Re: API common subset

On 1/23/15 5:11 AM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote: Hi all, I intend to implement the element in gecko and as part of my research I put up a wiki page that summarize the browser-api or API that has been implemented by vendors here: https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/BrowserAPI/Common_Subset I wond

FYI: Change in my affiliation

[ Bcc public-pointer-events ] FYI, as of January 20, I am no longer an employee (or affiliated with) Nokia. I have been re-appointed as a co-Chair of WebApps (and Chair of Pointer Events WG) under an Invited Expert status. I will continue to chair as a "volunteer" as I seek a new employer to

[admin] Important: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015*

All Editors and Active contributors - I would greatly appreciate it if you would please reply to this poll. If you do not intend to attend the meeting `live` regardless of its location, please reply with "No" to both locations and state in the comments something like "will not attend".

CfC: publish Wide Review Draft of Manifest for web application; deadline Feb 5

Marcos is working toward a Candidate Recommendation of "Manifest for web application" and before that step, we need to publish a Working Draft for "Wide Review" [WR] (a WR Draft is equivalent to a "Last Call" draft as defined in the consortium's 2005 Process). As such, this is a Call for Consen

Re: [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404

On 2/2/15 7:14 AM, Tobie Langel wrote: Hi, Heads-up that the link to the Editor's Draft of the IndexedDB spec is now a 404. Thanks for reporting this Tobie. I've asked Joshua and Mike Smith to address this problem. Not sure whether that is on purpose or an accident. This is a side effec

Toward more productive f2f meetings [Was:Re: Feedback needed for April 2015 face-to-face location by *January 27, 2015*]

On 1/20/15 5:38 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: We are fortunate enough to have two proposed locations for the HTML and Web Applications face-to-face meeting in the week of April 13-17, 2015. Your feedback will help us picking the location. 1. Redmond, WA, USA (Hosted by Microsoft): 2. Zaragoza,

PSA: publishing new WD of Service Workers on February 5

The Service Workers editors - which now includes Jake Archibald (thanks Jake!) - would like to publish a new WD of Service Workers and the proposed publication date is February 5: If anyone has an

Re: Are web components *seriously* not namespaced?

On 2/4/15 4:41 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote The proposed solution is using registries: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24578 Thanks Dimitri. Glen - FYI, I added a link to the thread you started to the above bug (and embellished the bug's title a bit to reflect this thread). The

Mail list Etiquette [Was: Re: Shadow tree style isolation primitive]

[ Apologies for cross-posting ] On 2/4/15 6:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: That sounds rather demeaning and insulting [1]. public-webapps, or a mailing list of any W3C working group, isn't an appropriate forum to rant. Given this thread resulted in some "heated" replies, I'd like to remind everyo

Violation of mail list policy [Was: Fwd: Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest]

Michaela, Some of the language you used in [1] is offensive. Per the group's mail list etiquette policy ([2]), please do not use such language on WebApps' mail lists. -Regards, AB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JanMar/0538.html [2] https://www.w3.org/2008/webapp

Staying on topic [Was: Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest]

On 2/10/15 3:43 PM, Michaela Merz wrote: The web-developers are the people who have to use the available browser technologies to provide what users want. And often we can't oblige because - well, browsers don't implement it for whatever reason. Michaela - this list is for technical discussions

Standards wonks and developers working together [Was: Re: do not deprecate synchronous XMLHttpRequest]

On 2/10/15 3:51 PM, Marc Fawzi wrote: I wish there was an app like Hacker News where browser vendors via W3C, TAG, webapps etc engage users and developers in discussions and use up/down votes to tell what matters most to users and developers. I like this idea. I think this is one of the reason

IETF seeking feedback on proposed "Token Binding" Working Group

[ public-webapps should have been included but was not ] Forwarded Message Subject:IETF seeking feedback on proposed "Token Binding" Working Group Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 07:00:35 -0500 From: Arthur Barstow Reply-To: unbeara...@ietf.org CC: Steph

RfC: Manifest for web application; review deadline March 5

[ Bcc: public-webappsec, www-style, public-privacy, public-sysapps, public-digipub-ig, public-pfwg, public-web-mobile, www-international, chairs^1, public-review-announce; Reply-to: public-webapps ] This is a Request for Comments (RfC) for WebApp's "Manifest for web application" specification:

