Hello,
You can also try going to the events menu and tempo and constant tempo, you
see it does the same thing there. Infact you will notice it does the same in
all edit fields in all of the different event dialog boxes.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:01 PM
If memory serves correct those very same apple docs linked to were used to get
us the accessibility we have to day during the initial work.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2012, at 7:26 PM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:
Its not really a case of them
do you set a tempo for any of your projects or do any recording hat requires
you to change settings at the start of each project?
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 14, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com wrote:
Hi, I use pro tools 10.1 on mountain lion
it may also only be in the software mixer for the MBox, which isn't accessible.
U would find this in system preferences by clicking on the MBox iCon there.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Aug 6, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have no idea
led me to believe.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Christopher-Mark gilland clgillan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unfortunately, Kevin, no, I do not have Bookshare.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess
side, and once you feell confident about
that with your current gear work on the mixing side a bit.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK, I did mark this message with low importance, however it would
It still tells you its an edit field, it just doesnt read the values in the
edit field where it used to
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jul 25, 2012, at 10:17 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
So, then, how do you know if it actually was an edit field
if memory serves correct edit fields werent reading wit pt 10 on ml. like if
you go into the tempo dialog box it wouldn't read any of the edit fields. You
could make changes and they would stick, but it wouldn't read the edit field.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jul 25, 2012
:
OK. How do I split a stereo track into two monos?
Chris.
- Original Message - From: The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: Balancing channels
There is no way to match the gain knob other
the audio files folder
and then you can import that file or files into a new protools project.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland
clgillan...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I just had my worst moment. I did a track, and oh, my, God
check ebay, u should still find dealers selling a boxed version of 9 with a
free upgrade to version 10. install 9 activate and download 10 so u don't loose
the liscense to it but hold off on installing it till you hear its ready.
The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9
You can try importing the the audio to the regions list or clips list and see
if you can follow the steps below to put it on the track u want.
Note someone posted this to the list sometime in the past, just passing along
the info here.
Below are the steps I found on the internet for drag and
You could always find a dealer on ebay willing to ship to the netherlands. Of
course you loos all Local Avid Support and warranty most likely. Check out the
Allen Heath ZED R16. Not full control surface but its its a full on analog
mixer with 18x18 i/o via firewire and can do more with adat
not sure if this will hep but here is something chuck posted to the list
sometime ago about doing something like what you asked about. Hope it helps.
Elastic audio is usable! :)
Long explanation Read the PT manual! ;)
Short story!
Import a drum loop in to PT.
Click on the Elastic Audio Plug-in
did u go into playback engine under the setup menu and change the playback
engine to your M-Audio Card?
On May 26, 2012, at 9:42 AM, baker420 baker3...@gmail.com wrote:
hi i have a drum track recorded it sounds great
now my friend came over to put a guitar track down
but under in and out it
list on the tacks
again.
On May 26, 2012, at 11:46 AM, chad baker baker3...@gmail.com wrote:
hi when i open playback engine it says fast track pro where's the drop down
thanks
On May 26, 2012, at 11:40 AM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
did u go into playback engine under the setup menu and change
when in finder do command+comma to enter finder preferences. under the general
tab, make sure always open folders in new finder window or something like that
is unchecked.
On May 24, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Jon Solitro soli...@msu.edu wrote:
I know this isn't particularly a PT question, but it is
if you want/are able to, post a link to a zip of the session and one of us can
try it and take a look at it.
On May 11, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Brian Howerton bshowert...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I still cannot get protools to play back a session through my built-in mac
sound card. The only
for the export.
HTH,
Slau
On May 9, 2012, at 7:49 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
Earlier someone mentioned there was a way to export selected clips or
regions from a project with out doing a bounce. Could someone mention how to
do that again, it seems to have been accidentally deleted from my mail
Try setting the playback engine to your mac soundcard before opening the
project. Not sure why the settings reverted back not sure, but try resetting it
in system preferences again.
On May 10, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Brian Howerton bshowert...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Here's what I want to do.
Rip the cd, then import it into Pro Tools. It will import into a stereo track.
Then record your intro. Select the audio track you just imported and do the
cut command. move the cursor to the end of you intro or about where you want
the music to start, and paste. Then select the intro of the
As for your second question, From the things you been saying you been doing
with ProTools, I think you should know how to do the second one. So here is a
challenge, Tell us how you think it could be or should be done, and We will
throw in suggestions/corrections if needed.
On May 8, 2012, at
been recorded. I guess
almost like a punch in, but not exactly.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: Two, more intermediate tasks
As for your second
to be, and
boom, but that's not exactly what I'm trying to do.
I'm wanting to insert something which hasn't even yet been recorded. I guess
almost like a punch in, but not exactly.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess
Yeah once again, given everything you just said, especially the part about not
wanting to use stands, avoid condensor microphones for now.Personally i have a
few decent condensor mics and dynamic mics and to be honest after doing shoot
outs before tracking vocals, majority of the time we aall
this any simpler in explaination.
