[Puppet-dev] Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Thomas Gelf
Am 13.04.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Nigel Kersten: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Trevor Vaughan > wrote: > This is a tangent, but I would also like to see more advanced > content at the Puppet Camps. > > Would anyone be open to a dual tracked Puppet Camp

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Rob Nelson
> I'd also be remiss not to point out we've got way more scope to have > advanced talks at PuppetConf in the US and the CFP is open. > http://2016.puppetconf.com/cfp-registration/ > Speaking to the advanced realm, is there any possibility of slots longer than 45 minutes? Even an extra 10 minut

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > This is a tangent, but I would also like to see more advanced content at > the Puppet Camps. > > Would anyone be open to a dual tracked Puppet Camp? > > Beginner/Intermediate + Business and Advanced + Hackathon? > > Trevor >

Re: Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Trevor Vaughan
Hi Nigel, This is a tangent, but I would also like to see more advanced content at the Puppet Camps. Would anyone be open to a dual tracked Puppet Camp? Beginner/Intermediate + Business and Advanced + Hackathon? Trevor On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > For those who don

Euro/London Presence (was: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs])

2016-04-12 Thread Nigel Kersten
For those who don't know, I'm responsible for the Community team now at Puppet, and can answer some of this. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Dean Wilson wrote: > > Next up European/London presence: Where is PuppetConf Europe? This is absolutely something we've talked about and would love to

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]

2016-04-12 Thread R.I.Pienaar
- Original Message - > From: "dean" > To: "puppet-dev" > Sent: Tuesday, 12 April, 2016 20:56:09 > Subject: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs] > On 12 April 2016 at 19:16, Ryan Whitehurst wrote: > >> The puppetlabs-aws module [1] is pretty powerful these

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]

2016-04-12 Thread Dean Wilson
On 12 April 2016 at 19:16, Ryan Whitehurst wrote: > The puppetlabs-aws module [1] is pretty powerful these days -- we on > the operations team here at Puppet use it for managing a large portion > of our AWS infrastructure. If you remove the Route53 DNS record resource types then that module clai

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]

2016-04-12 Thread Ryan Whitehurst
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Dean Wilson wrote: > AWS: Over the last 5 years I've deployed a -lot- of AWS and spoke to a > lot of people about it and unless they are a large enterprise > forklifting their current environment over or looking to run a few > bits of code at instance time, and ju

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]

2016-04-12 Thread Dean Wilson
On 11 April 2016 at 12:08, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > Eric asked so here it is, this is my feedback with a open source user hat > on. Echoing much what was said. I hope others send in their story. Since you asked so politely. I have a few main areas of concern, and oddly they are not so much with th