Re: Web Components F2F in April 2015

[ - the easily recognizable p-webapps subscribers ] On 2/18/15 12:50 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: Following Art's suggestion [1], I propose a Web Components-specific F2F with with the primary goal of reaching consensus on the Shadow DOM contentious bits [2]. When: Friday, April 24, 2015 Where:

Staying on Topic [Was: Re: WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept]

On 2/19/15 9:35 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: Hi Anders, In the spirit of restricting postings on this list to the group's chartered scope ... I don't see a clear and direct connection between your posting [1] and WebApps' chartered scope [2]. If I missed such a connection, please focus your r

Re: Staying on Topic [Was: Re: WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept]

On 2/19/15 9:57 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: Where are you supposed to propose new APIs? Can such proposal be made by non-W3C members? This was a proposal for using Chrome Native Messaging as the foundation for a new standard. Perhaps you should pursue the Community Group process

Re: CORS explained simply

On 2/19/15 4:28 PM, henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote: Hi, I find that understanding CORS is a really not easy. It seems that what is missing is an general overview document, that would start by explaining why the simplest possible method won't work, in order to help the user understand then why

[admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10

The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at Google's Mount View CA office is now open: The meeting/agenda page is: . Please register by April 1

FYI: IETF Token Binding Working Group formed (tokbind)

FYI (the IETF formally started the Token Binding Working Group). Forwarded Message Subject: WG Action: Formed Token Binding (tokbind) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:13:05 -0700 From: The IESG Reply-To: i...@ietf.org To: IETF-Announce CC: tokbind WG A new IETF working group has be

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14

rect to <http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-uievents-20150317/>. -Regards, ArtB [1] <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2014OctDec/0039.html> On 11/7/14 10:28 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: During WebApps' October 27 meeting, the participants agreed to stop work on the UI

CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

As previously mentioned on [p-w], the test results for Web Messaging [All] indicate significant interoperability with only two tests that have less than two passes [<2]. The two tests, including a short analysis of the failure, are: 1.

Re: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"

On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote: is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we track and discuss issues). if so, i see no real difference between using github or bugzilla – our process is desi

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: 2.<http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html>; this test failure (which passes on IE) is considered an implementation bug (MessageChannel and MessagePort are supposed to be e

Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

On 3/24/15 3:52 PM, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv: On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: 2.<http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html>; this test failure (which passes on

Re: I18N comments on "Manifest for Web applications"

On 3/24/15 3:07 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 3/24/15 10:21 AM, Richard Ishida wrote: is it possible to send mail to www-internatio...@w3.org each time someone adds somethign to the github issue? (this is the list where we track and discuss issues). if so, i see no real difference between

[websockets] Test results available

Earlier today I ran the Web Sockets tests on Chrome 41, Chrome/Canary 43, FF Nightly 39, IE 11, and Opera 12 and pushed the results to the test-results repo: * All results * <2 passes

Re: [websockets] Test results available

On 3/26/15 1:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 3/26/15 10:51 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: * All results <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/websockets/all.html> * <2 passes <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/websockets/less-than-2.html> Overall these results are pretty good: 97% o

PSA: publishing new WD of Quota Management API on April 9

Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of Quota Management API is planned for April 9 using the following version as the basis: If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. Note this spec is now using Github

Reminder: [admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10

On 2/24/15 3:37 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at Google's Mount View CA office is now open: <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/webcomponents-042015/> The meeting/agenda page is: <https://www.w3.or

PSA: publishing new WD of Input Method Editor (IME) API on April 9

Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of IME API is planned for April 9 using the following version as the basis: If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. A few notes about this spec: * Travis is now the sole Editor of th

PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14

Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of Gamepad is planned for April 14 using the following version as the basis: If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. A few notes about this spec: * This spec is now u

[gamepad] UA applied mapping cannot be escaped [Was: Re: PSA: publishing new WD of Gamepad on April 14]

On 4/9/15 8:28 AM, Florian Bösch wrote: If my reading is correct, there is no provision to escape a mapping that the UA would apply? I've observed in the past that the mappings can go quite awry. Would it be possible to offer a way toggle off mapping on a gamepad? Hi Florian - I was about to