If I'm going about this the wrong way, do tell. Don't imtimidate.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: Two, more intermediate
Earlier someone mentioned there was a way to export selected clips or regions
from a project with out doing a bounce. Could someone mention how to do that
again, it seems to have been accidentally deleted from my mail archives.
just out of curiosity which effect is this? But to answer your question.
Garage band uses AudioUnit as its plug in format, and ProTools uses RTAS. If
you can find a wrapper for audio Unit plug isn so they can be seen as an RTAS
plug in then its possible. Not sure if such a tool exist.i Know
of the reverb effects they offer for doing some backings.
Again, I totally like, agree with you. Like totally! NOrmally, I'd not do
it, but in this one case, I think it fits the mood of the track.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
Which microphones do you currently have? Those sound like condensors but yet
you say they don't require phantom power.Personally i think every studio should
own a Behringer xm8500 or two. Yeah they may only be $20 but they are every bit
as good in build/sound quality as the shure SM58 they
of heat and do you think a wind screen on the microphones will help
on the background room noise? Nick Gawronski
On 5/7/2012 5:20 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
Which microphones do you currently have? Those sound like condensors but
yet you say they don't require phantom power.Personally i think
another mac or a pc? Nick Gawronski
On 5/4/2012 10:28 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
Hello,
I believe SeroTek makes a product that should do what you want in an
accessible manner. not sure if it works on teh mac though. Check their site.
On May 4, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Nick Gawronskin
i think the app Gord mentioned was pro control
- T.O.M
On May 2, 2012, at 4:13 AM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo...@gmail.com wrote:
I dimly recall Gord having a tinker with it a month or so back. He put
up a post saying it looked pretty usable from a brief inspection.
Would definitely be
enable
the track it says I don't have both my input and output selected.
Thanks,
Courtney
On Apr 29, 2012, at 2:01 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
on the track its saying that the internal mic isn't an option?
On the input pop up menu on the track you should be able to choose
a faeture that wouldn't necessarily have to be added
quietly. I think that's a big difference, but that's only a how the
world ought to work opinion from one chap who really doesn't have the
time to do much other than expound it.
Scott
On 4/30/12, The Oreo Monster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
I am not sure bombarding apple is the way to go either, or that it will Yield
any results. Apple is notorious for shifting resources around as needed, and
are also notorious for not responding to or saying anything about future
products untill the features are done and they are ready to make
to the headphones okay, but it still says I don't have an
input set up, I'm trying to make the input my internal mic.
Thanks,
Courtney
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:30 PM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
IF you don't have any other hardware audio interfaced connected then it
should be that way
time to have a tinker with it.
On 4/26/12, The Oreo Monster monkeypushe...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the SamsAmp PSA1 included with sonar or is that an extra cost. I hear
people like tht one alot and keep forgetting to look for it.
- T.O.M
On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Scott Chesworth scottcheswo
Personally I kind of see that asa positive. Find the few tools that work well
and learn them inside out. No mucking about with 5 or 6 of one type of effect
to see which one works better when they all come fairly close. Yeah choice is
nice, but sometimes limitations free us up to get more done
Well a work around and back up plan, Record in Sonar, then wehn you are done
export all the tracks to wav, imprt in PT and set up the PT Session. Then you
will have aPT session to give them. Just saying since its all new it may be
good to keep a sonar session ready to go as a back up if the
Hey Guys,
Try the stuff from isotope, I haven't tried RX, which is there noise reduction
plug in but i hear good things about it and have luck with Ozone and some of
their other stuff on the Mac though. Not sure if its in your price range but
there is a 10 day demo available.Also I have heard
The waves stuff while not accessible, should be mappable and controlable from a
control surface. Whether or not the guitar plug in suite falls into this
category is unknown. Chuck on this list is a Big fan of the waves stuff and
probably the person to consult with. I honestly on guitars just
Ditto to everything brian said. It really comes down to your needs and which
platform (windows/mac) you want to go with. Personally i prefered the JSonar
scripts as it relied on the fimiliar sonar interface i was already used to from
using sonar with a screen magnifier before my sight got to
has seemed to hault
without any notice, but it of course is workable for the moment according to
the educated few!!
Just to balance this thread as much as possible!
Brian.
From: The Oreo Monster
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:53 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pro
Hello,
I am selling my mBox Pro 3rd Gen which is the current model avid makes. Also my
Tascam US2400 as i plan to replace them both with an interface/control surface
combo. Email if interested off list. In my experiences the US2400 control
surface worked fine in PT 10 and PT 9 but you do get
also if the effect is on a send, you can automate the send level to go from inf
to the value u want for that measure, then back to inf when you want it off.
- T.O.M
On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Brian Casey brian_w_ca...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hey Chris,
You could use automation in the plugin to
-04-19, at 7:56 AM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
Since i was never much of MIDI user or had much MIDI gear i always just used
audio loops in one of the 3 main formats Acid loops, REX, or AppleLoops.
They are just wav files with some extra embedded info that programs like PT,
Sonar, and may others
to know what the through port is used for though?
Chris.
