Frank Sweetser writes:
> I'm in the process of setting up sudoers entries to get managed by
> augeas.
If you can insure a suitable recent sudo, you can use sudo's #includedir
option and just manage a directory.
seph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Yeah, I can update the external nodes page no problem.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:54 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Teyo
>
> If you have a chance do you want to throw your email and my email
> into the External nodes page? It really needs some mor
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> b) How do you require a definition? That makes no sense.
A definition is essentially just a custom resource.
-scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@goo
On Dec 15, 5:01 pm, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I'll trying to work out the best way to configure networking in
> puppet, being routes, dns and ip addresses.
>
> First question... are definitions executed in the order they appear?
Do not attempt to rely on file order to control the sequence in wh
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Steven VanDevender wrote:
> Douglas Garstang writes:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Peter Meier
> wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >> First question... are definitions executed in the order they appear?
> > >
Douglas Garstang writes:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Peter Meier wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >> First question... are definitions executed in the order they appear?
> >
> > puppet doesn't execute anything. it manages resources and defines are
>
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Peter Meier wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>> First question... are definitions executed in the order they appear?
>> puppet doesn't execute anything. it manages resources and defines are
>> resources as wel
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Peter Meier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> First question... are definitions executed in the order they appear?
>
> puppet doesn't execute anything. it manages resources and defines are
> resources as well.
Fine. Does puppet manages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> First question... are definitions executed in the order they appear?
puppet doesn't execute anything. it manages resources and defines are
resources as well.
cheers pete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Douglas Garstang
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
>> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I'll trying to work out the best way to configure networking in
>>>
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
>>> Douglas Garstang wrote:
I'll trying to work out the best way to configure networking in
puppet, being routes, dns and ip addresses.
>>> http://gi
I understand and sympathize with the political/legal reasons. We obviously
want to do our best to support default RHEL4 configurations (since we have
so many RHEL4 nodes running Puppet) and it is unfortunate that the available
rake RPM lags JUST behind our requirements.
Try running things with a r
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
>> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>>> I'll trying to work out the best way to configure networking in
>>> puppet, being routes, dns and ip addresses.
>>>
>> http://github.com/ohlol/puppet-network
>>
>> Doesn't handle route-#{if
Scott Smith wrote:
> http://github.com/ohlol/puppet-network
>
> Doesn't handle route-#{iface} files, but would be trivial to add.
>
Scratch that -- it does! :) Been a long time since I wrote that.
-scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Use
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>> I'll trying to work out the best way to configure networking in
>> puppet, being routes, dns and ip addresses.
>>
>
> http://github.com/ohlol/puppet-network
>
> Doesn't handle route-#{iface} files, but would be trivia
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I'll trying to work out the best way to configure networking in
> puppet, being routes, dns and ip addresses.
>
http://github.com/ohlol/puppet-network
Doesn't handle route-#{iface} files, but would be trivial to add.
-scott
--
You received this message because you ar
I'll trying to work out the best way to configure networking in
puppet, being routes, dns and ip addresses.
First question... are definitions executed in the order they appear?
If I put definitions way up the node hierarchy, and they are indeed
executed first, I can be sure that the network will
I'm sure this RubyGems topic probably deserves it's own thread...
We go through a lot of political/legal paperwork at $WORK to deploy
open-source software on our Red Hat systems. Throwing logic aside, we
managed to get approval to use any RPM package from EPEL, but that's
not the case for RubyGem
Greetings Folks,
Because I did something dumb, I am announcing the immediate release of
Puppet Dashboard 0.1.1. This release adds the missing reports migration that
made rake install totally not work.
My bad.
Get the code at http://github.com/reductivelabs/puppet-dashboard.
Submit feature reques
At the risk of sparking another flame war, the best way to manage Ruby
library dependencies is via Rubygems rather than your platform's packaging
system -- which tends to have out of date Ruby packages and can conflict
with installed gems[1]. Fortunately, it is entirely possible and in fact
quite e
Bummer. Requires rake >= 0.8.4, but RHEL5/EPEL is only 0.8.3.
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/x86_64/repoview/rubygem-rake.html
On Dec 14, 3:29 pm, Rein Henrichs wrote:
> Greetings Puppeteers,
>
> It's the holidays once again and, in the spirit of the season, I bring you
> the imm
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 08:24 -0800, Os wrote:
> Is there something else I am missing or does augeas and puppet do not
> work on Sles10 ?
As others have mentioned, you need the ruby-augeas bindings. Rather than
building them from a tarball/gem, you might try to find (a) an srpm from
OpenSuSe or (b)
Luke,
Upon further review of the play, apparently a migration file "went missing".
