I apologize for not being able to attend today. I got tied up on
other tasks.
Once quick note re: the minutes - I've been working closely with
Daniel Rubin to integrate the neuroanatomical branches of our BIRN
ontology (BIRNLex) with RadLex. Daniel - in addition to his other
hats - is o
eed the right answers; to get ahead you need the
right questions
---John Browning and Spencer Reiss, Wired 6.04.95
-Original Message-
From: kei cheung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:41 AM
To: Kashyap, Vipul
Cc: William Bug; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
&l
-semweb-lifesci@w3.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [BIONT]
Teleconference on Tuesday, 5th September 2006
Helen,
Thanks for bringing
these issues up:
I have one
observation on expressing ontology in UML notation.
As we know that UML and
ontology language in
*/So at this stage, we are not committing to any UML semantics, we are
just using it for the visualization facilities./*
*/I would be happy to switch to another OWL-based tool which offers the
visualization capabilities offered by Visio… Any suggestions?/*
Vipul,
if you are interested in a
10:03 AM
To
"William Bug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: [BIONT] Teleconference on Tuesday,
5th September 2006
For the time being, I have
uploaded the JPEG and GIF versions of the Ontology in UML.
---Vipul
From: William Bug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
taff&stAb=vikTo keep up you need the right answers; to get ahead you need the right questions---John Browning and Spencer Reiss, Wired 6.04.95 -Original Message-From: kei cheung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:41 AMTo: Kashyap, VipulCc: William Bug; public
liam Bug"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: [BIONT] Teleconference on Tuesday, 5th
September 2006
For the time being, I have uploa
nal Message-
> From: kei cheung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:41 AM
> To: Kashyap, Vipul
> Cc: William Bug; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [BIONT] Teleconference on Tuesday, 5th September 2006
>
> Hi Vipul, Bill et al.,
>
> Tha
uesday, September 05, 2006 12:01 AM
*To:* Kashyap, Vipul
*Cc:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
*Subject:* Re: [BIONT] Teleconference on Tuesday, 5th September 2006
Many thanks, Vipul.
I think this is a nice, concrete start and will certainly provide a
solid foundation for discussion as we move f
For the time being, I have uploaded the JPEG
and GIF versions of the Ontology in UML.
---Vipul
From: William Bug
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006
12:01 AM
To: Kashyap, Vipul
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: [BIONT]
Teleconference
sted.
Thank you for producing a great start
Vipul!
Don
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of William Bug
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006
12:01 AM
To: Kashyap, Vipul
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: [BIONT]
Teleconferenc
Many thanks, Vipul.I think this is a nice, concrete start and will certainly provide a solid foundation for discussion as we move forward - as will the Design Issues page you've created.If it's OK, I'd like to make a small request re: the UML file. I see MS has created an XMI export feature for Vi
/HCLS/ParkinsonUseCase From: William Bug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:28 AMTo: Kashyap, VipulCc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.orgSubject: Re: [BIONT] Teleconference 22nd August, 2006 - All times are US Eastern! Hi Vipul, I've finally filled out my agenda item a bit. Unfort
>>just a small datapoint to what you say. Although I essentially agree,
we
>>should not forget that even OWL-Lite requires a Description Logic
>>reasoning engine (if one wants to use reasoning, that is).
>
>I also think we should consider a recommended practice of using OWL
Lite or
>DL where possi
n order to get the
expected results.
jb
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthias Samwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: [BIONT] Teleconference 22nd August, 2006 - All times ar
t 22, 2006 8:28 AMTo: Kashyap, VipulCc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.orgSubject: Re: [BIONT] Teleconference 22nd August, 2006 - All times are US Eastern! Hi Vipul, I've finally filled out my agenda item a bit. Unfortunately, I had a very difficult time trying to figure out where the relevant prior work
Bill,
The wiki URL was on the agenda page.
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ParkinsonUseCase
From: William Bug
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006
8:28 AM
To: Kashyap,
Vipul
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: [BIONT]
Teleconference 22nd
Hi Vipul,I've finally filled out my agenda item a bit. Unfortunately, I had a very difficult time trying to figure out where the relevant prior work was on the Wiki. I think I found the important Use Cases - Don & Kei's work on the NeuronDB to CocoDat connection along with the Parkinson's Use Cas
Matthias,
I am glad you are raising these issues.
We need to broaden the F2F task to RDF(S) vs XML(S) vs OWL
In the meanwhile, is it possible for you to post use cases to the Ontology Task
Force wiki, that in your experience, illustrates the issues below?
Regards,
---Vipul
> I wonder what it
Matthias,
just a small datapoint to what you say. Although I essentially agree, we
should not forget that even OWL-Lite requires a Description Logic
reasoning engine (if one wants to use reasoning, that is). For many,
even OWL Lite is too complicated for that. On the other hand, making a
simple (i
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:08:36 -0400, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
> Discuss tasks for discussion at F2F in Amsterdam. Some examples
> are: 1. OWL vs RDF (John Barkley?)
I wonder what it is that makes people choose between RDFS or OWL. It seems that
people seem to think that RDFS is of better use for mo
Vipul
Time - BDT comes out as Bangladeshi time when I check the official
time zone web site. That doesn't seem plausible.
Did you mean British Summer Time (BST)?
Regards
Alan
On 20 Aug 2006, at 02:31, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
Phone: +1 617 761 6200, conference 24668 ("BIONT")
IRC: irc://
Hi Vipul,
For ontology mapping, I can try to talk about the two mapping examples
between NeuronDB and CoCoDat.
Cheers,
-Kei
Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
Phone: +1 617 761 6200, conference 24668 ("BIONT")
IRC: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hcls
Browser-based IRC client: http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
I put some slides together for this morning's discussion:
http://hissa.nist.gov/jb/neuro-db-integration-model/jb-strawman-model-biont-telecon-6-6-06.pdf
jb
- Original Message -
From: "Kashyap, Vipul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: [BIONT] Telecon
: Sunday, April 30, 2006 10:25
AM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: RE: [BIONT]
Teleconference Tuesday and Agenda:
Are the BIONT meeting minutes being posted
somewhere? March 14 was the last meeting posted to the BIONT Telcon page (http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/Telcons
Are the BIONT meeting minutes being posted
somewhere? March 14 was the last meeting posted to the BIONT Telcon page (http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/Telcons).
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kashyap, Vipul
> Discuss Alan Ruttenberg’s use cases for BIORDF and identify
relevant artifacts (thesauri, ontologies, mappings,
> etc.).
Which use case you meant? Or did I miss something?
[VK] The use cases I meant were created by Alan Ruttenberg
and are available at the following locat
-Vipul,
> Discuss Alan Ruttenberg’s use cases for
BIORDF and identify relevant artifacts (thesauri, ontologies, mappings,
>
etc.).
Which use case you meant? Or did I miss
something?
> Brainstorm pragmatic and
engineering definitions of ontologies in the context of the use cases
28 matches
Mail list logo