- Original Message - From: The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: A couple of questions about instrumental music Arranging
ther
Why not try these crazy ideas and see if they work and what you think. And let
us know how they sound or what you discover as well. In theory your idea
should work, it will also allow you to control the blend of auto tune to
unautotune vocals as well. How well this will sound and whether or
try another free pdf app called skim to do the same thing to copy it into text
edit. Also email me off list for a copy of pro tools 10 reference guide in RTF
- T.O.M
On Apr 18, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com wrote:
Hi, I have tried all of the steps for converting the
I can verify that in lion it does take a while to copy and past the entire
1000+ page document and paste it into text edit. However once you let it sit
for Ten minutes and do its thing, look under the format menu in text edit for
the make plain text opiton. that will strip out all the
I currently am using a usb drive plugged into one of the usb ports on my iMac.
It's a 5900RPM Drive and surprisingly handles all my PT work just fine. I used
it as it was the only drive I had at the time but its worked well enough i
never did get around to buying a firewire drive. That being
so long as your audio interface/mixer/soundcard has core audio drivers for mac
or is core audio compliant, it should work with protools. Why not get the copy
that comes with the plug in if there is no additional cost?
- T.O.M
On Apr 16, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Nektarios Mallas nmal...@gmail.com
should be good to go with ProTools 9 or 10 then. Wont work with anything
earlier. How is that interface btw?
- T.O.M
On Apr 16, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is off topic for the list so will end the thread here, but yes, I will
add you to
, the drive is
fantastic and the support first rate.
Karen
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, The Oreo Monster wrote:
I currently am using a usb drive plugged into one of the usb ports on my
iMac. It's a 5900RPM Drive and surprisingly handles all my PT work just
fine. I used it as it was the only drive
did u ever get this resolved? Event menu, tempo event should get you on the
right track.
- T.O.M
On Apr 7, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Eric Lambier elamb...@rogers.com wrote:
Hey all
I've searched and searched and can't seem to figure out out to set the tempo
via key commands for the tempo of a
If i Remember correctly, accessibility wasn't until version 8.04 and up right?
- T.O.M
On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com wrote:
8 is indeed accessible. There are really no noticeable differences between 8
and 9 for accessibility. However, the advantage that 9 offers
.
Also, you keep mentioning PT 10. Remember, I'm not on PT 10. I have 9.0.5 M
Powered.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: A few questions about arranging
on pt MP9, for two, I have a bad enough hearing loss that I don't
always hear the clipping, chief.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: The Oreo Monster
monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: No use
I am
Good to know it works that way as well. Saves a few steps.
- T.O.M
On Apr 8, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, just paste it into the address field and hit option return on there
before even loading the page. Should work. If not, load the page first, then
copy the link and paste it into your web browser, worked in safari over here.
- T.O.M
On Apr 7, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Ronald van Rhijn pa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hey Mike,
Thanks for the second cc, but cannot download or even open the file. I am
using the standard OSX Mail app. Is it just me having
,
Ronald
Op 7 apr. 2012, om 14:01 heeft The Oreo Monster het volgende geschreven:
copy the link and paste it into your web browser, worked in safari over here.
- T.O.M
On Apr 7, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Ronald van Rhijn pa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hey Mike,
Thanks for the second cc, but cannot
THe ones i recommended is the Tascam US122MKII or US144MKII. And yes the
control panel on these are at least accessible on the mac, but you would
probably never have to go in there.
- T.O.M
On Apr 6, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Brian Howerton bshowert...@gmail.com wrote:
What was the model again of
My vote in this catogory is still the tascam US122 or US144, i believe both are
in the MKII iterations now. 2 mic inputs or line inputs, midi in and out
headphones jack only minor gripe is the speaker outs are on rca jacks instead
of balanced quarter inch or xlr jacks, but theres ways around
panel for changing direct monitoring and such.
Your t
On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:47 AM, The Oreo Monster wrote:
My vote in this catogory is still the tascam US122 or US144, i believe both
are in the MKII iterations now. 2 mic inputs or line inputs, midi in and
out headphones jack only minor
either the tascam US122 or US144 could fit in alaptop bag. The uS144 is alittle
bigger/bulkier. They both have 2 mic/line inputs.
- T.O.M
On Apr 5, 2012, at 9:29 PM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com wrote:
Hi, If I buy an interface that I can travel with as my digi 003 is rather
large
odd
reason I'm not coming up with anything rellavant.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: The Oreo Monster
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: best method for reading pro tools 10 documentation the
accessible way with voiceover
Voice over getting started guide and help are your friends go through them.
Also, stop using your pc for atleast a few days. The mac is a different world
and you need some time to adjust or it will take alot longer I have found.
- T.O.M
On Apr 1, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Poppa Bear
did u try the method suggested here of copying and pasting the text into text
edit?
- T.O.M
On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com wrote:
Hi, When trying to read the intro to pro tools document as well as all of the
other manuals and start preview I hit voiceover
Yes, they do get installed in the DegiDesign or Avid folder in applications.
They are in a sub folder called documents. A google search for pro tools 9
reference guide or pro tools 10 reference guide should take you right to it on
avids site. Not sure about the gettings started guides
70 matches
Mail list logo