Re: WebIDL Plans

On 4/12/15 2:44 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: We are planning to move WebIDL forward to REC, here is the plan to achieve that: Who is "we"? Apparently this wasn't even discussed with the editors. I consider Yves' posting [1] as a followup to

PSA: Seeking feedback on W3C's "Modern Tooling" project

[Bcc public-openw3c ] Hi All, In case you missed it, last February, Robin, Philippe and others (see [1] for a list of contributors) started a project to "capture the state of the discussion about modernising the tooling that supports the making of W3C standards". The working document is

RfC: LCWD of Media Capture and Streams; deadline May 15

Hi All, WebApps has been asked to review and submit comments for the April 14 Last Call Working Draft of WebRT and DAP's Media Capture and Streams spec: WebApps is specifically mentioned re "the overall usage of Web IDL and the de

PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of File API is planned for April 21 using the following version as the basis: If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. A few notes about this spec: * This spec is now using Github <

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

On 4/15/15 10:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: * This spec is now using Github <https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/> That repo is actually <https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/>.

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

On 4/15/15 3:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: * This spec is now using Github <https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/> and the ED is <https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/Overview.html>. PRs are welcome and encouraged. (I think it would be us

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

On 4/15/15 3:54 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: On 15 April 2015 at 07:26, Arthur Barstow wrote: * This spec is now using Github <https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/> That repo is actually <https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/>. Since the most obvious github.io link is currently broken, w

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of File API on April 21

On 4/15/15 5:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: <https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/TR.html> Note that this version appears to be based off the file in the CVS repo, which hasn't been touched in 5 years. The file is much more recent

PSA: publishing new WD of Clipboard APIs and events on April 21

Hi All, A new Working Draft publication of Clipboard APIs and events is planned for April 21 using the following version as the basis: If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away. A few notes about this spec: * This s

[admin] Updating our /TR stylesheets

Below is an announcement about a project "to provide a modern design to future technical reports published by the W3C" i.e. updating the stylessheet used for Technical Report . If you have any feedback, please use

Re: [admin] Registration for April 24 2015 Web Components f2f meeting; deadline April 10

On 2/24/15 3:37 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at Google's Mount View CA office is now open: <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/webcomponents-042015/> The meeting/agenda page is: <https://www.w3.or

PSA: publishing new WD of UI Events and D3E Keyboard specs April 28/30

Thanks to Xiaoqian, the UI Events and the two D3E Keyboard Events code/key Values specs have been moved to Github and we plan to publish them next week using the following Draft WDs as the basis: https://w3c.github.io/uievents/TR.html https://w3c.github.io/DOM-Level-3-Events-code/TR.html https:

Re: PSA: publishing new WD of UI Events and D3E Keyboard specs April 28/30

On 4/24/15 11:33 AM, Gary Kacmarcik (Кошмарчик) wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Arthur Barstow <mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com>> wrote: * The permissions of the specs' now obsolete Github repository will be set to read-only. s/Github/Mercurial/ ? Duh; what Gary said ;-).

Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting

On 4/25/15 8:45 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: * cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: http://www.w3.org/2015/04/25-webapps-minutes.html See . That contains just a few lines. Looks like the decade-old UTC day change bug is still plaguing the minutes gen

Re: Minutes of Shadow DOM meeting

On 4/25/15 8:45 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: * cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: We'll post a summary - there is most of one at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hnCoaJTXkfSSHD5spISJ76nqbDcOVNMamgByiz3QWLA/edit?pli=1#gid=0 Perhaps a document in some kind of open format would be a better medium

PSA: publishing new WD of Push API on April 30

This is an announcement of the intent to publish a new WD of Push API on April 30 using the following document as the basis: (The sequence diagram is not found when the above document is loaded but the diagram will be available in the WD versi

[selectors-api] How to mark TR version as obsolete/superseded? [Was: Re: Obsolete Document]

On 3/26/15 8:30 AM, Gulfaraz Yasin wrote: Hi It has come to my notice that the following document http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api/#resolving-namespaces is obsolete. Hi Gulfaraz, Thanks for your e-mail and sorry for the slow reply. I was directed to it's page from one of StackOverflow's

Re: Web Storage Rec errata?

