comes down to your needs and which
platform (windows/mac) you want to go with. Personally i prefered the JSonar
scripts as it relied on the fimiliar sonar interface i was already used to from
using sonar with a screen magnifier before my sight got to the
Actually if I am not mistaken, those are just standard keyboard commands.
Turning on keyboard focus allows you to do things with a single key that you
would normally have to press a couple keys to do. For example, paste would be
just "V" instead of "CMD+V" and so on. Btw, that was just an exampl
The waves stuff while not accessible, should be mappable and controlable from a
control surface. Whether or not the guitar plug in suite falls into this
category is unknown. Chuck on this list is a Big fan of the waves stuff and
probably the person to consult with. I honestly on guitars just be
Hey Guys,
Try the stuff from isotope, I haven't tried RX, which is there noise reduction
plug in but i hear good things about it and have luck with Ozone and some of
their other stuff on the Mac though. Not sure if its in your price range but
there is a 10 day demo available.Also I have heard o
Hello,
I am selling my mBox Pro 3rd Gen which is the current model avid makes. Also my
Tascam US2400 as i plan to replace them both with an interface/control surface
combo. Email if interested off list. In my experiences the US2400 control
surface worked fine in PT 10 and PT 9 but you do get
also if the effect is on a send, you can automate the send level to go from inf
to the value u want for that measure, then back to inf when you want it off.
- T.O.M
On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:06 PM, "Brian Casey" wrote:
> Hey Chris,
>
> You could use automation in the plugin to only bring up the de
Why not try these crazy ideas and see if they work and what you think. And let
us know how they sound or what you discover as well. In theory your idea
should work, it will also allow you to control the blend of auto tune to
unautotune vocals as well. How well this will sound and whether or n
ing
>
>> Would you happen to know what the through port is used for though?
>>
>> Chris.
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "The Oreo Monster"
>>
>> To:
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:45 PM
>> Subject: Re: A couple
ther is a stock chorus plug in under modulation under the fx list I have seen
midi equipment with an out/through port but never a separate out and through
port curious about that one myself now.
- T.O.M
On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:34 PM, "Christopher-Mark Gilland"
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a
tunes.com)
> (ericlambier.com)
> On 2012-04-19, at 7:56 AM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>
>> Since i was never much of MIDI user or had much MIDI gear i always just used
>> audio loops in one of the 3 main formats Acid loops, REX, or AppleLoops.
>> They are just wav file
Since i was never much of MIDI user or had much MIDI gear i always just used
audio loops in one of the 3 main formats Acid loops, REX, or AppleLoops. They
are just wav files with some extra embedded info that programs like PT, Sonar,
and may others can use to figure out lopping and tempo and etc
I can verify that in lion it does take a while to copy and past the entire
1000+ page document and paste it into text edit. However once you let it sit
for Ten minutes and do its thing, look under the format menu in text edit for
the make plain text opiton. that will strip out all the graphics
try another free pdf app called skim to do the same thing to copy it into text
edit. Also email me off list for a copy of pro tools 10 reference guide in RTF
- T.O.M
On Apr 18, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Nick Gawronski wrote:
> Hi, I have tried all of the steps for converting the pro tools manual into
drive is
> fantastic and the support first rate.
> Karen
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>
>> I currently am using a usb drive plugged into one of the usb ports on my
>> iMac. It's a 5900RPM Drive and surprisingly handles all my PT work just
>>
should be good to go with ProTools 9 or 10 then. Wont work with anything
earlier. How is that interface btw?
- T.O.M
On Apr 16, 2012, at 7:29 PM, "Christopher-Mark Gilland"
wrote:
> This is off topic for the list so will end the thread here, but yes, I will
> add you to skype. Be on the loo
so long as your audio interface/mixer/soundcard has core audio drivers for mac
or is core audio compliant, it should work with protools. Why not get the copy
that comes with the plug in if there is no additional cost?
- T.O.M
On Apr 16, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Nektarios Mallas wrote:
> Hello everyon
I currently am using a usb drive plugged into one of the usb ports on my iMac.
It's a 5900RPM Drive and surprisingly handles all my PT work just fine. I used
it as it was the only drive I had at the time but its worked well enough i
never did get around to buying a firewire drive. That being sai
did u ever get this resolved? Event menu, tempo event should get you on the
right track.
- T.O.M
On Apr 7, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Eric Lambier wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I've searched and searched and can't seem to figure out out to set the tempo
> via key commands for the tempo of a sesino. Sorry to bu
Based on what you said and revies and etc i have read, I'd go for the sound
devices and or apogee personal. The downside is the Apogee is mac only, but
that may not matter. Everyone who has heard anything apogee says there is some
magic mojo in there that just makes evertything that goes through
tely useless to us.
