On Jan 23, 4:33 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/2476
>
> This does seem to confuse a fair few new users.
>
> What would be a better name for "--test"?
What about "--manual" ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet
On 25 Jan 2011, at 10:30, Felix Frank wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 09:39 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:17 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>>>
- Original Message -
> If we don't want --manual you could go with --watch as that's
>
On 01/24/2011 09:39 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:17 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>>
>>> - Original Message -
If we don't want --manual you could go with --watch as that's
really
what I'm doing - watching puppet run. :)
>>>
>>
On Jan 24, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
>> The problem seems to be --test does so many things you can't concisely
>> describe it.
>
> On the other hand, maybe --live-test would be good, as it makes it clear
> changes will be made which seems to be the biggest complaint about --test.
I
The problem seems to be --test does so many things you can't concisely
describe it.
On the other hand, maybe --live-test would be good, as it makes it clear
changes will be made which seems to be the biggest complaint about --test.
Cheers,
Adam.
--
You received this message because you are s
Well, I see where you're coming from, but I see all flags as commands given
to the program meaning you're telling puppet to do that thing. So,
"--no-daemonize" tells puppet not to daemonize. In this case, I'd expect
"watch" to tell puppet to watch something. I really think this is a bad
choice
On Jan 24, 2011, at 12:39 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:17 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>>
>>> - Original Message -
If we don't want --manual you could go with --watch as that's
really
what I'm doing - watching puppet run. :)
>>>
- Original Message -
> On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:17 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> >> If we don't want --manual you could go with --watch as that's
> >> really
> >> what I'm doing - watching puppet run. :)
> >
> >
> > I like --watch too
>
> I hope this is a jok
On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:17 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> If we don't want --manual you could go with --watch as that's really
>> what I'm doing - watching puppet run. :)
>
>
> I like --watch too
I hope this is a joke. I really think this name is a worse fit than "--t
On Jan 24, 2011, at 2:38 AM, Carles Amigó wrote:
> +1
>
> El 24/01/2011 9:13, Daniel Pittman escribió:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 23:36, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>>> Jesse Reynolds writes:
>>>
--manual
>>>
>>> Looks better than --interactive, since I don't assume it will start
>>>
- Original Message -
> If we don't want --manual you could go with --watch as that's really
> what I'm doing - watching puppet run. :)
I like --watch too
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send ema
If we don't want --manual you could go with --watch as that's really what
I'm doing - watching puppet run. :)
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Stefan Schulte <
stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Felix Frank wrote:
> > On 01/24/2011 11:38 AM, Carles
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Felix Frank wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 11:38 AM, Carles Amigó wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > El 24/01/2011 9:13, Daniel Pittman escribió:
> >> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 23:36, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
> >> wrote:
> >>> Jesse Reynolds writes:
> >>>
> --manual
>
>
On 01/24/2011 11:48 AM, chris.does.t...@googlemail.com wrote:
> How about --apply
Please don't. That's begging for confusion of "puppet apply" vs. "puppet
agent --apply".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, se
How about --apply
On Jan 23, 9:33 pm, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/2476
>
> This does seem to confuse a fair few new users.
>
> What would be a better name for "--test"?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users"
On 01/24/2011 11:38 AM, Carles Amigó wrote:
> +1
>
> El 24/01/2011 9:13, Daniel Pittman escribió:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 23:36, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
>> wrote:
>>> Jesse Reynolds writes:
>>>
--manual
Seconded (or, fourthed?)
Also, I'll outright *refuse* to install a software that
+1
El 24/01/2011 9:13, Daniel Pittman escribió:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 23:36, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Jesse Reynolds writes:
--manual
Looks better than --interactive, since I don't assume it will start
asking me questions. :)
I like it too.
Daniel
--
Carles Amigó
Linux
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 23:36, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Jesse Reynolds writes:
>
>> --manual
>
> Looks better than --interactive, since I don't assume it will start
> asking me questions. :)
I like it too.
Daniel
--
⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com
✉ Daniel Pittman
Jesse Reynolds writes:
> --manual
Looks better than --interactive, since I don't assume it will start
asking me questions. :)
--
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Oooo, shiny!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" gr
--manual
?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit t
On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:58 PM, eshamow wrote:
> I can tell you that for me, and for my group, it's a halfway step
> between reloading Puppet and watching the logs, and a full --debug --
> no-daemonize run.
>
> So for instance, when they're troubleshooting a bug in a newly-written
> or modified cla
No, because sometimes making the changes causes the error.
For instance, if you are using a File resource to create a file in a read-only
file-system (which isn't possible) the resource will tell you it plans to make
a file when run in noop, and give you no errors. When not run in noop it will
so the purpose of having a noop is to run the same test but to not actually
make any changes. do we get the same debug messages, etc?
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:58 PM, eshamow wrote:
> I can tell you that for me, and for my group, it's a halfway step
> between reloading Puppet and watching the lo
I can tell you that for me, and for my group, it's a halfway step
between reloading Puppet and watching the logs, and a full --debug --
no-daemonize run.
So for instance, when they're troubleshooting a bug in a newly-written
or modified class, I suggest a puppetd -tv run to just output the
errors
24 matches
Mail list logo