On 4/21/15 5:39 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: Hi, Is there a plan to publish an errata to sync the Web Storage Rec [1] with the latest? I counted 8 commits cherry picked into the Editor's Draft since Rec [2]. If no errata publication is planned, I'd expect the Rec to clearly indicate its statu

PSA: Martin Thomson joins Push API Editor team

Hi All, We are pleased to announce Mozilla's Martin Thomson has agreed to be a co-Editor of the Push API spec . Eduardo and Bryan are no longer able to continue as active editors and we thank them for their past contributions and we hope their active particip

RfC: Subresource Integrity; deadline May 26

The WebAppSec community requests review of Subresource Integrity , specifically: [[ Fetch Integration Privacy and Security Considerations CORS interactions Future Considerations regarding broader integration into other HTML elements Ext

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

[ + Marcos and Frederick ] Hi Andrew, The group stopped working on XML Digital Signature for Widgets several years ago and there is no plan to resume work (except to process errata as required). Marcos, Frederick - this spec's namespace document includes the following statement: [[

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems to be a rather theoretical discussion: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/SDK/H

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the "Implementers ..." statement from [NS] document, if that statement is removed, does that address your concern? -Thanks, ArtB [NS] <http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets-digsig/> On 5/8/15 7:14 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

[widgets] implementation data [Was: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig]

On 5/8/15 8:52 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

-Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 May 2015 13:55 To: Andrew Twigger Cc: Marcos Caceres; Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the "Impleme

Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?]

ilto:anssi.kostiai...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi, On 28 Apr 2015, at 15:46, Arthur Barstow <mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 4/21/15 5:39 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: Hi, Is there a plan to publish an errata to sync the Web Storage Rec [1] with the latest? I counted 8 commits c

Re: A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?]

On 5/12/15 7:57 AM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: I don't think we need a CfC to publish a WD, right? We should just publish it, and then open a CfC on the plan to move to 2nd edition with these changes incorporated, and asking if there are other changes we should include before we move ahead.

CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21

Hi All, Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The draft WD is [2]

[admin] Getting notification about WebApp's web-platform-tests activity?

Hi All, Dom has a tool that could be used to notify one of WebApps' mail lists when a "wg-webapps" label is applied to something (f.ex an Issue or PR) in the web-platform-tests repo. Is this something we want to use? If yes, which list? public-webapps-github seems like the closest match but

PSA: HTML5 Web Messaging is a W3C Recommendation

Congratulations to Ian and all the contributors! On 5/19/15 12:53 PM, Coralie Mercier wrote: It is my pleasure to announce that HTML5 Web Messaging is published as a W3C Recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-webmessaging-20150519/ This specification defines two mechanisms for communicat

PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

Hi All, For those interested in Web Components, please note I received a related e-mail titled "Web Components vs Extract Widget patent". I forwarded this e-mail (which has an attachment) to the www-archive list: Please do

[ime-api] Fwd: [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink

Below is a proposal to remove the "experimental" IME API implementation from Blink. Is there sufficient interest from other implementers to keep this spec on the TR track or should we formally stop work on it and publish a WG Note? Travis, All, WDYT? -Thanks, ArtB Forwarded Message

[admin] Need a list for "Extract Widget patent" [Was: Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent]

Rigo, Wendy, Jeff - I don't think it is appropriate to use WebApps' public-webapps list regarding "Web Components vs Extract Widget patent" [1]. What list should be used? (FYI, Aymeric Vitte's original disclosure was forwarded to the list [1], and Aymeric's followups are [2] and [3]). -Thank

RfC: Style Sheet for Technical Reports; deadline July 7

Fantasai is leading an effort to improve the style sheet used for new Technical Reports. She created a survey [1] that is supposed to reflect the entire group's feedback but she also welcomes individual feedback via the spec-prod list [2], using the 10 questions below as a guide. If you have i

CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web Storage 2nd Edition deadline June 3 [Was: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition]

d with this proposal. -Thanks, ArtB Thanks. — xiaoqian On 2015-5-14, at 7:30pm, Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi All, Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wid

[charter] Discussions about HTMLWG charter and WebApps

Hi All, If you are interested in the charter of HTMLWG, please note there are related discussions in [GH], and see in particular: Note WebApps is implicated, with at least three different proposals to replace WebApps and HTMLWG with four