I'm not sure how, but it has been restored. Sorry about this bush league
slacker stuff, things should be working fine with the just released 0.1.1
code (or the code fresh off the HEAD of the master branch, which sho
Luke,
Interesting. I think the issue here is with migration order. The
Report#success? method depends on the existence of a `success` boolean field
on the reports table, which may happen at a later migration than when the
method is called. Flattening the migrations into a single file should
allevi
I'm trying to set up puppet-dashboard but I seem to have run into a roadblock:
when executing 'rake install' the follow message gets returned..
rake aborted!
undefined method `success?' for #
If it makes a difference, I'm using an sqlite database. Any assistance would be
much appreciated ;)
--
I’m trying to set up puppet-dashboard but I seem to have run into a
roadblock: when executing ‘rake install’ the follow message gets
returned..
rake aborted!
undefined method `success?' for #
If it makes a difference, I’m using an sqlite database. Any assistance
would be much appreciated ;)
--
yes, this is a problem but you can do add --server="your-server-address"
when executing the puppet at client's command prompt
Muhammad Haris Farooque
MSc. Software Engineering (Hochshule Für Technik-Stuttgart)
Home: +49-711-121-70007
Cell:+49-176-701-39163
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:31 PM, R
jeanvaljean wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I would like to know if there is a plugin that allow us to manage
> advances ACL on a linux system (Debian )
> Because for the moment,the idea to use "exec setfacl" to set my ACLs
> sounds a little bit "dirty"
> Thanks
>
> --
>
> You received this message bec
Hello everybody,
I would like to know if there is a plugin that allow us to manage
advances ACL on a linux system (Debian )
Because for the moment,the idea to use "exec setfacl" to set my ACLs
sounds a little bit "dirty"
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I think, problems was resolved:
Exec with this "onlyif":
onlyif => "test `/root/test-new.sh ${veid} ${vetarif}` = 0 "
Run only if $veid=302:
Dec 15 19:12:19 vz-test puppetd[16426]: Starting catalog run
Dec 15 19:12:45 vz-test puppetd[16426]: (//Node[vz-test.local]/
Mod_class_ovzconfigs::Mod_de
Silviu,
That fixed it. I had assumed removing the .pem file (
/etc/puppet/ssl/certs/client.hostname.pem
) would be enough but removing the whole directory was the answer
Thanks very much
Paul
2009/12/15 Silviu Paragina
> This looks a lot like this problem:
> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/i
I have a bunch of puppet report files, and I would like to regenerate
the rrd files for those reports. Can anyone tell me what the process
is to do that?
--
Chad M. Huneycutt
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this gro
This looks a lot like this problem:
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2890
Have you tried rm -rf /etc/puppet/ssl on the client? Or you are avoiding
exactly that?
In 0.25.1 puppet seems to force the usage of the cached certificates
despite the fact that some of the data may be wrong, so yo
On Dec 15, 4:03 am, Alexandre wrote:
> I though i found a way to do it, and i would like to show it here,
> but unfortunately it does not exactly work well, see the comment in
> uppercase: global variables seems to be set even if no class from
> the .pp file is included.
Yes. Modules and ma
After further investigation it seems the problem exists with new 0.25.1
clients
On the server I run:-
puppetca --clean client.hostname
On the client I run :-
rm /etc/puppet/ssl/certs/client.hostname.pem
Followed by the command that brings up the error
# /opt/csw/bin/puppetd --trace --debug --t
Hi John,
Thank you for answer.
> For debugging your manifests, you could try using
>
> unless => "/bin/true"
>
> or
>
> unless => "/bin/false"
>
> to take that test script out of the picture.
Script, in "command" work fine.
> Speaking of the test script, are you sure your nodes are g
Os wrote:
> No, I have just installed the 4 packages. How do I compile these
> bindings, I have not worked with ruby that much.
> I have downloaded "ruby-augeas-0.3.0.tgz" from "http://augeas.net/
> download/ruby/" but do not know how to go further.
> I need rake to compile this Rakefile?
>
>
Yo
I though i found a way to do it, and i would like to show it here,
but unfortunately it does not exactly work well, see the comment in
uppercase: global variables seems to be set even if no class from
the .pp file is included.
And i also think now i am going to far into akwardness, just tryin
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> Silviu,
>
> My system is aware of both the -1 and -2 releases in the repo.
>
> This is before running puppet...
>
> papp1 ~:# yum list tf-elements-core-tfel0-14.3-1.tf
> [ stuff removed ]
> Available Packages
> tf-elements-core-tfel0.noarch
> 14
No, I have just installed the 4 packages. How do I compile these
bindings, I have not worked with ruby that much.
I have downloaded "ruby-augeas-0.3.0.tgz" from "http://augeas.net/
download/ruby/" but do not know how to go further.
I need rake to compile this Rakefile?
On 14 Dez., 22:52, Dan Bode
40 matches
Mail list logo