>
> Also, you keep mentioning PT 10. Remember, I'm not on PT 10. I have 9.0.5 M
> Powered.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "The Oreo Monster"
>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 7:43 PM
> Subject: Re: A
I believe PT comes with a free stripped down version of eleven, which is avid
own guitar amp modeler plug in. If not There is probably a trial out ther to
grab, or plug the the guitar into a distortion pedal then the interface. The
thrid cd is just a bunch of loops that you can just copy onto yo
If i Remember correctly, accessibility wasn't until version 8.04 and up right?
- T.O.M
On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote:
> 8 is indeed accessible. There are really no noticeable differences between 8
> and 9 for accessibility. However, the advantage that 9 offers is the ability
>
Good to know it works that way as well. Saves a few steps.
- T.O.M
On Apr 8, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote:
> Actually, just paste it into the address field and hit option return on there
> before even loading the page. Should work. If not, load the page first, then
> hit option return
rote:
> A, I'm on pt MP9, for two, I have a bad enough hearing loss that I don't
> always hear the clipping, chief.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message - From: "The Oreo Monster"
>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 12:29 AM
> Subject:
I am guessing you are running PT 10? Well I am and i noticed the same issue as
well. didn't till a few days ago while miing a song recorded a couple weekes
ago on a project started in PT9 where i know the meters were working. However
We finished the mix on friday, and you know how we got around
gt; thx,
> Ronald
>
>
> Op 7 apr. 2012, om 14:01 heeft The Oreo Monster het volgende geschreven:
>
>> copy the link and paste it into your web browser, worked in safari over here.
>> - T.O.M
>>
>> On Apr 7, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Ronald van Rhijn wrote:
>>
>
copy the link and paste it into your web browser, worked in safari over here.
- T.O.M
On Apr 7, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Ronald van Rhijn wrote:
> Hey Mike,
> Thanks for the second cc, but cannot download or even open the file. I am
> using the standard OSX Mail app. Is it just me having this trouble?
THe ones i recommended is the Tascam US122MKII or US144MKII. And yes the
control panel on these are at least accessible on the mac, but you would
probably never have to go in there.
- T.O.M
On Apr 6, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Brian Howerton wrote:
> What was the model again of this interface? Is the
either the tascam US122 or US144 could fit in alaptop bag. The uS144 is alittle
bigger/bulkier. They both have 2 mic/line inputs.
- T.O.M
On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:29 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote:
> Hi, If I buy an interface that I can travel with as my digi 003 is rather
> large what is the easiest wa
naccessible control panel for changing direct monitoring and such.
> Your t
> On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:47 AM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
>
>> My vote in this catogory is still the tascam US122 or US144, i believe both
>> are in the MKII iterations now. 2 mic inputs or line inputs, midi i
My vote in this catogory is still the tascam US122 or US144, i believe both are
in the MKII iterations now. 2 mic inputs or line inputs, midi in and out
headphones jack only minor gripe is the speaker outs are on rca jacks instead
of balanced quarter inch or xlr jacks, but theres ways around i
on I'm not coming up with anything rellavant.
>
> Chris.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: The Oreo Monster
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:51 PM
> Subject: Re: best method for reading pro tools 10 documentation the
> access
e between
>> sections of the manual. I guess one could then take that document and put
>> it on a talking book player to read it is there a way to export it as html
>> so you at least get the headings preserved? Nick Gawronski
>>
>> On 4/1/2012 9:42 PM, The Oreo M
did u try the method suggested here of copying and pasting the text into text
edit?
- T.O.M
On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Nick Gawronski wrote:
> Hi, When trying to read the intro to pro tools document as well as all of the
> other manuals and start preview I hit voiceover and a and get chopt of
Voice over getting started guide and help are your friends go through them.
Also, stop using your pc for atleast a few days. The mac is a different world
and you need some time to adjust or it will take alot longer I have found.
- T.O.M
On Apr 1, 2012, at 5:13 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrote:
> Your
Yes, they do get installed in the DegiDesign or Avid folder in applications.
They are in a sub folder called documents. A google search for pro tools 9
reference guide or pro tools 10 reference guide should take you right to it on
avids site. Not sure about the gettings started guides availabili
arrow keys are for setting start and end point for a selection on the fly.
- T.O.M
On Mar 30, 2012, at 6:54 AM, Chris Norman wrote:
> From what I understand, markers are for saving spots in your project,
> whereas arrow keys are for marking regions for editing.
>
> You can change to SMTPE time
Hold on a sec, I think you misunderstood. I bought a box version of 9. When i
bought the macs with lion,i installed from the dvd, then installed 9.05 update
that i downloaded for the site. I did not at any time get a full download of
9.05 as i bought the boxed copy. So i didm have access to the
90 matches
Mail list logo