Re: RfC: Style Sheet for Technical Reports; deadline July 7

ome fairly cluttered since nearly every word is a reference. I suppose the alternatives are color (?), style (italics is used for variables), or weight (used for definitions). Ideas? On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Arthur Barstow <mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com>> wrote: Fantasai is le

Re: Clipboard API: remove dangerous formats from mandatory data types

On 6/10/15 5:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: Developing web browsers and their specs means paranoia should be part of your job description. It is a concern and I'm not sure how to solve it. Well we should be able to allow

[TPAC2015] Registration is now open for Oct 26-30 meeting week; deadline October 7

Registration is now open for the October 26-30 Technical Plenary and all Working Group meeting week [TPAC], this year in Sapporo Japan: WebApps (the entire group) will meet on Monday and Tuesday (October 26 and 27). Registration for WebApps'

Re: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink

tB [Issues] https://github.com/w3c/ime-api/issues [Bugs] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=IME%20API&list_id=57282&product=WebAppsWG&resolution=--- -Original Message- From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rn...@apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:00 PM To: Travis

Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes.

On 6/2/15 4:05 PM, Kelvin Poon wrote: Hi public-webapps We are exploring a new web API for content to be notified of clipboard changes and would like to discuss it here. The problem For certain classes of web apps, it is necessary to determine when new clipboard contents have been set, e

Re: [Clipboard] Web API for clipboard changes.

On 6/16/15 6:58 AM, James M. Greene wrote: Please share it with the rest of the group. Thanks! Agree. Kelvin - please do. -Thanks, AB

[admin] Use public-patent-issues list for all patent discussions [Was: Need a list for "Extract Widget patent"]

ou, AB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-patent-issues/ On 5/28/15 5:23 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Rigo, Wendy, Jeff - I don't think it is appropriate to use WebApps' public-webapps list regarding "Web Components vs Extract Widget patent" [1]. What list should be

Re: PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

On 6/17/15 5:29 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote: As directed in [1], if anyone wants to reply to this thread, please use the public-patent-issues list and do *not* reply on public-webapps. -Thank you, AB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0912.html

PSA: publishing new WD of Service Workers on June 25

This is an announcement of the intent to publish a new Working Draft of Service Workers on June 25 using the following document as the basis: If anyone has any major concerns with this proposal, ple

[admin] Moving Custom Elements bugs to Github [Was: Re: Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated]

Yves, Xiaoqian, Mike - would one of you please do as Hayato requests below (and then notify him so he can move the Custom Elements bugs to Github)? -Thanks, ArtB On 6/25/15 2:49 AM, Hayato Ito wrote: I am thinking about migrating Custom Element bugs[1] to Web Components GitHub Issues [2], as

[admin] WebEx has replaced Zakim

The consortium's Zakim voice conference bridge has been replaced with WebEx [1][2][3]. The group's meeting page [4] has been updated to reflect this change and calendar invitations were created for the three reoccurring telecons: 1. D3E/UI Events

[html-imports] Syntax is "mystic and daunting" [Was: Re: HTML5 includes from within ]

Hi Anatoly, Perhaps it would be helpful if you expanded on specific issues with the HTML Imports syntax, either on this list or using an Issue . -Regards, ArtB On 7/14/15 3:32 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: 7 years ago the request to a

RfC: LCWD of Tracking Compliance and Scope; deadline October 7

WebApps has been asked to review the Tracking Protection group's July 14 Last Call Working Draft of T/racking Compliance and Scope/: If anyone in WebApps wants to propose an official group response, please do so ASAP, in reply to t

[charter] Request for Comments; deadline Sept 10

Hi All, The proposal to merge the WebApps WG and the HTML WG has started a formal review period that ends September 10: If you have any comments about the proposal, please reply to this e-mail or [Github] before September 10. Note Me

PSA: Arun Ranganathan is now an Invited Expert

I am pleased to announce Arun is nowan Invited Expert in this group (he is no longer a member of WebApps on behalf of Mozilla). Thanks Arun! -AB

[charter] What is the plan for Streams API?

On 7/30/15 8:46 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: <http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html> The WebApps + HTML WG draft charter says the following about WebApps' Streams API: [[ Streams API <https://w3c.github.io/streams-api/> An API for representing a stre

Re: W3C's version of XMLHttpRequest should be abandoned

On 8/6/15 3:15 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: According to Art https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/Overview.html is no longer maintained. WebApps agreed to stop work on the above (aka XHR L2) and published a WG Note in November 2014 [1]. It should redirect to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.o

Re: W3C's version of XMLHttpRequest should be abandoned

On 8/6/15 8:07 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Anne van Kesteren > wrote: According to Art the plan of record is to still pursue https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/xhr-1/Overview.html And you correctly note

Re: [charter] What is the plan for Streams API?

o stop the work, the work can be stopped (and a WG Note published). -Thanks, AB Takeshi On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Arthur Barstow <mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 7/30/15 8:46 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: <http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.htm

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

On 8/4/15 2:21 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi All, This is heads-up re the intent to publish a Working Draft of "WebIDL Level 1" (on or around August 4) using Yves' document as the basis and a new "shortname&quo

[charter] Need clarification about "Fetching resources"

All - WebApps' draft charter (formally being reviewed by consortium Members through Sept 10 [1]) includes the following text about "Fetching resources": [[ Fetching resources The Group MAY also define the mechanisms to fetch resources

Re: [charter] What is the plan for Streams API?

On 8/7/15 8:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Given this status, and in the absence of other feedback, I think the Streams API should remain in WebApps' charter (at least for now). Then later, the work may proceed (if there is

Re: [charter] Request for Comments; deadline Sept 10

Hi Josh, Thanks for the feedback! I filed to record your comments regarding the draft charter. A pull request - especially for the the editorial comments (such as typos, missing links, etc.) - would be welcome. Below I reply to a few of your

Reminder: [TPAC2015] Registration is now open for Oct 26-30 meeting week; deadline October 7

On 6/10/15 9:28 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Registration is now open for the October 26-30 Technical Plenary and all Working Group meeting week [TPAC], this year in Sapporo Japan: <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2015/> WebApps (the entire group) will meet on Monday and T

Re: Normative references to Workers.

On 9/16/15 4:47 AM, Mike West wrote: Note that this is an issue that's going to come up for a number of WebAppSec specs (see https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/#issue-a30f61b8 , for instance (and that s

Re: Service Workers 1 and Nightly

On 9/18/15 2:22 AM, Jungkee Song wrote: Hi all, We editors are happy to announce that we make a new branch for Service Workers 1 today [1]. Thanks to all the contributions, Service Workers 1 now covers the fundamental model and the associated APIs to support offline-first and background process

RfC: Service Workers

[ Bcc: TAG (www-tag), WebAppSec WG (public-webapsec), Mobile IG (public-web-mobile), W3C Chairs (chairs), Review Announce list (public-review-announce), Geolocation WG (public-geolocation) ] The Editors and active contributors of Service Workers intend to publish a Candidate Recommendation so

Re: RfC: Service Workers

Please use the Version 1 branch for this review: <https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker_1/> On 9/21/15 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: [ Bcc: TAG (www-tag), WebAppSec WG (public-webapsec), Mobile IG (public-web-mobile), W3C Chairs (chairs), Review Announc

Re: Normative references to Workers.

On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2015 11:05 AM, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: If it helps, I’d like to prepare a Workers draft to revise the previous CR, and schedule the publication ASAP (hopefully 22 Sep). The goal is to synchronise with the upstre

Re: RfC: Service Workers

On 9/23/15 1:46 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote: Could you better define what "soon" means? More specifically, do you have a deadline for comments? I don't see any dates in the thread below. I think four weeks is the `normal` expectation for `wide reviews`. However, the Editors and some active pa

Re: Proposal: CSS WG / WebApps Joint Meeting for Shadow DOM Styling

On 9/29/15 11:19 AM, Alan Stearns wrote: On 9/28/15, 4:49 PM, "rn...@apple.com on behalf of Ryosuke Niwa" wrote: Hi, Attending the recent meeting for shadow DOM styling [1] convinced me to join CSS WG, and further that we need a joint meeting between CSS WG and WebApps WG on this topic dur

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >